I've been trying to use the mix-blend-mode on a page that has contains instances of css opacity transitions. What appears to be happening is that the div containing the mix-blend-mode displays as it would without the blend mode during the transition, or rather, while the animation is in progress. I've only found it to be an issue in Chrome.
In my example, while the div is transforming the blend-mode displays correctly over the image but not over the page background. Once the transition is complete it goes back to display as it should. In other words the blended div appears as solid yellow on the black background while the animation is ongoing but since it is set to darken it should be invisible over the black background. Once the animation is finished it appears as it should. It appears normal over the image.
I've tried this is Firefox and Safari and there seems to be no issue.
Pen: http://codepen.io/anon/pen/QGGVOX
Edit - I've found another instance where this occurring that doesn't involve any animation. Weirdly it happens when the position of one div is set to fixed while the other is absolute, see here: http://codepen.io/anon/pen/wooRME If the position of the div .image is changed to absolute then the blend-mode appears normal.
body {
background: #000;
}
.blend {
height: 650px;
width: 50%;
background-color: yellow;
mix-blend-mode: darken;
position: absolute;
opacity: 1;
left: 0;
top: 0px;
z-index: 100;
}
img {
position: relative;
z-index: 0;
}
So, I think I figured the problem. During the animation, it seems like the body doesn't count as an element, thus making the yellow appear at 1 opacity. I tested with other blend mode and it always appears yellow. (when set to 'difference the expected result would be white instead of yellow)
So the fix? just add a div with 100% sizes and a black background! Then, the yellow has something to blend in and doesn't show up.
Here's the code that worked in your pen:
html - added the bg div:
<div class="bg"></div>
<div class="blend"></div>
<img src="http://lorempixel.com/500/500/">
it's css:
.bg{
background: #000;
position: absolute;
width: 100%;
height: 100%;
margin: 0;
}
body {
background: #000;
width: 100%;
height: 100%;
margin: 0;
}
I also changed the body to fill the window so the margin weren't yellow too. Alternatively, the blend div could be sized in function of the body.
tagging #chrscblls since they wanted to know if you found anything.
EDIT :
For the other codepen the problem wasn't the same tho. They were trying to darken an image and a yellow rectangle onto a gray background.
If they didn't want the yellow to show on their gray background, the solution was simply to put the image inside a div and use ::after to blend in a color. Or even just make an empty div, give it the image as background and use the ::after.
this:
<div/>
with:
body {
background: #333;
}
div{
position:fixed;
width: 500px;
height: 500px;
top:50px;
left: 50px;
mix-blend-mode: darken;
background-image: url("http://lorempixel.com/500/500/");
}
div::after {
content: "";
height: 100%;
width: 100%;
background-color: yellow;
mix-blend-mode: darken;
position:absolute;
opacity: 1;
left: 0;
top: 0;
}
or this:
<div><img src="http://lorempixel.com/500/500/"></div>
without the 'background-image' in the div css.
Related
I am making a One-Page webstie to practise Flexbox etc.
To do that, Im using PSD file and I have some troubles.
I wanna make rectangle with an oblique upper side with opacity on my background, i read about svg and should I do it with that like on this picture:
(brown thing with opacity throughout the website view)
I have again similar problem. I have a pic:
And it should looks like:
Tips will be great
You could do this with a CSS gradient.
Here I have a <div> with two backgrounds:
the image
a CSS linear gradient on top of it.
The sharp edge of the gradient works because there are two gradient steps that coincide. Meaning the gradient colour jumps straight from transparent to 50% blue.
I've used blue so that it shows up well in this example. In your case, just switch it to brown.
div {
width: 1240px;
height: 648px;
background: linear-gradient(175deg, rgba(0,0,200,0) 0%, rgba(0,0,200,0) 70%, rgba(0,0,200,0.5) 70%, rgba(0,0,200,0.5) 100%),
url(https://i.stack.imgur.com/Rq6eR.jpg);
}
<div></div>
Another approach without gradient.
Create a wrapper
It can be the div with background image. Important thing is you need to overflow: hidden and position: relative.
Create a rectangle and rotate it
You can create a :before pseudo element like this:
.wrapper {
position: relative;
width: 100%;
height: 200px;
background: red;
overflow: hidden;
}
.wrapper:before {
content: '';
position: absolute;
display: block;
background: blue;
opacity: .5;
bottom: -100px;
left: -100px;
right: -100px;
height: 150px;
transform: rotate(-5deg);
}
<div class="wrapper"></div>
I want to use a background color, along with a transparent (or opaque) background image. Is this possible?
I've tried using div commands, but may be doing this wrong. The only opacity command I can see is in CSS, but how do you link this specifically to the background image, rather than just the body content?
Maybe this is what you are looking for (run snippet to see):
.stack{
height: 200px;
width: 200px;
background-color: #ddd;
position:relative;
}
.layer {
position: absolute;
top: 0;
left: 0;
height: 100%;
width: 100%;
background-image: url('http://design.ubuntu.com/wp-content/uploads/ubuntu-logo32.png');
}
.base{
filter: opacity(.3);
-webkit-filter: opacity(.3);
}
.offset{
margin-top: 20px;
}
<div class="stack">
<div class="layer base">
</div>
<div class="layer offset">
</div>
</div>
I've added a margin to the top layer for you to see that there are two layer one (base) under the other. If you remove the margin you should see the tho images aligned perfectly.
I would like to make a transparent arrow over an image. This triangle should be indented in a block and show the background image.
Desired output:
I used skewX() property that #web-tiki had explained here but I want it to display on the top of the border rather than on the bottom of image and have this issue:
A fiddle demo of my code is available here
Can anyone tell me why it's not working in my case?
As stated in the question, your case is a bit different from the example that was provided by web-tiki. In the example that you were referring to, the border with the transparent cut was included as the bottom border for the image whereas you need it as the top border of the plain text area.
The expected output can be achieved with the same skew technique described in that answer. However, it needs to be tweaked a bit to match your case.
First thing is, the skewed pseudo-elements (that produce the border) should be added to the container of plain text area and not the top section which holds the image. This part you have already done correctly.
Next, you need to position the border such that even with the border the height of your text container will be equal to the other two images placed by its side. For this, you need to position the elements that form the border within the plain text container (top: 0%) instead of above it (bottom: 100% in your code).
Then, if the text container has a non-transparent background, you need to clip it such that it is not present behind the elements that is creating the border effect. This can be achieved by adding a padding-top on the text container equal to the height of the border pseudo-elements and then setting background-clip: content-box to it.
Finally, you need to move the entire bottom part up by the same number of pixels as the height of the border in order for the top image to be seen through the transparent cut out area. This can be done by adding a negative margin-top to the bottom container.
Putting it altogether your code should be similar to the below snippet to achieve the effect that you need. (Note: Your fiddle has way too much code and so I have created a simpler sample for the demo).
.section {
height: 200px;
width: 500px;
background: url(http://lorempixel.com/500/200/nature/3);
}
.bottom-container {
margin-top: -15px;
height: 100px;
width: 500px;
}
.text,
.middle-image,
.right-image {
float: left;
height: 100%;
width: calc(100% / 3);
}
.middle-image {
background: url(http://lorempixel.com/200/100/nature/2);
}
.right-image {
background: url(http://lorempixel.com/250/100/nature/1);
}
.text {
position: relative;
box-sizing: border-box;
height: 100%;
padding-top: 15px;
text-align: center;
line-height: 85px;
background: #F7F7F7; /* Just for demo */
background-clip: content-box; /* needed only if your background is not transparent */
overflow: hidden;
}
.text:after,
.text:before {
position: absolute;
content: '';
top: 0px;
height: 15px;
background: rgb(215,182,115);
}
.text:before {
left: 0px;
width: 25%;
transform-origin: left bottom;
transform: skew(45deg);
}
.text:after {
right: 0px;
width: 75%;
transform-origin: right bottom;
transform: skew(-45deg);
}
<!-- prefix free library to avoid browser prefixes in CSS -->
<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/prefixfree/1.0.7/prefixfree.min.js"></script>
<section class="section">
</section>
<div class="bottom-container">
<div class="text">Some text</div>
<div class="middle-image"></div>
<div class="right-image"></div>
</div>
Screenshot:
Note: The images that are displayed when the snippet is executed could be different from those in the screenshot because they are random placeholder images
I have two divs.
The first one covers the whole screen and with a transparent background
the other div has a white background and a higher z-index then the first div. But the transparent background covers the second div with the white backgorund...what can I do to fix this?
.lightbox{
top: 0;
left: 0;
background: #000;
width: 100%;
height: 100%;
position: absolute;
z-index: 1000;
filter:alpha(opacity=50);
opacity:0.5;
}
#lightboxContent{
display: none;
width: 325px;
height: 260px;
background: #FFF;
position: absolute;
z-index: 2000;
top:0;
border:3px solid #CCC;
text-align:center;
}
http://jsfiddle.net/DHYFz/
This works perfectly fine for me using IE7+ with your setup. Possible overlapping elements in some other portion of your code?
Possible problem: if you were to, let's say, nest the lightboxContent element, keep in mind that the parent z-index will trump the child.
Easy fix is, not to nest lightbox > lightboxContent. Takes full width and height of container regardless.
An easy way to do it is stop IE7 by putting at the top of your html.
I'm trying to learn how to use the :before and :after pseudo elements. I'm trying to add a black background to the bottom of the page as a sticky footer but it doesn't seem to be working correctly.
Basically I have a repeating image as the background of the HTML element and then I add an absolute div positioned at the bottom with a solid black background.
I'd just like to point out that this is a learning experiment and not really how I'd achieve the same effect but what I'm trying is working in Firefox but not in Chrome!
Here's my CSS:
html {
background-image: url('images/template/html-bg.jpg');
background-position: top left;
background-repeat: repeat-x;
background-color: #0e0e0e;
height: 100%;
position: relative;
}
html:before {
content: "";
display: block;
background-color: #000;
width: 100%;
height: 138px;
bottom: 0px;
position: absolute;
}
In FF the page is rendered as I'd expect but in Chrome the whole page is black... Any ideas, am I doing this wrong?
Your CSS should work as expected, as your pseudo-element should be drawn in the context of the initial containing block (the viewport, represented by the html element) anyway, which is exactly what Firefox is doing.
Your particular issue was reported as a Chrome bug, but it hasn't been addressed. As a workaround, you can apply your pseudo-element to body instead:
body:before {
content: "";
display: block;
background-color: #000;
width: 100%;
height: 138px;
bottom: 0px;
position: absolute;
}
Depending on your layout, you may need to either keep your html rule or change it to body as well.