I'm using object-fit: cover; in my CSS for images on a specific page, because they need to stick on the same height. It works great in most browsers.
But when scaling my browser in IE or Edge, the image is resizing in width (not height) instead of zooming. The image gets out of shape.
What CSS rule can I use to fix this?
Here is the page
I had similar issue. I resolved it with just CSS.
Basically Object-fit: cover was not working in IE and it was taking 100% width and 100% height and aspect ratio was distorted. In other words image zooming effect wasn't there which I was seeing in chrome.
The approach I took was to position the image inside the container with absolute and then place it right at the centre using the combination:
position: absolute;
top: 50%;
left: 50%;
transform: translate(-50%, -50%);
Once it is in the centre, I give to the image,
// For vertical blocks (i.e., where height is greater than width)
height: 100%;
width: auto;
// For Horizontal blocks (i.e., where width is greater than height)
height: auto;
width: 100%;
This makes the image get the effect of Object-fit:cover.
Here is a demonstration of the above logic.
https://jsfiddle.net/furqan_694/s3xLe1gp/
This logic works in all browsers.
There is no rule to achieve that using CSS only, besides the object-fit (that you are currently using), which has partial support in EDGE1 so if you want to use this in IE, you have to use a object-fit polyfill in case you want to use just the element img, otherwise you have to do some workarounds.
You can see the the object-fit support here
UPDATE(2019)
You can use a simple JS snippet to detect if the object-fit is supported and then replace the img for a svg
//ES6 version
if ('objectFit' in document.documentElement.style === false) {
document.addEventListener('DOMContentLoaded', () => {
document.querySelectorAll('img[data-object-fit]').forEach(image => {
(image.runtimeStyle || image.style).background = `url("${image.src}") no-repeat 50%/${image.currentStyle ? image.currentStyle['object-fit'] : image.getAttribute('data-object-fit')}`
image.src = `data:image/svg+xml,%3Csvg xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2000/svg' width='${image.width}' height='${image.height}'%3E%3C/svg%3E`
})
})
}
//ES5 version transpiled from code above with BabelJS
if ('objectFit' in document.documentElement.style === false) {
document.addEventListener('DOMContentLoaded', function() {
document.querySelectorAll('img[data-object-fit]').forEach(function(image) {
(image.runtimeStyle || image.style).background = "url(\"".concat(image.src, "\") no-repeat 50%/").concat(image.currentStyle ? image.currentStyle['object-fit'] : image.getAttribute('data-object-fit'));
image.src = "data:image/svg+xml,%3Csvg xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2000/svg' width='".concat(image.width, "' height='").concat(image.height, "'%3E%3C/svg%3E");
});
});
}
img {
display: inline-flex;
width: 175px;
height: 175px;
margin-right: 10px;
border: 1px solid red
}
[data-object-fit='cover'] {
object-fit: cover
}
[data-object-fit='contain'] {
object-fit: contain
}
<img data-object-fit='cover' src='//picsum.photos/1200/600' />
<img data-object-fit='contain' src='//picsum.photos/1200/600' />
<img src='//picsum.photos/1200/600' />
UPDATE(2018)
1 - EDGE has now partial support for object-fit since version 16, and by partial, it means only works in img element (future version 18 still has only partial support)
I just used the #misir-jafarov and is working now with :
IE 8,9,10,11 and EDGE detection
used in Bootrap 4
take the height of its parent div
cliped vertically at 20% of top and horizontally 50% (better for portraits)
here is my code :
if (document.documentMode || /Edge/.test(navigator.userAgent)) {
jQuery('.art-img img').each(function(){
var t = jQuery(this),
s = 'url(' + t.attr('src') + ')',
p = t.parent(),
d = jQuery('<div></div>');
p.append(d);
d.css({
'height' : t.parent().css('height'),
'background-size' : 'cover',
'background-repeat' : 'no-repeat',
'background-position' : '50% 20%',
'background-image' : s
});
t.hide();
});
}
Hope it helps.
You can use this js code. Just change .post-thumb img with your img.
$('.post-thumb img').each(function(){ // Note: {.post-thumb img} is css selector of the image tag
var t = $(this),
s = 'url(' + t.attr('src') + ')',
p = t.parent(),
d = $('<div></div>');
t.hide();
p.append(d);
d.css({
'height' : 260, // Note: You can change it for your needs
'background-size' : 'cover',
'background-repeat' : 'no-repeat',
'background-position' : 'center',
'background-image' : s
});
});
Here's a CSS solution to fix this.
Use the below css.
.row-fluid {
display: table;
}
.row-fluid .span6 {
display: table-cell;
vertical-align: top;
}
.vc_single_image-wrapper {
position: relative;
}
.vc_single_image-wrapper .image-wrapper {
position: absolute;
top: 0;
left: 0;
bottom: 0;
right: 0;
background-size: cover;
background-repeat: no-repeat;
background-position: 50% 50%;
}
HTML from the OP:
<div class="vc_single_image-wrapper vc_box_border_grey">
<div class="image-wrapper" style="background-image: url(http://i0.wp.com/www.homedecor.nl/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/Gordijnen-Home-Decor-2.jpg?fit=952%2C480;"></div>
</div>
try this, it should work. also remove float from .row-fluid .span6
I achieved satisfying results with:
min-height: 100%;
min-width: 100%;
this way you always maintain the aspect ratio.
The complete css for an image that will replace "object-fit: cover;":
width: auto;
height: auto;
min-width: 100%;
min-height: 100%;
position: absolute;
right: 50%;
transform: translate(50%, 0);
parent div:
height: 584px;
display: block;
background-position: center center;
background-size: cover;
width: 100%;
position: absolute;
overflow: hidden;
background-color: #fff;
child img
object-position: center center;
min-height: 100%;
display: block;
position: absolute;
top: -9999px;
bottom: -9999px;
left: -9999px;
right: -9999px;
margin: auto;
width: auto;
min-width: 100%;
max-width: none;
-o-object-fit: cover; // you can keep them for modern browsers
object-fit: cover; // you can keep them for modern browsers
height: 100%;
fiddle: http://jsfiddle.net/j6hLaxz8/
Related
I know that it is impossible to actually modify an image with CSS, which is why I put crop in quotes.
What I'd like to do is take rectangular images and use CSS to make them appear square without distorting the image at all.
I'd basically like to turn this:
Into this:
A pure CSS solution with no wrapper div or other useless code:
img {
object-fit: cover;
width: 230px;
height: 230px;
}
Assuming they do not have to be in IMG tags...
HTML:
<div class="thumb1">
</div>
CSS:
.thumb1 {
background: url(blah.jpg) 50% 50% no-repeat; /* 50% 50% centers image in div */
width: 250px;
height: 250px;
}
.thumb1:hover { YOUR HOVER STYLES HERE }
EDIT: If the div needs to link somewhere just adjust HTML and Styles like so:
HTML:
<div class="thumb1">
Link
</div>
CSS:
.thumb1 {
background: url(blah.jpg) 50% 50% no-repeat; /* 50% 50% centers image in div */
width: 250px;
height: 250px;
}
.thumb1 a {
display: block;
width: 250px;
height: 250px;
}
.thumb1 a:hover { YOUR HOVER STYLES HERE }
Note this could also be modified to be responsive, for example % widths and heights etc.
If the image is in a container with a responsive width:
.rect-img-container {
position: relative;
}
.rect-img-container::after {
content: "";
display: block;
padding-bottom: 100%;
}
.rect-img {
position: absolute;
width: 100%;
height: 100%;
object-fit: cover;
}
<div class="rect-img-container">
<img class="rect-img" src="https://picsum.photos/id/0/367/267" alt="">
</div>
(edit: updated from sass to plain css)
(edit: Added dummy image for reference)
Place your image in a div.
Give your div explicit square dimensions.
Set the CSS overflow property on the div to hidden (overflow:hidden).
Put your imagine inside the div.
Profit.
For example:
<div style="width:200px;height:200px;overflow:hidden">
<img src="foo.png" />
</div>
Using background-size:cover - http://codepen.io/anon/pen/RNyKzB
CSS:
.image-container {
background-image: url('http://i.stack.imgur.com/GA6bB.png');
background-size:cover;
background-repeat:no-repeat;
width:250px;
height:250px;
}
Markup:
<div class="image-container"></div>
I actually came across this same problem recently and ended up with a slightly different approach (I wasn't able to use background images). It does require a tiny bit of jQuery though to determine the orientation of the images (I' sure you could use plain JS instead though).
I wrote a blog post about it if you are interested in more explaination but the code is pretty simple:
HTML:
<ul class="cropped-images">
<li><img src="http://fredparke.com/sites/default/files/cat-portrait.jpg" /></li>
<li><img src="http://fredparke.com/sites/default/files/cat-landscape.jpg" /></li>
</ul>
CSS:
li {
width: 150px; // Or whatever you want.
height: 150px; // Or whatever you want.
overflow: hidden;
margin: 10px;
display: inline-block;
vertical-align: top;
}
li img {
max-width: 100%;
height: auto;
width: auto;
}
li img.landscape {
max-width: none;
max-height: 100%;
}
jQuery:
$( document ).ready(function() {
$('.cropped-images img').each(function() {
if ($(this).width() > $(this).height()) {
$(this).addClass('landscape');
}
});
});
Check out CSS aspect-ratio
https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/CSS/aspect-ratio
.square-image{
width: 50%;
background-image: url('https://picsum.photos/id/0/367/267');
background-size: cover;
background-position: center;
aspect-ratio: 1/1;
}
<div class="square-image"></div>
You can also do this with a regular img tag as follows
.square-image{
width: 50%;
object-fit: cover; /* Required to prevent the image from stretching, use the object-position property to adjust the visible area */
aspect-ratio: 1/1;
}
<img src="https://picsum.photos/id/0/367/267" class="square-image"/>
Today you can use aspect-ratio:
img {
aspect-ratio: 1 / 1;
}
It has wide support amongst modern browsers as well:
https://caniuse.com/mdn-css_properties_aspect-ratio
object-fit: cover will do exactly what you need.
But it might not work on IE/Edge. Follow as shown below to fix it with just CSS to work on all browsers.
The approach I took was to position the image inside the container with absolute and then place it right at the centre using the combination:
position: absolute;
top: 50%;
left: 50%;
transform: translate(-50%, -50%);
Once it is in the centre, I give to the image,
// For vertical blocks (i.e., where height is greater than width)
height: 100%;
width: auto;
// For Horizontal blocks (i.e., where width is greater than height)
height: auto;
width: 100%;
This makes the image get the effect of Object-fit:cover.
Here is a demonstration of the above logic.
https://jsfiddle.net/furqan_694/s3xLe1gp/
This logic works in all browsers.
Original Image
Vertically Cropped
Horizontally Cropped
Square Container
I had a similar issue and could not "compromise" with background images.
I came up with this.
<div class="container">
<img src="http://lorempixel.com/800x600/nature">
</div>
.container {
position: relative;
width: 25%; /* whatever width you want. I was implementing this in a 4 tile grid pattern. I used javascript to set height equal to width */
border: 2px solid #fff; /* just to separate the images */
overflow: hidden; /* "crop" the image */
background: #000; /* incase the image is wider than tall/taller than wide */
}
.container img {
position: absolute;
display: block;
height: 100%; /* all images at least fill the height */
top: 50%; /* top, left, transform trick to vertically and horizontally center image */
left: 50%;
transform: translate3d(-50%,-50%,0);
}
//assuming you're using jQuery
var h = $('.container').outerWidth();
$('.container').css({height: h + 'px'});
Hope this helps!
Example:
https://jsfiddle.net/cfbuwxmr/1/
Use CSS: overflow:
.thumb {
width:230px;
height:230px;
overflow:hidden
}
Either use a div with square dimensions with the image inside with the .testimg class:
.test {
width: 307px;
height: 307px;
overflow:hidden
}
.testimg {
margin-left: -76px
}
or a square div with a background of the image.
.test2 {
width: 307px;
height: 307px;
background: url(http://i.stack.imgur.com/GA6bB.png) 50% 50%
}
Here's some examples: http://jsfiddle.net/QqCLC/1/
UPDATED SO THE IMAGE CENTRES
.test {
width: 307px;
height: 307px;
overflow: hidden
}
.testimg {
margin-left: -76px
}
.test2 {
width: 307px;
height: 307px;
background: url(http://i.stack.imgur.com/GA6bB.png) 50% 50%
}
<div class="test"><img src="http://i.stack.imgur.com/GA6bB.png" width="460" height="307" class="testimg" /></div>
<div class="test2"></div>
I came with a different approach. You basically have to crop the rectangular image to fit it inside the square is all there is to it. Best approach is if the image width is greater than the height, then you crop the image alittle from left and right side of the image. If the image height is greater than the image width then you crop the bottom of the image. Here is my solution. I needed a little help from PHP though.
<div style="position: relative; width: 154px; height: 154px; overflow: hidden;">
<?php
//get image dimmensions whichever way you like. I used imgaick
$image = new Imagick("myimage.png");
$width = $image->getImageWidth();
$height = $image->getImageHeight();
if($width > $height){
?>
<img src="myimage.png" style="display: block; position: absolute; top: 0px; left: 50%; transform: translateX(-50%); -ms-transform: translateX(-50%); -webkit-transform: translateX(-50%); height: 100%; " />
<?php
}else{
?>
<img src="myimage.png" style="display: block; position: absolute; top: 0px; left: 0px; width: 100%; " />
<?php
}
?>
</div>
This'll probably be one of the easier questions, but I just cannot seem to find the answer.
I've got the following setup:
.wrapper {
position: absolute;
top: 5%;
bottom: 5%;
left: 50%;
transform: translateX( -50%);
}
img.content {
height: 100%;
width: auto;
}
The image's width doesn't seem to change when shrinking the height of the window.
Here's a quick JSfiddle to demonstrate the issue. Adjusting the height of the window either skews or offsets the image, instead of adjusting the width accordingly.
https://jsfiddle.net/5p82ey8k/
Cheers
width + translate is maybe not the best way.
block and margin auto is less tricky:
.wrapper {
position: absolute;
top: 5%;
bottom: 5%;
left: 0;
right: 0;
}
.content {
height: 100%;
display: block;
margin: auto;
}
<div class="wrapper">
<img src="http://www.keenthemes.com/preview/conquer/assets/plugins/jcrop/demos/demo_files/image1.jpg" alt="" class="content">
</div>
https://jsfiddle.net/5p82ey8k/2/
If you want to keep the image a well <img/> you could try this style.
img {
display: block;
max-width: 100%;
max-height: 100%;
width: auto;
height: auto;
}
This should preserve the ratio. However a better solution in my opinion is making the img a css background-image, and setting it's size to cover, like so:
.image {
width: 100%;
height: 100%;
background-position: center;
background-size: cover;
background-repeat: no-repeat;
}
you could implement your picture as a background image instead of an img. and give the container this stylings.
background:url('imgurl') center center no-repeat;
background-size:cover;
this way you could set the background-size property which allows you to let the picture always covers the container or contains it
about background-size
see working fiddle.
img.imgdemo {
background: white;
width: 65%;
margin: auto;
}
<a class=imagelink href=periodictable.htm>
<img class=imgdemo src=ptabledemo.png>
</a>
I'm trying to center an image that also acts as a link, but when it has a style of display: block, it acts as a block element, making everything in it's width a link as well. Is there any way to fix this?
Images are inline just like text so:
.imagelink {
text-align:center;
}
One option you could use is the transform: translate() property and give the a.imagelink display: inline-block. This will let you set the size of the image to whatever you want and make sure the link is the same size and stays centered at all times:
JS Fiddle
a.imagelink {
display: inline-block;
background: blue;
position: relative;
left: 50%;
transform: translateX(-50%);
}
img {
width: 50%;
display: block;
}
If your image is 200px
img {
width: 200px;
margin-left: calc(50% - 200px / 2);
}
If your image is 65%
img {
width: 65%;
margin-left: calc(50% - 65% / 2);
}
I am looking to make my video background like this:
http://www.teektak.com/
The issue I'm having is that my video is responsive, but it is fixed to the left. I can't figure out for the life of me how to make it so that it centers horizontally to the window when adjusted.
Here is a link to the test site to see what I am talking about: https://robotplaytime.paperplane.io/
HTML
<body>
<video poster="images/robotPlaytimeVideo.png" id="bgvid" autoplay loop muted>
<source src="images/robotPlaytimeVideo.mp4" type="video/mp4">
</video>
</body>
CSS
html,
body {
height: 100%;
width: 100%;
overflow: hidden;
}
video {
position: absolute;
top: 0;
bottom: 0;
left: 0;
right: 0;
margin: auto;
min-width: 100%;
min-height: 100%;
z-index: -100;
background: url(../images/robotPlaytimeVideo.png) no-repeat;
background-size: cover;
}
Add these CSS rules to your body (the video's parent container):
text-align: center; /* ensures the image is always in the h-middle */
overflow: hidden; /* hide the cropped portion */
Add these CSS rules to your video:
display: inline-block;
position: relative; /* allows repositioning */
left: 100%; /* move the whole width of the image to the right */
margin-left: -200%; /* magic! */
Most of this was pulled directly from Bryce Hanscomb's answer to another similar question: How to center crop an image (<img>) in fluid width container
Here's a jsfiddle just in case:
http://jsfiddle.net/pLj0gcpu/
(Note that the markup and styles in this fiddle were pulled from your given URL)
To get the video to take the full size of the screen:
video {
position: absolute;
top: 0;
left: 0;
right: 0;
bottom: 0;
height: 100%;
width: 100%;
}
If you wanna center something horizontally responsively, then do
left: 50%;
transform: translateX(-50%);
Note, you will need to set a "position" as well
Normally, you center images with display: block; margin: auto, but if the image is larger than the container, it overflows to the right. How do I make it overflow to the both sides equally? The width of the container is fixed and known. The width of the image is unknown.
A pure css solution
Requiring one extra wrapper (tested in FireFox, IE8, IE7):
Improved Answer
There was a problem with the original answer (below). If the image is larger than the container that outer is centered on with it's auto margins, then it truncates the image on the left and creates excessive space on the right, as this fiddle shows.
We can resolve that by floating inner right and then centering from the right. This still truncates the img off the page to the left, but it does so by explicitly pushing it that way and then centers back off of that, the combination of which is what prevents the extra horizontal scroll on the right. Now we only get as much right scroll as we need in order to see the right part of the image.
Fiddle Example (Borders in fiddle are for demo only.)
Essential CSS
div.outer {
width: 300px; /* some width amount needed */
margin: 0 auto;
overflow: visible;
}
div.inner {
position:relative;
float: right; /* this was added and display removed */
right: 50%;
}
div.inner img {
position: relative;
right:-50%; /* this was changed from "left" in original */
}
If you desire no right scroll at all for wide images
Then using the above, also set whatever element wraps outer (like body or a third wrapper) to have overflow: hidden.
Original Idea (for History)
Fiddle Example (Borders in fiddle are for demo only.)
HTML
<div class="outer">
<div class="inner">
<img src="/yourimage.png">
</div>
</div>
CSS
div.outer {
width: 300px; /* some width amount needed */
margin: 0 auto;
overflow: visible;
}
div.inner {
display: inline-block;
position:relative;
right: -50%;
}
div.inner img {
position: relative;
left:-50%;
}
Here's a 2 line CSS solution (a couple more lines might be required for cross-browser support):
img {
margin-left: 50%;
transform: translateX(-50%);
}
HTML
<div class="image-container">
<img src="http://www.google.com/images/logo.gif" height="100" />
</div>
CSS
.image-container {
width: 150px;
border: solid 1px red;
margin:100px;
}
.image-container img {
border: solid 1px green;
}
jQuery
$(".image-container>img").each(function(i, img) {
$(img).css({
position: "relative",
left: ($(img).parent().width() - $(img).width()) / 2
});
});
See it on jsFiddle: http://jsfiddle.net/4eYX9/30/
Alternative pure CSS solution is to use transform attribute:
HTML:
<div class="outer">
<img class="image" src="http://www.gstatic.com/webp/gallery/4.jpg" />
</div>
CSS:
.outer {
position: relative;
width: 100px;
border: 1px solid black;
height: 150px;
margin-left: 100px; /* for demo */
/* overflow: hidden; */
}
img.image {
width: 200px;
opacity: 0.7;
position: absolute;
left: 50%;
transform: translateX(-50%);
-webkit-transform: translateX(-50%);
}
Fiddle
Just to add a overflow:hidden to parent div to hide the extra area of the image.
Your best bet is to set it as background image of the container instead.
#container {
background: url('url/to/image.gif') no-repeat center top;
}
In fact there is a simpler pure css/html way (without large horizontal scroll) :
Html :
<div class="outer">
<img src="/my/sample/image.jpg">
</div>
Css :
If you don't want to see image overflow
div.outer img {
position: absolute;
left: -50%;
z-index:-1;
}
div.outer {
overflow: hidden;
position: relative;
height: 200px;
}
With image overflow visible
div.outer img {
position: absolute;
left: -50%;
z-index:-1;
}
div.outer {
overflow: visible;
position: relative;
height: 200px;
}
body, html {
overflow-x:hidden;
}
A background solution with image overflow visible :
Html :
<div class="outer">
<div class="inner"></div>
</div>
Css :
div.outer {
width: 100%;
height: 200px;
}
div.inner {
background: url('/assets/layout/bg.jpg') center no-repeat;
position: absolute;
left: 0;
width: 100%;
height: inherit;
}
assuming outer is in a width specified container.
I see this is an old post, so maybe everybody knows this by now, but I needed help for this and I solved it using flex:
.parent {
display: flex;
/* give it the width and height you like */
}
.parent img {
min-width: 100%;
min-height: 100%;
object-fit: cover;
}
I can only think of a Javascript solution since what you need to do is relatively position the image a negative amount to the left of its container:
jQuery
$(document).ready(function(){
var theImg = $('#container img');
var theContainer = $('#container');
if(theImg.width() > theContainer.width()){
theImg.css({
position: 'relative',
left: (theContainer.width() - theImg.width()) / 2
})
}
})
I found this to be a more elegant solution, without flex, similar to something above, but more generalized (applies on both vertical and horizontal):
.wrapper {
overflow: hidden;
}
.wrapper img {
position: absolute;
top: 50%;
left: 50%;
transform: translate(-50%, -50%);
/* height: 100%; */ /* optional */
}
I don't think there is a pure CSS solution (Except for the next answer :)). However with Javascript it would be just a matter of finding the width of the image, subtracting the container width, dividing by two and you have how far to the left of the container you need.