I have a problem in encoding a raw multiview video in MV-HEVC codec, I am facing this error: "error parsing option frame 1 with argument".
Any clue how to resolve this error?
Replace in source\Lib\TLibCommon\TypeDef.h
#define HEVC_EXT 2
with
#define HEVC_EXT 1
Related
I'm getting a compile error with my qt application when i added some device oem classes(which uses stdafx.h).
"Error 1 error C1189: #error : Building MFC application with /MD[d] (CRT dll version) requires MFC shared dll version. Please #define _AFXDLL or do not use /MD[d]
From what i found from the internet, i set my project properties to "Use MFC in a Shared DLL" to solve the error but when i compile again it generates some other errors:
Error 1 error C2664: 'LONG SCardConnectW(SCARDCONTEXT,LPCWSTR,DWORD,DWORD,LPSCARDHANDLE,LPDWORD)' : cannot convert argument 2 from 'const char *' to 'LPCWSTR'
Error 2 error C2440: '=' : cannot convert from 'int8 *' to 'LPCWSTR'
Error 3 error C2679: binary '=' : no operator found which takes a right-hand operand of type 'LPCWSTR' (or there is no acceptable conversion)
Error 4 error C2664: 'LONG SCardStatusW(SCARDHANDLE,LPWSTR,LPDWORD,LPDWORD,LPDWORD,LPBYTE,LPDWORD)' : cannot convert argument 2 from 'int8 *' to 'LPWSTR'
i tried to set to Use Unicode Character Set and Use Multibyte Character Set but doesn't solve the issue.
Do not mix MFC and Qt - this will not work. You need to either refactor the OEM stuff or your own software to use Qt / MFC.
I'm using a SIM900A GSM Shield to communicate between an arduino due and an API.
I currently using it's default values in the multiplexer of GSM Shield. But now I'm in need of changing it's frame size to 255. When I check the current frame size, it gives following response which indicates the frame size as 127.
CMUX Read:AT+CMUX?
+CMUX: 0,0,5,127,10,3,30,10,2
OK
Then I used following AT command to change it to 255. But it gives an ERROR.
sim900_send_cmd("AT+CMUX=0[,0[,1[,255[,10[,3[,30[,10[,2]]]]]]]]\r\n");
CMUX Read:AT+CMUX=0[,0[,5[,255[,10[,3[,30[,10[,2]]]]]]]]
ERROR
What am I doing wrong here ? am I missing a step ? Any insight will be much appreciated. Thank you
I'm not an expert in AT commands, but I bet you don't need all the brackets in yours. Brackets are used to indicate parameters which could be omitted. So your command should look like this:
CMUX Read:AT+CMUX=0,0,5,255,10,3,30,10,2
Maybe even a shoter version will work:
CMUX Read:AT+CMUX=0,0,5,255
I'm trying to use Tera Term to send binary data over the serial port. When I try to send data that has the MSB = '1' Tera Term send multiple 8bit characters. I've tried modifying the TERATERM.ini file as follows:
Meta8Bit=raw
Accept8BitCtrl=on
Send8BitCtrl=on
My .ttl script is very simple with the following loop just for testing purposes:
while 1
send $80
mpause 2
endwhile
With the above script I get multiple 8bit character sends every 2ms - not 1 80hex send.
Thanks
You can do
while 1
sendfile 'binaryfile' 1
mpause 2
endwhile
where binaryfile is a file that contains 0x80 in binary
This is a terrible work around, I wish I had a better solution.
Change Language from UTF-8 to English
Setup --> General --> Language
Set to English
Then you can send HEX >= 0x80
I am using SIM900 GSM module connect to my AVR Microcontroller.
I tested it with FT232 to see transmitting data.
First Micro sends AT it will response OK
AT OK
AT+CMGF=1 OK
AT+CMGS="+9893XXXXXX" returns ERROR and doesn't show ">"
Could anybody advise me what to do?
Command AT+CSCS? will answer You what type of sms-encoding is used. Properly answer is "GSM", and if not, You should set it by command AT+CSCS="GSM".
And remember about "Ctrl+Z" (not "Enter") as a finish of sms text, please.
You aren't passing all the parameters to the command.
The command format is:
AT+CMGS=<number><CR><message><CTRL-Z>
Where:
<CR> = ASCII character 13
<CTRL-Z> = ASCII character 26
You have passed only the number and without the <CR> you won't see the > note for the message.
Example:
AT+CMGS="+9893XXXXXX"
> This is the message.→
The response is:
+CMGS:<mr>
OK
Where <mr> is the message reference.
If AT+CSCS? command returns UCS2, then many arguments need to be encoded as hex string of UTF-16 encoding, so the phone number would become "002B0039003800390033...", and the SMS text would need to be encoded in the same way. If you don't need UCS2 encoding, then the easiest thing to do is to switch to GSM encoding (or another encoding from the available set as shown by AT+CSCS=? command)
Sometimes the issue is the text mode you are in. Enter AT+CMGF? and you should receive +CMGF: 1. If instead you receive +CMGF: 0, enter AT+CMGF=1. This changes the message format from PDU mode to Text mode. I'm not sure what either of those mean exactly, but this fixed my issue.
SIM 800 AT command manual
I am not sure if this is the right stack exchange website to post this on, but if it isn't please move it to the appropriate one.
I am facing a small problem in writing my constraints file for the spartan 3 starter kit.
I have read the documentation provided by Xilinx (the manufacturer) and ive been searching online for a few weeks without any luck.
What i am trying to do is link my Netlist interface to any of the 3 40-pin-headers on the board. (See image below)
Usually its very simple, if say i want to interface a button or a led on the board, i just read the connection name on the board, for example one of the buttons is M13 and write in the UCF file something like this :
NET "BTN0" LOC = "M13";
As you can see on the image the headers are named A1, A2 and B1 on the board, but oddly enough, none of the following worked :
NET "TestOutputLine" LOC = "A1(0)"; -- The (0) is to reference a single line on an array
NET "TestOutputBus" LOC = "A1"; -- The bus is of equal dimension of A1 (which is 40)
The errors i got meant that either the target (specified by LOC) does not exist or that the assignment is invalid.
I hope you have some ideas for me.
Thanks in advance
EDIT :
Here is the output from ISE :
ConstraintSystem:59 - Constraint <NET "TestOutputBus" LOC = "A1";>
[circuit.ucf(12)]: NET "TestOutputBus" not found. Please verify that:
1. The specified design element actually exists in the original design.
But i am pretty sure that TestOutputBus exists, as a matter of fact there is nothing else in my design right now, and the correct top level unit is being used.
EDIT2 :
I updated my UCF file, right now it's like this :
NET "TestOutputBus(0)" LOC = "A1(0)";
NET "TestOutputBus(1)" LOC = "A1(1)";
But i get a different error now in mapping :
MapLib:30 - LOC constraint A1:0 on TestOutputBus<0> is invalid: No such
site on the device. To bypass this error set the environment variable
'XIL_MAP_LOCWARN'.
MapLib:30 - LOC constraint A1:1 on TestOutputBus<1> is invalid: No such
site on the device. To bypass this error set the environment variable
'XIL_MAP_LOCWARN'.
Solution :
In order to get the pins 5 and 6 mapped to TestOutputBus(0) and TestOutputBus(1) respectively what i had to use was this :
NET "TestOutputBus(0)" LOC = "N7"; -- A1 pin 5
NET "TestOutputBus(1)" LOC = "L5"; -- A1 pin 6
Note that pins 0 are not mappable thats why i used pins 5 and 6, here are the tables that show the mappable pins for all headers and their LOCs.
As it turns out, there is an address for each usable pin of each header of the FPGA.
The datasheet (http://forums.xilinx.com/xlnx/attachments/xlnx/Spartan/3411/1/S3BOARD_RM.pdf) was helpful especially pages 49 - 51
I copied this from my earlier comment to your question so it would be an actual answer and not just a comment.
You should have LOC constraints in your UCF file for every port on your top-level module. So if you have a 40-bit-wide bus as an input or output at the top level then you should also have 40 separate LOC constraints in your UCF file to make sure that the logical bus in your top-level schematic actually gets mapped to the correct pins on your FPGA. If you are only using two pins, then you can declare the bus to be 2-bits wide and use 2 LOC constraints. The FPGA will treat all unused pins as inputs and ignore them.
I once got the original ConstraintSystem:59 net xyz not found error when i accidentally selected one of my modules as a top module. The pins declared in UCF could not be found in the port declaration of wrong module.
Also i get this error when i have some pin declared in UCF but ommit it in port declaration of top module.