I've recently created two C# console applications. The first transforms a bunch of command outputs into an XML, and the second transforms the XML into a Word document using a template.
I'd like to know how I could get this onto the web, i.e having a web page where the command output can be uploaded, the two step conversion executed, and finally the Word document made available for download.
Should the web page be created in ASP.NET or are there other (better) options? Do I need to rewrite the console applications in some other format?
This question is fairly broad, with plenty of room for novel sized explanations, but here's a brief highlevel walk through of what likely needs to happen to achieve the proposed results (language agnostic):
Get a hosting provider that allows users to spin up their own machine (i.e. AWS).
Spin up a machine that is compatible with the "console" programs in question.
Install "console" programs on machine.
Install a programming language (i.e. Node.js, PHP, ASP.NET, even C# could do) on the machine.
Install a web server (i.e. NGINX, Apache) on machine, configure it to serve public requests and run with chosen language.
On server request, execute appropriate commands from within the chosen language. Languages typically come with a exec method (i.e. in node.js: require('child_process').exec(command,options,callback))
Get the results of said commands and send it back to the client. Alternatively (for downloads), write the result to a path on the system that is publicly available to the internet and redirect the user to that url (additional configuration might be required to make sure the browser downloads the file as oppose to just serving it).
The steps above should get you pretty close to that you want. As for your questions:
Should the web page be created in ASP.NET or are there other (better)
options?
The "better" options is whatever you feel most comfortable with at the moment, you could always change it later with reasonable effort (assuming that your "console" apps are not unsuspecting unicorns).
Do I need to rewrite the console applications in some other format?
No, unless you have strong reasons to do so (i.e. multi environment compatibility). You could also rewrite to significantly simplify (i.e. bypass working with a CLI and do everything in C#).
Try thinking through these high level steps, begin working on a implementation, and post more specific questions here on StackOverflow when you get stuck.
I hope that helps!
Related
I had little experience writing a web based inventory management system using jsp, tomcat, and db in mysql.
Ever since then, I changed my career as an embedded software engineer(so my knowledge about this topic is rather outdated), and I need to write a web format based code tracking tool with localized database and no server running like a tomcat.
So I decided to give sqllite a try since it does not require a sever running. But I am not sure what to replace a web container with. (I might be little confused here)
basically I need something like below:
1. user accesses web based interface
2. user requests code tracking or source browsing
3. something(that does not require a server running) handles request and extracts information and displays possible matching links
db will be replaced with sqlite, and no tomcat will run. But then I am not sure how I can make "something" in 3) work :(
I'd really appreciate any suggestion.
Disclaimer, I am technical support and sysadmin for my company, not a developer. I'm not after the specifics, simply an idea if what I'd like to acheive is possible or not.
We host hundreds of instances of our in-house classic ASP legacy ecommerce software application and due to countless customisations by clients and ourselves, version management is nightmarish, custom code can't be managed and we've given up releasing new features and mass deploying bug fixes due to the inability to track who needs what patches where.
Parellel to this question I am making management scripts to better automate this though.
What however I'd really like to do is using the miniumum possible effort, port the application code (not the database) to a single code base. Questions I have:
Can ASP relatively effeciently handle connecting to different databases depending on the host header being called? I plan some basic extension to the routine, get hostheader
lookup up db credentials in metadb, set application connection string accordingly logic.
The application writes a few files to the webserver from the database for caching purposes, I'd like to handle this by emulating this behaviour by writing it to something like /masterapp/customer1/specificfile.htm then changing the references to /specificfile.htm in the code to more like /masterapp/shop name/specificfile.htm. Obviously the routines that write specificfile.htm would write to the new location accordingly. Does this seem reasonable?
Other webserver-bound store specific contents like images and csv files I need to keep working without URLs changing ideally, can ASP employ logic to redirect get requests for /images/example.jpg to either /masterapp/shop name/images/example.jpg or /shopname/images/example.jpg depending again on host header? Or could that be done via isapirewrite? (which we already use)
I think these are the biggest challenges. I don't need a complete project plan of how to implement each of these things, I just want to know if it's possible. If the answer is 'yes' I should be able to sell my bosses on the development due to saving support time and our in-house developers could hopefully manage this.
This should be possible and I have achieved similar outcomes with code developed that way from the start. As you are retrofitting this in it's going to be a lot harder, but that's separate to your actual question.
To answer your actual points:
Presumably your DB connection string is already in a application variable or settings file? If so, you just need some logic in your global.asa Session_OnStart that reads the host header and selects the appropriate DB string. This could be hard coded or you could have a "control" DB that stores sites, their DB strings file paths etc and pulls the details into the session object.
This is related to the above, pull your cache storage locations from the DB, or have a "directory name friendly" base name for each site, so you can have "/masterapp/" & Session("strSiteBaseName") & "/cache/somefile.htm"
If you're on IIS7 then you can use the URL rewrite module to handle this, if you're on IIS6 there are 3rd party tools you can get to do URL rewriting for you. Again I have done this so can vouch for it working. If you want to get really clever, you can have your master app create the rewrite files for you and "touch" web.config to get them loaded into IIS.
One "gotcha" you'll have with host headers is remember to handle www and no-www records!
You mentioned custom code as well for each site, I haven't done this in production but have tested outside an app and you can rewrite functions after they've already been declared. You can't have includes with variable names, but you can load in a text file and execute it, so there is a way to have custom functions, or changed core functions specific to an individual instance of your over-arching app.
I am currently working on a project that is very new to me, and I feel a bit over my head as far as knowledge base is concerned. My request is for references and information to help me expand my knowledge base, as well as recommendations for technologies and methods.
I have experience primarily with Java, so all this Windows service stuff is new to me. I am not really asking for a how-to (but if someone has time....I wouldn't object :-P)
The project is as follows:
I am to develop an application in ASP.NET that runs as a process from start-up to shutdown. It will be checking some things in a folder, encrypting some files from that folder, and then check if internet connectivity is available. If it is available, it will be sending those files to a server (via a web service on that server, I believe). If it is not available, it will check every 'insert time interval here' to see if connectivity has become available, at which time it will send the files. Once the files are received by the service, the application will need to recieve some kind of confirmation from the server that the file associated with 'xxxxxxxxxxxxx' uniqueidentifier has been received.
Any explanation of the way that web services work or how to implement file encryption in a desktop app (resource load optimization is a very substantial requirement of this app).
Thanks!
badPanda
There are a couple of things going on here. First off it sounds like you are trying to write a service. Assuming you are writing code for Windows, and that code needs to run regularly and perform some tasks, and you want it to start and stop automatically when the computer is starting or shutting down, a service is ideal for this kind of task. Writing a service isn't too different from writing a normal application except that it has a few extra parts to allow the operating system to control it, and it typically has no user interface.
As far as interacting with a web service goes, typically a web service has a published WSDL (Web Services Description Language) which is just a fancy XML file that contains a description of the service. Most moden programming tools have a feature that loads a WSDL file and creates an object that communicates with the service for you. Then its as simple as creating an instance of that client object and calling the appropriate method. Typically using this created object is as simple as calling normal code, and the object does all the work of converting your parameters to a message, sending them over the network, waiting for the response, and converting the response from the web service back into a return value your client can read.
Encryption methods are going to vary based on operating system and programming language. To get any serious kind of answer you are going to have to add more details.
Really all of this is stuff you should be able to find with google, but one of the ironies of search is sometimes you can't find what you are looking for unless you already know what it is called. Try matching up terms like 'Windows Service' with your programming tools and throw in the word tutorial and you should find lots of good stuff to read. So if you are using Visual Studio and C#, a search like 'Windows Service Visual Studio C# Tutorial' should get you exactly what you need.
I am about to write a tender. The solution might be a PHP based CMS. Later I might want to integrate an ASP.NET framework and make it look like one site.
What features would make this relatively easy.
Would OpenId and similar make a difference?
In the PHP world Joomla is supposed to be more integrative than Druapal. What are the important differences here?
Are there spesific frameworks in ASP.NET, Python or Ruby that are more open to integration than others?
The most important thing is going to be putting as much of the look-and-feel in a format that can be shared by any platforms. That means you should develop a standard set of CSS files and (X)HTML files which can be imported (or directly presented) in any of those platform options. Think about it as writing a dynamic library that can be loaded by different programs.
Using OpenID for authentication, if all of your platform options support it, would be nice, but remember that each platform is going to require additional user metadata be stored for each user (preferences, last login, permissions/roles, etc) which you'll still have to wrangle between them. OpenID only solves the authentication problem, not the authorization or preferences problems.
Lastly, since there are so many options, I would stick to cross-platform solutions. That will leave you the most options going forward. There's no compelling advantage IMHO to using ASP.NET if there's a chance you may one day integrate with other systems or move to another system.
I think that most important thing is to choose the right server. The server needs to have adequate modules. Apache would be good choice as it supports all that you want, including mod_aspnet (which I didn't test, but many people say it works).
If you think asp.net integration is certanly going to come, I would choose Windows as OS as it will certanly be easier.
You could also install reverse proxy that would decide which server to render content based on request - if user request aspx page, proxy will connect to the IIS and windoze page, if it asks for php it can connect to other server. The problem with this approach is shared memory & state, which could be solved with carefull design to support this - like shared database holding all state information and model data....
OpenID doesn't make a difference - there are libs for any framework you choose.
We have a web application that uses AJAX to talk to an ASP.NET web service. We would like to write another version that can be used offline. We need to be able to re-use our existing code as much as possible. What approaches should we consider?
The app is currently using XmlHttpRequest to get dynamic data from the server. Obviously the offline version will not be able to talk to the server, but it does need to talk to something! I'm sure installing IIS or Cassini on the client would work, but I was hoping for a simpler solution. Is there no other way for JavaScript to talk to some external code?
There are plenty offline web apps nowaday. It simply evolve from AJAX.
For example:
WoaS (wiki on a stick / stickwiki), Tiddly Wiki,
Google doc and Gmail is going to be offline.
You don't need a webserver to run these webapps in offline mode. Just store the required data, scripts on the client side (usually as XML).
One of the possibilities would be to use Cassini. This is a web server that acts as a host for the ASP.Net runtime. You can host Cassini in a Windows application or a Windows Service. In this scenario you do not have to rewrite the web app and the web service.
Most other solutions do require a rewrite of both your web app and your web service. Depending on the way you have written the existing app you can reuse more or less code.
Have you considered HTML5 with application cache and offline storage?
If you hope to create an "offline" version of your package your biggest issue by far will be the need to install your site into a local copy of IIS (registering a virtual directory, etc.). I pursued this briefly a few years ago and gave up in frustration. It can be done: a number of software vendors such as DevExpress do this so you have local copies of their demonstration projects. Indeed, I was able to do this. The problem was the classic "it works on my computer" syndrome. There was simply no way to guarantee that most of my end-users had anywhere near the technical proficiency to make this work.
Thus, I would strongly recommend that you not pursue this path unless you have very technically proficient users and a huge support staff.
But there is one more very important question: did you abstract all data access code to a DAL? If not, then you have a lot of work to do in managing data access as well.
Update: user "Rine" has recommended Cassini. I just wanted to let you know that I pursued Cassini and another 3rd-party web server as well. I think that there are licensing issues with Cassini but may be wrong - it has been awhile. However, I do distinctly remember running into barrier after barrier with this approach and very little documentation to help me out.
if you want a web application run offline, you need a webserver (IIS for ASP) bound to the localhost (127.0.0.1) address. After this so can access your web application by typing http://127.0.0.1/ in your web browser the same way as you do online.
If your AJAX relies on XMLHttpRequest's, you can:
Make the static versions of XML's you get over XMLHttpRequest and put then into a folder on disk.
Rewrite your XMLHttpRequest URL's so that they point to files on disk.
Rewrite your XMLHttpRequest's so that they don't check status (it's always 0 for the file:// protocol.
All JScript works on file:// pages as well as on http:// ones.
Of course it's not the best way to develop static pages, but it may save you some time on rewriting.
I havent come across any framework specifically built for asp.net like the ones available for PHP or RoR.
Here is a good article by Steven to get you started with HTML 5 and ASP.Net Creating HTML 5 Offline application
Obviously the offline version will not be able to talk to the server, but it does need to talk to something!
Enter HTML5 LocalStorage. It works like a database and enables you to put data on your client. Indeed you have to rework parts of your code in javascript and transmit it to the client, but then it would work offline.
Local Storage works like this:
- Setter: window.localStorage.setItem(KEY, VALUE)
- Getter: window.localStorage.getItem(KEY)
- Remove: window.localStorage.removeItem(KEY)
To get the main page working offline you need to create a manifest. This is used to store complete sites on the client. Please refer to this for more information about manifests:
http://diveintohtml5.info/offline.html
You want to build a web application to work offline?? It can't be done.
You could split the interface code from the rest (in diferent dlls) and create a windows application to mimic the behaviour of your web application. This way you have 2 distinct user interfaces but the same code for business rules and data access.
I don't really see any other way...