yt-project is a nice toolkit for volumetric data.
But the dataset it used is a bit of complex, such as Enzo data.
So if I only want to volume render a simple 3d data via yt-project, how to load data?
The simple 3D data only contain the Coordinate(x, y, z) and the density of the point. just as follow:
[[x, y, z, density]
[x, y, z, density]
...]
Any help appreciate!
If the x, y, and z coordinates are regularly spaced, you can load your data into yt using the load_uniform_grid function:
http://yt-project.org/doc/reference/api/generated/yt.frontends.stream.data_structures.load_uniform_grid.html
Here is an example that makes a volume rendering using a dataset loaded with load_uniform_grid:
http://yt-project.org/doc/examining/generic_array_data.html#Volume-Rendering-Loaded-Data
If the data are not uniform resolution, then you're going to need to give more information about how the data are laid out before I can help more.
Related
I'm rather new to programming and the site so let me know if I screw up on this explanation.
I have a rather long series of x, y coordinates representing a character in 2d space. Let's say that space is 200 x 400. I want to represent the amount of time the character is in each x, y coordinate by means of a pretty chloropleth.
I want to use heatmaply for this because I think the output is pretty and I want my audience to be able to zoom in on the data. It isn't really meant to do density estimation (I think?) so I'm trying to work around it.
I suppose the way to do this is to fill a 200x400 dataframe with counts of the number of occurrences of each x, y coordinate in the data at each x, y coordinate in the frame. Essentially, to build a 2d map out of the data frame and impose the counts upon it
So, I suppose my questions are:
1). How do I get the count of each unique x, y coordinate in my set
2). How might I pass those counts easily to the matching x, y cell in my 200x400 dataframe full of zeroes?
This seems like it should be easy but I can't seem to figure it out! I'm a novice to r and can't see the shape of what I need to do.
You can use the table function to get your matrix of counts.
table(X,Y)
X and Y should be columns of coordinates.
Output based on some sample data
I'm trying to plot 3-dimensional vectors (x, y, z coordinates) onto a 3D coordinate system in R like in the picture below. Ideally, I would then like to construct 3d kernel density plots, also like in the image below.
Ideal result of vector plot and 3d kernel density plot
I have a matrix containing ~100 rows and one column for each coordinate (x, y , z). Initially, I tried arrow3D() from the plot3D package but I find the perspective to be sub-par, it's rather difficult to discern directions of the arrows from one perspective in the final plot. Next I tried the rgl package which gives me interactivity - great. Minimal working example:
library(rgl)
library(matlib)
data2 <- data.frame(replicate(6,rnorm(100))) #sample data set for minimum working example
colnames(data2) <- c("x_target", "y_target", "z_target", "x_start", "y_start", "z_start")
x1 <- data2$x_target - data2$x_start
y1 <- data2$y_target - data2$y_start
z1 <- data2$z_target - data2$z_start
vec <- (diag(6,3)) # coordinates for x, y and z axis
rownames(vec) <- c("X", "Y", "Z") # labels for x, y and z axis
z <- as.matrix((data.frame(x=x1, y=y1, z=z1)))
open3d()
vectors3d(vec, color=c(rep("black",3)), lwd=2, radius=1/25)
vectors3d(X=z, headlength=1/25)
(due to the random numbers generator the strange looking rods appear at different coordinates, not exactly like in the image i link to below)
The result of the code above is a version of the image link below. One set of coordinates produces a very strange looking more like rod object which is far longer then the coordinates would produce. If I plot the vectors individually, no such object is created. Anyone have any ideas why this happens? Also, if anyone has a tool (doesn't have to be R), that can create a 3D vector plot like in the first image, I'd be grateful. I find it to be very complicated in R, but I'm definitely a beginner.
Strange object to the right (long red rod that doesn't look like an arrow at all)
Thank you!
This is due to a bug in the matlib package, fixed in verson 0.9.2 of that package. I think you need to install it from Github instead of CRAN to get the bug fix:
devtools::install_github("friendly/matlib")
BTW, if you are using random numbers in a reproducible example, you can make it perfectly reproducible by something like
set.seed(123)
at the start (or some number other than 123). I saw reproducible problems with your example for set.seed(4).
I've been working with a spatial model which contains 21,000 grid cells of unequal size (i by j, where i is [1:175] and j is[1:120]). I have the latitude and longitude values in two seperate arrays (lat_array,lon_array) of i and j dimensions.
Plotting the coordinates:
> plot(lon_array, lat_array, main='Grid Coordinates')
Result:
My question: Is it possible to plot these spatial coordinates as a grid rather than as points? Does anyone know of a package or function that might be able to do this? I haven't been able to find anything online to this nature.
Thanks.
First of all it is always a bit dangerous to plot inherently spherical coordinates (lat,long) directly in the plane. Usually you should project them in some way, but I will leave it for you to explore the sp package and the function spTransform or something like that.
I guess in principle you could simply use the deldir package to calculate the Dirichlet tessellation of you points which would give you a nice grid. However, you need a bounding region for this to avoid large cells radiating out from the border of your region. I personally use spatstat to call deldir so I can't give you the direct commands in deldir, but in spatstat I would do something like:
library(spatstat)
plot(lon_array, lat_array, main='Grid Coordinates')
W <- clickpoly(add = TRUE) # Now click the region that contains your grid
i_na <- is.na(lon_array) | is.na(lat_array) # Index of NAs
X <- ppp(lon_array[!i_na], lat_array[!i_na], window = W)
grid <- dirichlet(X)
plot(grid)
I have not tested this yet and I will update this answer once I get the chance to test it with some artificial data. A major problem is the size of your dataset which may take a long time to calculate the Dirichlet tessellation of. I have only tried to call dirichlet on dataset of size up to 3000 points...
I have a set of 3D coordinates (below - just for a single point, in 3D space):
x <- c(-521.531433, -521.511658, -521.515259, -521.518127, -521.563416, -521.558044, -521.571228, -521.607178, -521.631165, -521.659973)
y <- c(154.499557, 154.479568, 154.438705, 154.398682, 154.580688, 154.365189, 154.3564, 154.559189, 154.341309, 154.344223)
z <- c(864.379272, 864.354675, 864.365479, 864.363831, 864.495667, 864.35498, 864.358582, 864.50415, 864.35553, 864.359863)
xyz <- data.frame(x,y,z)
I need to make a time-series plot of this point with a 3D rendering (so I can rotate the plot, etc.). The plot will visualize a trajectory of the point above in time (for example in the form of solid line). I used 'rgl' package with plot3d method, but I can't make it to plot time-series (below, just plot a single point from first frame in time-series):
require(rgl)
plot3d(xyz[1,1],xyz[1,2],xyz[1,3],axes=F,xlab="",ylab="",zlab="")
I found this post, but it doesn't really deal with a real-time rendered 3D plots. I would appreciate any suggestions. Thank you.
If you read help(plot3d) you can see how to draw lines:
require(rgl)
plot3d(xyz$x,xyz$y,xyz$z,type="l")
Is that what you want?
How about this? It uses rgl.pop() to remove a point and a line and draw them as a trail - change the sleep argument to control the speed:
ts <- function(xyz,sleep=0.3){
plot3d(xyz,type="n")
n = nrow(xyz)
p = points3d(xyz[1,])
l = lines3d(xyz[1,])
for(i in 2:n){
Sys.sleep(sleep)
rgl.pop("shapes",p)
rgl.pop("shapes",l)
p=points3d(xyz[i,])
l=lines3d(xyz[1:i,])
}
}
The solution was simpler than I thought and the problem was that I didn't use as.matrix on my data. I was getting error (list) object cannot be coerced to type 'double' when I was simply trying to plot my entire dataset using plot3d (found a solution for this here). So, if you need to plot time-series of set of coordinates (in my case motion capture data of two actors) here is my complete solution (only works with the data set below!):
download example data set
read the above data into a table:
data <- read.table("Bob12.txt",sep="\t")
extract XYZ coordinates into a separate matrixes:
x <- as.matrix(subset(data,select=seq(1,88,3)))
y <- as.matrix(subset(data,select=seq(2,89,3)))
z <- as.matrix(subset(data,select=seq(3,90,3)))
plot the coordinates on a nice, 3D rendered plot using 'rgl' package:
require(rgl)
plot3d(x[1:nrow(x),],y[1:nrow(y),],z[1:nrow(z),],axes=F,xlab="",ylab="",zlab="")
You should get something like on the image below (but you can rotate it etc.) - hope you can recognise there are joint centers for people there. I still need to tweak it to make it visually better - to have first frame as a points (to clearly see actor's joints), then a visible break, and then the rest of frames as a lines.
I need to make a topographic map of a terrain for which I have only fairly sparse samples of (x, y, altitude) data. Obviously I can't make a completely accurate map, but I would like one that is in some sense "smooth". I need to quantify "smoothness" (probably the reciprocal the average of the square of the surface curvature) and I want to minimize an objective function that is the sum of two quantities:
The roughness of the surface
The mean square distance between the altitude of the surface at the sample point and the actual measured altitude at that point
Since what I actually want is a topographic map, I am really looking for a way to construct contour lines of constant altitude, and there may be some clever geometric way to do that without ever having to talk about surfaces. Of course I want contour lines also to be smooth.
Any and all suggestions welcome. I'm hoping this is a well-known numerical problem. I am quite comfortable in C and have a working knowledge of FORTRAN. About Matlab and R I'm fairly clueless.
Regarding where our samples are located: we're planning on roughly even spacing, but we'll take more samples where the topography is more interesting. So for example we'll sample mountainous regions more densely than a plain. But we definitely have some choices about sampling, and could take even samples if that simplifies matters. The only issues are
We don't know how much terrain we'll need to map in order to find features that we are looking for.
Taking a sample is moderately expensive, on the order of 10 minutes. So sampling a 100x100 grid could take a long time.
Kriging interpolation may be of some use for smoothly interpolating your sparse samples.
R has many different relevant tools. In particular, have a look at the spatial view. A similar question was asked in R-Help before, so you may want to look at that.
Look at the contour functions. Here's some data:
x <- seq(-3,3)
y <- seq(-3,3)
z <- outer(x,y, function(x,y,...) x^2 + y^2 )
An initial plot is somewhat rough:
contour(x,y,z, lty=1)
Bill Dunlap suggested an improvement: "It often works better to fit a smooth surface to the data, evaluate that surface on a finer grid, and pass the result to contour. This ensures that contour lines don't cross one another and tends to avoid the spurious loops that you might get from smoothing the contour lines themselves. Thin plate splines (Tps from library("fields")) and loess (among others) can fit the surface."
library("fields")
contour(predict.surface(Tps(as.matrix(expand.grid(x=x,y=y)),as.vector(z))))
This results in a very smooth plot, because it uses Tps() to fit the data first, then calls contour. It ends up looking like this (you can also use filled.contour if you want it to be shaded):
For the plot, you can use either lattice (as in the above example) or the ggplot2 package. Use the geom_contour() function in that case. An example can be found here (ht Thierry):
ds <- matrix(rnorm(100), nrow = 10)
library(reshape)
molten <- melt(data = ds)
library(ggplot2)
ggplot(molten, aes(x = X1, y = X2, z = value)) + geom_contour()
Excellent review of contouring algorithm, you might need to mesh the surface first to interpolate onto a grid.
maybe you can use:
GEOMap
geomapdata
gtm
with
Matrix
SparseM
slam
in R