I don't know why, but clicking an anchor link to a .themepack file in Edge causes Edge to change the file extension to ".htm" instead, but only on my site. The .themepack files available on the Microsoft gallery do not behave this way.
Given this, I'm sure it must be a server configuration, but I can't determine how to fix it. At first it was trying to display the .themepack (it's a cab format file) as if it was text, right in the browser. I added the html5 attribute "download" to my <a> tag and that prompted for download, but it still tries to name it as .htm.
Demo of issue:
https://soulcon.com/downloads contains a link to https://soulcon.com/img/SOULCON.themepack
This either tries to show as text, or if you use the page to click the link containing the "download" attribute, it downloads as a .htm file.
Links at https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/help/13768/windows-desktop-themes do not cause this.
Considering this site is on managed wordpress by GoDaddy, I don't have any true direct access to the server.
You need to associate the .themepack file extension with the application/octet-stream MIME type on the server. Ask a support person at your hosting provider how to do that. It may be doable with an .htaccess file.
Worked round the issue by zipping the file.
Related
My .css file was working fine but today I noticed the website is not acting based on CSS rules so I tried to inspect the rues on browser and surprisingly I noticed the CSS file is empty!
I tried to open the style.css file in Notepad++ and this is how it looks like
I also tried to open the file in Bracket editor which I got this message
Can you please let me know if there is a way to fix this issue and retrieve the CSS rules from these NULs?
If your file is indeed corrupted, and you have site backups as part of your hosting plan, restore your website to a point where your file worked. (Many web hosts that offer backups will store 30 days' worth, depending on your hosting plan.)
If you don't have such a hosting plan, go to Wayback Machine and search for your URL. Pick a snapshot date when your site was working. Look in your source code and find a link to Wayback's cached version of your CSS file. Copy your CSS from there.
Alternatively, try searching for your website in Google. Unless you have noarchive tags on your site, there should be a link right in your search results to access a cached version of your site. If Google last crawled your site before your file got corrupted, you should be able to access your cached CSS file through the source code (or a link in Dev Tools).
Finally, check out this thread:
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/brackets-dev/4hEn8qs9MKs
You may be able to open the file in a third code editor and save it as UTF-8.
I'm using an Azure storage account to store images and files as block blobs.
Browsers seem to be able to serve images correctly without an extension as long as the content type property is set. For example this will show up as a normal image: https://navhomeprod.blob.core.windows.net/facilityroomphotos/12
Would it be better for any reason to save the blob name with an extension: https://navhomeprod.blob.core.windows.net/facilityroomphotos/12.jpg
The reason I chose not to have extensions is so that I didn't need an extension field in the database, I could just use ids to serve the images.
Simple answer is no. You don't really need to specify a file extension in order to serve images. The catch here is that content type should be set properly. Content type tells browsers how to serve the content.
Even if you have the extension set but content type not set, some browsers will not be able to serve the content in that case. I have seen many questions where Chrome prompted to download an image file instead of showing the content inline if the content-type of that image file not set properly.
One use case that I could think of where the file extension will be handy is when you download these files on your local computer. Based on the file extension, your local computer would decide the application to use to view/edit these files.
Our sitecore developer quit suddenly and I need to make a small change. I'm a front end developer and have no real experience with the sitecore backend. I just need to add some CSS styles to the main style.css file or I need to add my own file. I've got full access to the CMS, but no access to the hosting account. I'm trying to find the main CSS file through the CMS browser, but I'm not having any luck.
Can you help me either:
A) Locate the main CSS file so I can add some classes (preferred)
B) Add my own link in the tag to my own CSS file hosted on another domain
C) Use the home page link to CSS file where I can add some classes
A note about OPTION C... I'm in the CMS and I see there is a system folder and in that a CSS folder where I can add a custom.css file. Then I go to the home page and I can actually call that CSS file from a field in the home page BUT, when the site loads, even though it's calling this file, it comes over as .aspx and it's blank so no styles I set are applied.
you can find the location of file as suggested by Maciej or use firebug or any other developer tools to find the location of main style.css. Once you get the location you can browser the physical file on server by going to Sitecore start menu -> All Application ->File explorer . Download file using File explorer make your changes and upload it back, make sure you check override existing file when you upload. Also make sure you upload file to delivery server once you test your changes, typically you will be accessing Sitecore using Authoring Server so instance you are accessing might not be same as CD server.
You could right-click in your browser to figure out where your css is coming from relative to the server root. Although not completely fool-proof, this method may give you a quick answer.
According to documentation for sitecore 6.2, style sheet location is determined by the developer so it could be anywhere that the developer has chosen.
Take a look at this answer for more details.
You should also be wary of how code gets built and deployed. Most Sitecore developers have very specific methodologies for how they include code (including front end) in their solutions.
Make sure you're aware of any deployment methodologies your developer used, so that your work doesn't get overwritten in a future deployment.
Did they use a source control management solution (like Git or TFS)? Did they use an automated tool to do deployments (like Octopus Deploy)?
If you can find main CSS file in physical location, you can update the file with new CSS styles.
If you want to add your own CSS as an additional CSS style, you might need to create a new template for css link and use that template when you create new page with your own CSS.
Just for future reference, by default the location of the used css files is described in Sitecore.config like this:
<!-- WEB SITE STYLESHEET
CSS file for HTML content of Sitecore database.
The file pointed to by WebStylesheet setting is automatically included in Html and Rich Text fields.
By using it, you can make the content of HTML fields look the same as the actual Web Site
-->
<setting name="WebStylesheet" value="/default.css"/>
Paths are relative to the root of your sitecore installation, you can find default.css in the root of the sitecore application on the webserver.
In Chrome Browser, Inspect element and select source tab
and open required css file and make changes.
Here's what I would like to accomplish:
I have a file stored in Windows Azure Blob Storage (or for that matter any file which is not on my web server but accessible via a URL).
I want to force download a file without actually downloading the file on my web server first i.e. browser should automatically fetch the file from this external URL and prompts the user to download it.
Possible Solutions Explored:
Here's what I have explored so far (and why they won't work):
Using something like FileContentResult as described here Returning a file to View/Download in ASP.NET MVC to download the file. This solution would require me to fetch the contents on my server and then stream from my server to the browser. For this reason this solution won't work.
Using HTML 5 download attribute: HTML 5 download attribute would have worked perfectly fine however the problem is that while it is really a very neat solution, it is not supported in all browsers.
Changing the file's content type: Another thing I could do (at least for the files that I own) to change the content type property of the file to something that the browser wouldn't understand and thus would be forced to download the file. This might work in some browsers however not in all as IE is smart enough to go beyond the content type and sees the file's content to determine the content type. Furthermore if I don't own the files, then I won't have access to changing the content type of the file.
Simply put, in my controller action I should be able to specify the URL of the file and somehow browser should force download the file.
Is this something which can be accomplished? If yes, then any ideas how I could accomplish this?
Simply put, in my controller action I should be able to specify the URL of the file and somehow browser should force download the file [without exposing the URL of the file to the client].
You can't. If the final URL is to remain hidden, your server must serve the data, so your server must download the file from the URL.
Your client can't download a file it can't get the URL to.
You can create file transfer WCF service (REST) which will stream your content from blob storage or from other sources through your file managers to client browser directly by URL.
https://{service}/FileTransfer/DownloadFile/{id, synonym, filename etc}
Blob path won't be exposed, web application will be free from file transfer issues.
Is there a way to get the select file dialog box open and putting the location of the file into a textbox without ever uploading the file?
ETA I'm using VB.NET in a web page. By using the asp:fileupload tag I can get the file location
_fudFileLocation.PostedFile.FileName_
But how do I prevent the file from being uploaded at all. We don't need it, just the file location. (The files are on a shared drive so if it's M:\documents\todayslunch.pdf for person A, it's the same for person B.)
You do not get access to the full filepath in the browser because of security.
If this was possible, one could get the full layout of the computer of anyone going to any website.
System.Web.HttpPostedFile.FileName gets the fully qualified name of the file on the client which includes the directory path.