I am running a launcher in publish instance,the launcher doesn't invoke the workflow when run mode is publish or publish and author but it works when I make run mode as author
Can someone help me with this behaviour of AEM?
Wrokflow launchers are tied to run-modes and you can change the behavior to run to either or both of them. The default dialog height is less hence it is not visible you need to scroll down.
Taken from the Adobe documentation:
When using one of the above run modes (author, publish, samplecontent, nosamplecontent), the value used at installation time defines the run mode for the entire lifetime of that installation.
For these run modes you cannot change them after installation.
You cannot use runmodes author AND publish at the same time (I wonder what AEM will do if you try to set both runmodes) and switching the runmode is also a bad idea.
See https://docs.adobe.com/docs/en/aem/6-0/deploy/configuring/configure-runmodes.html for details.
There must be something wrong with your instance. Any log messages?
Related
I used an evaluated jxbrowser, which version is 6.14, I write an demo to use it. but i have a problem with it.
Use the demo app to start an application, which can show web UI, keep this applciation with opened, but then I start demo app again, system will throw below exception:
chromium profile directory is already/used by another BrowserContext instance or process
jxbrwowser cannot start two clients in one PC? if can, how to resolve it?
We strongly recommend that you don't use several BrowserContext instances with the same profile directory. Chromium engine wasn't designed for such usage and doesn't support it. Even if you don't see any issues right now, the issues will appear later in end user environments. For example, in macOS environment you will get the Chromium's error message dialog every time when you run your application instance developed in such way.
Since it's a critical requirement in the Chromium engine, I don't think we will make it configurable in next versions. This is how Chromium engine works. These is a recommendation we have to follow when working with the Chromium engine.
I'm developing a mobile AIR application using IntelliJ.
When debugging in Flash Builder there is an option to clear to application data on each (debug) launch of the ADL (see screenshot below) However, I can't find this setting in IntelliJ or some ADL parameter to force a clear on each new debug session. I was wondering if such an option exist in IntelliJ or ADL.
A little background: I'm using the PersistanceManager in the application to store some user settings and I want to be able to start the application without the saved settings from my previous run. Using this setting in Flash Builder does the trick, but I'm having no luck with IntelliJ.
Not sure, never had to do that before, but I believe that if you do a "clean" before rebuilding, that should clear out the PersistanceManager.
Yes im still trying to find a solution for this.
The reason this happens is because when you are testing on the device, for some reason IntelliJ sends an uninstall command to the device so it wipes clean everything.
I tried to run my own compiler arguments, but the uninstall command has higher priority so i can't cancel it yet. I think a good solution could be using ant tasks: http://livedocs.adobe.com/flex/3/html/help.html?content=anttasks_1.html
We have a number of config transforms which enable us to publish to a particular environment with the correct options specified in web.config.
However, it would be useful to run the application locally while specifying a particular build configuration. This would enable us to run the app locally and have it connected to the live database, for example - quite handy when tracking down bugs, for example.
However, when we press F5 to run the app locally, regardless of the build configuration currently selected, no transform of the web.config file appears to occur.
Is this the normal behaviour and is it possible to change it?
Reposted from comment:
Yes, it is the normal behaviour. It's a nuisance because it makes the whole thing feel half-a-job-ish and I agree there should be the option to opt-in for the same transformations being applied during a standard build. I haven't found any VS extensions that can do this for you yet, though I imagine it could be done. I personally make a ".Local" version of all my build configs and publish to a local IIS which I can attach to very quickly/easily if I want to use a diffferent environment/config's web.config. Requires some duplication, but does the job
Thanks David
I have an NSIS installer that installs my Qt application. At the end of the install process, the installer gives the user the option to launch the application immediately.
My application uses QLocalSocket/QLocalServer to talk to other local instances of the application. (They talk to each other basically just to ensure that there's only one instance of the app running at a time.) However, on Vista, if one of the instances was started up by the installer, then other instances cannot talk to that instance unless they were also started by the installer (or uninstaller, interestingly).
The NSIS installer launches the app with the Exec command. The client tries to connect to the server through QLocalSocket::connectToServer, which fails with the error "QLocalSocket::connectToServer: Unknown error 5".
Can anyone explain this? What's the best way to work around it?
If 5 is a windows error code, it would mean access denied. Is there a way for you to change the security on this server (You would need to access the native pipe handle)?
The finish page run option has more issues than just this, the new process gets the wrong HKCU and user profile etc.
I would recommend just disabling the run checkbox on the finish page. (This issue goes all the way back to win2000 when RunAs was added)
If you really really want this run checkbox, you can use the UAC plugin, it will allow you to start a child process as the "correct" user.
Finally figured this out. The installer was running as admin (the install script said "RequestExecutionLevel admin"), and apparently it launched my app with those elevated permissions, which meant that other instances of my app running with user-level permissions couldn't connect to it. QLocalSocket/Server uses named pipes on windows, so I figure this is a windows security feature. I'm planning to work around this by using the UAC NSIS plugin, which I believe lets you run a process with user-level permissions.
I have some problems running FlexUnit tests in IntelliJ.
Every time I execute test, Internet Explorer (which is not even set as default browser) pops up and blocks unit test, i.e. blocks it as add so I must allow access through that dumb top bar and then another confirmation and then finally test runs. Is there any way to reconfigure it to another browser or to run it some other way so I just hit the Run button on Idea and I can see results right away?
Thank you for help
As you are using Windows have a look at the first comment by Alexander Doroshko in this bug report: http://youtrack.jetbrains.net/issue/IDEA-49795
Current behavior:
if 'Use system default browser' is selected at Settings | Web Browsers | Default Web Browser then swf/html is started in default OS application (either default browser of standalone Flash player)
if default browser is overridden in IDEA then it is always used both for swf/html.
It would be more convenient if standalone Flash player is used for swfs independently of this setting as soon as it is OS default program for sfws.
I recommend to configure the stand alone flashplayer executable for executing unit tests. As you can also see from the report this has been improved in IDEA 10.