I have a custom FleuntValidation validationrule that checks if a Guid is valid;
public static class GuidValidator
{
private static Regex isGuid = new Regex(#"^(\{){0,1}[0-9a-fA-F]{8}\-[0-9a-fA-F]{4}\-[0-9a-fA-F]{4}\-[0-9a-fA-F]{4}\-[0-9a-fA-F]{12}(\}){0,1}$", RegexOptions.Compiled);
public static bool IsGuid(string candidate)
{
if (candidate != null)
{
if (isGuid.IsMatch(candidate))
{
return true;
}
}
return false;
}
}
I want to use this to check a Guid Property for a valid Guid and then return a custom error message.
RuleFor(x => x.ShiftId).Must(guid => GuidValidator.IsGuid(guid.ToString())).WithMessage("StopShift.ShiftId.GuidNotValid()");
However, my rule does not get hit, because i guess the Guid is not valid and some built in check runs before it. How would i disable the built-in check so my custom rule gets reached?
It depends on what your stack looks like. A Guid will not be instantiated with an "invalid" value.
If you want to cater for a use case where the value in question can either be a valid or invalid Guid I suggest you model it as a string.
e.g.
[Validator(typeof(FooRequestValidator))]
public class FooRequest
{
public string Bar { get; set; }
}
public class FooRequestValidator : AbstractValidator<FooRequest>
{
public FooRequestValidator()
{
RuleFor(x => x.Bar)
.Must(ValidateBar).WithErrorCode("Not a guid");
}
private bool ValidateBar(string bar)
{
return Guid.TryParse(bar, out var result);
}
}
Property in the class is a non-nullable Guid.
public Guid ProductId {get;set;}
Here is what I use
RuleFor(product => product.ProductId).Must(BeAValidGuid).When(product => product.ProductId != null);
With the Custom Rule
private bool BeAValidGuid(Guid unValidatedGuid)
{
try
{
if(unValidatedGuid != Guid.Empty && unValidatedGuid != null )
{
if (Guid.TryParse(unValidatedGuid.ToString(), out Guid validatedGuid))
{
return true;
}
else
{
return false;
}
}
else
{
return false;
}
}
catch (Exception)
{
throw;
}
}
I am working with ASP.NET MVC4 and My requirement is that the date selected should be greater than or equal to today's date. I have created a custom validation attribute. It is working fine for server side but not for client side. Here is my code so far:
[AttributeUsage(AttributeTargets.Property)]
public class DateGreaterThanTodayAttribute : ValidationAttribute, IClientValidatable
{
private readonly bool allowTodayDate;
public DateGreaterThanTodayAttribute( bool allowTodayDate = false)
{
this.allowTodayDate = allowTodayDate;
}
protected override ValidationResult IsValid(object value, ValidationContext validationContext)
{
if (value == null || !(value is DateTime))
{
return ValidationResult.Success;
}
// Compare values
if ((DateTime)value > DateTime.Today)
{
return ValidationResult.Success;
}
if (this.allowTodayDate && (DateTime)value == DateTime.Today)
{
return ValidationResult.Success;
}
return new ValidationResult(FormatErrorMessage(validationContext.DisplayName));
}
public IEnumerable<ModelClientValidationRule> GetClientValidationRules(ModelMetadata metadata, ControllerContext context)
{
var rule = new ModelClientValidationRule
{
ErrorMessage = this.ErrorMessageString,
ValidationType = "istodaydate"
};
rule.ValidationParameters["allowtodaydate"] = this.allowTodayDate;
yield return rule;
}
}
My client side code is:
// Greater Than Today dates
$.validator.unobtrusive.adapters.add(
'istodaydate', ['allowtodaydate'], function (options) {
options.rules['istodaydate'] = options.params.allowtodaydate;
options.messages['istodaydate'] = options.message;
});
$.validator.addMethod("istodaydate", function (value, element, param) {
if (!value) return true;
return (param.allowtodaydate) ?
$.datepicker.parseDate('dd/mm/yy', new Date()) <= $.datepicker.parseDate('dd/mm/yy', value) :
$.datepicker.parseDate('dd/mm/yy', new Date()) < $.datepicker.parseDate('dd/mm/yy', value);
}, '');
And my Model is
[DateGreaterThanToday(true, ErrorMessageResourceType = typeof(APMS.Resources.Errors), ErrorMessageResourceName = "StartDateAfterEndDate")]
[Required(ErrorMessageResourceType = typeof(Resources.QCP.Resource), ErrorMessageResourceName = "SurveyInterval_FromDateRequired")]
public DateTime FromDate { get; set; }
This is the simplified model :
public class Person {
public int Id;
public string Name;
}
public class Task {
public int Id;
public int PersonId;
public DateTime StartDate;
[GreaterThan("StartDate")]
public DateTime EndDate;
}
To validate the EndDate >= StartDate, i write general GreaterThanAttribute. The server side is trivial, but i have problem on client side validation.
My GreaterThanAttribute got the other property (ex: "StartDate") from constructor, then i pass this other property name to javascript as validation rule. But it won't work, because the JS will not found this element, because MVC will render & named it as "Task.StartDate", not "StartDate".
My question is, how i can get the prefix which will be used by the controller to render my model inside IClientValidatable.GetClientValidationRules() ?
Thanks
Here's how you could implement it:
public class GreaterThanAttribute : ValidationAttribute, IClientValidatable
{
private readonly string _otherProperty;
public GreaterThanAttribute(string otherProperty)
{
_otherProperty = otherProperty;
}
public override string FormatErrorMessage(string name)
{
return string.Format(CultureInfo.CurrentCulture, ErrorMessageString, name, _otherProperty);
}
protected override ValidationResult IsValid(object value, ValidationContext validationContext)
{
var property = validationContext.ObjectType.GetProperty(_otherProperty);
if (property == null)
{
return new ValidationResult(
string.Format(
CultureInfo.CurrentCulture,
"unknown property {0}",
_otherProperty
)
);
}
var otherValue = (DateTime)property.GetValue(validationContext.ObjectInstance, null);
var thisValue = (DateTime)value;
if (thisValue <= otherValue)
{
return new ValidationResult(FormatErrorMessage(validationContext.DisplayName));
}
return null;
}
public IEnumerable<ModelClientValidationRule> GetClientValidationRules(ModelMetadata metadata, ControllerContext context)
{
var rule = new ModelClientValidationRule();
rule.ErrorMessage = FormatErrorMessage(metadata.GetDisplayName());
rule.ValidationType = "greaterthandate";
rule.ValidationParameters["other"] = "*." + _otherProperty;
yield return rule;
}
}
and on the client side:
(function ($) {
var getModelPrefix = function (fieldName) {
return fieldName.substr(0, fieldName.lastIndexOf('.') + 1);
};
var appendModelPrefix = function (value, prefix) {
if (value.indexOf('*.') === 0) {
value = value.replace('*.', prefix);
}
return value;
};
$.validator.unobtrusive.adapters.add('greaterthandate', ['other'], function (options) {
var prefix = getModelPrefix(options.element.name),
other = options.params.other,
fullOtherName = appendModelPrefix(other, prefix),
element = $(options.form).find(':input[name=' + fullOtherName + ']')[0];
options.rules['greaterThanDate'] = element;
if (options.message) {
options.messages['greaterThanDate'] = options.message;
}
});
$.validator.addMethod('greaterThanDate', function (value, element, params) {
var otherDate = $(params).val();
var thisDate = value;
// TODO: put your custom date comparison implementation here between
// the 2 values. Be careful here. Javascript date handling is culture dependent
// so you might need to account for that when building your js Date instances
return false;
}, '');
})(jQuery);
This has already been done. I suggest you use FoolProof validation. If you do not want to, you can at least check out their soure code. Here's a link
I am trying to find out how to solve the problem for serializing a type of bool from a camel case string.
I have the following xml
<Root>
<BoolElement>
False
</BoolElement>
</Root>
and the following class
[XmlRoot("Root")]
public class RootObj{
[XmlElement("BoolElement")]
public bool BoolElement{get;set;}
}
this will produce an error.
If I use the same class and rename the "False" to "false" it will work. The problem is that I can't edit the xml.
Does anyone know how can I solve this?
You could use a backing field to aid for the deserialization of this invalid XML (I say invalid because according to the xsd:boolean schema False is an invalid value):
[XmlRoot("Root")]
public class RootObj
{
[XmlElement("BoolElement")]
public string BackingBoolElement
{
set
{
BoolElement = bool.Parse(value.ToLower());
}
get
{
return BoolElement.ToString();
}
}
[XmlIgnore]
public bool BoolElement { get; set; }
}
False is not a valid value for an xsd:boolean (but as you note false and 0 are) - if you cannot change the source data, then you could have a separate property purely for XML serialisation:
[XmlRoot("Root")]
public class RootObj{
[XmlElement("BoolElement")]
public string BoolElementForSerialization
{
get
{
return (this.BoolElement ? "True" : "False");
}
set
{
this.BoolElement = (string.Compare(value, "false", StringComparison.OrdinalIgnoreCase) != 0);
}
}
[XmlIgnore]
public bool BoolElement{get;set;}
}
I created a new Boolean type that can deserialize from any string. It may not be perfect but it suited my needs at the time.
For the class you want to use simply change the data type from bool to SerializableBoolean:
[XmlRoot("Root")]
public class RootObj{
[XmlElement("BoolElement")]
public SerializableBoolean BoolElement{get;set;}
}
You can then use the BoolElement property like any normal bool data type:
RootObj myObj = new RootObj();
if (myObj.BoolElement) { ... }
Here is the code for the SerializableBoolean class, note this code only handles deserializing, serializing to xml wasn't required for my purposes and so not implemented.
[System.Diagnostics.DebuggerDisplay("{Value}")]
public struct SerializableBoolean: System.Xml.Serialization.IXmlSerializable
{
private bool Value { get; set; }
public override bool Equals(object obj)
{
if (obj is string stringBoolean)
{
bool.TryParse(stringBoolean, out bool boolean);
return Value == boolean;
}
else if (obj is bool boolean)
{
return Value == boolean;
}
else if (obj is SerializableBoolean serializableBoolean)
{
return Value == serializableBoolean.Value;
}
else
{
return Value == Convert.ToBoolean(obj);
}
}
public override int GetHashCode()
{
return -1937169414 + Value.GetHashCode();
}
public XmlSchema GetSchema()
{
throw new NotImplementedException();
}
public void ReadXml(XmlReader reader)
{
Value = Convert.ToBoolean(reader.ReadElementContentAsString());
}
public void WriteXml(XmlWriter writer)
{
throw new NotImplementedException();
}
public static bool operator ==(SerializableBoolean obj1, bool obj2)
{
return obj1.Value.Equals(obj2);
}
public static bool operator !=(SerializableBoolean obj1, bool obj2)
{
return !obj1.Value.Equals(obj2);
}
public static implicit operator SerializableBoolean(string value)
{
return new SerializableBoolean() { Value = Convert.ToBoolean(value) };
}
public static implicit operator SerializableBoolean(bool value)
{
return new SerializableBoolean() { Value = value };
}
public static implicit operator bool(SerializableBoolean b)
{
return b.Value;
}
}
I'm using ASP.NET MVC and I'd like all user entered string fields to be trimmed before they're inserted into the database. And since I have many data entry forms, I'm looking for an elegant way to trim all strings instead of explicitly trimming every user supplied string value. I'm interested to know how and when people are trimming strings.
I thought about perhaps creating a custom model binder and trimming any string values there...that way, all my trimming logic is contained in one place. Is this a good approach? Are there any code samples that do this?
public class TrimModelBinder : DefaultModelBinder
{
protected override void SetProperty(ControllerContext controllerContext,
ModelBindingContext bindingContext,
System.ComponentModel.PropertyDescriptor propertyDescriptor, object value)
{
if (propertyDescriptor.PropertyType == typeof(string))
{
var stringValue = (string)value;
if (!string.IsNullOrWhiteSpace(stringValue))
{
value = stringValue.Trim();
}
else
{
value = null;
}
}
base.SetProperty(controllerContext, bindingContext,
propertyDescriptor, value);
}
}
How about this code?
ModelBinders.Binders.DefaultBinder = new TrimModelBinder();
Set global.asax Application_Start event.
This is #takepara same resolution but as an IModelBinder instead of DefaultModelBinder so that adding the modelbinder in global.asax is through
ModelBinders.Binders.Add(typeof(string),new TrimModelBinder());
The class:
public class TrimModelBinder : IModelBinder
{
public object BindModel(ControllerContext controllerContext,
ModelBindingContext bindingContext)
{
ValueProviderResult valueResult = bindingContext.ValueProvider.GetValue(bindingContext.ModelName);
if (valueResult== null || valueResult.AttemptedValue==null)
return null;
else if (valueResult.AttemptedValue == string.Empty)
return string.Empty;
return valueResult.AttemptedValue.Trim();
}
}
based on #haacked post:
http://haacked.com/archive/2011/03/19/fixing-binding-to-decimals.aspx
One improvement to #takepara answer.
Somewere in project:
public class NoTrimAttribute : Attribute { }
In TrimModelBinder class change
if (propertyDescriptor.PropertyType == typeof(string))
to
if (propertyDescriptor.PropertyType == typeof(string) && !propertyDescriptor.Attributes.Cast<object>().Any(a => a.GetType() == typeof(NoTrimAttribute)))
and you can mark properties to be excluded from trimming with [NoTrim] attribute.
In ASP.Net Core 2 this worked for me. I'm using the [FromBody] attribute in my controllers and JSON input. To override the string handling in the JSON deserialization I registered my own JsonConverter:
services.AddMvcCore()
.AddJsonOptions(options =>
{
options.SerializerSettings.Converters.Insert(0, new TrimmingStringConverter());
})
And this is the converter:
public class TrimmingStringConverter : JsonConverter
{
public override bool CanRead => true;
public override bool CanWrite => false;
public override bool CanConvert(Type objectType) => objectType == typeof(string);
public override object ReadJson(JsonReader reader, Type objectType,
object existingValue, JsonSerializer serializer)
{
if (reader.Value is string value)
{
return value.Trim();
}
return reader.Value;
}
public override void WriteJson(JsonWriter writer, object value,
JsonSerializer serializer)
{
throw new NotImplementedException();
}
}
With improvements in C# 6, you can now write a very compact model binder that will trim all string inputs:
public class TrimStringModelBinder : IModelBinder
{
public object BindModel(ControllerContext controllerContext, ModelBindingContext bindingContext)
{
var value = bindingContext.ValueProvider.GetValue(bindingContext.ModelName);
var attemptedValue = value?.AttemptedValue;
return string.IsNullOrWhiteSpace(attemptedValue) ? attemptedValue : attemptedValue.Trim();
}
}
You need to include this line somewhere in Application_Start() in your Global.asax.cs file to use the model binder when binding strings:
ModelBinders.Binders.Add(typeof(string), new TrimStringModelBinder());
I find it is better to use a model binder like this, rather than overriding the default model binder, because then it will be used whenever you are binding a string, whether that's directly as a method argument or as a property on a model class. However, if you override the default model binder as other answers here suggest, that will only work when binding properties on models, not when you have a string as an argument to an action method
Edit: a commenter asked about dealing with the situation when a field should not be validated. My original answer was reduced to deal just with the question the OP had posed, but for those who are interested, you can deal with validation by using the following extended model binder:
public class TrimStringModelBinder : IModelBinder
{
public object BindModel(ControllerContext controllerContext, ModelBindingContext bindingContext)
{
var shouldPerformRequestValidation = controllerContext.Controller.ValidateRequest && bindingContext.ModelMetadata.RequestValidationEnabled;
var unvalidatedValueProvider = bindingContext.ValueProvider as IUnvalidatedValueProvider;
var value = unvalidatedValueProvider == null ?
bindingContext.ValueProvider.GetValue(bindingContext.ModelName) :
unvalidatedValueProvider.GetValue(bindingContext.ModelName, !shouldPerformRequestValidation);
var attemptedValue = value?.AttemptedValue;
return string.IsNullOrWhiteSpace(attemptedValue) ? attemptedValue : attemptedValue.Trim();
}
}
Another variant of #takepara's answer but with a different twist:
1) I prefer the opt-in "StringTrim" attribute mechanism (rather than the opt-out "NoTrim" example of #Anton).
2) An additional call to SetModelValue is required to ensure the ModelState is populated correctly and the default validation/accept/reject pattern can be used as normal, i.e. TryUpdateModel(model) to apply and ModelState.Clear() to accept all changes.
Put this in your entity/shared library:
/// <summary>
/// Denotes a data field that should be trimmed during binding, removing any spaces.
/// </summary>
/// <remarks>
/// <para>
/// Support for trimming is implmented in the model binder, as currently
/// Data Annotations provides no mechanism to coerce the value.
/// </para>
/// <para>
/// This attribute does not imply that empty strings should be converted to null.
/// When that is required you must additionally use the <see cref="System.ComponentModel.DataAnnotations.DisplayFormatAttribute.ConvertEmptyStringToNull"/>
/// option to control what happens to empty strings.
/// </para>
/// </remarks>
[AttributeUsage(AttributeTargets.Property | AttributeTargets.Field, AllowMultiple = false)]
public class StringTrimAttribute : Attribute
{
}
Then this in your MVC application/library:
/// <summary>
/// MVC model binder which trims string values decorated with the <see cref="StringTrimAttribute"/>.
/// </summary>
public class StringTrimModelBinder : IModelBinder
{
/// <summary>
/// Binds the model, applying trimming when required.
/// </summary>
public object BindModel(ControllerContext controllerContext, ModelBindingContext bindingContext)
{
// Get binding value (return null when not present)
var propertyName = bindingContext.ModelName;
var originalValueResult = bindingContext.ValueProvider.GetValue(propertyName);
if (originalValueResult == null)
return null;
var boundValue = originalValueResult.AttemptedValue;
// Trim when required
if (!String.IsNullOrEmpty(boundValue))
{
// Check for trim attribute
if (bindingContext.ModelMetadata.ContainerType != null)
{
var property = bindingContext.ModelMetadata.ContainerType.GetProperties()
.FirstOrDefault(propertyInfo => propertyInfo.Name == bindingContext.ModelMetadata.PropertyName);
if (property != null && property.GetCustomAttributes(true)
.OfType<StringTrimAttribute>().Any())
{
// Trim when attribute set
boundValue = boundValue.Trim();
}
}
}
// Register updated "attempted" value with the model state
bindingContext.ModelState.SetModelValue(propertyName, new ValueProviderResult(
originalValueResult.RawValue, boundValue, originalValueResult.Culture));
// Return bound value
return boundValue;
}
}
If you don't set the property value in the binder, even when you don't want to change anything, you will block that property from ModelState altogether! This is because you are registered as binding all string types, so it appears (in my testing) that the default binder will not do it for you then.
Extra info for anyone searching how to do this in ASP.NET Core 1.0. Logic has changed quite a lot.
I wrote a blog post about how to do it, it explains things in bit more detailed
So ASP.NET Core 1.0 solution:
Model binder to do the actual trimming
public class TrimmingModelBinder : ComplexTypeModelBinder
{
public TrimmingModelBinder(IDictionary propertyBinders) : base(propertyBinders)
{
}
protected override void SetProperty(ModelBindingContext bindingContext, string modelName, ModelMetadata propertyMetadata, ModelBindingResult result)
{
if(result.Model is string)
{
string resultStr = (result.Model as string).Trim();
result = ModelBindingResult.Success(resultStr);
}
base.SetProperty(bindingContext, modelName, propertyMetadata, result);
}
}
Also you need Model Binder Provider in the latest version, this tells that should this binder be used for this model
public class TrimmingModelBinderProvider : IModelBinderProvider
{
public IModelBinder GetBinder(ModelBinderProviderContext context)
{
if (context == null)
{
throw new ArgumentNullException(nameof(context));
}
if (context.Metadata.IsComplexType && !context.Metadata.IsCollectionType)
{
var propertyBinders = new Dictionary();
foreach (var property in context.Metadata.Properties)
{
propertyBinders.Add(property, context.CreateBinder(property));
}
return new TrimmingModelBinder(propertyBinders);
}
return null;
}
}
Then it has to be registered in Startup.cs
services.AddMvc().AddMvcOptions(options => {
options.ModelBinderProviders.Insert(0, new TrimmingModelBinderProvider());
});
In case of MVC Core
Binder:
using Microsoft.AspNetCore.Mvc.ModelBinding;
using System;
using System.Threading.Tasks;
public class TrimmingModelBinder
: IModelBinder
{
private readonly IModelBinder FallbackBinder;
public TrimmingModelBinder(IModelBinder fallbackBinder)
{
FallbackBinder = fallbackBinder ?? throw new ArgumentNullException(nameof(fallbackBinder));
}
public Task BindModelAsync(ModelBindingContext bindingContext)
{
if (bindingContext == null)
{
throw new ArgumentNullException(nameof(bindingContext));
}
var valueProviderResult = bindingContext.ValueProvider.GetValue(bindingContext.ModelName);
if (valueProviderResult != null &&
valueProviderResult.FirstValue is string str &&
!string.IsNullOrEmpty(str))
{
bindingContext.Result = ModelBindingResult.Success(str.Trim());
return Task.CompletedTask;
}
return FallbackBinder.BindModelAsync(bindingContext);
}
}
Provider:
using Microsoft.AspNetCore.Mvc.ModelBinding;
using Microsoft.AspNetCore.Mvc.ModelBinding.Binders;
using System;
public class TrimmingModelBinderProvider
: IModelBinderProvider
{
public IModelBinder GetBinder(ModelBinderProviderContext context)
{
if (context == null)
{
throw new ArgumentNullException(nameof(context));
}
if (!context.Metadata.IsComplexType && context.Metadata.ModelType == typeof(string))
{
return new TrimmingModelBinder(new SimpleTypeModelBinder(context.Metadata.ModelType));
}
return null;
}
}
Registration function:
public static void AddStringTrimmingProvider(this MvcOptions option)
{
var binderToFind = option.ModelBinderProviders
.FirstOrDefault(x => x.GetType() == typeof(SimpleTypeModelBinderProvider));
if (binderToFind == null)
{
return;
}
var index = option.ModelBinderProviders.IndexOf(binderToFind);
option.ModelBinderProviders.Insert(index, new TrimmingModelBinderProvider());
}
Register:
service.AddMvc(option => option.AddStringTrimmingProvider())
I created value providers to trim the query string parameter values and the form values. This was tested with ASP.NET Core 3 and works perfectly.
public class TrimmedFormValueProvider
: FormValueProvider
{
public TrimmedFormValueProvider(IFormCollection values)
: base(BindingSource.Form, values, CultureInfo.InvariantCulture)
{ }
public override ValueProviderResult GetValue(string key)
{
ValueProviderResult baseResult = base.GetValue(key);
string[] trimmedValues = baseResult.Values.Select(v => v?.Trim()).ToArray();
return new ValueProviderResult(new StringValues(trimmedValues));
}
}
public class TrimmedQueryStringValueProvider
: QueryStringValueProvider
{
public TrimmedQueryStringValueProvider(IQueryCollection values)
: base(BindingSource.Query, values, CultureInfo.InvariantCulture)
{ }
public override ValueProviderResult GetValue(string key)
{
ValueProviderResult baseResult = base.GetValue(key);
string[] trimmedValues = baseResult.Values.Select(v => v?.Trim()).ToArray();
return new ValueProviderResult(new StringValues(trimmedValues));
}
}
public class TrimmedFormValueProviderFactory
: IValueProviderFactory
{
public Task CreateValueProviderAsync(ValueProviderFactoryContext context)
{
if (context.ActionContext.HttpContext.Request.HasFormContentType)
context.ValueProviders.Add(new TrimmedFormValueProvider(context.ActionContext.HttpContext.Request.Form));
return Task.CompletedTask;
}
}
public class TrimmedQueryStringValueProviderFactory
: IValueProviderFactory
{
public Task CreateValueProviderAsync(ValueProviderFactoryContext context)
{
context.ValueProviders.Add(new TrimmedQueryStringValueProvider(context.ActionContext.HttpContext.Request.Query));
return Task.CompletedTask;
}
}
Then register the value provider factories in the ConfigureServices() function in Startup.cs
services.AddControllersWithViews(options =>
{
int formValueProviderFactoryIndex = options.ValueProviderFactories.IndexOf(options.ValueProviderFactories.OfType<FormValueProviderFactory>().Single());
options.ValueProviderFactories[formValueProviderFactoryIndex] = new TrimmedFormValueProviderFactory();
int queryStringValueProviderFactoryIndex = options.ValueProviderFactories.IndexOf(options.ValueProviderFactories.OfType<QueryStringValueProviderFactory>().Single());
options.ValueProviderFactories[queryStringValueProviderFactoryIndex] = new TrimmedQueryStringValueProviderFactory();
});
While reading through the excellent answers and comments above, and becoming increasingly confused, I suddenly thought, hey, I wonder if there's a jQuery solution. So for others who, like me, find ModelBinders a bit bewildering, I offer the following jQuery snippet that trims the input fields before the form gets submitted.
$('form').submit(function () {
$(this).find('input:text').each(function () {
$(this).val($.trim($(this).val()));
})
});
Late to the party, but the following is a summary of adjustments required for MVC 5.2.3 if you are to handle the skipValidation requirement of the build-in value providers.
public class TrimStringModelBinder : IModelBinder
{
public object BindModel(ControllerContext controllerContext, ModelBindingContext bindingContext)
{
// First check if request validation is required
var shouldPerformRequestValidation = controllerContext.Controller.ValidateRequest &&
bindingContext.ModelMetadata.RequestValidationEnabled;
// determine if the value provider is IUnvalidatedValueProvider, if it is, pass in the
// flag to perform request validation (e.g. [AllowHtml] is set on the property)
var unvalidatedProvider = bindingContext.ValueProvider as IUnvalidatedValueProvider;
var valueProviderResult = unvalidatedProvider?.GetValue(bindingContext.ModelName, !shouldPerformRequestValidation) ??
bindingContext.ValueProvider.GetValue(bindingContext.ModelName);
return valueProviderResult?.AttemptedValue?.Trim();
}
}
Global.asax
protected void Application_Start()
{
...
ModelBinders.Binders.Add(typeof(string), new TrimStringModelBinder());
...
}
Update: This answer is out of date for recent versions of ASP.NET Core. Use Bassem's answer instead.
For ASP.NET Core, replace the ComplexTypeModelBinderProvider with a provider that trims strings.
In your startup code ConfigureServices method, add this:
services.AddMvc()
.AddMvcOptions(s => {
s.ModelBinderProviders[s.ModelBinderProviders.TakeWhile(p => !(p is ComplexTypeModelBinderProvider)).Count()] = new TrimmingModelBinderProvider();
})
Define TrimmingModelBinderProvider like this:
/// <summary>
/// Used in place of <see cref="ComplexTypeModelBinderProvider"/> to trim beginning and ending whitespace from user input.
/// </summary>
class TrimmingModelBinderProvider : IModelBinderProvider
{
class TrimmingModelBinder : ComplexTypeModelBinder
{
public TrimmingModelBinder(IDictionary<ModelMetadata, IModelBinder> propertyBinders) : base(propertyBinders) { }
protected override void SetProperty(ModelBindingContext bindingContext, string modelName, ModelMetadata propertyMetadata, ModelBindingResult result)
{
var value = result.Model as string;
if (value != null)
result = ModelBindingResult.Success(value.Trim());
base.SetProperty(bindingContext, modelName, propertyMetadata, result);
}
}
public IModelBinder GetBinder(ModelBinderProviderContext context)
{
if (context.Metadata.IsComplexType && !context.Metadata.IsCollectionType) {
var propertyBinders = new Dictionary<ModelMetadata, IModelBinder>();
for (var i = 0; i < context.Metadata.Properties.Count; i++) {
var property = context.Metadata.Properties[i];
propertyBinders.Add(property, context.CreateBinder(property));
}
return new TrimmingModelBinder(propertyBinders);
}
return null;
}
}
The ugly part of this is the copy and paste of the GetBinder logic from ComplexTypeModelBinderProvider, but there doesn't seem to be any hook to let you avoid this.
I disagree with the solution.
You should override GetPropertyValue because the data for SetProperty could also be filled by the ModelState.
To catch the raw data from the input elements write this:
public class CustomModelBinder : System.Web.Mvc.DefaultModelBinder
{
protected override object GetPropertyValue(System.Web.Mvc.ControllerContext controllerContext, System.Web.Mvc.ModelBindingContext bindingContext, System.ComponentModel.PropertyDescriptor propertyDescriptor, System.Web.Mvc.IModelBinder propertyBinder)
{
object value = base.GetPropertyValue(controllerContext, bindingContext, propertyDescriptor, propertyBinder);
string retval = value as string;
return string.IsNullOrWhiteSpace(retval)
? value
: retval.Trim();
}
}
Filter by propertyDescriptor PropertyType if you are really only interested in string values but it should not matter because everything what comes in is basically a string.
There have been a lot of posts suggesting an attribute approach. Here is a package that already has a trim attribute and many others: Dado.ComponentModel.Mutations or NuGet
public partial class ApplicationUser
{
[Trim, ToLower]
public virtual string UserName { get; set; }
}
// Then to preform mutation
var user = new ApplicationUser() {
UserName = " M#X_speed.01! "
}
new MutationContext<ApplicationUser>(user).Mutate();
After the call to Mutate(), user.UserName will be mutated to m#x_speed.01!.
This example will trim whitespace and case the string to lowercase. It doesn't introduce validation, but the System.ComponentModel.Annotations can be used alongside Dado.ComponentModel.Mutations.
I posted this in another thread. In asp.net core 2, I went in a different direction. I used an action filter instead. In this case the developer can either set it globally or use as an attribute for the actions he/she wants to apply the string trimming. This code runs after the model binding has taken place, and it can update the values in the model object.
Here is my code, first create an action filter:
public class TrimInputStringsAttribute : ActionFilterAttribute
{
public override void OnActionExecuting(ActionExecutingContext context)
{
foreach (var arg in context.ActionArguments)
{
if (arg.Value is string)
{
string val = arg.Value as string;
if (!string.IsNullOrEmpty(val))
{
context.ActionArguments[arg.Key] = val.Trim();
}
continue;
}
Type argType = arg.Value.GetType();
if (!argType.IsClass)
{
continue;
}
TrimAllStringsInObject(arg.Value, argType);
}
}
private void TrimAllStringsInObject(object arg, Type argType)
{
var stringProperties = argType.GetProperties()
.Where(p => p.PropertyType == typeof(string));
foreach (var stringProperty in stringProperties)
{
string currentValue = stringProperty.GetValue(arg, null) as string;
if (!string.IsNullOrEmpty(currentValue))
{
stringProperty.SetValue(arg, currentValue.Trim(), null);
}
}
}
}
To use it, either register as global filter or decorate your actions with the TrimInputStrings attribute.
[TrimInputStrings]
public IActionResult Register(RegisterViewModel registerModel)
{
// Some business logic...
return Ok();
}
OK, I have this thing and it kinda works:
class TrimmingModelBinder : IModelBinder
{
public Task BindModelAsync (ModelBindingContext ctx)
{
if
(
ctx .ModelName is string name
&& ctx .ValueProvider .GetValue (name) .FirstValue is string v)
ctx .ModelState .SetModelValue
(
name,
new ValueProviderResult
((ctx .Result = ModelBindingResult .Success (v .Trim ())) .Model as string));
return Task .CompletedTask; }}
class AutoTrimAttribute : ModelBinderAttribute
{
public AutoTrimAttribute ()
{ this .BinderType = typeof (TrimmingModelBinder); }}
It is a shame that there is no standard feature for this though.
I adapted #Kai G's answer for System.Text.Json:
using System;
using System.Text.Json;
using System.Text.Json.Serialization;
public class TrimmedStringConverter : JsonConverter<string>
{
public override bool CanConvert(Type typeToConvert) => typeToConvert == typeof(string);
public override string Read(ref Utf8JsonReader reader, Type typeToConvert, JsonSerializerOptions options)
{
return reader.GetString() is string value ? value.Trim() : null;
}
public override void Write(Utf8JsonWriter writer, string value, JsonSerializerOptions options)
{
writer.WriteStringValue(value);
}
}