Is there any way how to hide child inside parent and show after he runned away from div ?? I am using anymation, transform - translate from (100%,0) to (0,0), but during moving, this div overlaps the parent div.. and i cant use z-index because of child. Child cant go upper in layer then parrent... so is there any other way? How to show child only out of parent div ?
I am making dynamic menu with anymation, and i want after click on link show subMenu just next to
you want something like this ? use overflow:hidden on parent or if you want the child to be visible use overflow:visible
you can set animation instead. it still works like the example below
let me know if it helps
.parent {
width:100px;
height:100px;
border:2px solid black;
overflow:hidden;
}
.child {
width:100px;
height:96px;
border:2px solid red;
opacity:0;
transition:0.5s;
}
.parent:hover .child {
transform:translateX(30px);
opacity:1;
}
<div class="parent">
<div class="child">
</div>
</div>
Related
I tried to make a simple CSS hover but got a blinking image issue. Is there something I can do to fix that?
In the meantime, there is a empty gap between a H3 title and .term-image class because of my CSS settings for a class (.term-desc). Is there a way to eliminate this gap? It appears that the gap created by position:relative is not easy to be removed.
I need to hide the image when mouse hovers.
http://jsfiddle.net/fveqkcnj/
<div class="categorywrapper">
<div class="views-row views-row-1 views-row-odd views-row-first">
<h3 class="term-title">
Arts & Culture
</h3>
<div class="term-desc">
<p>This is Arts & Culture</p>
</div>
<div class="term-image"> <img src="http://placehold.it/235x150/ffffee" />
</div>
</div>
.categorywrapper {
width: 720px;
clear:both;
}
.categorywrapper .views-row {
float:left;
position:relative;
width:235px;
}
.categorywrapper .views-row h3 {
position:relative;
margin-left:30px;
border-bottom-width: 2px;
border-bottom-style: solid;
border-bottom-color: #000;
width:80%;
min-height:38px;
}
.categorywrapper .views-row .term-desc {
position:relative;
top:100px;
left:20px;
width:200px;
}
.categorywrapper .views-row .term-image {
position:relative;
}
.categorywrapper .views-row .term-image:hover {
z-index:-2;
}
Add to your css: pointer-events:none; in the .categorywrapper .views-row .term-desc
Basically the result is:
.categorywrapper .views-row .term-desc {
pointer-events:none;
position:relative;
top:100px;
left:20px;
width:200px;
}
Additionally you use a negative z-index on your hover element which means it goes behind the parent elements and triggers the mouseout event which turns off the hover.
You can fix that by instead of applying the following css to the row instead of the image:
.categorywrapper .views-row:hover .term-desc {
z-index:2;
}
Here is the JSFiddle
If you want it over the image do the same but put the .term-desc element inside the tag.
I've never used z-index for image hovers, but I would imagine that if you move the z-index down, the browser no longer considers you to be hovering over the image, so you get the blinking effect you mention. Try producing your hover effect using an alternative background image instead. Or else by changing opacity.
I assume your intention is to show the text when hovering the image. If that is true, you've chosen not only a cumbersome approach, but also one that doesn't work.
Since your image is wrapped in a div already, it is extremely easy to achieve your goal: Just put the div with text that should appear inside the same container that has the image. Apply proper positioning and give it a default opacity: 0; so it's initially invisible.
Then
.categorywrapper .views-row .term-image:hover .term-desc {
opacity: 1;
}
To also get rid of the unwanted whitespace between your h3 and your image, just set the h3's margin-bottom: 0;
http://jsfiddle.net/fveqkcnj/5/
Have a parent div and 3 child div's. Know the height of child2 only. Want the child1 and child3 to have the same height as height getting reduced. Also border of the parent is collapsing. Want the border of parent to be visible around the child.
Pasted the code http://jsfiddle.net/586Cr/
Provided the code below.
<html>
<head>
<style>
#parentt{
background-color:#000000;
border:4px solid #0000FF;
}
#child1{
background-color:#000000;
border:4px solid #FF0000;
float:left;
width:25%;
}
#child2{
background-color:#000000;
border:4px solid #FF0000;
float:left;
width:30%;
height:100px;
}
#child3{
background-color:#000000;
border:4px solid #FF0000;
width:25%;
float:left;
}
.trans60 {
zoom: 1;
filter: alpha(opacity=60);
opacity: 0.6;
}
.trans100 {
zoom: 1;
filter: alpha(opacity=100);
opacity: 1.0;
}
</style>
</head>
<body>
<div id="parentt">
<div id="child1" class="trans60"> child1</div>
<div id="child2" class="trans100">child2</div>
<div id="child3" class="trans60">child3</div>
</div>
</body>
</html>
Give overflow:hidden to your parent here the fiddle because child's are floating.
Briefly
http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS2/visuren.html#block-formatting
Setting overflow: hidden on an element causes a new float context to be created, so elements that are floated inside an element that has overflow: hidden applied are cleared.
Ok let's start off!
Anytime you float, it tends to break the parent. I know, children leave the parents broke.. it's just a habit we have in nature.
To fix this, I always make a class called 'clear' and just attach a div when I want to do clearing! I find this to be more useful than doing an overflow: hidden, as the clear class can be reused nearly any and everywhere.
//css
.clear { clear: both; }
// calling it up after the 3 children
<div class="clear"></div>
Ok, so that fixes that problem.
Now to do the div height, that's not overly complicated with some jQuery.
Now I could go on trying to explain this, but it would take a minute. Follow this tutorial:
Demo:
http://www.cssnewbie.com/example/equal-heights/plugin.html
Article:
http://www.cssnewbie.com/equalheights-jquery-plugin/#.UoX-neKrTIU
However, instead of on click, do it at document ready.
Div highlighting question
I have 2 divs stacked on top of each other inside a container.
Here is the behavior I want: when you mouseover the top div, nothing happens. when you mouse
over the bottom div, the top div background changes color, and the bottom div's background
changes a different color. In the sample code I tried, mousing over the container div makes
the top turn green and the bottom turn vlueviolet. I want a mouseover on the bottom to cause
this behavior, but I want a mouseover on the top to do nothing. I feel like I could get this
done in jQuery using a parent selector or something, but it seems like I should be able to
do this in pure CSS. Thanks!
Here is what I've tried, which of course doesn't work, but gives an idea of what I'm trying to do.
<html>
<head>
<style>
div
{
display:inline;
border:1px dotted black;
font-family:Courier;
background:white;
}
div#outer{
display:inline-block;
border:2px solid red;
}
div#outer:hover #top{
background:green;
}
div#outer:hover #bottom{
background:blueviolet;
}
div#top:hover, div#bottom:hover{
background:white;
}
</style>
</head>
<body>
<div id=outer>
<div id=top>
top
</div>
<br>
<div id=bottom>
bottom
</div>
</div>
</body>
</html>
I changed up your CSS a little bit. Basically to make it bigger.
The order is important here.
This is not perfect due to the outer div's border.
<style>
div {
border:1px dotted black;
font-family:Courier;
background:white;
}
div#top, div#bottom {
height: 200px;
width: 200px;
}
div#outer:hover #bottom:hover {
background:blueviolet;
}
div#outer:hover #top {
background:green;
}
div#outer #top:hover{
background:white;
}
div#outer{
display:inline-block;
border:2px solid red;
}
</style>
Is this what you're looking for?
div#outer:hover div#top:hover, div#bottom:hover{
background:white;
}
Alternatively, you could also use !important:
div#top:hover {
background: white !important;
}
I don't think you can do this... CSS selection only works one way, from parent to child or in cascade.... so you can only change the CSS of divs below another div.
For example look this jsFiddle: as you can see, only the bottom divs' style can change.
This code
div#fourth:hover ~ #first{
background:green;
}
doesn't work because the "first" div is above the "fourth" div...
Anyway, if you want to set the background of top div to white, you will see a rollover with the delay.
PS: Sorry for my bad English.
I'm been learning for web design as well as development for quite some time now but I'm still stumped by some basic rules of CSS.
I'm trying to figure out how the behavior of :hover works when hovering one element, to affect another. But I came across something unexpected...
Q: Why does element .one turn black when .two is hovered?
Here's the code and the fiddle.
HTML:
<div class="one">
<div class="two"></div>
</div>
CSS:
div {
width: 100px;
height: 100px;
position: absolute;
top:0;
}
.one {
left:0;
background: red;
border: 5px solid black;
}
.two {
left:200px;
background: yellow;
}
.one:hover {
background: black;
}
here is my jsFiddle
Help anyone?
The element .two is found inside the .one element. so hovering .two means that you are also hovering .one. The event "bubbles" up to the parent element.. even if it doesn't look like that visually. To hover each one independently you will have to take .two out of .one. You might want to wrap both in a container to properly set their positioning. working jsFiddle
<div class="someContainer">
<div class="one"></div>
<div class="two"></div>
</div>
You have to change your html structure to achieve this.
As right now div having class two is inside the div class one so two is becoming child of class one div so when you hover on div which have class two it automatics consider that you are hovring on class one div as well.
Use absolute div and don't make it child of class one div.
This question already has answers here:
I do not want to inherit the child opacity from the parent in CSS
(18 answers)
Closed 7 years ago.
Hey i am searching in google but i can't fine any perfect answer
I want to Opacity in parent DIV but not Child DIV
Example
HTML
<div class="parent">
<div class="child">
Hello I am child
</div>
</div>
Css
.parent{
background:url('../images/madu.jpg') no-repeat 0 0;
}
.child{
Color:black;
}
Note: -- I want to background-image in Parent Div not Color
I know this is old, but just in case it will help someone else.
<div style="background-color: rgba(255, 0, 0, 0.5)">child</div>
Where rgba is: red, green, blue, and a is for transparency.
May be it's good if you define your background-image in the :after pseudo class. Write like this:
.parent{
width:300px;
height:300px;
position:relative;
border:1px solid red;
}
.parent:after{
content:'';
background:url('http://www.dummyimage.com/300x300/000/fff&text=parent+image');
width:300px;
height:300px;
position:absolute;
top:0;
left:0;
opacity:0.5;
}
.child{
background:yellow;
position:relative;
z-index:1;
}
Check this fiddle
You can do it with pseudo-elements: (demo on dabblet.com)
your markup:
<div class="parent">
<div class="child"> Hello I am child </div>
</div>
css:
.parent{
position: relative;
}
.parent:before {
z-index: -1;
content: '';
position: absolute;
opacity: 0.2;
width: 400px;
height: 200px;
background: url('http://img42.imageshack.us/img42/1893/96c75664f7e94f9198ad113.png') no-repeat 0 0;
}
.child{
Color:black;
}
As mentioned by Tom, background-color: rgba(229,229,229, 0.85) can do the trick.
Place that on the style of the parent element and child wont be affected.
You can't. Css today simply doesn't allow that.
The logical rendering model is this one :
If the object is a container element, then the effect is as if the contents of the container element were blended against the current background using a mask where the value of each pixel of the mask is .
Reference : css transparency
The solution is to use a different element composition, usually using fixed or computed positions for what is today defined as a child : it may appear logically and visualy for the user as a child but the element doesn't need to be really a child in your code.
A solution using css : fiddle
.parent {
width:500px;
height:200px;
background-image:url('http://canop.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/cropped-bandeau-cr%C3%AAte-011.jpg');
opacity: 0.2;
}
.child {
position: fixed;
top:0;
}
Another solution with javascript : fiddle
I had the same problem and I fixed by setting transparent png image as background for the parent tag.
This is the 1px x 1px PNG Image that I have created with 60% Opacity of black background !
You can't do that, unless you take the child out of the parent and place it via positioning.
The only way I know and it actually works, is to use a translucid image (.png with transparency) for the parent's background. The only disavantage is that you can't control the opacity via CSS, other than that it works!