When I try to get data from dynamoDb I am getting exception Resource Not Found exception. It is not going inside catch block as well so that I can catch the exception. Due to this I am getting runtime error. How to handle this error?
this.getModel()
.query(queryfilter)
.attributes(attr)
.exec();
}
I deployed an ASP.NET 5 MVC 6 app on Azure, and ran into this problem with SignalR 2:
when starting connection from client, call to
/signalr/negotiate?clientProtocol=1.5&connectionData=%5B%7B"name"%3A"gameHub"%7D%5D&_=1460028930688
fails with error 500.
The exception behind error 500 is this:
Exception Details:
System.Security.Cryptography.CryptographicException: The data
protection operation was unsuccessful. This may have been caused by
not having the user profile loaded for the current thread's user
context, which may be the case when the thread is impersonating.
Source Error:
An unhandled exception was generated during the execution of the
current web request. Information regarding the origin and location of
the exception can be identified using the exception stack trace below.
Stack Trace:
[CryptographicException: The data protection operation was
unsuccessful. This may have been caused by not having the user
profile loaded for the current thread's user context, which may be the
case when the thread is impersonating.]
I read and tried solution suggested at SignalR CryptographicException on AzureWebsites, but id didn't work for me.
As I understand, Azure doesn't allow LoadUserProfile.
Any workaround?
I had the same problem and my fix was to add a call to UseAesDataProtectorProvider() before my call to MapSignalR(). Hope this helps someone.
Is it possible to log all activities which ninject doing when trying to resolve every dependency? I got an exception "Instances of abstract classes cannot be created." and I can't find where the problem is. In the stack trace there is no info on which dependency this exception was thrown. In VS I have enabled debugging for this app, but I can't intercept this exception. No exception is caught by VS.
You could try ninject.extensions.logging and use log4net or nlog
https://github.com/ninject/ninject.extensions.logging and
http://www.ninject.org/extensions.html
I have an EJB3.0 timer which runs great.During application deployment i see this error in my WL logs,
An exception occurred while registering the MBean null.java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Registered more than one instance with the same objectName : com.bea:ServerRuntime=admin,Name=weblogic.ejb.timer"
And during undeployment this
An unexpected error was encountered while attempting to remove any EJB Timers from the persistent store for the EJB 'TimerBean(Application: )
I don't use persistence store mechanism.I trigger the timer with servlet context.
We use WL 10.3.1,How can i overcome/catch this exception so,that it wouldn't be displayed during build process.
Thanks
The WLS ejb timers are persisted to a default store. The error messages seem to be related to it. Its likely that the ejb timer from a previous deployment is interfering. Does a server restart resolve this issue? You may want to try your app on WLS 10.3.4 to see if the issue has been resolved.
I am getting below error, when i am trying to resume Suspended(resumable) orchestration instance.
Scenario: Request went thourgh DB2 Static solicit - Response port, and it got failed because of access permission denied. I can see two instances suspended in the admin console one is related to port and another one is related to orchestration. After fixing the credentials, suspended port instance got resumed but the orchestration one is keep on failing.
Uncaught exception (see the 'inner exception' below) has suspended an instance of service 'Orchestration name'.
The service instance will remain suspended until administratively resumed or terminated.
If resumed the instance will continue from its last persisted state and may re-throw the same unexpected exception.
InstanceId: ca927086-465d-40e8-93fe-c3a0e4c161f7
Shape name:
ShapeId:
Exception thrown from: segment -1, progress -1
Inner exception: An error occurred while processing the message, refer to the details section for more information
Message ID: {96B72521-9833-48EF-BB2F-4A2E2265D697}
Instance ID: {F6FBC912-C9DC-489C-87F3-103FA1273FDC}
Error Description: The user does not have the authority to access the host resource. Check your authentication credentials or contact your system administrator. SQLSTATE: HY000, SQLCODE: -1000
Exception type: XlangSoapException
Source: Microsoft.XLANGs.BizTalk.Engine
Target Site: Void VerifyTransport(Microsoft.XLANGs.Core.Envelope, Int32, Microsoft.XLANGs.Core.Context)
The following is a stack trace that identifies the location where the exception occured
at Microsoft.BizTalk.XLANGs.BTXEngine.BTXPortBase.VerifyTransport(Envelope env, Int32 operationId, Context ctx)
at Microsoft.XLANGs.Core.Subscription.Receive(Segment s, Context ctx, Envelope& env, Boolean topOnly)
at Microsoft.XLANGs.Core.PortBase.GetMessageIdForSubscription(Subscription subscription, Segment currentSegment, Context cxt, Envelope& env, CachedObject location)
at Microsoft.XLANGs.Core.PortBase.GetMessageId(Subscription subscription, Segment currentSegment, Context cxt, Envelope& env, CachedObject location)
at (StopConditions stopOn)
at Microsoft.XLANGs.Core.SegmentScheduler.RunASegment(Segment s, StopConditions stopCond, Exception& exp)
For more information, see Help and Support Center at http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/events.asp.
Any thoughts how to fix this?
Creating the above scenario using samples:
Go to BizTalk
samples/orchestrations/consumeWebservice
folder, install the
ConsumeWebService application and
publish POWebservice to IIS.
Change IIS Directory security
permissions for POWebservice, remove
anonymous or any other access.
Now drop the message you will see
suspended messages because of HTTP
status 401: Access Denied, then give
access to POWebservice either
anonymous or Windows.
Then resume
the suspended instances, one will
get disappear but
another(orchestration) one wont.
The orchestration will continue to fail with the exception because when it was suspended, the last persistence point was the receipt of the exception. This means that the orchestration will re-start (when resumed) and re-throw the exception.
Here's at article discussing some points at which orchestration state is persisted to the database: http://blogs.msdn.com/b/sanket/archive/2006/11/12/understanding-persistence-points-in-biztalk-orchestration.aspx
You can manipulate this to some extent in your orchestration design, as Richard Seroter discusses here, but generally you would do better to use failed message routing, enabling you to handle the failed messages, and terminate the failed orchestration instance.
Please correct me if I'm wrong, but is this not just normal biztalk behavior? I am not 100% sure so please let me know if this is wrong:
The outbound messaging instance was suspended because the credentials the port was using to connect to to the DB were wrong.
This caused the orchestrations making these calls to also suspend.
The suspended message instance was resumed and was processed correctly because the problem was fixed. So the call was made to the DB.
However, the orchestration instance may not be able to resume because when resumed it found itself at the most recent persistence point and the original error which was delivered back from the send port is still available to the orchestration, causing it to re-suspend.
In the error message, it actually says "If resumed the instance will continue from its last persisted state and may re-throw the same unexpected exception."
If you want to handle this sort of thing you could make the call to the database atomic. That way the orchestration will not persist itself at the point of making the DB call. If the orchestration then suspends it will resume at a point before the DB call is made, and will make the DB call as normal, which should succeed this time because you have fixed the original issue.
The only problem with this is if your DB call cannot be executed more than once with the same data without bad things happenning (is not idempotent).
I am not 100% on the above explaination. Please point out if my understanding is incorrect.
this scenario not treated by Microsoft Biztalk = Middleware FAIL.
you have to solve this at the orchestration design stage up front...
http://seroter.wordpress.com/2007/01/02/orchestration-handling-of-suspended-messages/