Trying to produce both a stripchart and a boxplot of the same (transformed) data but (because the boxplot is shifted down a tad) I don't want the axis labels twice:
set.seed(3121975)
bee = list(x1=rnbinom(50, mu = 4, size = .1),
x2=rnbinom(30,mu=6,size=.1),
x3=rnbinom(40,mu=2,size=.1))
f = function(x) asinh(sqrt(4*x+1.5))
stripchart(lapply(bee,f),method="stack",offset=.13,ylim=c(.8,3.9))
boxplot(lapply(bee,f),horizontal=TRUE,boxwex=.05,at=(1:3)-.1,add=TRUE,ann=FALSE)
Other things that don't work include: (i) leaving ann to take its default value of !add, (ii) specifying labels for ylab.
I presume I have missed something obvious but I am not seeing what it might be.
Just add yaxt = 'n' into boxplot() to suppress plotting of the y-axis. The argument ann controls axis titles and overall titles, not the axis itself.
I have a problem with the x-axis labelling.
I created a lm model(first.stage) and plotted the residuals using the code:
plot(first.stage$residuals,ylab="Deviation",xlab="Year",type="l",col="blue")
Now I'd like to change the x-axis labelling independent from the x values.
More precisely, I want to show the years 1960-2010 on the x axis. I tried a lot nothing worked.
If you want to set custom tick marks for your x axis, set xaxt = 'n' in the plot() call, then use axis(1, at = c()) to set the new tick marks. For example,
plot(mtcars$wt, mtcars$mpg, xaxt='n')
axis(1, at = c(1.5, 2.5))
Let's consider a vector and plot it.
s1 <- sample(100:1000,32,replace = T)
plot(s1)
The plot I get has a Y-Axis that ranges from 0-1000 with points in the intervals of 200 (0,200,400,600,800,1000) and this is happening implicitly.
If I use ylim argument, apparently or to be honest, evidently, I can now have a custom range,
plot(s1,ylim = c(0,1500))
The points on Y Axis now are 0-1500 as indicated but with the points in the intervals of 500 (0,500,1000,1500), this is happening without my control.
My question, how can I have custom points with custom intervals on the X or Y axis?
use axis() to set your limits : on either x, y, or both
s1 <- sample(100:1000,32,replace = T)
plot(s1, yaxt = "n") # `yaxt` prevents y-axis labels to be printed
axis(2, yaxp=c(10, 1000, 10), las=2) # 'las' helps to align the tick mark labels along the axis or perpendicular
# 'yaxp' helps to set the break points you desire. Learn more from ?par
When I manually add the following labels with (axis(1, at=1:27, labels=labs[0:27])):
> labs[0:27]
[1] "0\n9.3%" "1\n7.6%" "2\n5.6%" "3\n5.1%" "4\n5.7%" "5\n6.5%" "6\n7.3%" "7\n7.6%" "8\n7.5%" "9\n7%" "10\n6.2%" "11\n5.2%"
[13] "12\n4.2%" ........
I get the following:
How do I force all labels to be drawn so 1,3,5,6, and 11 are not skipped? (also, for extra credit, how do I shift the whole thing down a few pixels?)
If you want to force all labels to display, even when they are very close or overlapping, you can "trick" R into displaying them by adding odd and even axis labels with separate calls to the axis function, as follows:
labs <-c("0\n9.3%","1\n7.6%","2\n5.6%","3\n5.1%","4\n5.7%","5\n6.5%","6\n7.3%",
"7\n7.6%","8\n7.5%","9\n7%", "10\n6.2%","11\n5.2%","12\n4.2%",13:27)
n=length(labs)
plot(1:28, xaxt = "n")
axis(side=1, at=seq(1,n,2), labels=labs[seq(1,n,2)], cex.axis=0.6)
axis(side=1, at=seq(2,n,2), labels=labs[seq(2,n,2)], cex.axis=0.6)
You can play with cex.axis to get the text size that you want. Note, also, that you may have to adjust the number of values in at= and/or labels= so that they are equal.
I agree with #PLapointe and #joran that it's generally better not to tamper with R's default behavior regarding overlap. However, I've had a few cases where axis labels looked fine even when they weren't quite a full "m-width" apart, and I hit on the trick of alternating odd and even labels as a way to get the behavior I wanted.
?axis tells you that:
The code tries hard not to draw overlapping tick labels, and so will omit labels where they would abut or overlap previously drawn labels. This can result in, for example, every other tick being labelled. (The ticks are drawn left to right or bottom to top, and space at least the size of an ‘m’ is left between labels.)
Play with cex.axis so that labels are small enough to fit without overlapping
labs <-c("0\n9.3%","1\n7.6%","2\n5.6%","3\n5.1%","4\n5.7%","5\n6.5%","6\n7.3%",
"7\n7.6%","8\n7.5%","9\n7%", "10\n6.2%","11\n5.2%","12\n4.2%",12:27)
plot(1:27,xaxt = "n")
axis(side=1, at=1:27, labels=labs[0:27],cex.axis=0.35)
If you widen you graph (manually by dragging or programmatically), you can increase the size of your labels.
Although there are some good answers here, the OP didn't want to resize the labels or change anything about the plot besides fitting all of the axis labels. It's annoying, since often there appears to be plenty of room to fit all of the axis labels.
Here's another solution. Draw the plot without the axis, then add ticks with empty labels. Store the positions of the ticks in an object, so then you can go through each one and place it in the correct position on the axis.
plot(1:10, 1:10, yaxt = "n")
axis_ticks = axis(2, axTicks(2), labels = rep("", length(axTicks(2))))
for(i in axis_ticks) axis(2, i)
#PLapointe just posted what I was going to say, but omitted the bonus answer.
Set padj = 0.5 in axis to move the labels down slightly.
Perhaps draw and label one tick at a time, by calling axis repeatedly using mapply...
For example, consider the following data:
x = runif(100)*20
y = 10^(runif(100)*3)
The formula for y might look a bit odd; it gives random numbers distributed across three orders of magnitude such that the data will be evenly distributed on a plot where the y axis is on a log scale. This will help demonstrate the utility of axTicks() by calculating nice tick locations for us on a logged axis.
By default:
plot(x, y, log = "y")
returns:
Notice that 100 and 1000 labels are missing.
We can instead use:
plot(x, y, log = "y", yaxt = "n")
mapply(axis, side = 2, at = axTicks(2), labels = axTicks(2))
which calls axis() once for each tick location returned by axTicks(), thus plotting one tick at a time. The result:
What I like about this solution is that is uses only one line of code for drawing the axis, it prints exactly the default axis R would have made, except all ticks are labeled, and the labels don't go anywhere when the plot is resized:
I can't say the axis is useful in the resized example, but it makes the point about axis labels being permanent!
For the first (default) plot, note that R will recalculate tick locations when resizing.
For the second (always labeled) plot, the number and location of tick marks are not recalculated when the image is resized. The axis ticks calculated by axTicks depend upon the size of the display window when the plot is first drawn.
If you want want to force specific tick locations, try something like:
plot(x, y, log = "y", yaxt = "n")
mapply(axis, side = 2, at = c(1,10,100, 1000), labels = c("one", "ten", "hundred", "thousand"))
which yields:
axis() includes a gap.axis parameter that controls when labels are omitted. Setting this to a very negative number will force all labels to display, even if they overlap.
The padj parameter of axis() controls the y offset whilst plotting an individual axis.
par(mgp = c(3, 2, 0) will adjust the position of all axis labels for the duration of a plotting session: the second value (here 2, default 1) controls the position of the labels.
# Set axis text position, including for Y axis
par(mgp = c(3, 2, 0))
# Plot
plot(1:12, 1:12, log = 'x', ann = FALSE, axes = FALSE)
# Some numbers not plotted:
axis(1, 1:12)
# All numbers plotted, with manual offset
axis(1, 1:12, gap.axis = -100, padj = 0.5)
I had a similar problem where I wanted to stagger the labels and get them to print without losing some. I created two sets of ticks showing second set below the other to make it look as if it staggers.
xaxis_stagger = function(positions,labels) {
odd=labels[seq(1,length(labels),2)]
odd_pos=positions[seq(1,length(positions),2)]
even=labels[seq(2,length(labels),2)]
even_pos=positions[seq(2,length(positions),2)]
axis(side=1,at=odd_pos,labels=odd)
axis(side=1,at=even_pos,labels=even,padj=1.5)
}
So you give the positions where you want the ticks to be and the labels for those ticks and this would then re-organise it into two sets of axis and plot them on the original plot. Original plot would be done with xaxt="n".
I'm creating a histogram in R which displays the frequency of several events in a vector. Each event is represented by an integer in the range [1, 9]. I'm displaying the label for each count vertically below the chart. Here's the code:
hist(vector, axes = FALSE, breaks = chartBreaks)
axis(1, at = tickMarks, labels = eventTypes, las = 2, tick = FALSE)
Unfortunately, the labels are too long, so they are cut off by the bottom of the window. How can I make them visible? Am I even using the right chart?
Look at help(par), in particular fields mar (for the margin) and oma (for outer margin).
It may be as simple as
par(mar=c(5,3,1,1)) # extra large bottom margin
hist(vector, axes = FALSE, breaks = chartBreaks)
axis(1, at = tickMarks, labels = eventTypes, las = 2, tick = FALSE)
This doesn't sound like a job for a histogram - the event is not a continuous variable. A barplot or dotplot may be more suitable.
Some dummy data
set.seed(123)
vec <- sample(1:9, 100, replace = TRUE)
vec <- factor(vec, labels = paste("My long event name", 1:9))
A barplot is produced via the barplot() function - we provide it the counts of each event using the table() function for convenience. Here we need to rotate labels using las = 2 and create some extra space of the labels in the margin
## lots of extra space in the margin for side 1
op <- par(mar = c(10,4,4,2) + 0.1)
barplot(table(vec), las = 2)
par(op) ## reset
A dotplot is produced via function dotchart() and has the added convenience of sorting out the plot margins for us
dotchart(table(vec))
The dotplot has the advantage over the barplot of using much less ink to display the same information and focuses on the differences in counts across groups rather than the magnitudes of the counts.
Note how I've set the data up as a factor. This allows us to store the event labels as the labels for the factor - thus automating the labelling of the axes in the plots. It also is a natural way of storing data like I understand you to have.
Perhaps adding \n into your labels so they will wrap onto 2 lines? It's not optimal, but it may work.
You might want to look at this post from Cross Validated