I download a project, and in it there use less write the stylesheet.
And in the script code the name: own-space, and in the less code, there are &-btn-box, &-tra and &-input-identifycode-con selectors.
I have two questions:
I don't know the .own-space in less and the name: own-space's relationship.
and what's the meaning of &-btn-box, &-tra and &-input-identifycode-con there? what's the function of them?
My code is below:
<template>
<div>
.....
</div>
</template>
<script>
export default {
components: {
},
name: 'own-space',
data () {
...
};
},
methods: {
...
}
};
</script>
<style lang="less" rel="stylesheet/less">
...
.own-space {
&-btn-box {
margin-bottom: 10px;
button {
padding-left: 0;
span {
color: #2D8CF0;
transition: all .2s;
}
span:hover {
color: #0C25F1;
transition: all .2s;
}
}
}
&-tra {
width: 10px;
height: 10px;
transform: rotate(45deg);
position: absolute;
top: 50%;
margin-top: -6px;
left: -3px;
box-shadow: 0 0 2px 3px rgba(0, 0, 0, .1);
background-color: white;
z-index: 100;
}
&-input-identifycode-con {
position: absolute;
width: 200px;
height: 100px;
right: -220px;
top: 50%;
margin-top: -50px;
border-radius: 4px;
box-shadow: 0 0 2px 3px rgba(0, 0, 0, .1);
}
}
</style>
Less/Sass and other pre-processors let you write the CSS code with nested rules (besides other things like variables, mixins, and so on). So you don't have to write the full path like you do in CSS. You can just nest the style.
For example, you could have a structure like:
<parent>
<child>
<grandchild>
</grandchild>
</child>
</parent>
In plain CSS, to style every element you would write:
parent { styles }
parent child { styles }
parent child grandchild { styles }
With Less (and other preprocessors like SCSS) you can do the following
parent {
some parent styles
& child {
some child styles
& grandchild {
some grandchild styles
}
}
&:hover { hover styles on parent }
&:before { pseudo element styles }
}
etc.
So, the use of & can be to enable style writing for elements that are in a relationship with the parent element ( in your case the .own-space ).
btn-box , -tra , -input-identifycode-con are direct children of the own-space element, and button is child of btn-box , span is child of button, grandchild of btn-box and , grandgrandchild ( :) ) of the own-pace. Anyway, you get the ideea :)
For the specific question .own-space { &-btn-box { ... } } would mean that there is an element with class own-space-btn-box which most probably is a child of own-space but NOT necessarily ( see end of answer ). The HTML seems to be structured in a BEM style but not according to the documentation and rules. When using preprocessors for styling it is highly recommended to use the BEM naming strategy. Take a look at it.
For example, the current structure COULD look like:
Stack Snippets do not accept SCSS. You can check out a working example here
.own-space {
&-btn-box {
margin-bottom: 10px;
button {
padding-left: 0;
span {
color: #2D8CF0;
transition: all .2s;
}
span:hover {
color: #0C25F1;
transition: all .2s;
}
}
}
&-tra {
width: 10px;
height: 10px;
transform: rotate(45deg);
position: absolute;
top: 50%;
margin-top: -6px;
left: -3px;
box-shadow: 0 0 2px 3px rgba(0, 0, 0, .1);
background-color: white;
z-index: 100;
}
&-input-identifycode-con {
position: absolute;
width: 200px;
height: 100px;
right: -220px;
top: 50%;
margin-top: -50px;
border-radius: 4px;
box-shadow: 0 0 2px 3px rgba(0, 0, 0, .1);
}
}
<div class="own-space">
The SO snippet doesn't support CSS preprocessors.
Example purposes only
<div class="own-space-btn-box">
<button>Button</button>
<span>Some span</span>
</div>
<div class="own-space-tra">
Tra tra
</div>
<div class="own-space-input-identifycode-con">
identifycode
</div>
</div>
IMPORTANT when you see styles like these in most cases the elements ARE related but keep in mind when debugging other people's code that it's not always the case. They can be unrelated, e.g.
<element class="element"> .... </element>
<element2 class="element-element2"> .... </element2>
The SCSS could still look like this and have the same effect
.element {
styles
&-element2 {
styles
}
}
See example -> not related
Another example use of & would be in the case you have two elements with a common class and a specific class, e.g.
<element class="element specific1">....</element>
<element class="element specific2">....</element>
You can add common styles and specific styles all together like
.element {
/* common styles */
&.specific1 {
/* specific 1 styles */
}
&.specific2 {
/* specific 2 styles */
}
}
There are a lot of different uses for &. Read more:
the-sass-ampersand
Sass parent selector
LESS
BEM naming
I am writing a mixin in Less that adds a play button to video tags. It looks like this:
.playVideoButton(#size: 64px) {
&:before {
content: "";
width: #size;
height: #size;
top: 50%;
left: 50%;
display: none;
position: absolute;
.transform(translate(-50%, -50%));
.border-radius(50%);
border: 2px solid #fff;
background-color: rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.35);
}
&:after {
width: 0;
height: 0;
content: "";
border-top: #size / 4 solid transparent;
border-bottom: #size / 4 solid transparent;
border-left: #size / 2.4 solid #fff;
top: 50%;
left: 50%;
display: none;
position: absolute;
.transform(translate(-35%, -50%));
}
&:hover {
&:before {
display: block;
&:hover {
background-color: rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.60);
}
}
&:after {
display: block;
}
}
}
It Works fine but I want to make a second hover effect for the :before. So I write at the end: &:hover > &:before > &:hover {background-color: rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.60);} but when I hover the :before element I don't get a change of the background opacity.
Chromes Dev Tool hides the hover settings for pseudo elements. So is it not possible to modify them without JavaScript?
At present you can't attach :hover (or any other pseudo-classes to a pseudo-element). It is implied by the below text in the W3C Spec for pseudo-elements:
Only one pseudo-element may appear per selector, and if present it must appear after the sequence of simple selectors that represents the subjects of the selector.
and the following one from the W3C Spec for selector syntax:
One pseudo-element may be appended to the last sequence of simple selectors in a selector.
Pseudo-classes (like :hover, :link etc) are simple selectors and a pseudo-element can only be appended after all such simple selectors. So, it rules out the possibility of a div:hover:before:hover or div:before:hover.
In the below snippet, a very simple one, you can see how the div:after:hover selector never gets matched while the div:hover:after does.
div:after {
display: block;
content: 'World';
background: beige;
}
div:after:hover {
background: green;
}
div:hover:after {
border: 1px solid green;
}
div:hover {
border: 1px solid red;
}
<div>Hello!</div>
You should consider creating that play button using an actual child element (instead of a pseudo) and then attach the :hover selector to it.
I have two boxes that when you hover over, the background opacity should change, but the foreground text opacity should not change. I know the solution to this is on hover, set the rgba to the background color and add the opacity. Example:
#join:hover {
rgba(0, 102, 255, .4)
}
However, the thing is that in jquery the background of each of the boxes change when clicked on, so using a solid and specific color is not an option. I'd like to use just opacity: .4 so that the opacity is the same regardless of the background color of each box.
When I use opacity on hover, the opacity of the text in each box changes as well. To get around this, I tried using z-index/position: relative and setting the text (#join-text, #learn-text) to a higher z-index and the background (#join, #learn) to a lesser z-index. This did not render the correct results.
I also tried using pseudo class ::before like #join:hover::before but that also did not render the correct results, the position:absolute changed the position of the buttons.
Is there any way to change the opacity on hover ONLY for the background, using the opacity: .4 property? Any input would be greatly appreciated.
Find code here: https://jsfiddle.net/Lsqjwu15/1/
You can use CSS3 :before selector
#join:before {
background: #0066ff;
}
#learn:before {
background: #ffb31a;
}
.rectangle:before {
content: "";
width: inherit;
height: inherit;
position: absolute;
}
.rectangle:hover:before {
opacity: .4;
}
JSFiddle
You could make a workaround with pseudo elements (changed the "join" box):
.rectangle {
position:relative;
height: 200px;
width: 80px;
border: 1px solid transparent;
}
#join:before {
content:"";
position:absolute;
left:0;
right:0;
top:0;
bottom:0;
background: #0066ff;
}
#learn {
background: #ffb31a;
}
#join:hover:before,
#learn:hover {
opacity: .4;
}
.vertical {
text-align: center;
color: #000000;
font-size: 30px;
font-weight: bold;
white-space: nowrap;
transform: rotate(-90deg);
}
#join-text {
margin-top: 110px;
}
#learn-text {
margin-top: 125px;
}
<div class="rectangle" id="join">
<div class="vertical" id="join-text">
Join Here
</div>
</div>
<div class="rectangle" id="learn">
<div class="vertical" id="learn-text">
Learn More
</div>
</div>
Could you make the text "rgba(0,0,0,1) !important" to override the background opacity? would that still fade with the background?
However, the thing is that in jquery the background of each of the boxes change when clicked on, so using a solid and specific color is not an option.
You haven't specified HOW the background colors are changed or what they are initially but using RGBA Colors throughout seems simple enough. JQ is perfectly capable of handing RGBA.
.rectangle {
height: 200px;
width: 80px;
border: 1px solid transparent;
}
#join {
background: rgba(0, 102, 255, 1)
}
#learn {
background: rgba(255, 179, 26, 1)
}
#join:hover {
background: rgba(0, 102, 255, .4)
}
#learn:hover {
background: rgba(255, 179, 26, .4)
}
.vertical {
text-align: center;
color: #000000;
font-size: 30px;
font-weight: bold;
white-space: nowrap;
transform: rotate(-90deg);
}
#join-text {
margin-top: 110px;
}
#learn-text {
margin-top: 125px;
}
<div class="rectangle" id="join">
<div class="vertical" id="join-text">
Join Here
</div>
</div>
<div class="rectangle" id="learn">
<div class="vertical" id="learn-text">
Learn More
</div>
</div>
If there is something else you haven't told us then if you want a solution to your code, you're going to have to reproduce the exact issue including the JS/JQ
I have a set of <a> tags with differing rgba background colours but the same alpha. Is it possible to write a single css style that will change only the opacity of the rgba attribute?
A quick example of the code:
<img src="" /><div class="brown">Link 1</div>
<img src="" /><div class="green">Link 2</div>
And the styles
a {display: block; position: relative}
.brown {position: absolute; bottom: 0; background-color: rgba(118,76,41,.8);}
.green {position: absolute; bottom: 0; background-color: rgba(51,91,11,.8);}
What I would like to do is write a single style that would change the opacity when the <a> is hovered over, yet keep the colour unchanged.
Something like
a:hover .green, a:hover .brown {background-color: rgba(inherit,inherit,inherit,1);}
This is now possible with custom properties:
.brown { --rgb: 118, 76, 41; }
.green { --rgb: 51, 91, 11; }
a { display: block; position: relative; }
div { position: absolute; bottom: 0; background-color: rgba(var(--rgb), 0.8); }
a:hover div { background-color: rgba(var(--rgb), 1); }
To understand how this works, see How do I apply opacity to a CSS color variable?
If custom properties are not an option, see the original answer below.
Unfortunately, no, you'll have to specify the red, green and blue values again for each individual class:
a { display: block; position: relative; }
.brown { position: absolute; bottom: 0; background-color: rgba(118, 76, 41, 0.8); }
a:hover .brown { background-color: rgba(118, 76, 41, 1); }
.green { position: absolute; bottom: 0; background-color: rgba(51, 91, 11, 0.8); }
a:hover .green { background-color: rgba(51, 91, 11, 1); }
You can only use the inherit keyword alone as a value for the property, and even then the use of inherit isn't appropriate here.
You could do various things to avoid having to hard code the numbers if you want to. Some of these methods only work if you use a plain white background as they're really adding white on top rather than reducing opacity. The first one should work fine for everything provided:
you aren't already using the psuedo-element for something; and
you can set position to relative or absolute on the <div> tag
Option 1: ::before psuedo-element:
.before_method{
position:relative;
}
.before_method:before{
display:block;
content:" ";
position:absolute;
z-index:-1;
background:rgb(18, 176, 41);
top:0;
left:0;
right:0;
bottom:0;
opacity:0.5;
}
.before_method:hover:before{
opacity:1;
}
Option 2: white gif overlay:
.image_method{
background-color: rgb(118, 76, 41);
background-image: url(https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/f/fc/Translucent_50_percent_white.png)
}
.image_method:hover{
background-image:none;
}
Option 3: box-shadow method:
A variation of the gif method, but may have performance issues.
.shadow_method{
background-color: rgb(18, 176, 41);
box-shadow:inset 0 0 0 99999px rgba(255,255,255,0.2);
}
.shadow_method:hover{
box-shadow:none;
}
CodePen examples: http://codepen.io/chrisboon27/pen/ACdka
No, it's not possible.
You could try a CSS pre-processor, though, if you want to do this sort of thing.
From what I could see, at least LESS and Sass have functions that can make colors more, or less, transparent.
It's now 2017 and this is now possible with
CSS custom properties / CSS Variables (Caniuse)
One classic use case for CSS variables is the ability to individualize parts of a property's value.
So here, instead of repeating the whole rgba expression once again -
we split up or 'individulaize' the rgba values into 2 parts / variables (one for the rgb value and one for the alpha)
.brown {
--rgb: 118, 76, 41;
}
.green {
--rgb: 51, 91, 11;
}
.brown, .green {
--alpha: 0.3;
background-color: rgba(var(--rgb), var(--alpha));
}
Then, on hover we can now just modify the --alpha variable:
a:hover .green, a:hover .brown {
--alpha: 1;
}
a {
display: block;
position: relative;
}
.brown {
--rgb: 118, 76, 41;
}
.green {
--rgb: 51, 91, 11;
}
.brown, .green {
display: inline-block;
--alpha: 0.3;
background-color: rgba(var(--rgb), var(--alpha));
font-size: 40px;
margin: 20px;
}
a:hover .green, a:hover .brown {
--alpha: 1;
}
<a href="#">
<div class="brown">Link 1</div>
</a>
<a href="#">
<div class="green">Link 2</div>
</a>
Codepen
Further reading:
Individualizing CSS Properties with CSS Variables (Dan Wilson)
No, that's not possible.
If you want to use rgba, you must set each value together. There's no way to only change the alpha.
there is an alternative,you can add a linear-gradient background image onto the original color.
a{
background: green
}
a:hover{
background-image:linear-gradient(hsla(0,0%,0%,.2) 100%,transparent 100%) // darker
}
a:hover{
background-image:linear-gradient(hsla(255,100%,100%,.2) 100%,transparent 100%) // lighter
}
also, with css3 filter property,you can do that too,but it seems that it will change the text color
a:hover{
filter: brightness(80%) //darker
}
a:hover{
filter: brightness(120%) //lighter
}
here is a jsfiddle:https://jsfiddle.net/zhangyu911013/epwyL296/2/
Why not use :hover and specify a different opacity in the hover class?
a:hover {
opacity:0.6
}
simple solution :
a
{
position: relative;
display:inline-block;
background: rgba(red, 0.75);
padding: 20px;
&:before
{
content: ' ';
position: absolute;
left: 0;
top: 0;
width: 100%;
height: 100%;
}
&:hover
{
&:before
{
background-color: rgba(#000, 0.25);
}
}
}
exemple : https://jsfiddle.net/epwyL296/14/
just play with alpha of background. if you want light instead of darkness, just replace #000 by #fff
I had a similar problem. I had 18 different divs working as buttons, and each with a different color. Rather than figure out the color codes for each or use a div:hover selector to change the opacity (which affects all children) I used the pseudo-class :before like in #Chris Boon's answer.
Because I wanted to do the coloring on the individual elements, I used :before to create a transparent white div on :hover. This is a very basic washout.
#categories div {
position:relative;
width:100px;
height:100px;
float:left;
border:1px solid black;
display:table-cell;
}
#categories div:before{
content:"";
position:absolute;
top:0px;
left:0px;
width:100px;
height:100px;
}
#categories div:hover:before {
background-color:white;
opacity:0.2;
}
#a_Particular_Div {
background-color:red;
}
According to CanIUse.com, this should have something like 92% support as of early 2014. (http://caniuse.com/#feat=css-gencontent)
You can do this with CSS variables, although it's a little messy.
First, set a variable containing just the RGB values, in order, of the color you want to use:
:root {
--color-success-rgb: 80, 184, 60;
}
Then you can assign an RGBA value for a color and pull everything but the alpha value from this variable:
.button--success {
background: rgba(var(--color-success-rgb), 0.8);
}
This isn't super pretty, but it lets you use the same RGB values but different alpha values for a color.
Update: It's not possible to do that unfortunately. You'll need to write two separate selectors of:
a.green:hover {background-color: rgba(118,76,41,1);}
a.brown:hover {background-color: rgba(118,76,41,1);}
According to the W3C, the rgba property doesn't have/support the inherit value.
I faced a similar problem. Here's what I did and it works fine( only alpha changes on hover and also the text is not affected) by the following steps:
1) Apply a highlighted(or any of your choice) class to whichever element you wish to change background alpha of.
2) Get the background color rgba
3) Store it in a string and manipulate it(change alpha) as you want on hover(mouseenter and mouseleave)
HTML Code:
<div class="highlighted brown">Link 1</div><br><br>
<div class="highlighted green">Link 1</div>
CSS Code:
.brown {background-color: rgba(118,76,41,.8);}
.green {background-color: rgba(51,91,11,.8);}
Javascript Code:
$(document).on({
mouseenter: function() {
var rgba_str = $(this).css("background-color");
var new_rgba_str ="rgba(" + rgba_str.substring(rgba_str.lastIndexOf("(")+1,rgba_str.lastIndexOf(",")) + ", 0.5)";
$(this).css("background-color",new_rgba_str );
},
mouseleave: function(){
var rgba_str = $(this).css("background-color");
var new_rgba_str ="rgba(" + rgba_str.substring(rgba_str.lastIndexOf("(")+1,rgba_str.lastIndexOf(",")) + ", 0.8)";
$(this).css("background-color",new_rgba_str );
}
},'.highlighted');
Working Fiddle:http://jsfiddle.net/HGHT6/1/
Simple workaround with opacity if you can accommodate a slight change in background-color:
.yourClass {
// Your style here //
opacity: 0.9;
}
.yourClass:hover, .yourClass:focus {
opacity: 0.7;
}
.yourClass:active {
opacity: 1;
box-shadow: none;
}
.yourClass:hover, .yourClass:focus, .yourClass:active {
text-decoration: none;
outline: none;
}
Building on Yu Zhang's answer:
In :root, (or parent component in Blazor) set css variables:
--bg-img-light: linear-gradient(hsla(255,100%,100%,.2) 100%, transparent 100%);
--bg-img-dark: linear-gradient(hsla(0,0%,0%,.2) 100%, transparent 100%);
Then on any element that you want to apply a hover effect on:
.buttontomakelighter:hover {
background-image: var(--bg-img-light);
}
.buttontomakedarker:hover {
background-image: var(--bg-img-dark);
}
This is about the simplest way; put this in your css stylesheet:
a:hover { color : #c00; }
done!