Consider the following groupings:
> data.frame(x = c(3:5,7:9,12:14), grp = c(1,1,1,2,2,2,3,3,3))
x grp
1 3 1
2 4 1
3 5 1
4 7 2
5 8 2
6 9 2
7 12 3
8 13 3
9 14 3
Let's say I don't know the grp values but only have a vector x. What is the easiest way to generate grp values, essentially an id field of groups of values within a threshold from from each other? Is this a percolation algorithm?
One option would be to compare the next with the current value and check if the difference is greater than 1, and get the cumulative sum.
df1$grp <- cumsum(c(TRUE, diff(df1$x) > 1))
df1$grp
#[1] 1 1 1 2 2 2 3 3 3
EDIT: From #geotheory's comments.
Related
I have a list of events and sequences. I would like to print the sequences in a separate table if event = x is included somewhere in the sequence. See table below:
Event Sequence
1 a 1
2 a 1
3 x 1
4 a 2
5 a 2
6 a 3
7 a 3
8 x 3
9 a 4
10 a 4
In this case I would like a new table that includes only the sequences where Event=x was included:
Event Sequence
1 a 1
2 a 1
3 x 1
4 a 3
5 a 3
6 x 3
Base R solution:
d[d$Sequence %in% d$Sequence[d$Event == "x"], ]
Event Sequence
1: a 1
2: a 1
3: x 1
4: a 3
5: a 3
6: x 3
data.table solution:
library(data.table)
setDT(d)[Sequence %in% Sequence[Event == "x"]]
As you can see syntax/logic is quite similar between these two solutions:
Find event's that are equal to x
Extract their Sequence
Subset table according to specified Sequence
We can use dplyr to group the data and filter the sequence with any "x" in it.
library(dplyr)
df2 <- df %>%
group_by(Sequence) %>%
filter(any(Event %in% "x")) %>%
ungroup()
df2
# A tibble: 6 x 2
Event Sequence
<chr> <int>
1 a 1
2 a 1
3 x 1
4 a 3
5 a 3
6 x 3
DATA
df <- read.table(text = " Event Sequence
1 a 1
2 a 1
3 x 1
4 a 2
5 a 2
6 a 3
7 a 3
8 x 3
9 a 4
10 a 4",
header = TRUE, stringsAsFactors = FALSE)
This question already has an answer here:
Insert missing time rows into a dataframe
(1 answer)
Closed 5 years ago.
I have a dataset that look like the following
id = c(1,1,1,2,2,2,3,3,4)
cycle = c(1,2,3,1,2,3,1,3,2)
value = 1:9
data.frame(id,cycle,value)
> data.frame(id,cycle,value)
id cycle value
1 1 1 1
2 1 2 2
3 1 3 3
4 2 1 4
5 2 2 5
6 2 3 6
7 3 1 7
8 3 3 8
9 4 2 9
so basically there is a variable called id that identifies the sample, a variable called cycle which identifies the timepoint, and a variable called value that identifies the value at that timepoint.
As you see, sample 3 does not have cycle 2 data and sample 4 is missing cycle 1 and 3 data. What I want to know is there a way to run a command outside of a loop to get the data to place NA's where there is no data. So I would like for my dataset to look like the following:
> data.frame(id,cycle,value)
id cycle value
1 1 1 1
2 1 2 2
3 1 3 3
4 2 1 4
5 2 2 5
6 2 3 6
7 3 1 7
8 3 2 NA
9 3 3 8
10 4 1 NA
11 4 2 9
12 4 3 NA
I am able to solve this problem with a lot of loops and if statements but the code is extremely long and cumbersome (I have many more columns in my real dataset).
Also, the number of samples I have is very large so I need something that is generalizable.
Using merge and expand.grid, we can come up with a solution. expand.grid creates a data.frame with all combinations of the supplied vectors (so you'd supply it with the id and cycle variables). By merging to your original data (and using all.x = T, which is like a left join in SQL), we can fill in those rows with missing data in dat with NA.
id = c(1,1,1,2,2,2,3,3,4)
cycle = c(1,2,3,1,2,3,1,3,2)
value = 1:9
dat <- data.frame(id,cycle,value)
grid_dat <- expand.grid(id = 1:4,
cycle = 1:3)
# or you could do (HT #jogo):
# grid_dat <- expand.grid(id = unique(dat$id),
# cycle = unique(dat$cycle))
merge(x = grid_dat, y = dat, by = c('id','cycle'), all.x = T)
id cycle value
1 1 1 1
2 1 2 2
3 1 3 3
4 2 1 4
5 2 2 5
6 2 3 6
7 3 1 7
8 3 2 NA
9 3 3 8
10 4 1 NA
11 4 2 9
12 4 3 NA
A solution based on the package tidyverse.
library(tidyverse)
# Create example data frame
id <- c(1, 1, 1, 2, 2, 2, 3, 3, 4)
cycle <- c(1, 2, 3, 1, 2, 3, 1, 3, 2)
value <- 1:9
dt <- data.frame(id, cycle, value)
# Complete the combination between id and cycle
dt2 <- dt %>% complete(id, cycle)
Here is a solution with data.table doing a cross join:
library("data.table")
d <- data.table(id = c(1,1,1,2,2,2,3,3,4), cycle = c(1,2,3,1,2,3,1,3,2), value = 1:9)
d[CJ(id=id, cycle=cycle, unique=TRUE), on=.(id,cycle)]
I need to create (with R) a rolling index of pairs from a data set that includes groups. Consider the following data set:
times <- c(4,3,2)
V1 <- unlist(lapply(times, function(x) seq(1, x)))
df <- data.frame(group = rep(1:length(times), times = times),
V1 = V1,
rolling_index = c(1,1,2,2,3,3,4,5,5))
df
group V1 rolling_index
1 1 1 1
2 1 2 1
3 1 3 2
4 1 4 2
5 2 1 3
6 2 2 3
7 2 3 4
8 3 1 5
9 3 2 5
The data frame I have includes the variables group and V1. Within each group V1 designates a running index (that may or may not start at 1).
I want to create a new indexing variable that looks like rolling_index. This variable groups rows within the same group and consecutive V1 value, thus creating a new rolling index. This new index must be consecutive over groups. If there is an uneven amount of rows within a group (e.g. group 2), then the last, single row gets its own rolling index value.
You can try
library(data.table)
setDT(df)[, gr:=as.numeric(gl(.N, 2, .N)), group][,
rollindex:=cumsum(c(TRUE,abs(diff(gr))>0))][,gr:= NULL]
# group V1 rolling_index rollindex
#1: 1 1 1 1
#2: 1 2 1 1
#3: 1 3 2 2
#4: 1 4 2 2
#5: 2 1 3 3
#6: 2 2 3 3
#7: 2 3 4 4
#8: 3 1 5 5
#9: 3 2 5 5
Or using base R
indx1 <- !duplicated(df$group)
indx2 <- with(df, ave(group, group, FUN=function(x)
gl(length(x), 2, length(x))))
cumsum(c(TRUE,diff(indx2)>0)|indx1)
#[1] 1 1 2 2 3 3 4 5 5
Update
The above methods are based on the 'group' column. Suppose you already have a sequence column ('V1') by group as showed in the example, creation of rolling index is easier
cumsum(!!df$V1 %%2)
#[1] 1 1 2 2 3 3 4 5 5
As mentioned in the post, if the 'V1' column do not start at '1' for some groups, we can get the sequence from the 'group' and then do the cumsum as above
cumsum(!!with(df, ave(seq_along(group), group, FUN=seq_along))%%2)
#[1] 1 1 2 2 3 3 4 5 5
There is probably a simpler way but you can do:
rep_each <- unlist(mapply(function(q,r) {c(rep(2, q),rep(1, r))},
q=table(df$group)%/%2,
r=table(df$group)%%2))
df$rolling_index <- inverse.rle(x=list(lengths=rep_each, values=seq(rep_each)))
df$rolling_index
#[1] 1 1 2 2 3 3 4 5 5
In a dataframe I'd like to replace values in a series where they exceed a given threshold.
For example, within a group ('ID') in a series designated by 'time', if 'value' ever exceeds 3, I'd like to make all following entries also equal 3.
ID <- as.factor(c(rep("A", 3), rep("B",3), rep("C",3)))
time <- rep(1:3, 3)
value <- c(c(1,1,2), c(2,3,2), c(3,3,2))
dat <- cbind.data.frame(ID, time, value)
dat
ID time value
A 1 1
A 2 1
A 3 2
B 1 2
B 2 3
B 3 2
C 1 3
C 2 3
C 3 2
I'd like it to be:
ID time value
A 1 1
A 2 1
A 3 2
B 1 2
B 2 3
B 3 3
C 1 3
C 2 3
C 3 3
This should be easy, but I can't figure it out. Thanks!
The ave function makes this very easy by allowing you to apply a function to each of the groupings. In this case, we will adapth the cummax (cumulative maximum) to see if we've seen a 3 yet.
dat$value2<-with(dat, ave(value, ID, FUN=
function(x) ifelse(cummax(x)>=3, 3, x)))
dat;
# ID time value value2
# 1 A 1 1 1
# 2 A 2 1 1
# 3 A 3 2 2
# 4 B 1 2 2
# 5 B 2 3 3
# 6 B 3 2 3
# 7 C 1 3 3
# 8 C 2 3 3
# 9 C 3 2 3
You could also just use FUN=cummax if you want never-decreasing values. I wasn't sure about the sequence c(1,2,1) if you wanted to keep that unchanged or not.
If you can assume your data are sorted by group, then this should be fast, essentially relying on findInterval() behind the scenes:
library(IRanges)
id <- Rle(ID)
three <- which(value>=3L)
ir <- reduce(IRanges(three, end(id)[findRun(three, id)])))
dat$value[as.integer(ir)] <- 3L
This avoids looping over the groups.
I need a sequence of repeated numbers, i.e. 1 1 ... 1 2 2 ... 2 3 3 ... 3 etc. The way I implemented this was:
nyear <- 20
names <- c(rep(1,nyear),rep(2,nyear),rep(3,nyear),rep(4,nyear),
rep(5,nyear),rep(6,nyear),rep(7,nyear),rep(8,nyear))
which works, but is clumsy, and obviously doesn't scale well.
How do I repeat the N integers M times each in sequence?
I tried nesting seq() and rep() but that didn't quite do what I wanted.
I can obviously write a for-loop to do this, but there should be an intrinsic way to do this!
You missed the each= argument to rep():
R> n <- 3
R> rep(1:5, each=n)
[1] 1 1 1 2 2 2 3 3 3 4 4 4 5 5 5
R>
so your example can be done with a simple
R> rep(1:8, each=20)
Another base R option could be gl():
gl(5, 3)
Where the output is a factor:
[1] 1 1 1 2 2 2 3 3 3 4 4 4 5 5 5
Levels: 1 2 3 4 5
If integers are needed, you can convert it:
as.numeric(gl(5, 3))
[1] 1 1 1 2 2 2 3 3 3 4 4 4 5 5 5
For your example, Dirk's answer is perfect. If you instead had a data frame and wanted to add that sort of sequence as a column, you could also use group from groupdata2 (disclaimer: my package) to greedily divide the datapoints into groups.
# Attach groupdata2
library(groupdata2)
# Create a random data frame
df <- data.frame("x" = rnorm(27))
# Create groups with 5 members each (except last group)
group(df, n = 5, method = "greedy")
x .groups
<dbl> <fct>
1 0.891 1
2 -1.13 1
3 -0.500 1
4 -1.12 1
5 -0.0187 1
6 0.420 2
7 -0.449 2
8 0.365 2
9 0.526 2
10 0.466 2
# … with 17 more rows
There's a whole range of methods for creating this kind of grouping factor. E.g. by number of groups, a list of group sizes, or by having groups start when the value in some column differs from the value in the previous row (e.g. if a column is c("x","x","y","z","z") the grouping factor would be c(1,1,2,3,3).