I am trying to use the wcf-sql adapter to call a stored procedure multiple times with different parameters. I have created the original schema using the wizard and then created the composite schema by hand. I understand what the error is telling me I just do not understand why I am getting the error and/or how to resolve it.
Error: Microsoft.ServiceModel.Channels.Common.MetadataException:
Object [dbo].[DEPT_NUM] of type StoredProcedure does not exist. The
message that is suspended in Biztalk looks like this...
<ns0:DINV_sumDepartmentInventory xmlns:ns0="http://schemas.microsoft.com/Sql/2008/05/TypedProcedures/dbo"><ns0:DEPT_NUM> 4</ns0:DEPT_NUM><ns0:INV_DATE>2016-03-21T00:00:00</ns0:INV_DATE><ns0:USERNAME>Service</ns0:USERNAME></ns0:DINV_sumDepartmentInventory>
This is the portion of the orchestration...
This is the map that is associated with the "transform_3" shape...
This is what the composite schema looks like...
I am expecting the output to more like this...
<ns1:Request xmlns:ns1="http://BigY.PICSInventory.Updated_SQL_Schemas.Composite_SumDepartmentInventory" xmlns:ns0="http://schemas.microsoft.com/Sql/2008/05/TypedProcedures/dbo"><ns0:DINV_sumDepartmentInventory><ns0:DEPT_NUM>4</ns0:DEPT_NUM><ns0:INV_DATE>2016-03-21T00:00:00</ns0:INV_DATE><ns0:USERNAME>Service</ns0:USERNAME></ns0:DINV_sumDepartmentInventory></ns1:Request>
Any ideas what is wrong with the setup or what else I can try?
It looks like the Composite Operation is not composed correctly. It has to be a very specific structure with certain namespaces and Operation.
This Wiki Article explains the process step by step: BizTalk Server: Streamlining WCF SQL and Oracle Messaging-Only and Other Patterns
Related
A while back I set up BizTalk to pick up a file via FTP and drop it into a network directory. It's all passsthru so I didn't use an orchestration.
Now I've been asked to execute a stored procedure once the file is picked up. The procedure contains no parameters and I do not need the contents of the file.
It seems like such a simple request but I can't figure it out. Is there any way to do this without over complicating things?
This can be accomplished through the use of either the WCF-SQL adapter or the WCF_Custom adapter with a SQL binding. You can do this using messaging only with just a SendPort with a filter/map on it thus no orchestration needed.
For the SOAP action header use TypedProcedure/dbo/name_of_your_stored_procedure and in the messages tab you can specify the paramters to the stored procuders as well as add a payload in the following manner:
<name_of_your_stored_procedure xmlns="http://schemas.microsoft.com/Sql/2008/05/TypedProcedures/dbo">
<parameter1>XXXX</parameter1>
<xml_parameter>
<bts-msg-body xmlns="http://www.microsoft.com/schemas/bts2007" encoding="string"/>
</xml_parameter>
</name_of_your_stored_procedure>
In the above case xml_parameter will have the contents of the message payload passed to it.
The stored procedure should look something like :
CREATE PROCEDURE [dbo].[name_of_your_stored_procedure]
#parameter1 int,
#xml_parameter nvarchar(max)
AS
BEGIN
-- your code goes here
END
More details can be found here
Regards Hasse
This MSDN page describes the process and has this to say: "You must create a BizTalk orchestration to use BizTalk Server for performing an operation on SQL Server."
However if you're really desperate not to use an orchestration I believe you have the option of setting the operation context property in a custom pipeline component. Then you can initialise the message in a map on a port. In theory this should work but I can't guarantee it.
I have a StoredProcedure that returns a simple table containing several records:
DECLARE #STEPS_TABLE AS TABLE (OrchestrationID uniqueidentifier, [Message] nvarchar(1000));
-- LOADING THE VALUES HERE
SELECT * FROM #STEPS_TABLE As Step FOR XML AUTO, XMLDATA, ELEMENTS
I used the SQL Transport Schema Generation Wizard to create my schema and could configure the port correctly. If I use this schema on my orchestration, it works perfectly. BizTalk starts one instance of the orchestration everytime the #STEPS_TABLE has more than 1 record.
Reading Microsoft technical documentation, they recommend to get several messages in one call and then use the XML pipeline to disassemble the multi-row BizTalk message into a single-row BizTalk message.
I haven't used the XML pipeline before, so I tried the provided steps but couldn't get it to work.
Could somebody provide me a link to a "how to" (didn't find anything until now, after several hours of searching) or give me some hints to succeed.
Thanks in advance.
... some hours later I could figure it out myself. So if anybody comes across the same issue as me, here you have some guidelines to make it work on your environment.
At the end I followed a different walkthrough from Microsoft and avoided the pipeline recommendation altogether. The documentation I found is called "Disassembling Result Sets Using the SQL Adapter" and does exactly what i was looking for. You can just follow the whole walkthrough from Microsoft but avoid the creation of the send port and make some little adjustment on the receive port.
After following the technical document you will end up with two schemas, I will call them message and envelope (contains several messages) for the sake of this excercise. In your orchestration you can create a receiving port that maps to the message and then when you configure it as a SQL Port and you link it to your stored procedure (or select statement), you only have to change the Document Root Element Name to the envelope root name; the XML Receive pipeline (provided by default in BizTalk 2006) will do the magic of disassembling the messages contained in the envelope and instantiating an orchestration for each message.
The Microsoft "Disassembling Result Sets Using the SQL Adapter" walkthrough can be found under:
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa562098(v=bts.20).aspx
Mission accomplished :)
I need to poll the data in xml format and map it to the EDI 834.........
I have written the stored procedure using for xml auto,element
when i consume it using add adapter metadata i am getting a xml message....
but i need to use this xml message to map it to the EDI834 ....How to get the structure of xml so that i can use that in map....
I also followed http://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/biztalkgeneral/thread/6a7e0093-0692-4ba5-9e14-0d2090c2cf54
this thread and generated the schems using xml polling and mapped that to EDI834.
But when i use the map into outbound map...It doesnt map the polling data to edi 834..
The WCF-SQL adapter removes the need to use the 'for xml auto, elements' syntax. This is a legacy leftover from the old Sql Adapter.
Just write your stored procedure in a manner to return a consistent result set, then generate metadata against the stored procedure. The adapter framework will create an appropriate schema based on the metadata returned from your stored procedure.
Then simply map the data from your WCF-SQL schema to your EDI834 schema.
Create the stored procedure that returns xml (or xml part) by using the FOR XML PATH syntax
-Setup a receive location using WCF-SQL. Select XmlPolling. Choose a rootname and namespace for the adapter to wrap around the xml returned from SQL (mandatory).
-Set Polling Statement to: exec [SPNAME]
-Set PollDataAvailableStatement to something appropriate that will return a count > 0 if there are rows/xml to be polled.
-Use passthrureceive pipeline for the receive-location
-Set up a send port (FILE) that subscribes to everything that comes from the receiveport used for the receivelocation.
-Start the application. Examine the XML returned from the adapter.
-In VS generate a schema using well-formed XML (Add->Add generated Items->Generate Schemas) (NOTE: You may have to run the InstallWFX.vbs found under the BizTalk SDK/Utilities/Schema generator, if you have not already done this earlier on the machine).
-Choose the xml file generated by the adapter (give the file a name representing the schema you are trying to create).
-Now you should have a schema representing the xml returned by the adapter, you may have to go through the schema manually and change data types to something more appropriate than what the wizard has chosen.
I have created a connectionstring in mvc3 application and it is working fine in mvc views and controllers and I am able to fetch data. Now I have called the repository/model functions in a Unit Test in Test project and I am getting error:
System.Data.EntityCommandExecutionException: An error occurred while executing the command definition. See the inner exception for details. ---> System.Data.SqlClient.SqlException: Invalid object name 'dbo.tblProduct'.
How can i fix it?
That has nothing to do particularly with MVC. As it seems, when testing, you use ConnectionString on database that does not have 'dbo.tblProduct' table/view. Check the connetion string and database. You may need to debug tests
Check your table may have different schema (other then dbo) change it to dbo using query below
look at this.
How do I change db schema to dbo
Its very strange for my case, as it is required to do mapping between model and tables, the name has to be the same. When I added 's' at the end of table's name, it works. I don't know if this part work of what LINQ does.
We're getting a server error saying "Parameter count does not match Parameter Value count." Anyone have any idea what this could mean?
Our site's on ASP.NET Webforms running DotNetNuke as a CMS.
I've tried uploading an older version of the web.config file but it doesn't seem to have changed since the error came up. It wasn't in any of our recent module file uploads because I reuploaded the old files from this morning that we changed.
Could any changes in the database cause this or would it have to originate from an error in the code?
Thanks.
Some SQL query or stored procedure has more parameters specified then parameters' values received.
Something like this:
command.CommandText = "EXEC test #a";
command.Parameters.Add("#a", "a");
command.Parameters.Add("#b", "b");
i.e. look at the database scheme. Was it changed? Were stored procedures changed?
I've found that if you are using parameters that have default values, certain libraries can't handle.
For instance, we have an application that uses an older version of Microsoft Enterprise Library Data Access method that allows you to pass parameters as an array.
It fails if the amount of items in the array doesn't match exactly the number of parameters on the stored procedure, regardless if some are 'optional' or not.
In cases like this have to use straight ADO.NET and use the cmd.Parameters.AddWithValues("#parameterName", value)
syntax for the required stored procedure parameters. You will not have to add, when using this method, command parameters for the 'optional' stored procedure parameters.
I had the same problem and I found that it was picking the fields from a temporary cache which was being maintained by MySQLHelper.