I have the following code:
img {
display: block;
margin: 0 auto;
}
<h2>Center an Image</h2>
<p>To center an image, use margin: auto; and make it into a block element:</p>
<img src="paris.jpg" alt="Paris" style="width:40%">
<img src="paris.jpg" alt="Paris" style="width:40%">
<img src="paris.jpg" alt="Paris" style="width:40%">
But I have this problem -
If i do as you see in the code: I am loosing the center effect and the all images are going left.
The only possibility I know - is to do display the images as "block" instead of "inline-block" - but that is make them one above the other and I want them to be close to each one.
You can center images by wrapping them in another div and giving this wrapper text-align:center (if you want them as inline-block elements):
img {display:inline-block;}
.wrapper {text-align:center;}
<div class="wrapper">
<img src="http://placehold.it/350x150" alt="Paris" style="width:40%">
<img src="http://placehold.it/350x150" alt="Paris" style="width:40%">
<img src="http://placehold.it/350x150" alt="Paris" style="width:40%">
</div>
You should use a DIV container around the image tags and give it a
width and
margin:0 auto instead of the images. put those on
display: inline-block.
From a JSFIDDLE
.wrapper {
border: 1px solid grey;
width: 80%;
margin: 0 auto;
text-align: center;
}
img {
display: inline-block;
}
<div class=wrapper>
<img src="https://static.pexels.com/photos/3247/nature-forest-industry-rails.jpg" alt="Paris" style="width:20%">
<img src="http://www.planwallpaper.com/static/images/4-Nature-Wallpapers-2014-1_ukaavUI.jpg" alt="Paris" style="width:20%">
<img src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-FlpE6jqIzQg/UmAq6fFgejI/AAAAAAAADko/ulj3pT0dIlg/s1600/best-nature-desktop-hd-wallpaper.jpg" alt="Paris" style="width:20%">
</div>
Related
Why in the following code the height of the div is bigger than the height of the img ? There is a gap below the image, but it doesn't seems to be a padding/margin.
What is the gap or extra space below image?
#wrapper {
border: 1px solid red;
width:200px;
}
img {
width:200px;
}
<div id="wrapper">
<img src="http://i.imgur.com/RECDV24.jpg" />
</div>
By default, an image is rendered inline, like a letter so it sits on the same line that a, b, c and d sit on.
There is space below that line for the descenders you find on letters like g, j, p and q.
You can:
adjust the vertical-align of the image to position it elsewhere (e.g. the middle) or
change the display so it isn't inline.
div {
border: solid black 1px;
margin-bottom: 10px;
}
#align-middle img {
vertical-align: middle;
}
#align-base img {
vertical-align: bottom;
}
#display img {
display: block;
}
<div id="default">
<h1>Default</h1>
The quick brown fox jumps over the lazy dog <img src="https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/f/f2/VangoghStarry-night2.jpg/300px-VangoghStarry-night2.jpg" alt="">
</div>
<div id="align-middle">
<h1>vertical-align: middle</h1>
The quick brown fox jumps over the lazy dog <img src="https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/f/f2/VangoghStarry-night2.jpg/300px-VangoghStarry-night2.jpg" alt=""> </div>
<div id="align-base">
<h1>vertical-align: bottom</h1>
The quick brown fox jumps over the lazy dog <img src="https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/f/f2/VangoghStarry-night2.jpg/300px-VangoghStarry-night2.jpg" alt=""> </div>
<div id="display">
<h1>display: block</h1>
The quick brown fox jumps over the lazy dog <img src="https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/f/f2/VangoghStarry-night2.jpg/300px-VangoghStarry-night2.jpg" alt="">
</div>
The included image is public domain and sourced from Wikimedia Commons
Another option suggested in this blog post is setting the style of the image as style="display: block;"
Quick fix:
To remove the gap under the image, you can:
Set the vertical-align property of the image to vertical-align: bottom; vertical-align: top; or vertical-align: middle;
Set the display property of the image to display:block;
See the following code for a live demo:
#vAlign img {
vertical-align :bottom;
}
#block img{
display:block;
}
div {border: 1px solid red;width:100px;}
img {width:100px;}
<p>No fix:</p>
<div><img src="http://i.imgur.com/RECDV24.jpg" /></div>
<p>With vertical-align:bottom; on image:</p>
<div id="vAlign"><img src="http://i.imgur.com/RECDV24.jpg" /></div>
<p>With display:block; on image:</p>
<div id="block"><img src="http://i.imgur.com/RECDV24.jpg" /></div>
Explanation: why is there a gap under the image?
The gap or extra space under the image isn't a bug or issue, it is the default behaviour. The root cause is that images are replaced elements (see MDN replaced elements). This allows them to "act like image" and have their own intrinsic dimensions, aspect ratio....
Browsers compute their display property to inline but they give them a special behaviour which makes them closer to inline-block elements (as you can vertical align them, give them a height, top/bottom margin and padding, transforms ...).
This also means that:
<img> has no baseline, so when images are used in an inline formatting
context with vertical-align: baseline, the bottom of the image will be
placed on the text baseline.
(source: MDN, emphasis mine)
As browsers by default compute the vertical-align property to baseline, this is the default behaviour. The following image shows where the baseline is located on text:
(Image source)
Baseline aligned elements need to keep space for the descenders that extend below the baseline (like j, p, g ...) as you can see in the above image. In this configuration, the bottom of the image is aligned on the baseline as you can see in this example:
div{border:1px solid red;font-size:30px;}
img{width:100px;height:auto;}
<div>
<img src="http://i.imgur.com/RECDV24.jpg" />jpq are letters with descender
</div>
This is why the default behaviour of the <img> tag creates a gap at the bottom of it's container and why changing the vertical-align property or the display property removes it as in the following demo:
div {width: 100px;border: 1px solid red;}
img {width: 100px;height: auto;}
.block img{
display:block;
}
.bottom img{
vertical-align:bottom;
}
<p>Default:</p>
<div>
<img src="http://i.imgur.com/RECDV24.jpg" />
</div>
<p>With display:block;</p>
<div class="block">
<img src="http://i.imgur.com/RECDV24.jpg" />
</div>
<p>With vertical-align:bottom;</p>
<div class="bottom">
<img src="http://i.imgur.com/RECDV24.jpg" />
</div>
One can also nullify parent's line height:
#wrapper {
line-height: 0;
}
All fixes: http://jsfiddle.net/FaPFv/
All you have to do is assign this property:
img {
display: block;
}
The images by default have this property:
img {
display: inline;
}
You can use several methods for this issue like
Using line-height
#wrapper { line-height: 0px; }
Using display: flex
#wrapper { display: flex; }
#wrapper { display: inline-flex; }
Using display: block, table, flex and inherit
#wrapper img { display: block; }
#wrapper img { display: table; }
#wrapper img { display: flex; }
#wrapper img { display: inherit; }
I used line-height:0 and it works fine for me.
I found it works great using display:block; on the image and vertical-align:top; on the text.
.imagebox {
width:200px;
float:left;
height:88px;
position:relative;
background-color: #999;
}
.container {
width:600px;
height:176px;
background-color: #666;
position:relative;
overflow:hidden;
}
.text {
color: #000;
font-size: 11px;
font-family: robotomeduim, sans-serif;
vertical-align:top;
}
.imagebox img{ display:block;}
<div class="container">
<div class="imagebox">
<img src="http://machdiamonds.com/n69xvs.jpg" /> <span class="text">Image title</span>
</div>
<div class="imagebox">
<img src="http://machdiamonds.com/n69xvs.jpg" /> <span class="text">Image title</span>
</div>
<div class="imagebox">
<img src="http://machdiamonds.com/n69xvs.jpg" /> <span class="text">Image title</span>
</div>
<div class="imagebox">
<img src="http://machdiamonds.com/n69xvs.jpg" /> <span class="text">Image title</span>
</div>
<div class="imagebox">
<img src="http://machdiamonds.com/n69xvs.jpg" /> <span class="text">Image title</span>
</div>
<div class="imagebox">
<img src="http://machdiamonds.com/n69xvs.jpg" /> <span class="text">Image title</span>
</div>
</div>
or you can edit the code a JS FIDDLE
I just added float:left to div and it worked
You can also set overflow: hidden; for the container, and increase the height of the image to > 100%. height: 100%;
Why in the following code the height of the div is bigger than the height of the img ? There is a gap below the image, but it doesn't seems to be a padding/margin.
What is the gap or extra space below image?
#wrapper {
border: 1px solid red;
width:200px;
}
img {
width:200px;
}
<div id="wrapper">
<img src="http://i.imgur.com/RECDV24.jpg" />
</div>
By default, an image is rendered inline, like a letter so it sits on the same line that a, b, c and d sit on.
There is space below that line for the descenders you find on letters like g, j, p and q.
You can:
adjust the vertical-align of the image to position it elsewhere (e.g. the middle) or
change the display so it isn't inline.
div {
border: solid black 1px;
margin-bottom: 10px;
}
#align-middle img {
vertical-align: middle;
}
#align-base img {
vertical-align: bottom;
}
#display img {
display: block;
}
<div id="default">
<h1>Default</h1>
The quick brown fox jumps over the lazy dog <img src="https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/f/f2/VangoghStarry-night2.jpg/300px-VangoghStarry-night2.jpg" alt="">
</div>
<div id="align-middle">
<h1>vertical-align: middle</h1>
The quick brown fox jumps over the lazy dog <img src="https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/f/f2/VangoghStarry-night2.jpg/300px-VangoghStarry-night2.jpg" alt=""> </div>
<div id="align-base">
<h1>vertical-align: bottom</h1>
The quick brown fox jumps over the lazy dog <img src="https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/f/f2/VangoghStarry-night2.jpg/300px-VangoghStarry-night2.jpg" alt=""> </div>
<div id="display">
<h1>display: block</h1>
The quick brown fox jumps over the lazy dog <img src="https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/f/f2/VangoghStarry-night2.jpg/300px-VangoghStarry-night2.jpg" alt="">
</div>
The included image is public domain and sourced from Wikimedia Commons
Another option suggested in this blog post is setting the style of the image as style="display: block;"
Quick fix:
To remove the gap under the image, you can:
Set the vertical-align property of the image to vertical-align: bottom; vertical-align: top; or vertical-align: middle;
Set the display property of the image to display:block;
See the following code for a live demo:
#vAlign img {
vertical-align :bottom;
}
#block img{
display:block;
}
div {border: 1px solid red;width:100px;}
img {width:100px;}
<p>No fix:</p>
<div><img src="http://i.imgur.com/RECDV24.jpg" /></div>
<p>With vertical-align:bottom; on image:</p>
<div id="vAlign"><img src="http://i.imgur.com/RECDV24.jpg" /></div>
<p>With display:block; on image:</p>
<div id="block"><img src="http://i.imgur.com/RECDV24.jpg" /></div>
Explanation: why is there a gap under the image?
The gap or extra space under the image isn't a bug or issue, it is the default behaviour. The root cause is that images are replaced elements (see MDN replaced elements). This allows them to "act like image" and have their own intrinsic dimensions, aspect ratio....
Browsers compute their display property to inline but they give them a special behaviour which makes them closer to inline-block elements (as you can vertical align them, give them a height, top/bottom margin and padding, transforms ...).
This also means that:
<img> has no baseline, so when images are used in an inline formatting
context with vertical-align: baseline, the bottom of the image will be
placed on the text baseline.
(source: MDN, emphasis mine)
As browsers by default compute the vertical-align property to baseline, this is the default behaviour. The following image shows where the baseline is located on text:
(Image source)
Baseline aligned elements need to keep space for the descenders that extend below the baseline (like j, p, g ...) as you can see in the above image. In this configuration, the bottom of the image is aligned on the baseline as you can see in this example:
div{border:1px solid red;font-size:30px;}
img{width:100px;height:auto;}
<div>
<img src="http://i.imgur.com/RECDV24.jpg" />jpq are letters with descender
</div>
This is why the default behaviour of the <img> tag creates a gap at the bottom of it's container and why changing the vertical-align property or the display property removes it as in the following demo:
div {width: 100px;border: 1px solid red;}
img {width: 100px;height: auto;}
.block img{
display:block;
}
.bottom img{
vertical-align:bottom;
}
<p>Default:</p>
<div>
<img src="http://i.imgur.com/RECDV24.jpg" />
</div>
<p>With display:block;</p>
<div class="block">
<img src="http://i.imgur.com/RECDV24.jpg" />
</div>
<p>With vertical-align:bottom;</p>
<div class="bottom">
<img src="http://i.imgur.com/RECDV24.jpg" />
</div>
One can also nullify parent's line height:
#wrapper {
line-height: 0;
}
All fixes: http://jsfiddle.net/FaPFv/
All you have to do is assign this property:
img {
display: block;
}
The images by default have this property:
img {
display: inline;
}
You can use several methods for this issue like
Using line-height
#wrapper { line-height: 0px; }
Using display: flex
#wrapper { display: flex; }
#wrapper { display: inline-flex; }
Using display: block, table, flex and inherit
#wrapper img { display: block; }
#wrapper img { display: table; }
#wrapper img { display: flex; }
#wrapper img { display: inherit; }
I used line-height:0 and it works fine for me.
I found it works great using display:block; on the image and vertical-align:top; on the text.
.imagebox {
width:200px;
float:left;
height:88px;
position:relative;
background-color: #999;
}
.container {
width:600px;
height:176px;
background-color: #666;
position:relative;
overflow:hidden;
}
.text {
color: #000;
font-size: 11px;
font-family: robotomeduim, sans-serif;
vertical-align:top;
}
.imagebox img{ display:block;}
<div class="container">
<div class="imagebox">
<img src="http://machdiamonds.com/n69xvs.jpg" /> <span class="text">Image title</span>
</div>
<div class="imagebox">
<img src="http://machdiamonds.com/n69xvs.jpg" /> <span class="text">Image title</span>
</div>
<div class="imagebox">
<img src="http://machdiamonds.com/n69xvs.jpg" /> <span class="text">Image title</span>
</div>
<div class="imagebox">
<img src="http://machdiamonds.com/n69xvs.jpg" /> <span class="text">Image title</span>
</div>
<div class="imagebox">
<img src="http://machdiamonds.com/n69xvs.jpg" /> <span class="text">Image title</span>
</div>
<div class="imagebox">
<img src="http://machdiamonds.com/n69xvs.jpg" /> <span class="text">Image title</span>
</div>
</div>
or you can edit the code a JS FIDDLE
I just added float:left to div and it worked
You can also set overflow: hidden; for the container, and increase the height of the image to > 100%. height: 100%;
Why in the following code the height of the div is bigger than the height of the img ? There is a gap below the image, but it doesn't seems to be a padding/margin.
What is the gap or extra space below image?
#wrapper {
border: 1px solid red;
width:200px;
}
img {
width:200px;
}
<div id="wrapper">
<img src="http://i.imgur.com/RECDV24.jpg" />
</div>
By default, an image is rendered inline, like a letter so it sits on the same line that a, b, c and d sit on.
There is space below that line for the descenders you find on letters like g, j, p and q.
You can:
adjust the vertical-align of the image to position it elsewhere (e.g. the middle) or
change the display so it isn't inline.
div {
border: solid black 1px;
margin-bottom: 10px;
}
#align-middle img {
vertical-align: middle;
}
#align-base img {
vertical-align: bottom;
}
#display img {
display: block;
}
<div id="default">
<h1>Default</h1>
The quick brown fox jumps over the lazy dog <img src="https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/f/f2/VangoghStarry-night2.jpg/300px-VangoghStarry-night2.jpg" alt="">
</div>
<div id="align-middle">
<h1>vertical-align: middle</h1>
The quick brown fox jumps over the lazy dog <img src="https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/f/f2/VangoghStarry-night2.jpg/300px-VangoghStarry-night2.jpg" alt=""> </div>
<div id="align-base">
<h1>vertical-align: bottom</h1>
The quick brown fox jumps over the lazy dog <img src="https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/f/f2/VangoghStarry-night2.jpg/300px-VangoghStarry-night2.jpg" alt=""> </div>
<div id="display">
<h1>display: block</h1>
The quick brown fox jumps over the lazy dog <img src="https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/f/f2/VangoghStarry-night2.jpg/300px-VangoghStarry-night2.jpg" alt="">
</div>
The included image is public domain and sourced from Wikimedia Commons
Another option suggested in this blog post is setting the style of the image as style="display: block;"
Quick fix:
To remove the gap under the image, you can:
Set the vertical-align property of the image to vertical-align: bottom; vertical-align: top; or vertical-align: middle;
Set the display property of the image to display:block;
See the following code for a live demo:
#vAlign img {
vertical-align :bottom;
}
#block img{
display:block;
}
div {border: 1px solid red;width:100px;}
img {width:100px;}
<p>No fix:</p>
<div><img src="http://i.imgur.com/RECDV24.jpg" /></div>
<p>With vertical-align:bottom; on image:</p>
<div id="vAlign"><img src="http://i.imgur.com/RECDV24.jpg" /></div>
<p>With display:block; on image:</p>
<div id="block"><img src="http://i.imgur.com/RECDV24.jpg" /></div>
Explanation: why is there a gap under the image?
The gap or extra space under the image isn't a bug or issue, it is the default behaviour. The root cause is that images are replaced elements (see MDN replaced elements). This allows them to "act like image" and have their own intrinsic dimensions, aspect ratio....
Browsers compute their display property to inline but they give them a special behaviour which makes them closer to inline-block elements (as you can vertical align them, give them a height, top/bottom margin and padding, transforms ...).
This also means that:
<img> has no baseline, so when images are used in an inline formatting
context with vertical-align: baseline, the bottom of the image will be
placed on the text baseline.
(source: MDN, emphasis mine)
As browsers by default compute the vertical-align property to baseline, this is the default behaviour. The following image shows where the baseline is located on text:
(Image source)
Baseline aligned elements need to keep space for the descenders that extend below the baseline (like j, p, g ...) as you can see in the above image. In this configuration, the bottom of the image is aligned on the baseline as you can see in this example:
div{border:1px solid red;font-size:30px;}
img{width:100px;height:auto;}
<div>
<img src="http://i.imgur.com/RECDV24.jpg" />jpq are letters with descender
</div>
This is why the default behaviour of the <img> tag creates a gap at the bottom of it's container and why changing the vertical-align property or the display property removes it as in the following demo:
div {width: 100px;border: 1px solid red;}
img {width: 100px;height: auto;}
.block img{
display:block;
}
.bottom img{
vertical-align:bottom;
}
<p>Default:</p>
<div>
<img src="http://i.imgur.com/RECDV24.jpg" />
</div>
<p>With display:block;</p>
<div class="block">
<img src="http://i.imgur.com/RECDV24.jpg" />
</div>
<p>With vertical-align:bottom;</p>
<div class="bottom">
<img src="http://i.imgur.com/RECDV24.jpg" />
</div>
One can also nullify parent's line height:
#wrapper {
line-height: 0;
}
All fixes: http://jsfiddle.net/FaPFv/
All you have to do is assign this property:
img {
display: block;
}
The images by default have this property:
img {
display: inline;
}
You can use several methods for this issue like
Using line-height
#wrapper { line-height: 0px; }
Using display: flex
#wrapper { display: flex; }
#wrapper { display: inline-flex; }
Using display: block, table, flex and inherit
#wrapper img { display: block; }
#wrapper img { display: table; }
#wrapper img { display: flex; }
#wrapper img { display: inherit; }
I used line-height:0 and it works fine for me.
I found it works great using display:block; on the image and vertical-align:top; on the text.
.imagebox {
width:200px;
float:left;
height:88px;
position:relative;
background-color: #999;
}
.container {
width:600px;
height:176px;
background-color: #666;
position:relative;
overflow:hidden;
}
.text {
color: #000;
font-size: 11px;
font-family: robotomeduim, sans-serif;
vertical-align:top;
}
.imagebox img{ display:block;}
<div class="container">
<div class="imagebox">
<img src="http://machdiamonds.com/n69xvs.jpg" /> <span class="text">Image title</span>
</div>
<div class="imagebox">
<img src="http://machdiamonds.com/n69xvs.jpg" /> <span class="text">Image title</span>
</div>
<div class="imagebox">
<img src="http://machdiamonds.com/n69xvs.jpg" /> <span class="text">Image title</span>
</div>
<div class="imagebox">
<img src="http://machdiamonds.com/n69xvs.jpg" /> <span class="text">Image title</span>
</div>
<div class="imagebox">
<img src="http://machdiamonds.com/n69xvs.jpg" /> <span class="text">Image title</span>
</div>
<div class="imagebox">
<img src="http://machdiamonds.com/n69xvs.jpg" /> <span class="text">Image title</span>
</div>
</div>
or you can edit the code a JS FIDDLE
I just added float:left to div and it worked
You can also set overflow: hidden; for the container, and increase the height of the image to > 100%. height: 100%;
In this fiddle : http://jsfiddle.net/H4F8H/16/
I'm attempting to center two divs by wrapping an outer div and centering it :
<div style="margin-left:auto;margin-right:auto;">
But the divs are remaining left aligned. How can I center these divs on page ?
fiddle code :
HTML :
<div style="margin-left:auto;margin-right:auto;">
<div id="block">
<img height="50" style="max-width: 50px;background-position: top left;" src="http://socialmediababe.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/12/administrator.jpg" />
<div style="font-size:20px;font-weight:bold;">
Test
</div>
<div>
Google
</div>
</div>
<div id="block">
<img height="50" style="max-width: 50px;background-position: top left;" src="http://socialmediababe.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/12/administrator.jpg" />
<div style="font-size:20px;font-weight:bold;">
Test
</div>
<div>
Google
</div>
</div>
</div>
CSS :
*{
margin:0;
padding:0;
}
#block {
margin-right:100px;
border-width: 2px;
border-color: #4682B4;
background-color: WHITE;
width: 100px;
text-align: center;
line-height:30px;
padding:3px 0;
float:left;
}
img{
float:left;
}
#block:hover {
background-color: #C2DFFF ;
}
div is a block level element by default so it will take up 100% of horizontal space if you do not assign some width to it, so you need to assign some width to your container
<div style="margin-left:auto;margin-right:auto; width: 300px;">
Here, you can just set the width accordingly. Also avoid using inline CSS.
Your CSS is lil sloppy, for example margin-right:100px; is not required, also, you can use shorthand like
margin: 0 auto; = margin-left:auto; margin-right:auto;
Demo (Added a red border just to show the boundaries)
Note: You are floating your elements, so make sure you clear your floats either by using <div style="clear: both;"></div> which I've already done in the demo provided, else you can also use the snippet below to self clear the parent like
.clear:after {
display: table;
clear: both;
content: "";
}
A couple things I want to point out in this post:
You have set Id="block" in two different instances. Id's are meant to be unique. If you want a reusable identifier you should be using classes.
Inline styling should be avoided when possible. In this case there is no need to set inline styling on the parent div.
There is more then one way to center div's
I am going to leave this link here: http://thenewcode.com/723/Seven-Ways-of-Centering-With-CSS
This would be my solution:
html:
<div class="container">
<div class="block">
<span>Test</span>
</div>
<div class="block">
<span>Test 2</span>
</div>
</div>
css:
.container {
display: flex;
justify-content: center;
align-items: center;
}
.block {
display: flex;
background: grey;
width: 30%;
height: 200px;
border: 1px solid #777;
margin: 5px;
}
Give a width to that container.
#outerdiv{
margin-left:auto;margin-right:auto;
width:500px;
}
<div align="center">
<!-- -staff ->
</div>
margin:auto; doesn't work unless the width is specified...
<div style="margin:auto;width:100px;">
your content here. [Replace the width with your choice]
</div>
Giving width and margin auto will centralise the content in specified width.
<div style="margin-left:auto;margin-right:auto;width:400px;">//give variable width here..Normally 1000 to 1018..
<div id="block">
<img height="50" style="max-width: 50px;background-position: top left;" src="http://socialmediababe.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/12/administrator.jpg" />
<div style="font-size:20px;font-weight:bold;">
Test
</div>
<div>
Google
</div>
</div>
<div id="block">
<img height="50" style="max-width: 50px;background-position: top left;" src="http://socialmediababe.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/12/administrator.jpg" />
<div style="font-size:20px;font-weight:bold;">
Test
</div>
<div>
Google
</div>
</div>
</div>
Like this
DEMO
CSS
.container{
width:960px;
margin:0 auto;
text-align:center;
border:1px solid red;
}
I have a container DIV with a fixed height and width (275x1000px). In this DIV I want to put multiple floating DIVs each with a width of 300px, and have a horizontal (x-axis) scrollbar appear to allow the user to scroll left and right to view everything.
This is my CSS so far:
div#container {
height: 275px;
width: 1000px;
overflow-x: auto;
overflow-y: hidden;
max-height: 275px;
}
div#container div.block {
float: left;
margin: 3px 90px 0 3px;
}
The problem is that the floating DIVs will not continue past the width of the container. After putting three of the floating DIV's they will continue on beneath. If I change overflow-y to auto, then the vertical scrollbar appears and I can scroll down.
How can I change this to make the floating DIVs continue on without going beneath each other?
div#container {
height: 275px;
width: 1000px;
overflow: auto;
white-space: nowrap;
}
div#container span.block {
width: 300px;
display: inline-block;
}
The trick here is only elements that behave as inline by default will behave properly when set to inline-block in Internet Explorer, so the inner containers need to be <span> instead of <div>.
#row {
white-space: nowrap; /* important */
overflow: auto;
}
.items {
display: inline-block;
}
<div id="row">
<div class="items">
<img src="//placehold.it/200/100" alt="item 1" />
</div>
<div class="items">
<img src="//placehold.it/200/100" alt="item 2" />
</div>
<div class="items">
<img src="//placehold.it/200/100" alt="item 3" />
</div>
<div class="items">
<img src="//placehold.it/200/100" alt="item 4" />
</div>
<div class="items">
<img src="//placehold.it/200/100" alt="item 5" />
</div>
<div class="items">
<img src="//placehold.it/200/100" alt="item 6" />
</div>
<div class="items">
<img src="//placehold.it/200/100" alt="item 7" />
</div>
<div class="items">
<img src="//placehold.it/200/100" alt="item 8" />
</div>
<div class="items">
<img src="//placehold.it/200/100" alt="item 9" />
</div>
<div class="items">
<img src="//placehold.it/200/100" alt="item 10" />
</div>
</div>
The trick here is the "white-space: nowrap" property of the parent which simply tells all it's child elements to continue horizontally and the "display: inline-block" property of it's children. You don't need to add any other property to make this work.
JS Fiddle: http://jsfiddle.net/2c4jfetf/
You need an extra div with a large width to contain the blocks, then they will extend wider than the container div and not drop down to a new line.
The HTML:
<div id="container">
<div id="width">
<div class="block">
<!-- contents of block -->
</div>
<div class="block">
<!-- contents of block -->
</div>
<div class="block">
<!-- contents of block -->
</div>
<!-- more blocks here -->
</div>
</div>
The CSS:
#container {
height: 275px;
width: 1000px;
overflow-x: auto;
overflow-y: hidden;
max-height: 275px;
}
#container #width {
width:2000px; /* make this the width you need for x number of blocks */
}
#container div.block {
float: left;
margin: 3px 90px 0 3px;
}
Wrap your floated divs in another div with the wider width.
<div style="width:230px;overflow-x:auto;background-color:#ccc;">
<div style="width:400px">
<div style="height:100px;width:100px;float:left;border:1px solid #000;"></div>
<div style="height:100px;width:100px;float:left;border:1px solid #000;"></div>
<div style="height:100px;width:100px;float:left;border:1px solid #000;"></div>
</div>
</div>
The table solution should work very well.
If you don't want to use tables, you can also put all .block divs in another div inside the #container and give that "in-between-div" a fixed - calculated - width using javascript after loading the page.
Of course if you already know how many .blocks you have / if the number is fixed, you can give the "in-between-div" a fixed width using css.
It sounds like you are doing gallery with div's?
What exactly are you using the divs for?
It may be easier to use a ul/li with spans inside of the li to get the same effect without all the headaches of floating divs.
Use:
div#container {
overflow: auto;
}
Or add a clearing div below the three divs with the style:
{
clear: both
}
Put the divs you want to scroll in a table like so:
<div style='width:1000;border:2 solid red;overflow-x:auto'>
<table><tr>
<td><div style='width:300;height:200;border:1 solid black'>Cell 1 </div></td>
<td><div style='width:300;height:200;border:1 solid black'>Cell 2 </div></td>
<td><div style='width:300;height:200;border:1 solid black'>Cell 3 </div></td>
<td><div style='width:300;height:200;border:1 solid black'>Cell 4 </div></td>
<td><div style='width:300;height:200;border:1 solid black'>Cell 5 </div></td>
</tr></table>
</div>
Edit:
I tried 3 of these suggested solutions - they all work fine in Google Chrome - but the first one (container1) doesn't work in IE (go figure) - so the SPAN solution gets my vote :-) :
<html>
<body>
<style>
div#container1
{
height: 275px;
width: 100%;
overflow: auto;
white-space: nowrap;
border:2 solid red;
}
div#container1 div.block
{
width: 300px;
height: 200px;
display: inline-block;
border: 1 solid black;
}
div#container2
{
height: 275px;
width: 100%;
overflow: auto;
white-space: nowrap;
border:2 solid red;
}
div#container2 span.block
{
width: 300px;
height: 200px;
display: inline-block;
border: 1 solid black;
}
div#container3
{
height: 275px;
width: 100%;
overflow: auto;
white-space: nowrap;
border:2 solid red;
}
div#container3 div.block
{
width: 300px;
height: 200px;
display: inline-block;
border: 1 solid black;
}
</style>
<p>
<div id='container1'>
<div class='block'>Cell 1 </div>
<div class='block'>Cell 2 </div>
<div class='block'>Cell 3 </div>
<div class='block'>Cell 4 </div>
<div class='block'>Cell 5 </div>
</div>
<p>
<div id='container2'>
<span class='block'>Cell 1 </span>
<span class='block'>Cell 2 </span>
<span class='block'>Cell 3 </span>
<span class='block'>Cell 4 </span>
<span class='block'>Cell 5 </span>
</div>
<p>
<div id='container3'>
<table><tr>
<td><div class='block'>Cell 1 </div></td>
<td><div class='block'>Cell 2 </div></td>
<td><div class='block'>Cell 3 </div></td>
<td><div class='block'>Cell 4 </div></td>
<td><div class='block'>Cell 5 </div></td>
</tr></table>
</div>
</body>
</html>
Edit 2:
I ran this test page through browsershots.org, to see how different browsers handle it.
Conclusion: Browser compatibility sucks. :-)
http://browsershots.org/http://dot-dash-dot.com/files/test_div2.htm
The table solution worked more often - but the span option (which is cleaner) only broke on browsers I've never heard of. :-)
My Ex:
div width: 850px
gridview
templatedcolumn
ItemTemplate
<span class="buttonspanlt"></span><asp:Button ID="imgEditSave" runat="server" Text="Edit SubStatus" CssClass="buttoncenter" OnClick="imgEditSave_OnClick"/><span class="buttonspanrt"></span>
<span style="display:none;float:left;clear:left;" id="spangrdCancel" runat="server"><span class="buttonspanlt"></span><asp:Button ID="imgCancel" runat="server" Text="Cancel" class="buttoncenter"/><span class="buttonspanrt"></span></span>
end ItemTemplate
end templatedcolumn
end gridview
end div
the button has left middle(actual button) right spans which where not floating as there was outer div with fixed width.
I had to use additional div with width 140px outside the button , inside the itemtemplate then it worked.
Hope this helps!!!
Thank You
Harish