First off, I tried to search for questions that kind of relates to the problem that I am facing, but alas no luck at all! If this question has been answered before, please do point me to it and sorry for the inconvenience.
Coming as a Cordova developer react-native sounds like a dream coming true but I am still a noob at it and am still learning it. I installed this SQLite plugin and followed every step for android development. But when I try to run the app on a simulator I always get the following error:
FAILURE: Build failed with an exception.
* What went wrong:
A problem occurred configuring project ':app'.
> A problem occurred configuring project ':react-native-sqlite-storage'.
> failed to find Build Tools revision 23.0.1
The configurations that I did:
settings.gradle:
rootProject.name = 'todo'
include ':app'
include ':react-native-sqlite-storage'
project(':react-native-sqlite-storage').projectDir = new File(rootProject.projectDir, '../node_modules/react-native-sqlite-storage/src/android')
build.gradle:
android {
compileSdkVersion 23
buildToolsVersion "23.0.3"
defaultConfig {
[...]
MainApplication.java:
protected List<ReactPackage> getPackages() {
return Arrays.<ReactPackage>asList(
new SQLitePluginPackage(this),
new MainReactPackage();
);
Thank you in advance.
there is another "build.gradle" file that you should config!
in your ".../node_modules/react-native-sqlite-storage/src/android/src/build.gradle"
change the build version on that file too!
set it with your build.gradle that already changed!
In your Android studio go to your SDK manager and find SDK tools tab. In there if you check the 'Show Package Details' you will find "Android SDK Build-Tools 23.0.1"
Install that and you are good to go :)
Related
I am getting error on debug session start on my dot net core API project; since I updated visual studio to latest version 17.1.1. Following is the exception detail, it is showing on console. I tried by deleting temp, bin, obj folders but nothing worked. Has somebody faced such an issue or know how to fix?
Unhandled exception. System.ObjectDisposedException: Cannot access a disposed object.
Object name: 'ConfigurationManager'.
at Microsoft.Extensions.Configuration.ReferenceCountedProviderManager.AddProvider(IConfigurationProvider provider)
at Microsoft.Extensions.Configuration.ConfigurationManager.AddSource(IConfigurationSource source)
at Microsoft.Extensions.Configuration.ConfigurationManager.Microsoft.Extensions.Configuration.IConfigurationBuilder.Add(IConfigurationSource source)
at Microsoft.AspNetCore.Builder.WebApplicationBuilder.<>c__DisplayClass25_0.b__2(HostBuilderContext context, IServiceCollection services)
at Microsoft.Extensions.Hosting.HostBuilder.CreateServiceProvider()
at Microsoft.Extensions.Hosting.HostBuilder.Build()
at Microsoft.AspNetCore.Builder.WebApplicationBuilder.Build()
at Program.$(String[] args) in Program.cs:line 40
It is because you use the old way of getting the settings from the configuration manager, like:
using (var serviceProvider = services.BuildServiceProvider())
{
...
}
If you remove these lines and just use the configuration as-is with
options = configuration.GetOptions<Object>("xxx");
it will work
we also had this issue since march 8.
is was introduced with the release of 6.0.3, see a github post about the issue : https://github.com/dotnet/aspnetcore/issues/40614
for now what we did is revert to the 6.0.2 version (this is a temporary work around, i will hope to figure out what was wrong asap)
for docker images:
FROM mcr.microsoft.com/dotnet/aspnet:6.0.2 AS base
WORKDIR /app
EXPOSE 80
EXPOSE 443
FROM mcr.microsoft.com/dotnet/sdk:6.0.200 AS build
WORKDIR /src
if you are using it in yml also probably
use dotnetversion
DotNetVersion: "6.0.200" instead of "6.0.x"
6.0.200 is the sdk version of 6.0.2 framework https://dotnet.microsoft.com/en-us/download/dotnet/6.0
11/03/2022
see also this https://github.com/dotnet/core/issues/7259 were i have pinpointed the issue in our code and added a sample app to reproduce
if we look into that repo https://github.com/microsoft/ApplicationInsights-Kubernetes/blob/69f44c6ec3fda26d76a01836b851402e3f8a02ad/src/ApplicationInsights.Kubernetes/Extensions/ApplicationInsightsExtensions.cs
we indeed find the same piece of code on the other answers
i faced to this problem when i update my SDK both in docker and my window 11
my sdk is : 6.0.3
but i cant understand why this problem is happend
After install react-native-firebase and add module auth, showed this erro in Android Studio:
ERROR: Project with path ':#react-native-firebase_app' could not be
found in project ':#react-native-firebase_auth'.
What does this mean?
I have also faced the same issue.
After I install npm i #react-native-firebase/app the problem is solved.
You can try the following:
-Checking if firebase app was referenced in an incorrect way in MainApplication.java.
-Remove the modules and re-installing them may fix the problem sometimes.
I think you have different versions of firebase/app and firebase/auth.
Just go in 'node module/#react-native-firebase' directory and check package json of both firebase/app and firebase/auth you will see different version.
This problem can also happen if you are using #react-native-firebase#6.2.0
if you check the build.gradle of firebase/auth in version 6.2.0
dependencies {
api project(':#react-native-firebase_app')
implementation platform("com.google.firebase:firebase-bom:${ReactNative.ext.getVersion("firebase", "bom")}")
implementation "com.google.firebase:firebase-auth"
}
So here is a problem that it is not able to find #firebase/app
and #firebase/auth depends on #firebase/app
And in #6.3.4 which is working fine for me have build.gradle of #firebase/auth like below
so it is able to find #firebase/app
if (findProject(':#react-native-firebase_app')) {
api project(':#react-native-firebase_app')
} else if (findProject(':react-native-firebase_app')) {
api project(':react-native-firebase_app')
} else {
throw new GradleException('Could not find the react-native-firebase/app package, have you installed it?')
}
implementation platform("com.google.firebase:firebase-bom:${ReactNative.ext.getVersion("firebase", "bom")}")
implementation "com.google.firebase:firebase-auth"
}
run npm uni #react-native-firebase/auth
then run this simple command #react-native-firebase/auth#10.4.1
I was using "#react-native-firebase/auth": "15.1.1", and having the same problem , then i downgrade it to "#react-native-firebase/auth": "^10.4.1", and it worked.
if you have any problem installing make sure to use --legacy-peer-deps at the end , like this:
npm i #react-native-firebase/auth#10.4.1 --legacy-peer-deps
I'm making a mobile game on Unity, Android first.
And now I'm integrating firebase analytics.
After set info on Firebase Console and put google-services.json file into Unity project, Unity shows an error saying :
Project Bundle ID com.RetroSpirit.ToiletRush does not match any bundle IDs in your google-services.json files
This will result in an app that will fail to initialize.
Available Bundle IDs:
You need to either:
* Fix your app's bundle ID under "Player Settings --> Bundle Identifier"
or:
* Add another app to your firebase project
Goto https://firebase.google.com/docs/unity/setup#add_firebase_to_your_app_1
and add the new configuration file to your project.
UnityEngine.Debug:LogError(Object)
Firebase.Editor.GenerateXmlFromGoogleServicesJson:LogErrorIfEnabled(String)
Firebase.Editor.GenerateXmlFromGoogleServicesJson:FindGoogleServicesFile(SortedDictionary`2, String, LogMessage, LogMessage)
Firebase.Editor.GenerateXmlFromGoogleServicesJson:FindGoogleServicesFile(String, LogMessage, LogMessage)
Firebase.Editor.GenerateXmlFromGoogleServicesJson:UpdateJson(Boolean, LogMessage, LogMessage)
Firebase.Editor.GenerateXmlFromGoogleServicesJson:OnPostprocessAllAssets(String[], String[], String[], String[])
UnityEditor.AssetPostprocessingInternal:PostprocessAllAssets(String[], String[], String[], String[], String[])
UnityEditorInternal.InternalEditorUtility:ProjectWindowDrag(HierarchyProperty, Boolean)
UnityEngine.GUIUtility:ProcessEvent(Int32, IntPtr)
Here's the part of google-services.json,
"client": [
{
"client_info": {
"mobilesdk_app_id": "*:***********:android:****************",
"android_client_info": {
"package_name": "com.RetroSpirit.ToiletRush"
}
},
"oauth_client": [
{
"client_id": "***********-********************************.apps.googleusercontent.com",
"client_type": 1,
"android_info": {
"package_name": "com.RetroSpirit.ToiletRush",
"certificate_hash": "****************************************"
}
I don't know what should I check.
Project Bundle ID (the Package name on Build Settings - Other Settings - Identification) is exactly same as package_names in google-services.json.
Any ideas?
My case was in Unity and to fix it I added the google-services.json from the firebase project to the assets folder. I had only the GoogleService-Info.plist before.
Little bit funny to answer myself...
I found the reason of problem accidently. There was something wrong with my VC runtime so generate_xml_from_google_services_json.exe couldn't extract package name from google-services.json. (vc90.crt.manifest could not be extracted!)
Unfortunately, I couldn't fix that runtime error despite so many re-install of Visual Studio, VC Runtime and .net frameworks. Finally I re-installed Windows 10 and the problem just gone away... Still don't know what caused this error.
I understand you have fixed this by re-installing Windows but this is how I got passed this problem in case anyone else runs into this:
Make sure you have set your Package Name in Unity player settings (Edit > Project Settings > Player > Other Settings > Identification > Package Name).
Set to the same one you set up in Firebase (looks like com.CompanyName.ProductName).
Make sure you have imported the Firebase assets into your Unity project as described here https://firebase.google.com/docs/unity/setup and that the Firebase folder exists in Assets > Firebase. Changing the location of this folder seems to break things.
In our case we solved the issue by requesting a new google-services.json file from a collegue who has admin rights.
In my case, the issue was with the Package Name. So I followed the following steps and solved the problem:
Change the package name (com.companyname.appname) [everything in lowercase]
Delete the existing keystore
Add a new keystore and generating a fingerprint with Keytool
Delete the current app from the Firebase console
Add a new app with the correct package name and the generated fingerprint
download google-services.json again and Import to Unity under the Assets folder
Done! It works!!
hey everyone I found a fix to this issue I'm using mac pro m1
step to fix
reinstall visual studio
download Microsoft.NET.Sdk.Android from the visual studio website
restart the project
and after that, it will fix
I'm trying to install a demo shop of Intershop version 7.9 but i'm failing to get it working. When I run "gradlew deployServer" I'm getting an error on all dependencies of the first demo shop cartridge:
Could not resolve all dependencies for configuration ':app_sf_responsive:compile'.
Could not resolve com.intershop.business:ac_ecircle:.
Required by:
nl.test.testproject:app_sf_responsive:1.0.0-LOCAL
No version for module 'com.intershop.business:ac_ecircle' in project properties and no version declared in dependency. Consider adding a version or filter property to 'C:\projects\test7.9\projects\testproject\gradle.properties'
I have followed the complete Intershop manual Setup CI Infrastructure but there is one point I don't know exactly what to do, that's with the new versioning plugin.
It is in chapter 6.2.5, any one have an idea how to configure that?
After loads of tinkering and mails back and forth with Intershop support I found a solution.
My alterations are in section 7.2.4 of the Setup CI Infrastructure of Intershop:
https://support.intershop.com/kb/index.php/Display/279D85#Cookbook-SetupCIInfrastructure-CorporateArtifactsRecipe:SetupCIBuildforCorporateArtifacts
I Made sure the corporate distribution is unique since I have more that 1 Intershop installation. Otherwise the upload to Nexus(in my case) will still fail.
In the build.gradle of the corporate distibution folder added disableSCM = true in the scm.version section. It now looks like this:
scm {
version {
type = 'threeDigits'
increment = 'MAJOR'
patternDigits = 1
disableSCM = true
initialVersion = '2.0.0'
}
}
If this is not added I got a bad request httpstatus 400 from Nexus because it tried to upload it as a snapshot while the distribution repository is a release repository.
Another problem is the distributionURL in the project/gradle/wrapper/gradle-wrapper.properties
All Nexus repository URL's are build up with < repoBaseURL > + repositories/snapshots, but the distributionURL is missing the repositories part.
After applied those changes it worked for me.
I am using the JavaScript Blank Apache Cordova App. Changes were made to the config.xml only.
I changed the Cordova CLI in config.xml from 4.3.0 to 5.0.0. NPM downloaded the files, and no errors were reported.
When I F5 Debug > Android > Ripple. I get the following:
"Exception occurred". Uncaught Error: cordova already defined
This error does not appear when running 4.3.0. Any thoughts on why is would happen in 5.0.0?
Unfortunately this is a known issue with Ripple and the Android implementation in Cordova 5.0.0. The next point release will resolve it as the fix has been merged.
See the following dev mailing list thread on Cordova for details if you are interested: http://callback.markmail.org/message/so6xavs6xdfn45zv?q=+list:org%2Eapache%2Eincubator%2Ecallback-dev+Ripple
UPDATE: Cordova 5.1.1 is out and resolves this problem along with an Android security issue.
A bit late, but this usually works for me. For testing purposes (not only this case, but most of errors that sometimes occur in ripple) I always give it a first try, just like:
---->line 104 on cordova.js (which you can find inside platform www)
replace
if ("cordova" in window) { throw new Error("cordova already defined"); };
With:
if ("cordova" in window) {
//check if emulation
if(window.location.href.indexOf('localhost:4400') < 0){
//if not emulating, throw error
throw new Error("cordova already defined");
}
};
If it doesn't work, then I start googling about the issue.
hope this helps somebody to save some time.