I am trying to design a responsive web page so I am trying to avoid using pixel values. But sometimes, for example when trying to limit the width of a text containing div, I cannot use percentages since the width of the contianer is not known and going to be determined by the content inside. And due to the way CSS works, I cannot give a width value with reference to the container div higher in the html hierarchy.
So I thought of using vw, but since I am using min-width, max-width values on the body, it will not work properly outside those values. What can I use instead to refer to the body width?
Edit:
Since an example was asked for, I provided below an example whereby percentage did not work. Trying to make the span width 10% of the outermost container with no luck. Here is the jsfiddle link also: https://jsfiddle.net/68ha60p6/
html,body{
width:100%;
height:100%;
padding:0;
margin:0;
}
<div style="width:100%; height:60px;">
<div style="float:right; height:100%;padding-right:1%">
<button style="display:inline-block; height:70%;background-color:green; color:white;border:none; padding:0;">
<span style="display:inline-block; max-width:10%; text-overflow:ellipses;overflow:hidden; max-height:100%;text-align:center;white-space:no-wrap;">John John</span>
</button>
</div>
</div>
I cannot give a width value with reference to the container div higher
in the html hierarchy.
You absolutely can.
Have a look at the example below.
You'll see that the width of the parent container is not explicitly stated (it's determined by the content of the first subcontainer). Regardless, the second subcontainer's width is 50% of its parent's.
div {
margin: 6px;
padding: 6px;
}
.container {
display: inline-block;
border: 1px solid rgb(255,0,0);
}
.subcontainer1 {
border: 1px solid rgb(0,0,255);
}
.subcontainer2 {
width: 50%;
margin: 6px;
border: 1px solid rgb(0,255,0);
}
div p {
line-height: 60px;
}
<div class="container">
<div class="subcontainer1">
<p>I am a long sentence and I will define the width both of this sub-container and of the overall parent container.
</div>
<div class="subcontainer2">
<p>I am half the width of the overall parent container.</p>
</div>
</div>
Related
As far as I understand it (which is not far), a div of height:0; and a div with no specified height will both expand to a height required to contain their child elements. Why would you ever code height:0 ?
(I'm sure there is a very good reason)
I do not think that you are right in saying that a div with height:0 expands to show its children.As you would expect, by setting the height to zero, the div disappears. Its children may still be shown, but the height of the div is zero. Try the combo:
#my-div{
height:0;
overflow:hidden;
}
In this way, anything that overflows from the div will be hidden and the effect of height:0 should be more visible.
Not true.
A div with a specific height will never expand. So if a div has content larger than the desired height, content will overflow, but the div will not expand.
Here's an example to illustrate this.
#div-1 {
margin: 5px;
border: 5px solid grey;
background: red;
}
#div-2 {
margin: 5px;
border: 5px solid grey;
background: green;
height: 0;
}
<div id="div-1">
<p>a</p>
<p>a</p>
<p>a</p>
<p>a</p>
</div>
<div id="div-2">
<p>a</p>
<p>a</p>
<p>a</p>
<p>a</p>
</div>
When you specify height: 0 the element will not expand higher than zero pixels.
When you don't specify the height, then the element will expand to the height of its contents.
It is huge difference between height:0 vs height no specified. Both will show the inside content but which height:0 this is content will show if you do not set overflow: hidden; but it not increase it's height based content but no specified height will show the content and its height will automatically increase, see [here][1].
[1]: https://jsfiddle.net/ntpr5enu/
I tried a responsive css layout,but "top:50%" can't work and the "left:50%" can.
Why it happened?
<div style="position:relative;top:0%;left:0%;height:100%;width:100%">
<div style="position:absolute;top:50%;left:50%;">
</div>
</div>
Define a dimension for the parent container, e.g. div:
<div style="border: 2px solid red;position:relative;top:0%;left:0%;height:200px;width:300px">
<div style="border: 2px solid green;position:absolute;top:50%;left:50%;height:50%;width:50%">
</div>
</div>
Or
Another way is to just stretch the parent container, i.e. div, by its top, bottom, left, and right properties. Like this:
<div style="border: 2px solid red;position: absolute;top: 0px;bottom: 0px;left:0px;right:0px;">
<div style="border: 2px solid green;position:absolute;top:50%;left:50%;height:50%;width:50%">
</div>
</div>
Consider your original HTML:
html, body {
height: 100%;
}
<div style="position:relative;top:0%;left:0%;height:100%;width:100%">
<div style="position:absolute;top:50%;left:50%;">test</div>
</div>
The inner/child div has position: absolute, so it is out of the content flow of the parent element and will not contribute to the height or width of the parent element.
The parent div is in the content flow, but has no content, so its intrinsic
height would be zero. However, you specified height: 100%, but this will not do anything because the div has no height reference on which to base a computed value. So the computed height value for the parent div is zero.
As a result, the child element's top offset computes to 50% of zero,
so it is positioned at the top edge of the parent block.
You would need either to specify a height for the parent div or assign
html, body {height: 100%}
as this would allow the div to compute its height based on the height of the
body, which is based on the height of the html, which being 100%, takes that of the screen.
See the link below. I believe you're going to have a better result with Fixed for what it is you're trying to do, although I'm still not 100% sure I understand what that is.
http://jsfiddle.net/8q107wvb/1/
body {background:#e9e9e9; color:#202020;}
#wrapper {width:500px; background:#fff; margin:50% auto;}
.centered-content {position: fixed; top: 50%; left: 50%; background:#fff; padding:20px;}
This is another to solve this issue
* {
height: 100%;
}
.first{
position:relative;
top:0%;
left:0%;height:100%;
width:100%"
}
div{
position:absolute;
top:50%;
left:50%;
}
<div class="first">
<div style=>Check this</div>
</div>
I was under the impression that when using % or auto for margins on a div contained within another div the position would be calculated in respect to the parent div.
So if I have a div with height: 50%, margin-top: 25% and margin-bottom: 25% the box should centre vertically within the parent div.
When I do this though the div centres on the page not the parent div.
The CSS
div#header {
width: 100%;
height: 100px;
margin: 0px;
position: fixed;
}
div#leftnavigation {
height: 50%;
margin-top: 25%;
margin-bottom: 25%;
float: left;
}
And the HTML
<!--Title and navigation bar-->
<div id='header'>
<!--Left navigation container-->
<div id='leftnavigation'>
<p>efwfwgwegwegweg</p>
</div>
</div>
In my case there are other divs floated to the right of the one detailed above, but any one of them behaves the same way. I'm assuming I'm doing something daft but I've been over all the other questions I could find along these lines and still can't figure it out.
EDIT
Here's the JSFiddle as requested http://jsfiddle.net/ChtVv/
UPDATE
I've tried removing the margin constraints and setting the leftnavigation div to height: 100%, this works so the issue is with the margin attribute?
The reason it didn't work is that percentage-margins are percentages of the parent's width, not its height. You can tell this by using margin-top: 25px; margin-bottom: 25px;, and also by increasing the width of the right-panel in jsFiddle.
In all cases % (percentage) is a valid value, but needs to be used
with care; such values are calculated as a proportion of the parent
element’s width, and careless provision of values might have
unintended consequences.
W3 reference
CSS is tricky!! :D
This is a borrowed technique to centre vertically and horizontally, but it would involve changing your HTML and CSS. I am not sure how flexible you are with your code:
CSS:
#outer {width: 100%; border: 3px solid red;}
#middle {width: 100%; text-align: center;border: 3px solid green;}
#inner {width: 200px; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto; text-align: left;border: 3px solid blue;}
/* Courtesy: http://www.jakpsatweb.cz/css/css-vertical-center-solution.html */
HTML
<!--Title and navigation bar-->
<div id='outer'>
<!--Left navigation container-->
<div id='middle'>
<p id="inner">efwfwgwegwegweg</p>
</div>
</div>
You can build upon this to achieve whatever you are after!
fiddle: http://jsfiddle.net/pratik136/ChtVv/2/
Ok, so there are a lot of reasons why this would not work.
The main reason would be that your container has position:fixed;
When adding position:fixed; to a element, it no longer reserved it's space in the DOM and won't contain it's children.
I have made a example of the best way (in my Opinion) to center your child both Vertically & Horizontally
Here is a demo.
Demo
And here is the code.
<div id="container">
<div id="child"></div>
</div>
#container{
width:100%;
height:500px;
background:#CCC;
margin:0;
}
#child{
width:50%;
height:50%;
background:#EEE;
position:relative;
top:25%;
left:25%;
}
I'm trying to get some nested div tags to auto grow in height depending on the content inside them. A sample code is given here. The middle for example has some more content, but the height doesn't seem to grow. What is the trick to make it auto grow? I took out all the floating elements from inside the parents thinking it might be the CSS clear rule. But that didn't help either. Appreciate any help.
<div id="editmain">
<div class="ticker">
some content here
</div>
<div class="ticker">
some longer content content here
</div>
<div class="ticker">
some content here
</div>
</div>
#editmain
{
position:relative;
min-height:480px;
background-color:#84d;
overflow:hidden;
padding: 20px 0px 30px 0px;
}
.ticker
{
position:relative;
border-bottom: solid 2px #ddd;
margin:10px;
background-color:white;
overflow:hidden;
height:auto;
min-height:100px;
}
In the absolute positioning model, a box is removed from the normal
flow entirely (it has no impact on later siblings) and assigned a
position with respect to a containing block.
w3.org
Remove the absolute positioning and find another way to format your labels and inputs using width and margin. Fiddle
.tickertxtlabel
{
display:inline-block;
margin: 10px 10px 10px 10px;
width:90px;
}
I have a problem which I do not understand.
If I use percentage in width, I would expect that elements calculate borders, margins or paddings within their size (in percentage).
But in fact those values are added to their size which I asume is wrong.
Is my expectation wrong?
The bellow example shows the issue. The both "divs" "left" and "right" I expect to be in a single line. If I remove "border" it works as expected.
<!DOCTYPE html>
<html>
<head>
<style>
.center {
border: 1px solid black;
width: 100%;
overflow: auto;
}
.left {
border: 1px solid black;
width: 20%;
float: left;
}
.right {
border: 1px solid black;
width: 80%;
float: left;
}
</style>
</head>
<body>
<div class="center">
<div class="left">left</div>
<div class="right">right</div>
</div>
</body>
</html>
What you can do to fix this issue is to use box-sizing. See http://jsfiddle.net/Marwelln/YYkxK/
box-sizing:border-box
That's totally normal. It's not what you might expect at first, but CSS works that way.
Even without percentages:
#width {
width: 100px;
padding: 0 20px;
}
This #width div will occupy 140px. Works the same for percentages.
So you might need inner divs to achieve what you want.
<div class="left">
<div class="inner">
</div>
</div>
<div class="right">
<div class="inner">
</div>
</div>
.inner { padding: 10px; }
.right .inner { border-left: 1px solid #ccc; }
Padding or Border always adds to an elements size, inside out.
Margin never adds to size but adds space outside the element.
Percentages or set values don't matter. The above is always true.
Reviewing the box model may help ---> HERE
When you use percentage as width (or height) values, these are the percentage of the width (or height) of the parent block element (containing block).
In super modern browsers you can use calc() to fix this: calc(80% - 2px). And yes, it is normal. If you set the width to 100px and border to 150px what would happen then if border wasnt added?