In IntelliJ IDEA, is there a way to see usages of a method nested in other usages?
I have a symfony2 app that has a class MyClass with method myMethod() this method is used in a bunch of services and controllers. I would like to trace all usages of this method all the way up to controllers that are linked to the app's routes. As a result, I would have a list of routes and corresponding controllers/methods that directly or indirectly use myMethod(). Is it possible?
In Java, it's Cmd-Alt-H (Ctrl-Alt-H on Windows), so I assume it's the same in PHP.
It's called "Call hierarchy". So you can use Cmd-shift-A (resp. Ctrl-shift-A and type "Call hierarchy" to find it.
Related
I am new to the usage of reflection in Java/scala. It is not quite clear to me why we need to instantiate a type at runtime. An example would be the best. Thanks a lot.
I will give you a general example of where runtime type instantiation or in general inspection of a types is useful. Think of the Plugin Pattern. Assume you want to create an application that allows users to create plugins. You don't have the plugins the users are going to make in the future, at hand. How are you able to use their plugins after you have released your application? You need to be able to inspect their plugins for a method your application requires and then call said method.
In order to enable this, language designers create a platform in which you are able to query a module (jar in java, assemblies in .net) for the types it defines and the methods, fields, etc it contains. You can then call any method, instantiate any type you want and basically interact with the module as if you had the module at compile time and you were referencing it(well not exactly but you get the point).
Here's and example of a method call that happens at runtime. You can assume that we have already created foo from a string we get from a configuration file at runtime. foo was specified as the name of the jar file containing the plugin types. I don't want to provide the instantiation code as it would make this too bloated, but here is the method:
Method method = foo.getClass().getMethod("doSomething", null);
method.invoke(foo, null);
As you see, we basically got the type of the class foo, we queried it for a method using the method's name and then called it. By doing so we extended the functionality of our program with the plugin at runtime.
Flash builder lets me insert metadata for events fired by a class, example:
[Event("myEvent", "flash.events.Event")]
public class MyClass() {
}
Is there any way to do the same for Exceptions?
Currently I have checked here, and can't see it documented. Perhaps it's not even worthwhile, what are your thoughts.
There are ways to create your own metadata; and add that into your app at compile time. Use the keep-as3-metadata compiler argument.
It will be up to you to write code to do something with it at runtime; or to build IDE extensions to make use of the code while writing the code.
To access such metadata at runtime, you'll need to perform some type of introspection. Here are some docs and another StackOverflow Question about this.
Many Flex Frameworks make use of custom metadata.
At a high level, how do these dep. injection frameworks work?
I can understand if you always instantiate an object via a custom factory like:
IUser user = DepInjector.Get<User>();
I'm guessing what happens is, wherever you defined the mappings, it will look at the type you want and try and find a match, if found, it will via reflection instantiate the type.
Are there dep. inj. frameworks that would work like:
IUser user = new User();
If so, how would it get the correct user, where is it hooking into the CLR to do this? In case of an asp.net website, is it any different?
If you want to know how Ninject works then the obvious place to start would be reading How Injection Works on their official wiki. It does use reflection but it now also uses dynamic methods:
"By default, the StandardKernel will
create dynamic methods (via
System.Reflection.Emit.DynamicMethod)
that can be used to inject values into
the different injection targets. These
dynamic methods are then triggered via
delegate calls."
As for you second example, I don't believe there are any DI frameworks that would do what you ask. However, constructor injection tends to be most common way of implementing IoC, so that when a class is constructed it knows what type to bind to via some configuration binding. So in your example IUser would be mapped to concrete User in config bindings so that any consuming class that has an IUser parameter as part of its constructor would get the correct User type passed in.
AFAIK there's no way to "hook into" object instantiation with the CLR. The only way to use DI in the second case would be to employ an assembly rewriter (i.e. a postprocessor similar to PostSharp) to replace the call to new with a call to the DI factory method (i.e. GetUser) in the compiled code.
I am creating a custom route by subclassing RouteBase. I have a dependency in there that I'd like to wire up with IoC. The method GetRouteData just takes HttpContext, but I want to add in my unit of work as well....somehow.
I am using StructureMap, but info on how you would do this with any IoC framework would be helpful.
Well, here is our solution. Many little details may be omitted but overall idea is here. This answer may be a kind of offtop to original question but it describes the general solution to the problem.
I'll try to explain the part that is responsible for plain custom HTML-pages that are created by users at runtime and therefore can't have their own Controller/Action. So the routes should be either somehow built at runtime or be "catch-all" with custom IRouteConstraint.
First of all, lets state some facts and requirements.
We have some data and some metadata about our pages stored in DB;
We don't want to generate a (hypothetically) whole million of routes for all of existing pages beforehand (i.e. on Application startup) because something can change during application and we don't want to tackle with pushing the changes to global RouteCollection;
So we do it this way:
1. PageController
Yes, special controller that is responsible for all our content pages. And there is the only action that is Display(int id) (actually we have a special ViewModel as param but I used an int id for simplicity.
The page with all its data is resolved by ID inside that Display() method. The method itself returns either ViewResult (strongly typed after PageViewModel) or NotFoundResult in case when page is not found.
2. Custom IRouteConstraint
We have to somewhere define if the URL user actually requested refers to one of our custom pages. For this we have a special IsPageConstraint that implements IRouteConstraint interface. In the Match() method of our constraint we just call our PageRepository to check whether there is a page that match our requested URL. We have our PageRepository injected by StructureMap. If we find the page then we add that "id" parameter (with the value) to the RouteData dictionary and it is automatically bound to PageController.Display(int id) by DefaultModelBinder.
But we need a RouteData parameter to check. Where we get that? Here comes...
3. Route mapping with "catch-all" parameter
Important note: this route is defined in the very end of route mappings list because it is very general, not specific. We check all our explicitly defined routes first and then check for a Page (that is easily changeable if needed).
We simply map our route like this:
routes.MapRoute("ContentPages",
"{*pagePath}",
new { controller = "Page", action = "Display" }
new { pagePath = new DependencyRouteConstraint<IsPageConstraint>() });
Stop! What is that DependencyRouteConstraint thing appeared in mapping? Well, thats what does the trick.
4. DependencyRouteConstraint<TConstraint> class
This is just another generic implementation of IRouteConstraint which takes the "real" IRouteConstraint (IsPageConstraint) and resolves it (the given TConstraint) only when Match() method called. It uses dependency injection so our IsPageConstraint instance has all actual dependencies injected!
Our DependencyRouteConstraint then just calls the dependentConstraint.Match() providing all the parameters thus just delegating actual "matching" to the "real" IRouteConstraint.
Note: this class actually has the dependency on ServiceLocator.
Summary
That way we have:
Our Route clear and clean;
The only class that has a dependency on Service Locator is DependencyRouteConstraint;
Any custom IRouteConstraint uses dependency injection whenever needed;
???
PROFIT!
Hope this helps.
So, the problem is:
Route must be defined beforehand, during Application startup
Route's responsibility is to map the incoming URL pattern to the right Controller/Action to perform some task on request. And visa versa - to generate links using that mapping data. Period. Everything else is "Single Responsibility Principle" violation which actually led to your problem.
But UoW dependencies (like NHibernate ISession, or EF ObjectContext) must be resolved at runtime.
And that is why I don't see the children of RouteBase class as a good place for some DB work dependency. It makes everything closely coupled and non-scalable. It is actually impossible to perform Dependency Injection.
From now (I guess there is some kind of already working system) you actually have just one more or less viable option that is:
To use Service Locator pattern: resolve your UoW instance right inside the GetRouteData method (use CommonServiceLocator backed by StructureMap IContainer). That is simple but not really nice thing because this way you get the dependency on static Service Locator itself in your Route.
With CSL you have to just call inside GetRouteData:
var uow = ServiceLocator.Current.GetService<IUnitOfWork>();
or with just StructureMap (without CSL facade):
var uow = ObjectFactory.GetInstance<IUnitOfWork>();
and you're done. Quick and dirty. And the keyword is "dirty" actually :)
Sure, there is much more flexible solution but it needs a few architectural changes. If you provide more details on exactly what data you get in your routes I can try to explain how we solved our Pages routing problem (using DI and custom IRouteConstraint).
I'm trying to create a decorator class in AS3/Flex in order to add some functionality to a UI element. The problem is that I don't know how to automatically "redirect" method and property calls to the object being decorated. I suppose I'm looking for something like the __call() "magic method" from PHP, which is called every time the application calls a non-callable method.
So, the question is - how do I redirect calls for methods and properties (which aren't overriden/don't exist in the decorator class) to the object being decorated?
I think the closest to magic methods in actionscript would be extending Proxy.