I have been trying to import customer master through data management tool in AX7 using "Customers" standard data entity, I have marked "Auto-Generate" for customer account field. And I am facing a number sequence error while the data gets inserted into staging. When I check the execution log I see the below error.
"Issue exists in auto generation of number sequence
Issue exist in generate staging data
'4' 'Customers' record(s) inserted in staging"
I checked number sequence setup for Customer account and it is proper it is as below:
Note:
Gives the same error irrespective of Continuous is marked or not for the number sequence code.
Any quick inputs would be appreciated!
Thanks Fh-Inway!
I have figured out the issue, and it's an issue with standard AX. An application hot fix (Metadata) is available for this which can be found in the LCS as a part of AX update2. I have installed it, tested it to be working fine.
Not sure whether I can share the Hotfix KB Article number here for the same.
Note: That hotfix has a common fix that addresses auto-generation of number sequences across all the data entities.
Related
I am trying to give access to a PowerBI(PBI) workspace for an Active Directory(AD) group comprised of few users. When users login to PBI service, they cant see the workspace. The type of the AD group where these users are, set as a Distribution List. There is another separate workspace I created where users in an AD group with type - Mail Enabled Security. Those users can see that Workspace with no issues. Level of permission the AD group was given for this Distribution list PBI workspace was - Viewer. When the users are individually added to this workspace, they can see the workspace. Could someone kindly confirm, if the AD group type has to be a - Mail Enabled Security for the users to see the PowerBI workspace?
According to PowerBI documentation, PBI Workspace also supports AD groups of the type, Distribution List.
See the link
https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/power-bi/admin/service-admin-rls
Thank you for your replies. Much appreciated.
enter image description here
Edited: Hi Andrey, I added an extra image. This I got from a posting in a blog post. It's confusing whether the group has to be security group or a distribution lists are also allowed under PBI workspaces. According to this image, distribution lists are also allowed.
Also want to add that PBI workspace here was created as new workspace type not the Classic type. Under the point 2 in the link, what that images says confirms by the Microsoft PBI documentation.
https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/power-bi/collaborate-share/service-give-access-new-workspaces
In order to make it simple, I didn't mention the fact that these groups are being used to access couple of reports inside the workspace. These reports use roles that maintain Row Level Security. I thought it would still show the users in the group the workspace even though they might not get access to the individual reports inside. Am I too optimistic here?
Edit 2:
Thank you everyone. The issue has been resolved without me doing anything. It was a delay in syncing the changes within the office365/AD accounts/PowerBI it seems. Just for the record I will leave this post here hoping it might help someone with my situation in the future.
Asking here, after asking to Clockify support.
Trying to extend some of clockify capabilities to create extra reporting for our clients,
I’ve been playing with your API and specifically: the enpoint /reports/{reportsId}
• My goal:
Get all the time entries of a specific "saved report” (usually saved by our Project Managers)
• What I EXPECT from "/reports/{reportsId}”:
To get all the info and entities (users, time entries, projects, etc.) only regarding that particular reportId
• What I GET from "/reports/{reportsId}”:
Lots of info regarding the whole workspace, and I only see summaryReport
as more “specific to the saved report itself”...
• Questions:
Is this the correct behavior?
How do you filter down time entries of specific reports in URLs like https://clockify.me/bookmarks/BOOKMARK_HASH_HERE ?
Do you only call "/reports/{reportsId}” and filter down on client-side? (it seems to me that way, exploring the Network tab)
If that’s the way, what’s the point of calling the report endpoint? Only for the summaryReport object?
3- Is "/reports/{reportsId}” the best endpoint I can use to reach my goal? …or which way would you recommend me?
summaryReport.timeEntries will contain all the individual time entries from that particular report. Each entry has a user, project, client, time etc. Grouping by project is done on the client.
I'm not sure I fully understand your specific problem though. Are you suggesting the entries you get from the report endpoint do not belong to the given report?
We are connecting to MYOB AccountRight Enterprise v19 with ODBC direct v10.
We are creating Invoices in MYOB using the same.
We sent only the tax code i.e. GW in the ODBC call to MYOB, however, in that case no tax got calculated in the Invoice created in MYOB, probably the TransPost didnt work when the code was sent through ODBC
Then we sent the total tax (GST+WET) in the GSTAmount field as there wasn't any separate field for WET. In that case, Total tax was reflected coorectly in the Invoice generated in MYOB but the GST and WET split up was incorrect
The aim is to generate the Invoice in MYOB with correct total amount, including tax component values (GST and WET)
Please advise ASAP
Thanks
Consolidated tax can be tricky to get right. Without more details I am unable to comment on precisely what you might be doing wrong; there are many possibilities, ranging from your construction of import records to the way the items and/or services you are importing are set up in the target system.
You can however test the import behaviour to find out what works best for you. The ODBC driver does not connect directly to the (ISAM) database, but invokes the import/export facility of the MYOB executable. Look at the import/export data menu option in the UI. Export sales first so you can work out the file format. You can then see what happens when you vary the data you submit.
Good luck.
I have a charge code called FREIGHT set up with the following configurations. Under Credit, I've specified a ledger account of 4800.
I now create a Purchase Order, confirm and go through the whole process, and then try to invoice / post it.
I'm presented the following error:
"The combination 4800- is not valid for the account structure MYACCOUNTSTRUCTURE"
So it's been identified that AX is attempting to use 4800 from the aforementioned charges code field MarkupTable.VendorLedgerDimension.
In the code, it crashes in the PurchFormLetter.run() method, and if I did further it goes into the SysOperationController\pack super(); class before it crashes.
Now, if I were to change my account from 4800 to for example 2100, then the invoice goes through fine, which is good.
My question, and what I need is to find out what class / where in the code is this happening during the invoice post process that AX is trying to use this MarkupTable.VendorLedgerDimension field. I need to access that part of the process and modify that value (obviously 4800 is just the display value) to be something else.
If anyone needs more information for background, I need to keep the account for FREIGHT at 4800, while setting the actual financial dimension to the financial dimension on the line item. I've been debugging and looking all over the place for where this process occurs, but have had no luck so far.
If anyone can point me in the right direction, it would be very greatly appreciated.
Thank you.
Check what dimensions are mandatory on this account. Then set financial dimension on invoce lines.
I am trying to automatically populate a field through a calculated field.
Just a quick background we distribute equipment with serials numbers. This equipment is sometimes returned. So some customers have multiple products each with different status of returned, shipped and installed.
I would like to transfer this serial number to a field on the contact through a calculated field only if the status is installed or shipped.
I have tried:
related($products,"serial"),",",(related($products,"status"))
and
related(contains(status,"installed)"products,"serial")
I need this for reporting reasons and would be greatly appreciated if you could help.
Thanks
You need a combination of ifElse and equal and related and or
As an example, the following Sugar Logic formula can be placed on a Contact record and will populate the field with the related account's name if the related account is of the type "Reseller." If the Account is of some other account_type then the field takes the value of "nope!"
ifElse(equal(related($accounts,"account_type"),"Reseller"),related($accounts,"name"),"nope!")
If you wanted to add another condition, or allow for another acceptable Account Type, build in an or
When you're writing lengthy Sugar Logic like this, I find it helpful to start writing it out with indentation using a text editor:
ifElse(
or(
equal(related($accounts,"account_type"),"Reseller"),
equal(related($accounts,"account_type"),"Investor"),
),
related($accounts,"name"),
"nope!"
)
In some versions of Sugar I've had to remove the extra spacing but it seems like in 7.2.2.0 at least the editor actually allows and preservers the formatting, which is a pleasant surprise.