HTTP: getById creates new instance, which is missing an Array (Angular 2 RC1 + TS) - http

I got some really good help to a previous question at: "TypeError.parent.context.car.getBrands is not a function": s
and that is related to my current question. As can seen in that answer to my previous error, my app won't work, unless I create an new instance of "car", but hen I call that method:
getById(id: string) {
return this.http.get('app/car.json'+id)
/*
if I log the incoming data here to the console,
the correct data from server comes, eg: 'id: id, name: name, brands: Array[2]'
*/
.map(data => data.json())
.map(car => new Car(car.id, car.name)); //<== this line causes problem!
}
receiving component:
routerOnActivate(curr: RouteSegment): void {
let id = curr.getParam('id');
this._service.getById(id)
.subscribe(car => {
// this code is executed when the response from the server arrives
this.car = car;
console.log("res: ", this.car);// <=== correct car, without the array of brands
});
// code here is executed before code from the server arrives
// event though it is written below
}
it creates a new instance "Car". Well that is all good, but the Car also contains an Array of Brands.
My service looks like this:
#Injectable()
export class Service {
constructor(private http: Http) { }
getCars(){
return this.http.get...
}
getById(id: string) {
return this.http.get...
}
}
and my Car class like:
export class Car {
private brands: Array<Brand>;
constructor(public id: string, public name: string) {
this.brands = new Array<Brand>();
}
public getBrands(): Array<Brand> {
return this.brands;
}
//some other methods.
}
So I also have some data in the brands Array, but since the getById method creates a new car, it only takes the parameter id and name, and the brands array becomes empty! I don't know how to get the data from the server side so that it includes the array of brands!
I've (desperately) tried creating an Car in my service, which does log the correct data... but obviously doesn't work.
getById(id: string) {
this.http.get('app/car.json'+id)
.map((res: Response) => res.json())
.subscribe(car => {
//this code is executed when the response from the server arrives
this.car = car;
console.log("res: ", this.car); // <==== correct data!
return this.car;
});
//return this.car placed here doesn't give void error, but returns an undefined car, since the code gets executed before subscribe!
}
and receiving component:
routerOnActivate(curr: RouteSegment){
let id = curr.getParam('id');
this.car = this._service.getById(id); //error: Type 'void' is not assignable to type 'Car'
}
Any advice to give? Thanks!

It's been ages, but I thought I would post the solution to my problem. I had to create a static method to get the app to work. As follows:
getById(id:string)
return this.http.get('app/car.json'+id)
.map(data => data.json())
.map(data => Car.carFromJSON(data))
Then in my Car class:
static carFromJSON(json) {
let id = json.id
let name = json.name
let brands: Brand[] =
json.brands.map (brand => new Brand())
return new Car(id, name, brands)
}

You're initializing your car with empty array every time:
export class Car {
private brands: Array<Brand>;
constructor(public id: string, public name: string) {
this.brands = new Array<Brand>(); <-- every new Car() will end up with empty array
}
public getBrands(): Array<Brand> {
return this.brands;
}
//some other methods.
}
You have to extend your constructor with brands:
constructor(public id: string, public name: string, public brands: Brand[]) {}
And then call:
getById(id: string) {
return this.http.get('app/car.json'+id)
.map(data => data.json())
.map(car => new Car(car.id, car.name, car.brands)); // <-- add brands
}

Related

Argument List can't be assigned to the param type List

I've run into an error I can't quite figure out. I'm calling the service from the action and setting a new redux state with th response. However, I get the following error:
Error:
The argument type 'List<Chat> (C:\flutter\bin\cache\pkg\sky_engine\lib\core\list.dart)' can't be assigned to the parameter type 'List<Chat> (C:\flutter\bin\cache\pkg\sky_engine\lib\core\list.dart)'.
Action:
class GetChatRequest {}
class GetChatSuccess {
final List<Chat> history;
GetChatSuccess(this.history);
}
class GetChatFailure {
final String error;
GetChatFailure(this.error);
}
final Function getLastChatMessages = () {
return (Store<AppState> store) {
var chatService = new ChatService(store);
store.dispatch(new GetChatRequest());
chatService.getLast50Messages().then((history) {
store.dispatch(new GetChatSuccess(history));
});
};
};
Service:
Future<List<Chat>> getLast50Messages() async {
final response = await webClient.get('xxxx');
return response['data'].map<Chat>((e) => new Chat.fromJSON(e)).toList();
}
Change
store.dispatch(new GetChatSuccess(history));
to
store.dispatch(new GetChatSuccess(List<Chat>.from(history)));
to get a properly typed list.
history is a List<dynamic> that contains only Chat elements, but the list has still the generic type dynamic. To create a properly typed List<Chat> create a new list with that type and fill it with the elements from history.
See also https://api.dartlang.org/stable/2.1.0/dart-core/List/List.from.html

After using Angular2+ RouteReuseStrategy, how to call a method in return to cache components to update part?

I have a list page, and click a column to enter the details page. Edit and return. Because using RouteReuseStrategy, it can maintain the list page of the scene remains the same. But I'd like to partially update, However, I don't know how to trigger it.
Here is my RouteReuseStrategy service and most of the same.
export class SimpleReuseStrategy implements RouteReuseStrategy {
_cacheRouters: { [key: string]: any } = {};
shouldDetach(route: ActivatedRouteSnapshot): boolean {
return true;
}
store(route: ActivatedRouteSnapshot, handle: DetachedRouteHandle): void {
this._cacheRouters[route.routeConfig.path] = {
snapshot: route,
handle: handle
};
}
shouldAttach(route: ActivatedRouteSnapshot): boolean {
return !!this._cacheRouters[route.routeConfig.path];
}
retrieve(route: ActivatedRouteSnapshot): DetachedRouteHandle {
return this._cacheRouters[route.routeConfig.path].handle;
}
shouldReuseRoute(future: ActivatedRouteSnapshot, curr:
ActivatedRouteSnapshot): boolean {
return future.routeConfig === curr.routeConfig;
}
}
In your list page component you can listen to route changes:
Detect if the navigation start came from the detail route i.e. /detail/1
if so, get the 'id' param of the route /detail/1
replace that element in the list
// List component
ngOnInit(): void {
this.subscription = this.router.events.subscribe((event) => {
if (event instanceof NavigationStart) {
// checkIfDetailPage and store ID
}
if (event instanceof NavigationEnd) {
// checkIfThisPage and get the ID
// replace element with ID
}
});
}
An alternative approach for detecting something changed (instead of observing the route changes) you could implement Service to which your list component subscribes and your detail component notifies.

TypeScript - passing a class as an argument, and reflection

I am writing a generic unmarshaller. It converts graph DB data to generated TypeScript (1.8.7) model classes. The input is JSON. The output should be an instance of a model class.
My ultimate goal is to create something like Hibernate OGM, only for Tinkerpop Frames and TypeScript, with REST endpoint in the middle.
What's the right way to pass a class as a parameter and reach it's static members? I want to have something like this:
SomeModel some = <SomeModel> unmarshaller.fromJSON({/*Object from JSON*/}, SomeModel);
I've tried to write a method.
Not sure if I am heading in the right direction, feel free to suggest different approaches.
public fromJSON(input: Object, clazz: typeof FrameModel): FrameModel
{
// This only demonstrates access to Framemodel's metadata
// about original Java model classes.
clazz.graphPropertyMapping;
clazz.graphRelationMapping;
let result = {};
...
return result;
}
...
But when I tried to execute this on Plunker, I got execution errors with unuseful stacktrace.
The model superclass looks like this:
/**
* Things common to all Frames models on the Typescript side.
*/
export class FrameModel
{
// Model metadata
static discriminator: string;
static graphPropertyMapping: { [key:string]:string; };
static graphRelationMapping: { [key:string]:string; };
// Each instance needs a vertex ID
private vertexId: number;
public getVertexId(): number {
return this.vertexId;
}
}
Sample model class:
import {TestPlanetModel} from './TestPlanetModel';
import {TestShipModel} from './TestShipModel';
export class TestGeneratorModel extends FrameModel
{
static discriminator: string = 'TestGenerator';
static graphPropertyMapping: { [key:string]:string; } = {
bar: 'boo',
name: 'name',
rank: 'rank',
};
static graphRelationMapping: { [key:string]:string; } = {
colonizes: 'colonizedPlanet',
commands: 'ship',
};
boo: string;
name: string;
rank: string;
public colonizedPlanet: TestPlanetModel[]; // edge label 'colonizedPlanet'
public ship: TestShipModel; // edge label 'ship'
}
I haven't found much material on reflection and class handling in TypeScript.
I know how I would do this in Java.
I know how I would do this in JavaScript.
I understand that I might achieve similar results with decorators, but having fields or static fields seemed a bit simpler, for generated models.
You've maybe already noticed that class members cannot have const keyword. But you could go with static instead. Also member should be public if you want it to be accessible from outside world.
public static graphPropertyMapping: { [key:string]:string; } = {
bar: 'boo',
name: 'name',
rank: 'rank',
};
As for creating result instance:
let result = new clazz();
//copy properties
return result;
If I understand you correctly then here's something to help you get started:
interface Model {}
interface ModelData {}
interface MyModelConstructor<M extends Model, D extends ModelData> {
new(data: D): M;
// static members
graphPropertyMapping: any;
graphRelationMapping: any;
}
class Unmarshaller {
public fromJSON<T>(input: string | ModelData, ctor: MyModelConstructor<T, ModelData>): T {
let data: ModelData = (typeof input === "string") ? JSON.parse(input) : input;
let propertyMapping = ctor.graphPropertyMapping;
let relationMapping = ctor.graphRelationMapping;
// do whatever with the mappings
return new ctor(input);
}
}
(code in playground)
I don't know how your models look like, so I hope this is close enough.
I recently released an enhanced version of the TypeScript compiler that allows exactly what you are expecting: read all (static or not) fields metadata from a class. For example you can write:
interface MyInterface {
active:boolean;
description: string;
}
class MyClass {
id: number;
name: string;
myComplexField: MyInterface;
}
function printMembers(clazz: Class) {
let fields = clazz.members.filter(m => m.type.kind !== 'function'); //exclude methods.
for(let field of fields) {
let typeName = field.type.kind;
if(typeName === 'class' || typeName === 'interface') {
typeName = (<Class | Interface>field.type).name;
}
console.log(`Field ${field.name} of ${clazz.name} has type: ${typeName}`);
}
}
printMembers(MyClass.getClass());
this is the output:
$ node main.js
Field id of MyClass has type: number
Field name of MyClass has type: string
Field myComplexField of MyClass has type: MyInterface
Of course, if you change the members property access of clazz to statics you will retrieve all static members. These information can be accessed at coding time too, so you can use autocompletion.
You can do the same with Interfaces metadata. Simply write MyInterface for example, and access its members.
You can find the project here.

How to use SignalR with Angular 2?

How to use SignalR with Angular 2?
How to manually run change detection when receiving data from SignalR?
I recently wrote an article that demonstrates one way to integrate Angular 2 and SignalR using a "channel/event" model:
https://blog.sstorie.com/integrating-angular-2-and-signalr-part-2-of-2/
I don't think just linking to another site is considered appropriate, so here's the core of the Angular 2 service that exposes SignalR:
import {Injectable, Inject} from "angular2/core";
import Rx from "rxjs/Rx";
/**
* When SignalR runs it will add functions to the global $ variable
* that you use to create connections to the hub. However, in this
* class we won't want to depend on any global variables, so this
* class provides an abstraction away from using $ directly in here.
*/
export class SignalrWindow extends Window {
$: any;
}
export enum ConnectionState {
Connecting = 1,
Connected = 2,
Reconnecting = 3,
Disconnected = 4
}
export class ChannelConfig {
url: string;
hubName: string;
channel: string;
}
export class ChannelEvent {
Name: string;
ChannelName: string;
Timestamp: Date;
Data: any;
Json: string;
constructor() {
this.Timestamp = new Date();
}
}
class ChannelSubject {
channel: string;
subject: Rx.Subject<ChannelEvent>;
}
/**
* ChannelService is a wrapper around the functionality that SignalR
* provides to expose the ideas of channels and events. With this service
* you can subscribe to specific channels (or groups in signalr speak) and
* use observables to react to specific events sent out on those channels.
*/
#Injectable()
export class ChannelService {
/**
* starting$ is an observable available to know if the signalr
* connection is ready or not. On a successful connection this
* stream will emit a value.
*/
starting$: Rx.Observable<any>;
/**
* connectionState$ provides the current state of the underlying
* connection as an observable stream.
*/
connectionState$: Rx.Observable<ConnectionState>;
/**
* error$ provides a stream of any error messages that occur on the
* SignalR connection
*/
error$: Rx.Observable<string>;
// These are used to feed the public observables
//
private connectionStateSubject = new Rx.Subject<ConnectionState>();
private startingSubject = new Rx.Subject<any>();
private errorSubject = new Rx.Subject<any>();
// These are used to track the internal SignalR state
//
private hubConnection: any;
private hubProxy: any;
// An internal array to track what channel subscriptions exist
//
private subjects = new Array<ChannelSubject>();
constructor(
#Inject(SignalrWindow) private window: SignalrWindow,
#Inject("channel.config") private channelConfig: ChannelConfig
) {
if (this.window.$ === undefined || this.window.$.hubConnection === undefined) {
throw new Error("The variable '$' or the .hubConnection() function are not defined...please check the SignalR scripts have been loaded properly");
}
// Set up our observables
//
this.connectionState$ = this.connectionStateSubject.asObservable();
this.error$ = this.errorSubject.asObservable();
this.starting$ = this.startingSubject.asObservable();
this.hubConnection = this.window.$.hubConnection();
this.hubConnection.url = channelConfig.url;
this.hubProxy = this.hubConnection.createHubProxy(channelConfig.hubName);
// Define handlers for the connection state events
//
this.hubConnection.stateChanged((state: any) => {
let newState = ConnectionState.Connecting;
switch (state.newState) {
case this.window.$.signalR.connectionState.connecting:
newState = ConnectionState.Connecting;
break;
case this.window.$.signalR.connectionState.connected:
newState = ConnectionState.Connected;
break;
case this.window.$.signalR.connectionState.reconnecting:
newState = ConnectionState.Reconnecting;
break;
case this.window.$.signalR.connectionState.disconnected:
newState = ConnectionState.Disconnected;
break;
}
// Push the new state on our subject
//
this.connectionStateSubject.next(newState);
});
// Define handlers for any errors
//
this.hubConnection.error((error: any) => {
// Push the error on our subject
//
this.errorSubject.next(error);
});
this.hubProxy.on("onEvent", (channel: string, ev: ChannelEvent) => {
//console.log(`onEvent - ${channel} channel`, ev);
// This method acts like a broker for incoming messages. We
// check the interal array of subjects to see if one exists
// for the channel this came in on, and then emit the event
// on it. Otherwise we ignore the message.
//
let channelSub = this.subjects.find((x: ChannelSubject) => {
return x.channel === channel;
}) as ChannelSubject;
// If we found a subject then emit the event on it
//
if (channelSub !== undefined) {
return channelSub.subject.next(ev);
}
});
}
/**
* Start the SignalR connection. The starting$ stream will emit an
* event if the connection is established, otherwise it will emit an
* error.
*/
start(): void {
// Now we only want the connection started once, so we have a special
// starting$ observable that clients can subscribe to know know if
// if the startup sequence is done.
//
// If we just mapped the start() promise to an observable, then any time
// a client subscried to it the start sequence would be triggered
// again since it's a cold observable.
//
this.hubConnection.start()
.done(() => {
this.startingSubject.next();
})
.fail((error: any) => {
this.startingSubject.error(error);
});
}
/**
* Get an observable that will contain the data associated with a specific
* channel
* */
sub(channel: string): Rx.Observable<ChannelEvent> {
// Try to find an observable that we already created for the requested
// channel
//
let channelSub = this.subjects.find((x: ChannelSubject) => {
return x.channel === channel;
}) as ChannelSubject;
// If we already have one for this event, then just return it
//
if (channelSub !== undefined) {
console.log(`Found existing observable for ${channel} channel`)
return channelSub.subject.asObservable();
}
//
// If we're here then we don't already have the observable to provide the
// caller, so we need to call the server method to join the channel
// and then create an observable that the caller can use to received
// messages.
//
// Now we just create our internal object so we can track this subject
// in case someone else wants it too
//
channelSub = new ChannelSubject();
channelSub.channel = channel;
channelSub.subject = new Rx.Subject<ChannelEvent>();
this.subjects.push(channelSub);
// Now SignalR is asynchronous, so we need to ensure the connection is
// established before we call any server methods. So we'll subscribe to
// the starting$ stream since that won't emit a value until the connection
// is ready
//
this.starting$.subscribe(() => {
this.hubProxy.invoke("Subscribe", channel)
.done(() => {
console.log(`Successfully subscribed to ${channel} channel`);
})
.fail((error: any) => {
channelSub.subject.error(error);
});
},
(error: any) => {
channelSub.subject.error(error);
});
return channelSub.subject.asObservable();
}
// Not quite sure how to handle this (if at all) since there could be
// more than 1 caller subscribed to an observable we created
//
// unsubscribe(channel: string): Rx.Observable<any> {
// this.observables = this.observables.filter((x: ChannelObservable) => {
// return x.channel === channel;
// });
// }
/** publish provides a way for calles to emit events on any channel. In a
* production app the server would ensure that only authorized clients can
* actually emit the message, but here we're not concerned about that.
*/
publish(ev: ChannelEvent): void {
this.hubProxy.invoke("Publish", ev);
}
}
Then a component could use this service by subscribing (not in the rxjs sense...) to a specific channel, and reacting to specific events emitted:
import {Component, OnInit, Input} from "angular2/core";
import {Http, Response} from "angular2/http";
import Rx from "rxjs/Rx";
import {ChannelService, ChannelEvent} from "./services/channel.service";
class StatusEvent {
State: string;
PercentComplete: number;
}
#Component({
selector: 'task',
template: `
<div>
<h4>Task component bound to '{{eventName}}'</h4>
</div>
<div class="commands">
<textarea
class="console"
cols="50"
rows="15"
disabled
[value]="messages"></textarea>
<div class="commands__input">
<button (click)="callApi()">Call API</button>
</div>
</div>
`
})
export class TaskComponent implements OnInit {
#Input() eventName: string;
#Input() apiUrl: string;
messages = "";
private channel = "tasks";
constructor(
private http: Http,
private channelService: ChannelService
) {
}
ngOnInit() {
// Get an observable for events emitted on this channel
//
this.channelService.sub(this.channel).subscribe(
(x: ChannelEvent) => {
switch (x.Name) {
case this.eventName: { this.appendStatusUpdate(x); }
}
},
(error: any) => {
console.warn("Attempt to join channel failed!", error);
}
)
}
private appendStatusUpdate(ev: ChannelEvent): void {
// Just prepend this to the messages string shown in the textarea
//
let date = new Date();
switch (ev.Data.State) {
case "starting": {
this.messages = `${date.toLocaleTimeString()} : starting\n` + this.messages;
break;
}
case "complete": {
this.messages = `${date.toLocaleTimeString()} : complete\n` + this.messages;
break;
}
default: {
this.messages = `${date.toLocaleTimeString()} : ${ev.Data.State} : ${ev.Data.PercentComplete} % complete\n` + this.messages;
}
}
}
callApi() {
this.http.get(this.apiUrl)
.map((res: Response) => res.json())
.subscribe((message: string) => { console.log(message); });
}
}
I tried to map the SignalR concepts into observables, but I'm still learning how to effectively use RxJS. In any case I hope that helps show how this might work in the context of an Angular 2 app.
You can also try using ng2-signalr.
npm install ng2-signalr --save
takes care of ng2 change detection using zones
allows your server events to be listened to using rxjs.
Here is the link to the source.
You didn't specified wich syntax you're using to develop your Angular 2 app.
I will assume you're using typescript.
One approach is use Definitely Typed files.
1 - You'll need to download a Definitely Typed JQuery:
https://github.com/DefinitelyTyped/DefinitelyTyped/blob/master/jquery/jquery.d.ts
2 - After this, download a Definitely typed SignalR:
https://github.com/DefinitelyTyped/DefinitelyTyped/blob/master/signalr/signalr.d.ts
3 - Add the JQuery refence in your Component:
/// <reference path="../jquery.d.ts" />
4 - Now, you can call SignalR methods with intelissense. But you will need to use the Late Binding approach:
var connection = $.hubConnection();
var proxy = connection.createHubProxy(proxy.on("newOrder", (order) => console.log(order));
connection.start();
As far as examples go, there probably aren't any yet. Welcome to the beginning of a framework. But do keep checking over time because as popularity and adoption increases, there will sure to be many examples.
As far as running change detection, that's a very vague question as angular2's change detection is now very different, and much improved.
My approach is to just let angular2 handle it, and not trigger a manual change detection at all as most of the time Angular2 picks up on the change and re-renders the view.
If that does not work, then the next step is to trigger .run() on the NgZone
example:
import {NgZone, Component} from 'angular2/core';
#Component({...})
export class MyComponent{
myProperty: string = 'Hello';
constructor(myService: MyService, ngZone: NgZone){}
doSomething(){
this.myService.doSomething().then(x => {
this.ngZone.run(() => {
this.myProperty = x;
});
});
}
}
Again though, I have found that even working with asynchronous code, angular2 usually picks up on the change without using ngZone at all.

Using Moq can you verify a method call with an anonymous type?

I'm trying to verify a method call using Moq, but I can't quite get the syntax right. Currently, I've got this as my verify:
repository.Verify(x => x.ExecuteNonQuery("fav_AddFavorites", new
{
fid = 123,
inputStr = "000456"
}), Times.Once());
The code compiles, but the test fails with the error:
Expected invocation on the mock once, but was 0 times:
x => x.ExecuteNonQuery("fav_AddFavorites", new <>f__AnonymousType0<Int32, String>(123, "000456"))
No setups configured.
Performed invocations:
IRepository.ExecuteNonQuery("fav_AddFavorites", { fid = 123, inputStr = 000456 })
How can I verify the method call and match the method parameters for an anonymous type?
UPDATE
To answer the questions:
I am trying to verify both that the method was called and that the parameters are correct.
The signature of the method I'm trying to verify is:
int ExecuteNonQuery(string query, object param = null);
The setup code is simply:
repository = new Mock<IRepository>();
UPDATE 2
It looks like this is a problem with Moq and how it handles anonymous types in .Net. The code posted by Paul Matovich runs fine, however, once the code and the test are in different assemblies the test fails.
This Passes
public class Class1
{
private Class2 _Class2;
public Class1(Class2 class2)
{
_Class2 = class2;
}
public void DoSomething(string s)
{
_Class2.ExecuteNonQuery(s, new { fid = 123, inputStr = "000456" });
}
}
public class Class2
{
public virtual void ExecuteNonQuery(string s, object o)
{
}
}
/// <summary>
///A test for ExecuteNonQuery
///</summary>
[TestMethod()]
public void ExecuteNonQueryTest()
{
string testString = "Hello";
var Class2Stub = new Mock<Class2>();
Class1 target = new Class1(Class2Stub.Object);
target.DoSomething(testString);
Class2Stub.Verify(x => x.ExecuteNonQuery(testString, It.Is<object>(o => o.Equals(new { fid = 123, inputStr = "000456" }))), Times.Once());
}
##Update##
That is strange, it doesn't work in different assemblies. Someone can give us the long definition about why the object.equals from different assemblies behaves differently, but for different assemblies, this will work, any variance in the object values will return a different hash code.
Class2Stub.Verify(x => x.ExecuteNonQuery(testString, It.Is<object>(o => o.GetHashCode() == (new { fid = 123, inputStr = "000456" }).GetHashCode())), Times.Once());
One option is to "verify" it in a Callback. Obviously this needs to be done at Setup time, e.g.:
aMock.Setup(x => x.Method(It.IsAny<object>())).Callback<object>(
(p1) =>
{
dynamic o = p1;
Assert.That(o.Name, Is.EqualTo("Bilbo"));
});
None of the answers are great when your test assembly is different than the system under test's assembly (really common). Here's my solution that uses JSON serialization and then strings comparison.
Test Helper Function:
using Newtonsoft.Json;
public static class VerifyHelper
{
public static bool AreEqualObjects(object expected, object actual)
{
var expectedJson = JsonConvert.SerializeObject(expected);
var actualJson = JsonConvert.SerializeObject(actual);
return expectedJson == actualJson;
}
}
Example System Under Test:
public void DoWork(string input)
{
var obj = new { Prop1 = input };
dependency.SomeDependencyFunction(obj);
}
Example Unit Test:
var expectedObject = new { Prop1 = "foo" };
sut.DoWork("foo");
dependency.Verify(x => x.SomeDependencyFunction(It.Is<object>(y => VerifyHelper.AreEqualObjects(expectedObject, y))), Times.Once());
This solution is really simple, and I think makes the unit test easier to understand as opposed to the other answers in this thread. However, because it using simple string comparison, the test's anonymous object has to be set up exactly the same as the system under the test's anonymous object. Ergo, let's say you only cared to verify the value of a single property, but your system under test sets additional properties on the anonymous object, your unit test will need to set all those other properties (and in the same exact order) for the helper function to return true.
I created a reusable method based on Pauls answer:
object ItIsAnonymousObject(object value)
{
return It.Is<object>(o => o.GetHashCode() == value.GetHashCode());
}
...
dependency.Verify(
x => x.SomeDependencyFunction(ItIsAnonymousObject(new { Prop1 = "foo" })),
Times.Once());
Also, this can be used for property name case-insensitive comparison:
protected object ItIsAnonymousObject(object value)
{
var options = new JsonSerializerOptions { PropertyNamingPolicy = JsonNamingPolicy.CamelCase };
return It.Is<object>(o => JsonSerializer.Serialize(o, options) == JsonSerializer.Serialize(value, options));
}

Resources