I have a pressure sensor plugged into my computer, and the only way to collect the data is through a localhost API endpoint, meaning right now only that machine can collect data. Is there any way to receive data from the localhost API on a different machine? I also need to ping the API 20-40 times a second if that matters.
There are couple of ways I can think of, I am assuming both the machines are on same network
Use localhost API to collect the data in database and create a GET endpoint inside same application for fetching the data according your parameters. You can access GET endpoint from different machine by hitting network ip address of your local machine. Which you can check using ifconfig command in your terminal, check en0 type where you will find something like 192.168.X.X. From other machine you can hit http://192.168.X.X:<port>/getData, where <port> is the localhost port.
If you don't want to use database, then you can use publish subscribe mechanism which is real time. see http://autobahn.ws/python/
How publish subscribe works ?
You will have to make your localhost machine a publisher (server) which will publish events or sensor data in your case (real time). The other machine will be subscriber (client ) which will listen to the events from your server and do necessary processing.
Its uses WAMP (Web application messaging protocol) for communication. The sample code for basic publisher and subsriber can be found here.
Follow steps:
1 : Download ngrok,
2 : Go to the path where ngrok.exe file present and open that path in cmd.
3 : Connect your account.
paste : ngrok authtoken1pA6advIt950uA4y2Rixgc8rdx9_23MSDokKjWhbPUW3NSrZK
4 : Replace your port no including bracket.
paste : ngrok http {9003} -host-header="localhost:{9003}".
5 : copy forward line and paste in other system to check.
Forwarding http://d1c0bc16ff7b.ngrok.io
Related
I have a Virtual Machine which is deployed on a Windows server. I have a custom port let's say 1100 on which some web APIs are called. Those APIs are accessed internally and externally as well. But there are some GET commands which are giving ERR CONNECTION RESET on the same port when accessed externally. i.e. the same commands are working internally on the VM and as well as on the server but when we try to access it from outside the network it gives an error. Other Calls/APIs are working very well on the same port 1100.
What steps do to make it executable?
Note I am using the Mikrotik Firewall behind the server
Any help would be highly appreciated.
I'm currently trying to setup a tunneling tool, specific for game servers.
So you can start the server locally and everyone can join without open your ports or getting unsecure.
Basicly I do a reverse ssh tunnel to one of my dedicated linux servers where the game port get mapped to a different port (for example 8888). So the server is now exposed to the internet and available for anyone and the user don't have to get unsecure and open his own ports. Everyone can connect to the following ip: SERVERADRESS:8888.
The command which gets executed looks like this:
ssh -N -R "*:8888:localhost:25565" root#SERVERADRESS
This works fine just as i want. But I also want to secure my "forwarding" server, so I'm relativ new to networking but I found reverse proxy's. I watched some tutorials and I installed the "Nginx Proxy Manager" tool which comes with a web interface and looks very good and easy. So there is an option to create an Stream (Picture below), there you can enter the incoming port and the forward Host + port, for example: REVERSEPROXY:7777 -> FORWARDINGSERVER:8888. So with this I want to hide the ip adress from the server where all the ssh tunnels. Sadly this Stream tool won't work, I already saw some other topics with that. They all said to enter the port into the docker-compose.yml which I already did + restart. But for now it won't work. Any other soloutions for this problem? Or completly different ideas to protect my server?
https://i.stack.imgur.com/FolLe.png https://i.stack.imgur.com/KuJbt.png https://i.stack.imgur.com/2SN4a.png https://i.stack.imgur.com/9kzbj.jpg
I try to do my own tunneling tool, but with a protection so that my server getting damaged.
EDIT: OBE - figured it out. Provided in answer for anyone else who has this issue.
I am working in an offline environment and am unable to connect to a kafka broker, on machine 1, from a separate machine, machine 2, on a LAN connection through a single switch.
Machine 1 (where Kafka and ZK are running):
server.properties
listeners=PLAINTEXT://<ethernet_IPv4_m1>:9092
advertised.listeners=PLAINTEXT://<ethernet_IPv4_m1>:9092
zookeeper.connect=localhost:2181
I am starting kafka/ZK from the config files located in kafka_2.12-2.8.0/config and the running the appropritate .bat from kafka_2.12-2.8.0/bin/windows.
On machine 2 I am able to ping <ethernet_IPv4_m1> and get results; however, I fail to get a TCP connection if I run Test-NetConnection <ethernet_IPv4_m1> -p 9092 while kafka is running. In python 3.8.11, using KafkaConsumer from kafka-python, I receive the NoBrokersAvailable error when using <ethernet_IPv4_m1>:9092 as the bootstrap_server. Additionally if I run a python:3.8.12-buster docker container with a '/bin/bash' entrypoint, and follow along with the kafka-listener walkthrough I am unable to connect to the broker. I'm in the exact situation as Scenario 1 provided in the link, but the walkthrough assumes you can connect to the broker. I have also tried opening the 9092 port in my Windows Defender for in/outbound traffic (on both machines) and still have no luck. Neither Kafka, nor networking, are my strong suits and every tutorial/answer I find refers to changing the listener and advertised.listener in the kafka server.properties file - I think I correctly did this, but am unsure. This is everything I have tried so far, any recommendations would be greatly appreciated. Thank you.
For M1, the private network was the active network.
Go to control panel -> Firewall & network protection -> advanced settings (must be admin) -> setup inbound/outbound rules for port 9092 for the active network.
I am using a win10 desktop app for which I know it is sending TCP packets in order to communicate with the server. The payloads are encrypted. There is a chance that if the app is using TLS, a proxy like mitmproxy or fiddler will be able to decrypt the data.
The app also gets assigned different port every time it launches. So far the only promising information was to use netsh:
netsh interface portproxy add v4tov4 listenport=appPort listenaddress=appLocalIP connectport=fiddlerListeningPort connectaddress=fiddlerLocalIP
I ran this command after the app was already running because I can not determine its local port beforehand. But that did nothing. I was unable to find any other way to force the app to route the traffic through fiddler / mitmproxy.
i've been searching and trying for weeks now to find a solution to my issue that I can understand and easily implement but I had no joy. So i would be very grateful if someone could put me out of my misery.
I'm building an iphone app similar in functionality to apps like "Air Video" and "Air Playit". The app should communicate with a server running on a remote host. This server should be able to execute a command sent by the iphone to encode a video and stream it over http.
In my case, my iphone app sends commands to be executed on a remote host. the remote host is running a python socket server listening for example on port 3333.
On the iphone, i'm simply using
"CFStreamCreatePairWithSocketToHost", "CFWriteStreamOpen" and
"CFReadStreamOpen"
to connect, write and read data.
My remote host, successfully intercepts the commands and starts the encoding.
To serve the contents, I'm having to run a separate http server (i'm using Python simpleHTTPServer) which is listening on another port.
What I would like to do is use the same port for both system commands and http requests.
The apps I've mentioned above seem to do it that way and I've noticed they have their own build-in web server.
I'm sure I'm missing something but please bear with me this is my first attempt at building an app.
Encode your system commands into special HTTP requests. Decide which thing to do (execute command or serve the contents) based on HTTP request, not on the incoming port. If you need to use separate http servers (like you told), consider having a layer that receives everything from the devices and dispatches to other servers (or ports) based on the request.