We're having an odd issue with a WebAPI application hosted by another ASP.NET webapp. The WebAPI controllers are all mapped with Ninject but the ASP.NET host site does not use Ninject.
The issue is that any requests to any of the WebAPI controllers fail with a Ninject error and HTTP 500:
"An error occurred when trying to create a controller of type 'MyObjectsController'. Make sure that the controller has a parameterless public constructor."
However, once even a single request to the main webapp is made (such as opening the login page) then the WebAPI calls all work as expected. The WebAPI is registered and initialized as part of the Application_Start global event. The start event is triggered regardless of whether the first request comes in under the WebAPI or the webapp so it's not bypassing the global startup when coming through the WebAPI before the main app. The WebAPI registration is pretty standard stuff:
GlobalConfiguration.Configure(AddressOf WebApiConfig.Register)
And the Register function itself is nothing unusual:
// Web API configuration and services
var cors = new EnableCorsAttribute("*", "*", "*", "X-Pagination");
//To allow cross-origin credentials in Web API
cors.SupportsCredentials = true;
config.EnableCors(cors);
// To disable host-level authentication inside the Web API pipeline and "un-authenticates" the request.
config.SuppressHostPrincipal();
config.Filters.Add(new HostAuthenticationFilter(Startup.OAuthBearerOptions.AuthenticationType));
// Web API routes
var constraintResolver = new DefaultInlineConstraintResolver();
constraintResolver.ConstraintMap.Add("nonzero", typeof(NonZeroConstraint));
//constraintResolver.ConstraintMap.Add("NonEmptyFolderIds", typeof(NonEmptyFolderIdsConstraint));
config.MapHttpAttributeRoutes(constraintResolver);
var jsonFormatter = config.Formatters.OfType<JsonMediaTypeFormatter>().First();
jsonFormatter.SerializerSettings.ContractResolver = new CamelCasePropertyNamesContractResolver();
The NinjectConfig is also pretty standard:
public static class NinjectConfig
{
/// <summary>
/// THe kernel of Ninject
/// </summary>
public static Lazy<IKernel> CreateKernel = new Lazy<IKernel>(() =>
{
var kernel = new StandardKernel();
kernel.Load(Assembly.GetExecutingAssembly());
RegisterServices(kernel);
return kernel;
});
private static void RegisterServices(KernelBase kernel)
{
kernel.Bind<IMyObjectRepository>().To<MyObjectRepository>().InRequestScope();
...
}
}
An example of the DI usage (again, very basic and standard) is:
public class MyObjectRepository : IMyObjectRepository
{
private readonly IMyOtherObjectRepository _objectRepository;
...
public MyObjectRepository(IMyOtherObjectRepository objectRepository)
{
_objectRepository = objectRepository;
...
}
...
}
We want to avoid the requirement of the initial request to the webapp before the WebAPI is available for requests but nothing seems to be getting us towards a solution.
We initially tried out the IIS preloading/app initialization by setting Start Mode to AlwaysRunning and Start automatically to True in the AppPool config. We also enabled preloadEnabled to true and then added the applicationInitialization config section to the web.config such as the following:
<system.webServer>
...
<applicationInitialization>
<add initializationPage="login.aspx" />
</applicationInitialization>
...
</system.webServer>
However, none of these changes and variations of made any difference to the behavior of the WebAPI. We've scoured the web for more help but are at somewhat of a loss as pretty much everything we've come across points to setting the Start Mode, Start Automatically, preloadEnabled, and applicationInitialization and then it will magically work but that's definitely not our experience.
Does anyone have suggestions or ideas?
Install Ninject integration for WebApi nuget package. It creates a file which initializes Ninject on startup. Here is the doc.
Related
I've got two hosted services in my web service: Domain and ComplianceService. ComplianceService needs to reference data and methods in Domain, like so:
public ComplianceService(ILogger<ComplianceService> logger, Domain domain, IRuleRepository ruleRepository)
{
// Initialize the service.
this.logger = logger;
this.domain = domain;
this.ruleRepository = ruleRepository;
}
My initialization in startup.cs looks like this:
// Add the dependencies.
serviceCollection.AddSingleton<RulesActivator>()
.AddSingleton<Accruals>()
.AddSingleton<IRuleRepository, ComplianceRuleRepository>()
.AddSingleton<IViolation, Violation>();
// Add the hosted services.
serviceCollection.AddHostedService<Domain>();
serviceCollection.AddHostedService<ComplianceService>();
When I try to run this, I get this message:
System.InvalidOperationException: 'Unable to resolve service for type 'ThetaRex.OpenBook.ServerDomain.Domain' while attempting to activate 'ThetaRex.OpenBook.WebApi.ComplianceService'.'
If I add Domain to the IoC, like this:
serviceCollection.AddSingleton<Domain>()
.AddSingleton<RulesActivator>()
.AddSingleton<Accruals>()
.AddSingleton<IRuleRepository, ComplianceRuleRepository>()
.AddSingleton<IViolation, Violation>();
It runs, but I get two copies of Domain. I can force it to work like this:
// Add the hosted services.
serviceCollection.AddHostedService(sp => sp.GetRequiredService<Domain>());
if (this.Configuration.GetValue<bool>("ComplianceEnabled"))
{
serviceCollection.AddHostedService<ComplianceService>();
}
But this seems really clumsy and counterintuitive. How come the AddHostedService can instantiate ComplianceService, but can't instantiate the dependent service?
I'm developing a spring application (client) that is secured with an OAuth2 provider. This application should do some REST calls to another spring application (resource server). For performing the REST calls, I will use spring's WebClient.
I therefore try to create a bean of type WebClient as can be found in several blogs.
#Configuration
public class AppConfig {
#Bean
public WebClient webClient(ReactiveClientRegistrationRepository clientRegistrations) {
ServerOAuth2AuthorizedClientExchangeFilterFunction oauth =
new ServerOAuth2AuthorizedClientExchangeFilterFunction(clientRegistrations,
new UnAuthenticatedServerOAuth2AuthorizedClientRepository());
oauth.setDefaultClientRegistrationId("myprovider");
return WebClient.builder().filter(oauth).build();
}
}
When starting the application, I get the following error:
The following candidates were found but could not be injected:
- Bean method 'clientRegistrationRepository' in 'ReactiveOAuth2ClientAutoConfiguration' not loaded because NoneNestedConditions 1 matched 0 did not; NestedCondition on ReactiveOAuth2ClientAutoConfiguration.NonServletApplicationCondition.ServletApplicationCondition found 'session' scope
Action:
Consider revisiting the entries above or defining a bean of type 'org.springframework.security.oauth2.client.registration.ReactiveClientRegistrationRepository' in your configuration.
As several websites recommend exactly this code for generating a WebClient instance when using OAuth2 authentication, I'm wondering what I'm doing wrong?
Do you have any suggestions for me?
Thanks.
I got the same issue. I changed the code as provided in the video : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1N-xwmoN83w&t=1569s and that worked
#Bean
public WebClient webClient(ClientRegistrationRepository clientRegistrationRepository , OAuth2AuthorizedClientRepository authorizedClientRepository) {
ServletOAuth2AuthorizedClientExchangeFilterFunction oauth =
new ServletOAuth2AuthorizedClientExchangeFilterFunction (clientRegistrationRepository , authorizedClientRepository);
return WebClient.builder().apply(oauth.oauth2Configuration()).build();
}
Hope that helps.
I'm having trouble getting the Hangfire (1.5.8) dashboard to work inside of an IIS Virtual Directoy. Everything works beautifully in my dev environment where my application is simply mapped to the root of localhost. Our beta server, on the other hand, uses Virtual Directories to separate apps and app pools.
It's an ASP.Net MVC site using Hangfire with an OWIN Startup class. It gets deployed to http://beta-server/app-name/. When I attempt to access either http://beta-server/app-name/hangfire or http//beta-server/hangfire I get a 404 from IIS.
For the purposes of troubleshooting this, my IAuthenticationFilter simply returns true.
Here is my Startup.cs, pretty basic:
public class Startup
{
public void Configuration(IAppBuilder app)
{
// For more information on how to configure your application, visit http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkID=316888
GlobalConfiguration.Configuration
.UseSqlServerStorage(new DetectsEnvironment().GetEnvironment());
app.UseHangfireDashboard("/hangfire", new DashboardOptions
{
AuthorizationFilters = new[] {new AuthenticationFilter()}
});
app.UseHangfireServer();
}
}
Does anyone have a working implementation that gets deployed to a Virtual Directory? Are there any OWIN middleware admin/management tools I can use to dig into what URL is getting registered within IIS?
I ended up fixing this simply by adding the HTTPHandler to the section in web.config.
<system.webServer>
<handlers>
<add name="hangfireDashboard" path="hangfire" type="System.Web.DefaultHttpHandler" verb="*" />
</handlers>
</system.webServer>
I had a similar issue in ASP.NET Core 2.0 and it required proper authorization setup (I use a middleware to protect the route, so I did not rely on authorization in my example):
app.UseHangfireDashboard("/hangfire", new DashboardOptions
{
Authorization = new [] {new HangfireDashboardAuthorizationFilter()}
});
/// <summary>
/// authorization required when deployed
/// </summary>
public class HangfireDashboardAuthorizationFilter : IDashboardAuthorizationFilter
{
///<inheritdoc/>
public bool Authorize(DashboardContext context)
{
// var httpContext = context.GetHttpContext();
// Allow all authenticated users to see the Dashboard (potentially dangerous).
// handled through middleware
return true; // httpContext.User.Identity.IsAuthenticated;
}
}
There is not need to change anything in web.config.
For more information check Hangfire documentation about this topic.
I had the exact same problem. In my case, this was because of bad configuration - the Startup class was not called. So try to add the following to your config file:
<add key="owin:appStartup" value="YourProject.YourNamespace.Startup, YourProject" />
<add key="owin:AutomaticAppStartup" value="true" />
Hope this helps.
Martin
I am currently investigating the possibility of using a Java Web Service (as described by the Info*Engine documentation of Windchill) in order to retrieve information regarding parts. I am using Windchill version 10.1.
I have successfully deployed a web service, which I consume in a .Net application. Calls which do not try to access Windchill information complete successfully. However, when trying to retrieve part information, I get a wt.method.AuthenticationException.
Here is the code that runs within the webService (The web service method simply calls this method)
public static String GetOnePart(String partNumber) throws WTException
{
WTPart part=null;
RemoteMethodServer server = RemoteMethodServer.getDefault();
server.setUserName("theUsername");
server.setPassword("thePassword");
try {
QuerySpec qspec= new QuerySpec(WTPart.class);
qspec.appendWhere(new SearchCondition(WTPart.class,WTPart.NUMBER,SearchCondition.LIKE,partNumber),new int[]{0,1});
// This fails.
QueryResult qr=PersistenceHelper.manager.find((StatementSpec)qspec);
while(qr.hasMoreElements())
{
part=(WTPart) qr.nextElement();
partName = part.getName();
}
} catch (AuthenticationException e) {
// Exception caught here.
partName = e.toString();
}
return partName;
}
This code works in a command line application deployed on the server, but fails with a wt.method.AuthenticationException when performed from within the web service. I feel it fails because the use of RemoteMethodServer is not what I should be doing since the web service is within the MethodServer.
Anyhow, if anyone knows how to do this, it would be awesome.
A bonus question would be how to log from within the web service, and how to configure this logging.
Thank you.
You don't need to authenticate on the server side with this code
RemoteMethodServer server = RemoteMethodServer.getDefault();
server.setUserName("theUsername");
server.setPassword("thePassword");
If you have followed the documentation (windchill help center), your web service should be something annotated with #WebServices and #WebMethod(operationName="getOnePart") and inherit com.ptc.jws.servlet.JaxWsService
Also you have to take care to the policy used during deployment.
The default ant script is configured with
security.policy=userNameAuthSymmetricKeys
So you need to manage it when you consume your ws with .Net.
For logging events, you just need to call the log4j logger instantiated by default with $log.debug("Hello")
You can't pre-authenticate server side.
You can write the auth into your client tho. Not sure what the .Net equivilent is, but this works for Java clients:
private static final String USERNAME = "admin";
private static final String PASSWORD = "password";
static {
java.net.Authenticator.setDefault(new java.net.Authenticator() {
#Override
protected java.net.PasswordAuthentication getPasswordAuthentication() {
return new java.net.PasswordAuthentication(USERNAME, PASSWORD.toCharArray());
}
});
}
long time ASP.Net interface developer being asked to learn WCF, looking for some education on more architecture related fronts - as its not my strong suit but I'm having to deal.
In our current ASMX world we adopted a model of creating ServiceManager static classes for our interaction with web services. We're starting to migrate to WCF, attempting to follow the same model. At first I was dealing with performance problems, but I've tweaked a bit and we're running smoothly now, but I'm questioning my tactics. Here's a simplified version (removed error handling, caching, object manipulation, etc.) of what we're doing:
public static class ContentManager
{
private static StoryManagerClient _clientProxy = null;
const string _contentServiceResourceCode = "StorySvc";
// FOR CACHING
const int _getStoriesTTL = 300;
private static Dictionary<string, GetStoriesCacheItem> _getStoriesCache = new Dictionary<string, GetStoriesCacheItem>();
private static ReaderWriterLockSlim _cacheLockStories = new ReaderWriterLockSlim();
public static Story[] GetStories(string categoryGuid)
{
// OMITTED - if category is cached and not expired, return from cache
// get endpoint address from FinderClient (ResourceManagement SVC)
UrlResource ur = FinderClient.GetUrlResource(_contentServiceResourceCode);
// Get proxy
StoryManagerClient svc = GetStoryServiceClient(ur.Url);
// create request params
GetStoriesRequest request = new GetStoriesRequest{}; // SIMPLIFIED
Manifest manifest = new Manifest{}; // SIMPLIFIED
// execute GetStories at WCF service
try
{
GetStoriesResponse response = svc.GetStories(manifest, request);
}
catch (Exception)
{
if (svc.State == CommunicationState.Faulted)
{
svc.Abort();
}
throw;
}
// OMITTED - do stuff with response, cache if needed
// return....
}
internal static StoryManagerClient GetStoryServiceClient(string endpointAddress)
{
if (_clientProxy == null)
_clientProxy = new StoryManagerClient(GetServiceBinding(_contentServiceResourceCode), new EndpointAddress(endpointAddress));
return _clientProxy;
}
public static Binding GetServiceBinding(string bindingSettingName)
{
// uses Finder service to load a binding object - our alternative to definition in web.config
}
public static void PreloadContentServiceClient()
{
// get finder location
UrlResource ur = FinderClient.GetUrlResource(_contentServiceResourceCode);
// preload proxy
GetStoryServiceClient(ur.Url);
}
}
We're running smoothly now with round-trip calls completing in the 100ms range. Creating the PreloadContentServiceClient() method and adding to our global.asax got that "first call" performance down to that same level. And you might want to know we're using the DataContractSerializer, and the "Add Service Reference" method.
I've done a lot of reading on static classes, singletons, shared data contract assemblies, how to use the ChannelFactory pattern and a whole bunch of other things that I could do to our usage model...admittedly, some of its gone over my head. And, like I said, we seem to be running smoothly. I know I'm not seeing the big picture, though. Can someone tell me what I've ended up here with regards to channel pooling, proxy failures, etc. and why I should head down the ChannelFactory path? My gut says to just do it, but my head can't comprehend why...
Thanks!
ChannelFactory is typically used when you aren't using Add Service Reference - you have the contract via a shared assembly not generated via a WSDL. Add Service Reference uses ClientBase which is essentially creating the WCF channel for you behind the scenes.
When you are dealing with REST-ful services, WebChannelFactory provides a service-client like interface based off the shared assembly contract. You can't use Add Service Reference if your service only supports a REST-ful endpoint binding.
The only difference to you is preference - do you need full access the channel for custom behaviors, bindings, etc. or does Add Service Reference + SOAP supply you with enough of an interface for your needs.