I am new to using the Trello API and am using asp.net
I have built an asp.net form containing card information. I want to save the form information into Trello, as a new card, instead of storing it in my database.
First add the script key to the page:
<script type="text/javascript" src="https://api.trello.com/1/client.js?key=yourAppKeyGoesHere"></script>
Log in to Trello and go to this URL to get your Application key.
This code can be used to authorize the user with your application:
Trello.authorize({
type: "redirect",
name: "YourWebsite.com",
scope: {
read: true,
write: true,
account: true
},
error: function () { onFailedAuthorization(); },
expiration: "never"
});
function onFailedAuthorization() {
alert("Trello login failed.")
}
You can then use a function like this to Create a card in Trello:
function CreateCard(cardName, Descr, listID, dueDate)
var newCard =
{
name: cardName, desc: Descr, pos: "top", idList: listID, due: dueDate, idMembers: member.id
};
Trello.post("/cards", newCard)
The idList can be found by opening a card in the Trello List. Add .json to the URL and search the JSON for idList.
Visit the Trello API Docs for more info.
Related
I have some users signed into my actions-on-google app via Google Sign-In ( https://developers.google.com/actions/identity/google-sign-in )
I want to sent push notifications to one of those users.
For getting push notifications work with actions in the first place, I tried this sample: https://github.com/actions-on-google/dialogflow-updates-nodejs/blob/master/functions/index.js but I only can get this to work without this commit: https://github.com/actions-on-google/dialogflow-updates-nodejs/commit/c655062047b49e372da37af32376bd06d837fc7f#diff-1e53ef2f51bd446c876676ba83d7c888
It works fine, but I think const userID = conv.user.id; returns the deprecated Anonymous User ID. The commit suggests to use const userID = conv.arguments.get('UPDATES_USER_ID'); which returns undefined.
I use this nodejs code to send the push notifications.
const request = require('request');
const {JWT} = require('google-auth-library');
const serviceAccount = require('./service-account.json');
let jwtClient = new JWT(
serviceAccount.client_email, null, serviceAccount.private_key,
['https://www.googleapis.com/auth/actions.fulfillment.conversation'],
null
);
jwtClient.authorize((authErr, tokens) => {
let notification = {
userNotification: {
title: process.argv[2],
},
target: {
userId: USERID,
intent: 'tell_latest_status',
// Expects a IETF BCP-47 language code (i.e. en-US)
locale: 'en-US'
},
};
request.post('https://actions.googleapis.com/v2/conversations:send', {
'auth': {
'bearer': tokens.access_token,
},
'json': true,
'body': {
'customPushMessage': notification, 'isInSandbox': true
},
}, (reqErr, httpResponse, body) => {
console.log(httpResponse.statusCode + ': ' + httpResponse.statusMessage);
});
});
I simply can't get this to work with the const userID = conv.arguments.get('UPDATES_USER_ID'); version, because as I said
When I use conv.user.profile.payload.sub as suggested here: https://developers.google.com/actions/identity/user-info the AoG API returns "SendToConversation response: Invalid user id for target."
Is there any way to make this work with Google Sign-In?
Has anyone made this work? I mean with the UPDATES_USER_ID field?
I already created an issue on the samples repo: https://github.com/actions-on-google/dialogflow-updates-nodejs/issues/15 but I was sent here.
Thanks!
While researching why I sometimes got undefined I found an answer on this question that solved my issue.
I've found solution for this problem. While getting UPDATES_USER_ID
conv.arguments.get() only works for first attempt. So, while building
your action you must save it. If you didn't store or save, you can
reset your profile and try again, you will be able to get.
You can reset your user profile for the action here.
Problem Description
My Android app collects data via Google Analytics for Firebase. For privacy reasons, users must be able to wipe their data off the Firebase servers, should they choose to do so.
The app requests a deletion by forwarding its Firebase APP_INSTANCE_ID to my own server. This server has been prepared in advance with credentials, from my personal Google account (via oauth2), for managing the Firebase project. The server authenticates with www.googleapis.com, and, using the supplied APP_INSTANCE_ID, invokes the upsert.
As noted by the documentation, the generic Google Analytics API is appropriate for this task.
After some initial trouble (b/c I didn't have the correct auth scope, and the Analytics API wasn't properly enabled), googleapis.com now returns HTTP 200 for each upsert request. (As an aside, even if you supply a bogus APP_INSTANCE_ID, it returns 200.)
Here is a sample response from the upsert, which shows nothing amiss:
{ kind: 'analytics#userDeletionRequest',
id:
{ type: 'APP_INSTANCE_ID',
userId: (REDACTED 32-char hexidecimal string) },
firebaseProjectId: (REDACTED),
deletionRequestTime: '2018-08-28T12:46:30.874Z' }
I know the firebaseProjectId is correct, because if I alter it, I get an error. I have verified that the APP_INSTANCE_ID is correct, and stable up until the moment it is reset with resetAnalyticsData().
Test Procedure
To test the deletions, I populated Firebase with several custom events, using the procedure below (Nexus 5X emulator, no Google Play, no Google accounts configured, but that shouldn't make any difference):
Install the app
Fire off some custom events (FirebaseAnalytics.logEvent)
Observe those events appear on the Firebase console
(About a minute later:) Make the upsert call, observe HTTP 200, and note the "deletionRequestTime"
Immediately call FirebaseAnalytics.resetAnalyticsData (to clear any event data cached on the device)
Uninstall the app
Rinse & repeat 7 or 8 times
However, even 24 hours later, 100% of the Firebase events are still present in the events table. No discernable state change has taken place on the Firebase server as a result of the upserts.
Question
So, what am I doing wrong? how do I successfully delete user data from Google Analytics for Firebase?
EDIT
Here's the code I'm using to make a request (from node.js):
const request = require( 'request' );
...
_deletePersonalData( data )
{
return new Promise( (resolve, reject) => {
request.post({
url: 'https://www.googleapis.com/analytics/v3/userDeletion/userDeletionRequests:upsert',
body: {
kind: 'analytics#userDeletionRequest',
id: {
type: 'APP_INSTANCE_ID',
userId: data.firebaseAppInstanceId
},
firebaseProjectId: (REDACTED)
},
headers: {
Authorization: 'Bearer ' + iap.getCurAccessToken()
},
json: true
}, (err, res, body) => {
console.log( 'user-deletion POST complete' );
console.log( 'Error ' + err );
console.log( 'Body ', body );
if( err )
{
reject( err );
return;
}
if( body.error )
{
reject( new Error( 'The Google service returned an error: ' + body.error.message + ' (' + body.error.code + ')' ) );
return;
}
resolve({ deletionRequestTime: body.deletionRequestTime });
});
});
}
Here's a sample request body:
{
kind: 'analytics#userDeletionRequest',
id: {
type: 'APP_INSTANCE_ID',
userId: (REDACTED 32-char hexidecimal string)
},
firebaseProjectId: (REDACTED)
}
And here's the console output for that same request (same userId and everything):
user-deletion POST complete
Error: null
Body: { kind: 'analytics#userDeletionRequest',
id:
{ type: 'APP_INSTANCE_ID',
userId: (REDACTED 32-char hexidecimal string) },
firebaseProjectId: (REDACTED),
deletionRequestTime: '2018-08-29T17:32:06.949Z' }
Firebase support just got back to me, and I quote:
Upsert method deletes any individual user data we have logged, but aggregate metrics are not recomputed. This means that you might not see any changes in the events tab in your Analytics console.
So, basically my mistake was expecting the events to disappear from the console.
This, of course, raises the question of how one determines that the API is actually working... but maybe the HTTP 200 is enough.
CONTEXT
I'm writing a custom checkout process using tokenized payments inside a WebView since I need to use payments outside US.
I'm using this code, based on this facebook guide, to ask for the user's credit card info.
const saveThis = this
MessengerExtensions.requestPaymentCredentials(
function success(name, email, cardType, cardLastFourDigits, shippingAddress) {
console.log('success getting user payment info', cardLastFourDigits)
saveThis.printAsyncData(cardType)
},
function error(err, errorMessage) {
console.log('error trying to get user payment info', errorMessage)
saveThis.printAsyncData(errorMessage)
},
['CONTACT_NAME', 'CONTACT_EMAIL', 'CONTACT_PHONE', 'SHIPPING_ADDRESS']
);
CONSIDERATIONS
saveThis.printAsyncData() function is a workaround to log the
output in mobile devices so I can debug the code, since payments
don't work using the Messenger web client.
I'm testing this chatbot with my facebook account which is the one having the chatbot's Administrator role.
Administrator user returns the profile property is_payment_enabled: true
OUTPUT
I'm getting the following error: "An unexpected error has occured.24002". In the facebook's error reference, 24002 means "Payment request cannot be processed due to missing privacy url".
QUESTION
Does that mean that I have to provide a privacy policy URL to test payments even when I'm using the Administrator's chatbot account in a testing environment??
UPDATE
As suggested, I implemented the updated WebView payment code as follows:
const methodData = [{
supportedMethods: ['fb'], //only 'fb' is supported
data: {
merchantTitle: 'Merchant name', // optional, defaults to the Facebook Page name
merchantImageUrl: 'imageURL', //optional, defaults to the app icon
confirmationText: 'Thank you!', // optional, defaults to "Thank you for your payment"
merchantFBPageId: '28636603843****', // page id with onboarded payment method. Need to be the same with the page id in thread or messenger extension
termsUrl: 'https://www.facebook.com/' // Merchant payment privacy terms and conditions.
}
}]
const paymentDetails = {
displayItems: [ //array of items being charged for
{
label: 'T-shirt',
amount: {
currency: 'USD',
value : '15.00'
}
}
],
total: {
label: 'Total', // defaults to "Total"
amount: {
currency: 'USD',
value : '16.23'
}
},
shippingOptions: [ // Optional. Array of options for user to select
{
id: 'free-shipping', // custom ID
label: 'Free shipping in US', //human-readable name
amount: {currency: 'USD', value: '0.00'},
selected: true
}
]
}
const additionalOptions = {
requestShipping: false, // If shipping is required. If true, handle shippingoptionchange and shippingaddresschange events.
requestPayerName: true, // Name of the payer sent with the final response
requestPayerEmail: true, // Email address, same as above
requestPayerPhone: false // Phone number, same as above
}
let request = new this.messengerExtensions.PaymentRequest(
methodData, // array of payment methods and their setup
paymentDetails, // array of items, total, shipping options
additionalOptions, // request shipping information, payee email address, etc
);
request.canMakePayment()
.then(response => {
this.printAsyncData(response + ' from canMakePayment')
if (response === true) {
// proceed
} else {
// something went wrong, e.g. invalid `displayItems` configuration
// or the device does not run a
// recent enough version of the Facebook app
}
})
.catch(error => {
this.printAsyncData(error+' error from canMakePayment')
// an error such as `InvalidStateError`
// if a payment is already in process
});
This suggested implementation returns the variable response as false. Each configuration variable is copied from this link. I changed the MerchantPageID with the PageID I found on my Chatbot's fb page > Information, so I don't think this could be the problem. I checked the Messenger's version of my Android device and is the latest, being the 147.0.0.25.86 one.
I even tried to implement the payment dialog as follows just to see how it behaves.
request.show().then(response => {
// Process the payment if using tokenized payments.
// Process the confirmation if using Stripe/PayPal
this.printAsyncData(response)
// paymentResponse.complete('success').then(() => {
// // cleanup UI, log, etc
// });
}).catch(error => this.printAsyncData(error+'from show()'));
Payment dialog pops over nicely. It shows user's name and email but under the METHOD PAYMENT header it shows a loading spinner indefinitely. Moreover, .show() never triggers the callback thus not allowing to print its response on the line before paymentResponse.complete('success').
UPDATE 2
I've got the supported features with the following code to try to get some clue of what I'm missing
const saveThis = this
MessengerExtensions.getSupportedFeatures(function success(result) {
var features = result.supported_features;
saveThis.printAsyncData(features)
}, function error(err, errorMessage) {
saveThis.printAsyncData(errorMessage)
});
This is the output on my android messenger client:
["sharing_broadcast","sharing_direct", "sharing_open_graph", "permissions", "thread_context", "context", "sharing_media_template"]
There is no "payments" as it should be, based on this reference
Yes, but since you are just testing it can be any URL. Once you submit your bot for approval it will need to point to a real privacy policy.
You are also using the deprecated version of payments. For webview payments you should use PaymentRequest which is explained here:
https://developers.facebook.com/docs/messenger-platform/payments/webview-payments
I'm writing a meteor app and I'm trying to add an autocomplete feature to a search box. The data is very large and is on the server, so I can't have it all on the client. It's basically a database of users. If I'm not wrong, the mizzao:autocomplete package should make that possible, but I can't seem to get it to work.
Here's what I have on the server:
Meteor.publish('autocompleteViewers', function(selector, options) {
Autocomplete.publishCursor(viewers.find(selector, options), this);
this.ready();
});
And here are the settings I use for the search box on the client:
getSettings: function() {
return {
position: 'bottom',
limit: 5,
rules: [{
subscription: 'autocompleteViewers',
field: '_id',
matchAll: false,
options: '',
template: Template.vLegend
}],
};
}
But I keep getting this error on the client:
Error: Collection name must be specified as string for server-side search at validateRule
I don't really understand the problem. When I look at the package code, it just seems like it's testing whether the subscription field is a string and not a variable, which it is. Any idea what the problem could be? Otherwise is there a minimum working example I could go from somewhere? I couldn't find one in the docs.
Error: Collection name must be specified as string for server-side search at validateRule
You get this error because you don't specify a Collection name in quotes.
getSettings: function() {
return {
position: 'bottom',
limit: 5,
rules: [{
subscription: 'autocompleteViewers',
field: '_id',
matchAll: false,
collection: 'viewers', // <- specify your collection, in your case it is a "viewers" collection.
options: '',
template: Template.vLegend
}],
};
}
For more information please read here.
Hope this helps!
I want to publish some limited user information about my users, the idea is that the admin role of my web app can view the emailaddress and username (last one is in the profile data).
Meteor.publish("usersSpecificDataforAdmin", function () {
return Meteor.users.find({}, {fields: {
'profile': 1,
'emails': 1,
'roles': 1
}});
});
I'm then subscribing to this in my router:
adminRoutes.route('/users', {
name: 'adminUsersList',
subscriptions: function (params, queryParams) {
this.register('adminUsersList', Meteor.subscribe('usersSpecificDataforAdmin'));
},
action: function (params, queryParams) {
BlazeLayout.render('layout_frontend', {
top: 'menu',
main: 'adminUsersList',
footer: 'footer'
});
}
});
In the template, I'm using the following to display the email address of the user: '{{emails.address}}', but that doesn't work. I can display all other info.
I have following questions:
how can I display the email address of the user in the template
even when I don't add the password or services fields in the publishing, it is send to the client (doing Meteor.user()) is revealing all the info, including passwords etc, which is a security issue in my opinion. How can I disable the publication of this?
Several things:
You don't need to include _id in the list of fields to be published, it is always included
You're publishing allUserData but your router code is subscribing to usersAllforAdmin which you're not showing code for. I suspect that publication is including services
Passwords are not stored anywhere in Meteor, only the bcrypt hash of the password is stored in services
emails is an array, you can't access it with {{emails.address}} in spacebars, instead use {{emails.[0].address}} (reference)