I have the following string and I want to ignore just strong tag from the string using css selector:
<p><strong>Local:</strong><br>
-Brasília/DF </p>
I tried the following syntax but it doesn't work.
p:not(strong)
Where am I wrong?
A pseudo-class, attached to an element p:not(strong), selects from those elements to which it is 'attached' (here the p); and a <p> element is always not a <strong> element; therefore this selector will always match every <p> element.
You seem to be trying to style the parent <p> element based on its child <strong> element which cannot work, as CSS has no parent-selector (see: "Is there a CSS parent selector?")
You could, instead, add a class (or other attribute) to the <p> element, and use that in the selector:
<p class="hasStrongDescendant"><strong><strong>Local:</strong><br>
-Brasília/DF </p>
And style with:
p:not(.hasStrongDescendant) {
/* CSS here */
}
p:not(.hasStrongDescendant) {
color: orange;
}
<p>A paragraph with no child elements</p>
<p class="hasStrongDescendant"><strong>Local:</strong>
<br>-Brasília/DF</p>
Or, using a data-* attribute:
<p data-hasChild="strong"><strong>Local:</strong><br>
-Brasília/DF </p>
And style with:
p:not([data-hasChild="strong"]) {
/* CSS here */
}
p:not([data-hasChild="strong"]) {
color: #f90;
}
<p>A paragraph with no child elements</p>
<p data-hasChild="strong"><strong>Local:</strong>
<br>-Brasília/DF</p>
Also, if you wrapped the contents of the <p>, following the <strong>, inside their own element you could style the descendants of the paragraph using the negation selector:
<p>A paragraph with no child elements</p>
<p><strong>Local:</strong>
<br><span>-Brasília/DF</span>
</p>
Styling with:
p :not(strong) {
/* note the space between the
'p' and the ':not()' */
color: #f90;
}
p :not(strong) {
color: #f90;
}
<p>A paragraph with no child elements</p>
<p><strong>Local:</strong>
<br><span>-Brasília/DF</span>
</p>
Two further approaches, assuming that you want to style the text of the child outside of the <strong> element is (the simplest):
/* define a colour for the <p>
elements: */
p {
color: #f90;
}
/* define a colour for the <strong>
elements within <p> elements: */
p strong {
color: #000;
}
p {
color: #f90;
}
p strong {
color: #000;
}
<p>A paragraph with no child elements</p>
<p><strong>Local:</strong>
<br>-Brasília/DF</p>
And a slightly more complex version, using CSS generated content:
p {
color: #f90;
}
p[data-label]::before {
content: attr(data-label) ': ';
color: #000;
display: block;
font-weight: bold;
}
<p data-label="Local">-Brasília/DF</p>
References:
CSS negation pseudo-class (:not()).
That is not how :not() pseudo-class works. It matches an element that is not represented by the argument.
So in this case to select text of p but not the strong tag you can wrap other part of text in span and then select all children of p but not strong like this
p :not(strong) {
color: blue;
}
<p><strong>Local:</strong><br>
<span>-Brasília/DF </span></p>
Other option is to simply select text of p and then overwrite strong tag with default style.
p {
color: blue;
}
p strong {
color: black;
}
<p><strong>Local:</strong>
<br>-Brasília/DF</p>
Anything but the strong tag will use CSS. Like:
.just_this :not(strong){
color:blue;
}
<p class="just_this">
<strong>Local:</strong>
<br /><span>-Brasília/DF</span>
</p>
Alternative(just use the child-combinator '>'):
.just_this{
color:blue;
}
.just_this>strong{
color:black;
}
<p class="just_this">
<strong>Local:</strong>
<br />-Brasília/DF
</p>
Related
This question already has answers here:
Why can't I use a heading tag inside a p tag and style it with CSS?
(5 answers)
What's the difference between CSS classes .foo.bar (without space) and .foo .bar (with space)
(6 answers)
Closed last year.
I want to override the css of <h1> and <h2> using selector (specific using selector only) but it's not working. It's getting only applied to one class only <h1> color changes to green not <h2>.
Please help can someone tell me where I am wrong. Please help!
.temp {
color: blue;
}
.temp2 {
color: red;
}
p .temp,.temp2{
color: green !important;
}
<p>
hi there this is a test page
<h1 class="temp">heading inside p tag</h1>
<h2 class="temp2">2nd heading inside p tag</h2>
</p>
Try this:
.temp {
color: blue;
}
.temp2 {
color: red;
}
div .temp,
div .temp2{
color: green !important;
}
<div>
hi there this is a test page
<h1 class="temp">heading inside p tag</h1>
<h2 class="temp2">2nd heading inside p tag</h2>
</div>
.temp {
color: blue;
}
.temp2 {
color: red;
}
span .temp, .temp2{
color: green !important;
}
<span>
hi there this is a test page
<h1 class="temp">heading inside p tag</h1>
<h2 class="temp2">2nd heading inside p tag</h2>
</span>
Answer:
putting h1/h2 content inside p is invalid (You might have noticed in Stack overflow's snippet editor)
Imagine having a huge heading inside small paragraph
so change to span/div/etc (in html+css)
You have missed to mention the paragraph element for temp2
.temp {
color: blue;
}
.temp2 {
color: red;
}
p .temp,p .temp2{
color: green !important;
}
<p>
hi there this is a test page
<h1 class="temp">heading inside p tag</h1>
<h2 class="temp2">2nd heading inside p tag</h2>
</p>
I'm looking for a neat way to solve the given problem:
Let's say we have an article, and I want to style every h1, h2 in unless they are located in the <div ="example">
<article class="article">
<h1>Direct Child 1</h1>
<h2>Direct Child 2</h2>
<div class="example">
<h1>Example Child 1</h1>
<h2>Example Child 2</h2>
</div>
<div class="other-div">
<h1>Indirect Child 1</h1>
<h2>Indirect Child 2</h2>
</div>
</div>
Now in pure CSS the solution is simple:
.article > h1,
.article *:not(.example) h1 {
color: red;
}
.article > h2,
.article *:not(.example) h2 {
color: blue;
}
All h1s are red, and h2s are blue, unless they're within <div class=example>" - Pen
In LESS, however, I can't find a clean way to do this.
.article {
& :not(.example) {
h1 {
color: red;
}
h2 {
color: blue;
}
}
}
I'm looking for a way to add <div class=article>" direct child h1s and h2 into the mix while keeping it DRY.
I guess the main show-stopper for your attempt is the limitation of Less requiring a selector combinator (like >) to always go before a selector element (so neither & > nor > alone can work).
There's workaround however:
.article {
#-: ~'>';
#{-}, *:not(.example) {
h1 {color: red}
h2 {color: blue}
}
}
I need to set it with CSS, not jquery.
The selector is for
all labels which do not have a sibling that is a checkbox or radio component.
a sample is:
<span>
<input id="item" type="checkbox">
<label for="item">Data</label>
</span>
This is because i have CSS which sets label to 12px, BUT it affects asp:checkboxes and asp:radio..., but i do not want them to be affected.
There isn't a CSS selector for an element that doesn't have a sibling of a certain kind.
But if you can guarantee that your structure is always an input followed by a label, then you could use the next-sibling combinator with :not() like so to match the label:
input:not([type="checkbox"]):not([type="radio"]) + label
Otherwise you're going to have to add classes to those labels, or use jQuery.
Try adjacent sibling selector:
input[type='text'] + label { // your styles }
You need to apply it to all predecessors you need namely. But there are not many possibilities to use label for besides checkbox and radios you don't want ;)
DEMO
You can select elements based on what kinds of siblings they have, IF the siblings precede your target elements. You can do however much type/selector checking you want on preceding siblings of your target.
You can kind of go backwards using nth-last-of-type and nth-last-child, but you can't do any selector checking on elements which follow your target, and the only kind of type checking you can do on following elements is counting how many there are of the same type.
So in your case you could use:
label {
/* your styling here */
}
input[type="checkbox"] + label, input[type="radio"] + label {
/* remove the styling for labels preceded by a checkbox or radio button */
}
Use ~ instead of + if you expect other elements between your inputs and labels.
Depending on what other elements might be inside the spans that you're working with, any of the 'nth' pseudoclasses may be useful to you.
This would also work for your example, if all you care about is that the labels don't have a preceding sibling:
label:first-child {
/* awesome styles */
}
I submitted an answer to a question that I feel is extremely valuable and along the lines to what you're asking for in this question. Here is the permalink to that question/answer.
https://stackoverflow.com/a/43132408/6167697
The key thing that is missing that may not work for your case is I propose keeping the inputs a child only to what they need to be so that other content can be selector'd using generic sibling selectors. Hypothetically you could still keep them in the span, and then use the labels in various elements inside the span, and that would still allow you treat those labels separate from any others I would think. I'll copy in a code snippet for a working example that demonstrates label elements that are not siblings to their inputs that can still be styled.
* {
padding: 0;
margin: 0;
background-color: #262626;
color: white;
}
.radio-button {
display: none;
}
#filter {
padding: 5% 0;
display: flex;
justify-content: center;
}
.filter-label {
display: inline-block;
border: 4px solid green;
padding: 10px 20px;
font-size: 1.4em;
text-align: center;
cursor: pointer;
}
main {
clear: left;
}
.content {
padding: 3% 10%;
display: none;
}
h1 {
font-size: 2em;
}
.date {
padding: 5px 30px;
font-style: italic;
}
.filter-label:hover {
background-color: #505050;
}
#featured-radio:checked~#filter .featured,
#personal-radio:checked~#filter .personal,
#tech-radio:checked~#filter .tech {
background-color: green;
}
#featured-radio:checked~main .featured {
display: block;
}
#personal-radio:checked~main .personal {
display: block;
}
#tech-radio:checked~main .tech {
display: block;
}
<input type="radio" id="featured-radio" class="radio-button" name="content-filter" checked="checked">
<input type="radio" id="personal-radio" class="radio-button" name="content-filter" value="Personal">
<input type="radio" id="tech-radio" class="radio-button" name="content-filter" value="Tech">
<header id="filter">
<label for="featured-radio" class="filter-label featured" id="feature-label">Featured</label>
<label for="personal-radio" class="filter-label personal" id="personal-label">Personal</label>
<label for="tech-radio" class="filter-label tech" id="tech-label">Tech</label>
</header>
<main>
<article class="content featured tech">
<header>
<h1>Cool Stuff</h1>
<h3 class="date">Today</h3>
</header>
<p>
I'm showing cool stuff in this article!
</p>
</article>
<article class="content personal">
<header>
<h1>Not As Cool</h1>
<h3 class="date">Tuesday</h3>
</header>
<p>
This stuff isn't nearly as cool for some reason :(;
</p>
</article>
<article class="content tech">
<header>
<h1>Cool Tech Article</h1>
<h3 class="date">Last Monday</h3>
</header>
<p>
This article has awesome stuff all over it!
</p>
</article>
<article class="content featured personal">
<header>
<h1>Cool Personal Article</h1>
<h3 class="date">Two Fridays Ago</h3>
</header>
<p>
This article talks about how I got a job at a cool startup because I rock!
</p>
</article>
</main>
That has the added benefit of being pure CSS too! And as per the other post, here's the JSFIDDLE so you can play around with it yourselves.
I have something along the lines of this
<div class="menu" style="background-color: transparent;">
<div class="button">
<div class="divider" style="background-color: transparent;"></div>
<a id="apple" class="unselect select" href="/apple">
<span class="apple1">Apple</span>
</a>
</div>
<div class="button">
<div class="divider"></div>
<a id="orange" class="unselect" href="/orange">
<span class="orange1">Orange</span>
</a>
</div>
....
this gives me the first divider
css=div.menu div.button div.divider
I am trying to access the 2nd divider. I have the need to access the buttons as well. I tried reading through the the nth child stuff and noticed that it is not compatible with IE.
Is there a CSS selector to locate the 2nd/3rd child or descendant (of a given class/id) under an element (with a given class/id)?
I am using xPaths now
//div[#class='menu']/descendant::div[contains(#class,'divider')][2]
it works but I want to migrate this to CSS.
The adjacent sibling selector + is able to do that and is compatible with IE7+
Fiddle demonstrating its use with 4 buttons: http://jsfiddle.net/AgNwu/
(no need for "div" if you rely already on id/class everywhere. If you call something "button", expect it to be a link, an input[type="submit|image|button|reset"] or button element ;) )
CSS
.menu > .button {
border: 1px solid darkblue;
padding: 10px;
margin: 5px 0;
}
.menu > .button + .button .divider {
background: Tan;
}
.menu > .button + .button .divider:after{
content: " (2nd or more)";
}
.menu > .button + .button + .button .divider {
background: yellow;
}
.menu > .button + .button + .button .divider:after{
content: " (3rd or more)";
}
edit: adjacent sibling, I thought this was sibling vs. general sibling
You can replace + by ~ (general sibling) if you have other type of nodes in-between your .button nodes/elements. This'd be the equivalent of :nth-of-type that would still work in IE7+
You can write like this:
div.menu div.button + div.button div.divider{
color:red;
}
Can we write selectors by only name
For example,
<div name= "outer-name">
<img name="inner-image" src="images/ine.jpg" alt"" />
</div>
I want to take style of inner-mage in css file like [outer-name] [inner-image]
In CSS file
[outer-name] [inner-image] {
/*styles*/
}
I cant take selector as [outer-name] img etc .. only selecting by name
You can use attribute selectors:
[name="outer-name"] [name="inner-image"]
But keep in mind that name is not a valid attribute for <div> or <img>, even though the above selector will work. It's best that you either change them to classes, or if you're using HTML5, add the data- prefix to them, so it looks like this:
<div data-name= "outer-name">
<img data-name="inner-image" src="images/ine.jpg" alt"" />
</div>
Then use this selector:
[data-name="outer-name"] [data-name="inner-image"]
Given the following html:
<div data-name="something">
<p>Content in 'something'</p>
<span data-someAttribute="someAttribute">Content in 'someAttribute' div.</span>
</div>
And the CSS:
[data-name] {
background-color: red;
}
[data-name] [data-someAttribute] {
display: block;
background-color: #ffa;
}
This is perfectly valid (or, at least, it's implemented in Chromium 14/Ubuntu 11.04). I've changed from using name attributes (since they're invalid for div elements, or other non-form elements), and used, instead, data-* prefixed custom attributes, which are valid in HTML5 and, while perhaps not 'valid' in HTML 4, they seem to be understood by those browsers still.
JS Fiddle demo.
It's worth noting that you can also use attribute=equals notation, to select only certain elements based on the value of their data-* attributes:
<div data-name="something">
<p>Content in data-name='something' element.</p>
<span data-someAttribute="someAttribute">Content in 'someAttribute' div.</span>
</div>
And the CSS:
[data-name] {
background-color: red;
}
[data-name="something"] {
font-weight: bold;
}
[data-name] [data-someAttribute] {
background-color: #ffa;
text-decoration: underline;
font-weight: normal;
}
JS Fiddle demo.
Also, if CSS3 is an option for you, it's possible to use attribute-begins-with (^=) notation:
[data-name] {
background-color: red;
}
[data-name^="s"] {
font-weight: bold;
}
[data-name] [data-someAttribute] {
background-color: #ffa;
text-decoration: underline;
font-weight: normal;
}
JS Fiddle demo.
And attribute-ends-with ($=) notation:
[data-name] {
background-color: red;
}
[data-name$="ing"] {
font-weight: bold;
}
[data-name] [data-someAttribute] {
background-color: #ffa;
text-decoration: underline;
font-weight: normal;
}
References:
data-* attributes (W3.org).
data-* attributes, (HTML5 Doctor).
attribute-equals selector (W3.org).
attribute-starts-with, and attribute-ends-with selectors (W3.org).
As #Bolt said, name isn't valid there (yet it still works on my browser). You can use the HTML5 data- properties. Here's a fiddle showing how it's done.
The real solution here would be to use classes, but I assume you have a reason for not using them.