Microsoft Cognitive Services Face API : FaceNotFound while using Verify API - microsoft-cognitive

Following are the steps
Create a Person and add Face
Like to register person details and ensure the Face Id is persisted
Step 1. faceServiceClient.CreatePersonGroupAsync(groupId, groupName);
Step 2. p.PersonId = _faceServiceClient.CreatePersonAsync(groupId, p.Name).Result.PersonId;
Step 3.
var persistPersonFaceID = _faceServiceClient.AddPersonFaceAsync(groupId, p.PersonId, fStream).Result.PersistedFaceId;
Step 4. _faceServiceClient.TrainPersonGroupAsync(groupID);
Now, like to authenticate a person using the Image provided
Step a
var DetectedFaceID = _faceServiceClient.DetectAsync(firstFilestream, true, true).Result.FaceId;
Step b..
var res = _faceServiceClient.VerifyAsync(persistPersonFaceID, DetectedFaceID).Result;
On the call to VerifyAsync, It throws and error like following
{"error":{"code":"FaceNotFound","message":"Face '7a89ace1-a4b7-4c08-b718-4fec0e9e89d5' is not found."}}
Please do let me know if any of the above needs to be corrected
Possible Issues:
A persistPersonFaceID belongs to a group and I am trying to compare the face id which was retrieved by using Detect. If this is a problem, can you please suggest a resolution

/verify only takes faceIds currently, not persistedFaceIds you're getting back after persisting to a person object.
If I've understood your scenario correctly, you can use either /findsimiliars or /identify since you're persisting the known face.
With /identify you'd pass in DetectedFaceID and specify the groupId (API reference for /identify)
Adding this support for verify is something being planned and if you wouldn't mind I'd encourage you to add some votes to it on uservoice: /verify should also take persistedFaceIds

Related

Logic App using HTTP Action to access and GET Jira ticket

So I followed this answer and it works fine:
https://stackoverflow.com/a/74981947/20829088
Provided URL:
https://<YOUR_DOMAIN>.atlassian.net/rest/api/2/search?jql=project=<PROJECTID>&fields=issue,status,name&startAt=0&maxResults=8000
However, it take a lot of time. So, if I want the url to check for specific ticket depending on created time and type of ticket. For example
I want ticket that is created within 15 days and that are NOT a sub-task.
so I tried something like this.
.....&fields=issue,summary,issuetype&created>=-15d&hierarchylevel=0
I'm not sure of how it should be written I just tried this and it doesn't work.
Here is the request result in JSON:
It should be earthier [subtask=false] OR [hierarchylevel=0] OR [name=Task]
After reproducing from my end, I could able to achieve this using Condition connector of logic apps. I have initialized an array variable first and then tried to append each item that satisfies the condition. Below is the flow of my logic app.
and then I used Parse Json to retrieve the required values for condition comparision
You can use the below Code view to reproduce the same in your environment.
{"definition":{"$schema":"https://schema.management.azure.com/providers/Microsoft.Logic/schemas/2016-06-01/workflowdefinition.json#","actions":{"For_each":{"actions":{"Compose":{"inputs":"#items('For_each')?['fields']?['created']","runAfter":{},"type":"Compose"},"Condition":{"actions":{"Append_to_array_variable":{"inputs":{"name":"Array","value":"#items('For_each')"},"runAfter":{},"type":"AppendToArrayVariable"}},"expression":{"or":[{"greaterOrEquals":["#formatDateTime(outputs('Compose'),'yyyy-MM-dd')","#formatDateTime(addDays(utcNow(),-15),'yyyy-MM-dd')"]},{"equals":["#items('For_each')?['fields']?['issuetype']?['subtask']",false]},{"equals":["#items('For_each')?['fields']?['issuetype']?['hierarchyLevel']",0]},{"equals":["#items('For_each')?['fields']?['status']?['statusCategory']?['name']","Task"]}]},"runAfter":{"Compose":["Succeeded"]},"type":"If"}},"foreach":"#body('Parse_JSON')?['issues']","runAfter":{"Parse_JSON":["Succeeded"]},"type":"Foreach"},"HTTP":{"inputs":{"authentication":{"password":"<API_KEY>","type":"Basic","username":"<USERNAME>"},"method":"GET","uri":"https://jira#<ProjectName>.atlassian.net/rest/api/2/search?jql=project=<ProjectID>"},"runAfter":{},"type":"Http"},"Initialize_variable":{"inputs":{"variables":[{"name":"Array","type":"array"}]},"runAfter":{"HTTP":["Succeeded"]},"type":"InitializeVariable"},"Parse_JSON":{"inputs":{"content":"#body('HTTP')","schema":{"properties":{"expand":{"type":"string"},"issues":{"items":{"properties":{"expand":{"type":"string"},"fields":{"properties":{"aggregateprogress":{"properties":{"progress":{"type":"integer"},"total":{"type":"integer"}},"type":"object"},"aggregatetimeestimate":{},"aggregatetimeoriginalestimate":{},"aggregatetimespent":{},"assignee":{},"components":{"type":"array"},"created":{"type":"string"},"creator":{"properties":{"accountId":{"type":"string"},"accountType":{"type":"string"},"active":{"type":"boolean"},"avatarUrls":{"properties":{"16x16":{"type":"string"},"24x24":{"type":"string"},"32x32":{"type":"string"},"48x48":{"type":"string"}},"type":"object"},"displayName":{"type":"string"},"emailAddress":{"type":"string"},"self":{"type":"string"},"timeZone":{"type":"string"}},"type":"object"},"customfield_10001":{},"customfield_10002":{},"customfield_10003":{},"customfield_10004":{},"customfield_10005":{},"customfield_10006":{},"customfield_10007":{},"customfield_10008":{},"customfield_10009":{},"customfield_10010":{},"customfield_10014":{},"customfield_10015":{},"customfield_10016":{},"customfield_10017":{"type":"string"},"customfield_10018":{"properties":{"hasEpicLinkFieldDependency":{"type":"boolean"},"nonEditableReason":{"properties":{"message":{"type":"string"},"reason":{"type":"string"}},"type":"object"},"showField":{"type":"boolean"}},"type":"object"},"customfield_10019":{"type":"string"},"customfield_10020":{},"customfield_10021":{},"customfield_10022":{},"customfield_10023":{},"customfield_10024":{},"customfield_10025":{},"customfield_10026":{},"customfield_10027":{},"customfield_10028":{},"customfield_10029":{},"customfield_10030":{},"customfield_10033":{},"description":{},"duedate":{},"environment":{},"fixVersions":{"type":"array"},"issuelinks":{"type":"array"},"issuetype":{"properties":{"avatarId":{"type":"integer"},"description":{"type":"string"},"entityId":{"type":"string"},"hierarchyLevel":{"type":"integer"},"iconUrl":{"type":"string"},"id":{"type":"string"},"name":{"type":"string"},"self":{"type":"string"},"subtask":{"type":"boolean"}},"type":"object"},"labels":{"type":"array"},"lastViewed":{},"priority":{"properties":{"iconUrl":{"type":"string"},"id":{"type":"string"},"name":{"type":"string"},"self":{"type":"string"}},"type":"object"},"progress":{"properties":{"progress":{"type":"integer"},"total":{"type":"integer"}},"type":"object"},"project":{"properties":{"avatarUrls":{"properties":{"16x16":{"type":"string"},"24x24":{"type":"string"},"32x32":{"type":"string"},"48x48":{"type":"string"}},"type":"object"},"id":{"type":"string"},"key":{"type":"string"},"name":{"type":"string"},"projectTypeKey":{"type":"string"},"self":{"type":"string"},"simplified":{"type":"boolean"}},"type":"object"},"reporter":{"properties":{"accountId":{"type":"string"},"accountType":{"type":"string"},"active":{"type":"boolean"},"avatarUrls":{"properties":{"16x16":{"type":"string"},"24x24":{"type":"string"},"32x32":{"type":"string"},"48x48":{"type":"string"}},"type":"object"},"displayName":{"type":"string"},"emailAddress":{"type":"string"},"self":{"type":"string"},"timeZone":{"type":"string"}},"type":"object"},"resolution":{},"resolutiondate":{},"security":{},"status":{"properties":{"description":{"type":"string"},"iconUrl":{"type":"string"},"id":{"type":"string"},"name":{"type":"string"},"self":{"type":"string"},"statusCategory":{"properties":{"colorName":{"type":"string"},"id":{"type":"integer"},"key":{"type":"string"},"name":{"type":"string"},"self":{"type":"string"}},"type":"object"}},"type":"object"},"statuscategorychangedate":{"type":"string"},"subtasks":{"type":"array"},"summary":{"type":"string"},"timeestimate":{},"timeoriginalestimate":{},"timespent":{},"updated":{"type":"string"},"versions":{"type":"array"},"votes":{"properties":{"hasVoted":{"type":"boolean"},"self":{"type":"string"},"votes":{"type":"integer"}},"type":"object"},"watches":{"properties":{"isWatching":{"type":"boolean"},"self":{"type":"string"},"watchCount":{"type":"integer"}},"type":"object"},"workratio":{"type":"integer"}},"type":"object"},"id":{"type":"string"},"key":{"type":"string"},"self":{"type":"string"}},"required":["expand","id","self","key","fields"],"type":"object"},"type":"array"},"maxResults":{"type":"integer"},"startAt":{"type":"integer"},"total":{"type":"integer"}},"type":"object"}},"runAfter":{"Initialize_variable":["Succeeded"]},"type":"ParseJson"}},"contentVersion":"1.0.0.0","outputs":{},"parameters":{},"triggers":{"manual":{"inputs":{"schema":{}},"kind":"Http","type":"Request"}}},"parameters":{}}

basic firebase + dialogflow - repeated agent add dialogflow

really appreciate the helps
I have been following this video with this code.
My code looks like this
function angerEmotionCapture(agent) {
const angryTo = agent.parameters.angryDirectedTo;
return admin.database().ref('directedTo').transaction((directedTo)=>{
let target = directedTo;
agent.add(`previous entry was ${target}`);
target = angryTo;
agent.add(`new entry is ${target}`);
return directedTo;
});
}
The purpose of this is to capture a conversation topic and store it in the database.
I'm planning to use it for multiple purposes that's why I don't use context.
This code is only the first step to see if I can capture it properly.
When doing this, the agent response always look like this
previous entry was null
new entry is boss
previous entry was friends
new entry is boss
Here "friends" and "boss" are expected. However, the first repetition is not expected and it always gives null. Despite of that, this correctly update the database
I want to understand why is there a repetition here
Thanks, really appreciate the time

Getting ProjectBOs from CatalogCategoryBO returns different results based on BusinessObjectRepositoryContext

We are trying to get all ProductBOs from CatalogCategoryBO with following code:
final CatalogBORepository catalogBORepository = applicationBO.getRepository("CatalogBORepository");
final CatalogCategoryBO catalogCategoryBO = catalogBORepository.getCatalogBOByCatalogName(catalogName).getCatalogCategoryBOByName(catalogCategoryName);
final CatalogCategoryBOCommonProductAssignmentExtension assignmentExtension = catalogCategoryBO.getExtension(CatalogCategoryBOCommonProductAssignmentExtension.class);
return assignmentExtension.getSortedProducts(applicationBO.getDefaultLocale());
But this does not always work as expected. After debugging I found out that main reason is BusinessObjectRepositoryContext:
((BusinessObjectRepositoryContext)catalogCategoryBO.getContext().getVariable("CurrentBusinessObjectRepositoryContext");
which is different based on location from which we call given method (organization or channel).
The same problem is described here: https://support.intershop.com/kb/index.php/Display/IS-22604
Is there some workaround or better way to get all assigned ProductBOs from CatalogCategoryBO?
We are using Intershop B2C version 7.9.1.2.
One possibility is to call pipeline for getting products as suggested by Willem Evertse, another one is to fetch CatalogBORepository and CatalogCategoryBO within block of:
try (ApplicationContext applicationContext = application.forceApplicationContext()) {
// your code here
}
https://support.intershop.com/kb/index.php/Display/2X3516#Concept-ApplicationFramework-TheExecutionContextofanApplication
Yes, this is because the business objects can have different implementations depending on the context (application).
If you look at how the rest api does it (see ProductListResource) they call the ProductHandler (see ProductHandlerImpl) method:
getProducts(Domain currentChannel, CatalogCategoryBO category, String searchTerm, String localeId,...)
Only the category parameter is mandatory it seems, the other parameters can be null. The added benefit is that this code will call the Solr index (if u have it enabled) so it should perform better than running a query on the database (which is also a possibility).

Meteor realtime game - match two players according to their score?

I want to build a realtime quiz game which randomly matches two players (according to their winning rate if they are logged in). I've read through the book Discover Meteor and have a basic understanding of the framework, but I just have no idea of how to implement the matching part. Anyone know how to do that?
if you want to match users who have scores close to each other, you can do something like this : mongodb - Find document with closest integer value
The Meteor code for those Mongo queries is very similar, but there are some subtle differences that are kind of tricky. In Meteor, it would look something like this :
SP // "selected player" = the User you want to match someone up with
var score = SP.score; // selected player's score
var queryLow = {score: {$lte:score},_id:{$ne:SP._id}};
var queryHigh = {score:{$gte:score},_id:{$ne:SP._id}};
// "L" is the player with the closest lower score
var L=Players.findOne(queryLow,{sort:{score:-1},limit:1});
// "H" is the player with the closest higher score
var H=Players.findOne(queryHigh,{sort:{score:1},limit:1});
so, now you have references to the players with scores right above and right below the 'selected player'. In terms of making it random, perhaps start with a simple algorithm like "match me with the next available player who's score is closest" , then if it's too predictable and boring you can throw some randomness into the algorithm.
you can view the above Meteor code working live here http://meteorpad.com/pad/4umMP4iY8AkB9ct2d/ClosestScore
and you can Fork it and mess about with the queries to see how it works.
good luck! Meteor is great, I really like it.
If you add the package peppelg:random-opponent-matcher to your application, you can match together opponents like this:
On the server, you need to have an instance of RandomOpponentMatcher like this:
new RandomOpponentMatcher('my-matcher', {name: 'fifo'}, function(user1, user2){
// Create the match/game they should play.
})
The function you pass to RandomOpponentMatcher will get called when two users been matched to play against each other. In it, you'll probably want to create the match the users should play against each other (this package does only match opponents together, it does not contain any functionality for playing games/matches).
On the client, you need to create an instance of RandomOpponentMatcher as well, but you only pass the name to it (the same name as you used on the server):
myMatcher = new RandomOpponentMatcher('my-matcher')
Then when the users is logged in and which to be matched with a random opponent, all you need to do is to call the add method. For example:
<template name="myTemplate">
<button class="clickMatchesWithOpponent">Match me with someone!</button>
</template>
Template.myTemplate.events({
'click .clickMatchesWithOpponent': function(event, template){
myMatcher.add()
}
})
When two different logged in users has clicked on the button, the function you passed to RandomOpponentMatcher on the server will get called.
One implementation might be as follows:
A user somehow triggers a 'looking for game' event that sets an attribute on user.profile.lookingForGame to true. The event then makes a call to a server side Meteor method which queries for all other online users looking for games.
From there you it really depends on how you want to handle users once they 'match'.
To determine all online users, try using the User Status package:
https://github.com/mizzao/meteor-user-status
Once added, any online user will have an attribute in the profile object of 'online'. You can use this to query for all online users.

StructureGroup Details using the Content Delivery/Broker API

I am trying to get all the structure groups published in a given publication using the PublicationID. I am expecting to get the structure groups with StructureGroupCriteria by passing the Root Structure Group TCM ID but getting page ids (I am expecting SGs).
Now I am trying to loop through the list and get details of each structuregroup. I did not find any API (.net) to get these details and also the API is returning only Pages.
What I have done and working so far using StructureGroupCriteria, returns list of Page IDs instead of SG IDs
PublicationCriteria pubCriteria = new PublicationCriteria(pubID);
// Root StructureGroup TCM ID -- tcm:45-3-4
StructureGroupCriteria sgCriteria = new StructureGroupCriteria("tcm:45-3-4", true);
Criteria allSGsInPub = CriteriaFactory.And(pubCriteria, sgCriteria);
Query allSGs = new Query(allSGsInPub);
string[] sgInfo = allSGs.ExecuteQuery();
Response.Write("Total : " + sgInfo.Length);
foreach (string sgid in sgInfo ) {
// HOW DO I get the Structure Group Details here
//TCMURI sgURI = new TCMURI(sgid);
}
Q # 1 : How to get the all the structuregroups and individual structure group details? (May be something simple, I am not able to find right API).
Q # 2 : How can I get all the structuregroups using ItemTypeCriteria sgCriteria = new ItemTypeCriteria(4); // 4 is SG Item Type .
When I tried this option, the query worked successfully but no results returned. Is this the expected behavior and should we always use StructureGroupCriteria instead of ItemTypeCriteria?
The reason for this approach, I want to avoid using the Root StructureGroup ID which is required with the above code. But at the moment, none of the approaches returning StructureGroup information and I always get Page Information.
Tridion Version: 2011 SP1, .net API.
Note: When I publish I am checking the publish SG info checkbox and published successfully. On Broker DB side, I can see the information on the taxnonomy table as well.
I was playing with Odata service and accidentally I found that I can get all my structure group information from Odata web service.
/cd_webservice/odata.svc/StructureGroups?$filter=PublicationId%20eq%2045
Also, the results are returning child structure groups with a depth parameter.
Just to clarify , using Broker API it is not feasible to get the structure groups (my original question). However, the workaround solution is to use OData Service to get the Structure Groups.
I don't think you will get Structure Groups returned by the Query object.
According to the documentation, when you publish Structure Group information the Structure Group hierarchy is published to the Content Delivery side where it is stored as a taxonomy.
Have you tried using the Taxonomy APIs to get the information you need?

Resources