How to Uniquely associate nested call with the original call? - asp.net

I have function that is using unity interception to log the method time. The problem comes when I want to log deeper info like database call time, backend time etc.
So my method (let say, M1) calls some other method(M2) that inturn call some other method and so on to finally call a dbMethod that calls db. I am able to log time for all functions individually but for final aggregation in my log server , it would be helpful if I can find for which M1 call, how much time the dbServer Method took.
So is there some property like threadId that I can use that remain same during the nested calls so that I can use them in final aggregation (for joining M1 and dbMethod log data)? I would like that unique value to be different in different invokation of M1.

For anyone out there that is facing same problem, I solved it using CallContext class. Just add a request Id in outermost call and it will propagate to all the inner nested call.

Related

Is there a way to cancel or override a jsonrpc call?

I'm using Polkadot.js in my project, and I have a function where user click to filter assets by categories. The issue is if the user click very fast, two rpc calls will be dispatched, instead of the later call overriding the first call, this will result in getting duplicate results.
Is there any way I can either cancel the first inflight rpc call, or let the second call overrides the first one? They share the same method name and the later one will have a higher id.
Any suggestions or help is much appreciated!

how to start one flux after completion of another?

how can i start Flux after completion of Flux? Flux doesn't depend on result of Flux.
I thought operation then() should do the work, but it just return mono. So what is the correct operator?
Flux.thenMany is the operator that you need
abstract Flux<Integer> flux1();
abstract Flux<String> flux2();
public Flux<String> flux2AfterFlux1(){
return flux1().thenMany(flux2());
}
My reply is late, so you have probably either figured this out, or moved on. I need to do the same thing, so I seem to have achieved this by using Flux.usingWhen(). I need to obtain IDs from my database that exhibit a certain property. After retrieving these IDs, then I need to get some information about these IDs. Normally, a join would work, but I am using MongoDB, and joins are horrible, so it is better to do separate, sequential queries. So let's say I have a Mongo reactive repository with a method called Flux<String> findInterestingIds(). I have another method in the same repository called Flux<String> findInterestingInformation(String[] interestingIds) that I need to feed the IDs found in the call to the previous method. So this is how I handle it:
Mono<List<String>> interestingIdsMono = myRepo.findInterestingIds()
.collectList();
Flux.usingWhen(interestingIdsMono,
interestingIds -> myRepo.findInterestingInformation(interestingIds),
interestingIds -> Flux.empty().doOnComplete(() -> log.debug("Complete"));
The cleanup function (third parameter) was something that I don't quite yet understand how to use in a good way, so I just logged completion and I do not need to emit anything extra when the flux completes.
ProjectReactor used to have a compose function that is now called transformDeferred, and I had some hopes for that, but I do not quite see how it would apply in this type of situation. At any rate, this is my attempt at it, so feel free to show me a better way!

Capping an Aerospike map in Lua

We want to remove elements from Map bin based on size. There will be multiple threads which will try to do above operation. So writing an UDF to do this operation will make it synchronized between threads. But remove_by_rank_range is not working inside lua. Below is the error iwe are getting:
attempt to call field 'remove_by_rank_range' (a nil value)
sample lua code:
function delete(rec)
local testBinMap = rec.testBin
map.remove_by_rank_range(testBinMap, 0, 5)
end
The Lua map API does not include most of the operations of the Map data type, as implemented in the clients (for example, the Java client's MapOperation class).
The performance of the native map operations is significantly higher, so why would you use a UDF here, instead of calling remove_by_rank_range from the client?
The next thing to be aware of is that any write operation, whether it's a UDF or a client calling the map remove_by_rank_range method, first grabs a lock on the record. I answered another stackoverflow question about this request flow. Your UDF doesn't give any advantage to the problem you described over the client map operation.
If you want to cap the size of your map you should be doing it at the very same time you're adding new elements to the map. The two operations would be wrapped together with operate() - an insert, followed by the remove. I have an example of how to do this in rbotzer/aerospike-cdt-examples.

Meteor pub/sub or method return, what will perform better?

I'd like to know the proper decision for this Meteor scenario:
User click button
Client side code calls a server Method.
Method code calls mongoDB and generates a random array with some content from collection A.
Server save the given array as a new doc into collection B.
Generated array data must get printed to the DOM.
What is better for performance maters? Return the array directly from method.call or publish/subscribe B collection?
NOTE THAT:
a) Array content are 20(tops) string elements of less than 120 characters each.
b) Array data is not reactive.
c) User won't need new data until he clicks '0 button' again.
I would go with the client->method->server and server->pub/sub->client way.
This way you get queries in minimongo. Also about reactivity you can throttle it so it's not a huge issue. Returning data via method would make you need promises etc cause it will take time to get back to you. Unless you will execute some function in return function from the call.
about the C), client won't get new data the pub/sub will handle this. Client will only get new data if there is new data/update.

When should I call javax.jdo.Query.close(Object)?

I'm trying to understand when I should call Query.close(Object) or Query.closeAll();
From the docs I see that it will "close a query result" and "release all resources associated with it," but what does "close" mean? Does it mean I can't use objects that I get out of a Query after I've called close on them?
I ask because I'm trying to compartmentalize my code with functions like getUser(id), which will create a Query, fetch the User, and destroy the query. If I have to keep the Query around just to access the User, then I can't really do that compartmentalization.
What happens if I don't call close on an object? Will it get collected as garbage? Will I be able to access that object later?
Please let me know if I can further specify my question somehow.
You can't use the query results since you closed them (i.e the List object you got back from query.execute). You can access the objects in the results ... if you copied them to your own List, or made references to them in your code. Failure to call close can leak memory
When your query method returns a single object it is easy to simply close the query before returning the single object.
On the other hand, when your query method returns a collection the query method itself can not close the query before returning the result because the query needs to stay open while the caller is iterating through the results.
This puts the responsibility for closing a query that returns a collection on the caller and can introduce leaks if the caller neglects to close the query - I thought there must be a safer way and there is!
Guido, a long time DataNucleus user, created a 'auto closing' collection facade that wraps the collection returned by JDO's Query.execute method. Usage is extremely simple: Wrap the query result inside an instance of the auto closing collection object:
Instead of returning the Query result set like this:
return q.execute();
simply return an 'auto closing' wrapped version of it:
return new JDOQueryResultCollection(q, q.execute());
To the caller it appears like any other Collection but the wrapper keeps a reference to the query that created the collection result and auto closes it when the wrapper is disposed of by the GC.
Guido kindly gave us permission to include his clever auto closing code in our open source exPOJO library. The auto closing classes are completely independent of exPOJO and can be used in isolation. The classes of interest are in the expojo_jdo*.jar file that can be downloaded from:
http://www.expojo.com/
JDOQueryResultCollection is the only class used directly but it does have a few supporting classes.
Simply add the jar to your project and import com.sas.framework.expojo.jdo.JDOQueryResultCollection into any Java file that includes query methods that return results as a collection.
Alternatively you can extract the source files from the jar and include them in your project: They are:
JDOQueryResultCollection.java
Disposable.java
AutoCloseQueryIterator.java
ReadonlyIterator.java

Resources