Is it possible to delete simulated text messages in the iOS 10 simulators? There isn't an edit button in the main Messages view on the simulator and swipe to delete doesn't seem to work either. Messages clears simulated messages after ending a session with an app but I'm trying to create a mockup for a screenshot and delete an individual simulated text I mistyped.
If you hold down on the message, a box comes up. Click on more and it allows you to select messages to delete. It took me a while to figure it out!
Related
I had included some buttons on my rasa chatbot and if you click on that button, it gives me the read sign that I can not access content. like it is shown on image below:
My domain is the next :
After several trials I got the response!
Well I could not got the possibility to click on any button because in my stories I had defined two successive utter_response :
utter_givesinfo
utter_moreinfo
means I will not give the user the chance to choose any button so after deleting:
utter_moreinfo
I resolved the problem well as it is shown on the next figure:
Is there a way to show some visual indication that the inline button has been pressed in telegram bot.
I have a bit which send inline keyboard, and when I press each buttons it works perfectly fine, but there is a slight delay in getting response from the server. As there is no visual indication to show if a button has been pressed, it is confusing for uses to know if the button was pressed and end up pressing the same button several times.
there are different types of inline buttons in Telegram:
Opens URL (with url).
Forward a message (with switch_inline_query).
Insert query at the chat (with switch_inline_query_current_chat).
Button with action (with callback_data).
I suppose you are refering to the last type of button, in that case, if a user press a button you will get the callback_data via CallbackQuery, and that lets you modify the original message with editMessageText to add something like:
Button TEST pressed.
As an alternative way, after you got the callback response at your server, you can use Emoji for showing feedback to your users. Just edit the inline message and edit some relative emoji to the button text.
Functionnaly :
On one of my components of my application, I have an editing/lock system. When a user starts editing, he locks the file so other users cannot edit it.
Problem scenario : When the user activates "edition mode" and leaves screen, I would like to show a alert with two options : save changes, or discard changes.
There are different ways to exit screen :
There is a List on the left side containing other possible editabel data. A click changes the data in my component.
There is a menubar on top leading to other screens.
The edition component is embedded in a Tab navigator. When changing tabs, the alert has to show.
Closing browser.
Do I have to catch all of these events and plug at all those places?
Is there any kind of focusout mecanism?
The answer to the first question is: YES.
You need to watch all possible exit events that could harm the currently edited data.
Well, the problem is now how to manage this properly. Using an MVC framework you would trigger the appropriate commands from your components:
CHANGE_LIST_ITEM (new item)
CHANGE_TAB (new tab)
CHANGE_SCREEN (new screen)
Each command then checks if the currently edited tab has been saved or not. If not, it displays the Alert. Else, if there are no changes, it allows the list, the screen chooser and the tab bar to continue.
So your components (list, screens, tabs) need to implement some kind of rollback or preventDefault mechanism. Generally, changing their state must be allowed by a central validator (in MVC the command).
In the case of the list: I would suggest that the list is not selectable by mouse click but only programmatically. You set a listener on the list item click event. If the command allows setting of a new item it will notify the list. In MVC usually by sending an async message that gets received by the list's mediator. [[And even more correct: The command would set some model properties (e.g. currentListItem) and the model than sends an async message.]]
Edit: For the browser close event, you need to call a JavaScript expert.
I don't really know how to formulate my question this time...
I have my application with a QDialog as a main window.
The application is getting different values like temperature, humidity and so on from a remote machine.
For development I added a group box with different widgets to simulate these values. I have different limits for throwing warnings and alarms to the user.
For example if temperature rises over 30°C then I open a QMessageBox with the request time (the application does polling at the remote machine) and the current temperature. So this is updated each request cycle.
I use the show() method to bring up the message box which keeps my application running in background. The problem now is: the focus is at the message box and nothing in my main window/ QDialog can be clicked until the message box is not accepted/ has finished.
And that's my problem: in simulation mode I want to play around with different temperature values which I can adjust by slider in the main window. How can I access these widgets/ make the message box somehow "not-blocking"?
Best regards,
Matthias
What you're experiencing is called "modality" of a window. By default, a QMessageBox is "application modal". This means that input to all other application windows is blocked.
To change the modality, use setWindowModality() with a value from Qt::WindowModality just before you call show(). In your case:
box->setWindowModality(Qt::NonModal);
box->show();
Indeed you have a modal message box which is the way QMessageBox is intended to work - ie the user is to be alerted and the ui is protected from further interaction until the user has registered the message, closed the message box and (if necessary) taken any action required in response to the message.
Now if you set the message box modality to Qt::NonModal, (remember to assign it to a variable that won't go out of scope when your application continues after popping up the messagebox) you'll be able to interact with the ui even while the message box is displayed., which I have to say is 'unusual'. If I understand your requirement you will already have the message box up - then while this is still up, you'll then want to play around with different temp values in the main window - to what effect? Until another message dialog box is produced? The message box is going to have to be discarded at some point.
Not only that, but if you show a non modal message box and then interact with the main window, you're quite likely to just have the message box disappear behind the main window, out of sight anyway.
I'd suggest that message boxes are generally treated as intended - transient, temporary modal alert boxes only and that perhaps you require a clearly visible live report/status area in your main window rather than utilizing a non-modal QMessageBox.
Hope this helps
Regards
Roger
Just wanting to know if anybody has seen an example of a telnet/chat or other console like FLEX application where you can use the same TextArea as input/ouput area.
I've been trying to modify the app at:
http://livedocs.adobe.com/flex/3/html/17_Networking_and_communications_8.html
but so far, computer says no.
All the implementations I've seen use a combination of TextInput and TextArea.
The challenge is that we'll be using this app to telnet into some old routers and we'll need to do a fair amount of copy/pasting. Based on what I've seen, it seems that I would need to point the mouse into the TextInput in order to be able to right click and paste, which is not very sleak.....
Your thoughts,
Fran
edit Just realized that I had trimmed out what was directly pertaining to the question: I was unable to find anything that used the TextArea for input and output; see the below suggestions if custom-component suggestions are ok.
The TextArea component only fires a change event whenever a user adds input. Whenever you set the text field programmatically, a change event does not fire--you could maybe use that as a way to know what is user input and console "responses" by looking for carriage-returns (\r).
I'm unsure if you have a requirement to maintain the user's input at the bottom-most line (like a console), even after the console responds with something like auto-complete. If that's the case, then something a bit more complex would have to come into play (such as remembering where the user's input started/ended) or the requirement of a single-component console needs to be reconsidered--sleek is nice, but not always necessary.