Can some one tell me what ii the role of PSPRCSQUE. I don't find much information about it when i look at the Process Scheduler Architecture they mentioned only about the PSPRCSRQST table and how it works but nothing about the PSPRCSQUE table and its role in Peoplesoft Process Scheduler.
The PSPRCSQUE table holds information needed to schedule the request and to check that it is still running. When the process is initiated, the operating system process ID of client process is stored in SESSIONIDNUM. [This column is updated with 0 when the process was submitted by user.] The information from this table is needed if the process scheduler needs to kill the process.
See following website for a clear overview on the workings of the Process Scheduler:
http://peoplesoftsa.blogspot.be/p/process-scheduler_30.html
Related
I use OOZIE to run a workflow. But a simple official example shell-wf (echo hello oozie) stuck in RUNNING state and never end. The workflow can be submitted but stuck at RUNNING state. There is not any error in job log in OOZIE UI.
When submitting a shell with spark-submit inside, the job will be never submitted and can not be seen in Spark UI. I suspect the shell didn't run at all.
What's the possible problem?
A Quick Checklist
For those who have the same problem, there is a checklist to check your system. Hope it helps!
Check jobTracker in your Oozie configuration. Note: If a job has been successfully run, it probably not the problem of jobTracker. Related discussion can be found here
Check your disk usage. If ## Heading ##disk usage is greater than 90%, remove some files to make sure disk usage is less than 90%. (That's my case!)
Check Console URL of the stuck action. It can be found in Job - Job Info tab - Actions - Action - Action Info tab. Job state here may help you to find the problem.
Check Oozie log. It's typically in /usr/local/oozie/logs. Check oozie.log* to find if there are exceptions.
Details
Disk usage
If your action state is
YarnApplicationState: ACCEPTED: waiting for AM container to be allocated, launched and register with RM.
That may be the disk problem. Relative discussion can be found in MapReduce job hangs, waiting for AM container to be allocated. Solutions can be found in Why does Hadoop report "Unhealthy Node local-dirs and log-dirs are bad"?.
My level of experience with the product is basic at best, but I'm expected to be a developer; I have a basic understanding of many things.
Right now my job is to investigate canceling lines in Purchase Orders. We have a workflow set up to handle those, and I'm trying to duplicate the scenario in my dev instance. Whenever a user cancels a line, the workflow is supposed to engage, and I've found that a batch job is what triggers that workflow to work (maybe that's the case with all workflows, but I don't know that for sure).
I've set up my personal Dev AX Instance under System Configuration => System => Server Configuration to use my personal Dev AOS server that my client is also running under, but when I go to System Configuration => Batch Jobs => Batch Jobs, then find the Batch Job I've been looking for and set the status to Waiting, the Batch Job never runs.
On our Test instance, the jobs is configured exactly the same way, except they use the AOS Server allotted for it.
I did a SQL script to change the batch job to use my personal Dev AOS Server, then did a restart of the Dynamics AX Servers.
There must be something I'm doing wrong for my personal dev instance. I've been reading some things from here about what may be going on and following down the list, but I'm pretty sure the problem is even stupider => https://www.daxrunbase.com/2017/07/02/troubleshooting-batch-jobs-in-ax/
First of all, do you have all 3 workflow jobs set up?
Workflow message processing
Workflow due date processing
Workflow line-item notifications
They can be set up from System administration > Setup > Workflow > Workflow infrastructure configuration.
Secondly, it is OK for the periodic batch jobs to have status Waiting. They will be in status Executing for a short time and then they will be Waiting for the next run. If the Scheduled start date/time value in this batch job is in the past, that could be a problem. Otherwise everything is OK.
Lastly, if you have already ticked the Is batch server check-box in System administration > Setup > System > Server configuration, please also make sure to move the workflow batch group in the Batch server groups section in the same form from Remaining groups to Selected groups.
The batch jobs should start at Scheduled start date/time - or a bit later, you'd need to wait a minute and refresh the grid.
as part of a batch job I create 4 command lines through control-m which invoke a legacy console application written in VB6. The console application invokes an ActiveEx server which performs a set of analytic jobs calculating outputs. The ActiveEx server was coded as a singleton but when invoked through control-m I get 4 instances running. the ActiveEx server does not tear down once the job has completed and the command line has closed it self.
I created 4 .bat files which once launced manually on the server, simulate the calls made through control-m and the ActiveEx server behaves as expected, i.e. there is only 1 instance ever running and once complete it closes down gracefully.
What am I doing wrong?
Control-M jobs are run under a service account and it same as we login as a user and execute a job. How did you test this? Did you manually executed each batch job one after another or you have executed all the batch job at the same time from different terminals? You can do one thing. Run the control-M jobs with a time interval like first one at 09.00 second one at 09.05, third one at 09.10 and forth one at 09.15 and see if that fix your issue.
Maybe your job cannot use the Desktop environment.
Check your agent service settings:
Log on As:
User account under which Control‑M Agent service will run.
Valid values:
Local System Account – Service logs on as the system account.
Allow Service to Interact with Desktop – This option is valid only if the service is running as a local system account.
Selected – the service provides a user interface on a desktop that can
be used by whoever is logged in when the service is started. Default.
Unselected – the service does not provide a user interface.
This Account – User account under which Control‑M Agent service will run.
NOTE: If the owner of any Control-M/Server jobs has a "roaming profile" or if job output (OUTPUT) will be copied to or from other computers, the Log in mode must be set to This Account.
Default: Local System Account
When i changed the start time of a coordinator job in job.properties in oozie, the job is not taking the changed time, instead its running in the old scheduled time.
Old job.properties:
startMinute=08
startTime=${startDate}T${startHour}:${startMinute}Z
New job.properties:
startMinute=07
startTime=${startDate}T${startHour}:${startMinute}Z
The job is not running at the changed time:07th minute,its running at 08th minute in every hour.
Please can you let me know the solution, how i can make the job pickup the updated properties(changed timing) without restarting or killing the job.
You can't really change the timing of the co-ordinator via any methods given by Oozie(v3.3.2) . When you submit a job the contents properties are stored in the database whereas the actual workflow is in the HDFS.
Everytime you execute the co-ordinator it is necessary to have the workflow in the path specified in properties during job submission but the properties file is not needed. What I mean to imply is the properties file does not come into the picture after submitting the job.
One hack is to update the time directly in the database using SQL query.But I am not sure about the implications of it.The property might become inconsistent across the database.
You have to kill the job and resubmit a new one.
Note: oozie provides a way to change the concurrency,endtime and pausetime as specified in the official docs.
How to get the user who initiated the process in IBM BPM 8.5. I want to reassign my task to the user who actually initiated the process. How it can be achieved in IBM BPM?
There are several ways to get that who initiated a Task , But who initiated a process Instance is somewhat different.
You can perform one out of the following :
Add a private variable and assign it tw.system.user_loginName at the POST of start. you can access that variable for user who initiated the process.(It will be null or undefined for the scenario if task is initiated by some REST API or UCA.)
Place a Tracking group after Start event . Add a input variable to it as username , assign it a value same as tw.system.user_loginName. So whenever Process is started entry will be inserted to DB Table.You can retrieve this value from that view in PerformanceDB.
Also there might be some table ,logging the process Instances details , where you can find the user_id directly.
I suggest you to look in getStarter() method of ProcessInstanceData API.
Official Documentation on API
This link on IBM Developerworks should help you too: Process Starter
Unfortunately there's not an Out Of The Box way to do this - nothing is recorded in the Process Instance that indicates "who" started a process. I presume this is because there are many ways to launch a process instance - from the Portal, via a Message Event, from an API call, etc.
Perhaps the best way to handle this is to add a required Input parameter to your BPD, and supply "who" started the process when you launch it. Unfortunately you can't supply any inputs from the OOTB Portal "New", but you can easilty build your own "launcher".
If you want to route the first task in process to the user that started the process the easiest approach is to simply put the start point in the lane, and on the activity select routing to "Last User In Lane". This will take care of the use case for you without requiring that you do the book keeping to track the user.
Its been a while since I've implemented this, so I can't remember if it will work elegantly if you have system steps before the first task, but this can easily be handled by moving the system steps into the human service to be executed as part of that call, rather than as a separate step in the BPD.
Define variable as string type and using script task to define the login user that use this task and assign it to your defined variable to keep to you in all of the process as initiator of the task.
You can use this line of code to achieve the same:
tw.system.user_loginName