I started out using Firth's logistic (logistf) to deal with my small sample size (n=80), but wanted to try out exact logistic regression using the elrm package. However, I'm having trouble figuring out how to create the "collapsed" data required for elrm to run. I have a csv that I import into R as a dataframe that has the following variables/columns. Here is some example data (real data has a few more columns and 80 rows):
+------------+-----------+-----+--------+----------------+
| patien_num | asymmetry | age | female | field_strength |
+------------+-----------+-----+--------+----------------+
| 1 | 1 | 25 | 1 | 1.5 |
| 2 | 0 | 50 | 0 | 3 |
| 3 | 0 | 75 | 1 | 1.5 |
| 4 | 0 | 33 | 1 | 3 |
| 5 | 0 | 66 | 1 | 3 |
| 6 | 0 | 99 | 0 | 3 |
| 7 | 1 | 20 | 0 | 1.5 |
| 8 | 1 | 40 | 1 | 3 |
| 9 | 0 | 60 | 1 | 3 |
| 10 | 0 | 80 | 0 | 1.5 |
+------------+-----------+-----+--------+----------------+
Basically my data is one line per patient (not a frequency table). I'm trying to run a regression with asymmetry as the dependent variable and age (continuous), female (binary), and field_strength (factor) as independent variables. I'm trying to understand how to collapse this into the appropriate format so I can get that "ntrials" part required for the elrm formula.
I've looked at https://stats.idre.ucla.edu/r/dae/exact-logistic-regression/ but they start with data in a different format than mine, and having trouble. Any help appreciated!
I'm trying to use the Merge() function in RStudio. Basically I have two tables with 5000+ rows. They both have the same amount of rows. Although there is no corresponding Columns to merge by. However the rows are in order and correspond. E.g. The first row of dataframe1 should merge with first row dataframe2...2nd row dataframe1 should merge with 2nd row dataframe2 and so on...
Here's an example of what they could look like:
Dataframe1(df1):
+-------------------------------------+
| Name | Sales | Location |
+-------------------------------------+
| Rod | 123 | USA |
| Kelly | 142 | CAN |
| Sam | 183 | USA |
| Joyce | 99 | NED |
+-------------------------------------+
Dataframe2(df2):
+---------------------+
| Sex | Age |
+---------------------+
| M | 23 |
| M | 33 |
| M | 31 |
| F | 45 |
+---------------------+
NOTE: this is a downsized example only.
I've tried to use the merge function in RStudio, here's what I've done:
DFMerged <- merge(df1, df2)
This however increases both the rows and columns. It returns 16 rows and 5 columns for this example.
What am I missing from this function, I know there is a merge(x,y, by=) argument but I'm unable to use a column to match them.
The output I would like is:
+----------------------------------------------------------+
| Name | Sales | Location | Sex | Age |
+----------------------------------------------------------+
| Rod | 123 | USA | M | 23 |
| Kelly | 142 | CAN | M | 33 |
| Sam | 183 | USA | M | 31 |
| Joyce | 99 | NED | F | 45 |
+-------------------------------------+--------------------+
I've considering making extra columns in each dataframes, says row# and match them by that.
You could use cbind:
cbind(df1, df2)
If you want to use merge you could use:
merge(df1, df2, by=0)
You could use:
cbind(df1,df2)
This will necessarily work with same number of rows in two data frames
I would like to assign groups to larger groups in order to assign them to cores for processing. I have 16 cores.This is what I have so far
test<-data_extract%>%group_by(group_id)%>%sample_n(16,replace = TRUE)
This takes staples OF 16 from each group.
This is an example of what I would like the final product to look like (with two clusters),all I really want is for the same group id to belong to the same cluster as a set number of clusters
________________________________
balance | group_id | cluster|
454452 | a | 1 |
5450441 | a | 1 |
5444531 | b | 1 |
5404051 | b | 1 |
5404501 | b | 1 |
5404041 | b | 1 |
544251 | b | 1 |
254252 | b | 1 |
541254 | c | 2 |
54123254 | d | 1 |
542541 | d | 1 |
5442341 | e | 2 |
541 | f | 1 |
________________________________
test<-data%>%group_by(group_id)%>% mutate(group = sample(1:16,1))
I'm trying to build a function in R in which I can subset my raw dataframe according to some specifications, and thereafter convert this subsetted dataframe into a proportion table.
Unfortunately, some of these subsettings yields to an empty dataframe as for some particular specifications I do not have data; hence no proportion table can be calculated. So, what I would like to do is to take the closest time step from which I have a non-empty subsetted dataframe and use it as an input for the empty subsetted dataframe.
Here some insights to my dataframe and function:
My raw dataframe looks +/- as follows:
| year | quarter | area | time_comb | no_individuals | lenCls | age |
|------|---------|------|-----------|----------------|--------|-----|
| 2005 | 1 | 24 | 2005.1.24 | 8 | 380 | 3 |
| 2005 | 2 | 24 | 2005.2.24 | 4 | 490 | 2 |
| 2005 | 1 | 24 | 2005.1.24 | 3 | 460 | 6 |
| 2005 | 1 | 21 | 2005.1.21 | 25 | 400 | 2 |
| 2005 | 2 | 24 | 2005.2.24 | 1 | 680 | 6 |
| 2005 | 2 | 21 | 2005.2.21 | 2 | 620 | 5 |
| 2005 | 3 | 21 | 2005.3.21 | NA | NA | NA |
| 2005 | 1 | 21 | 2005.1.21 | 1 | 510 | 5 |
| 2005 | 1 | 24 | 2005.1.24 | 1 | 670 | 4 |
| 2006 | 1 | 22 | 2006.1.22 | 2 | 750 | 4 |
| 2006 | 4 | 24 | 2006.4.24 | 1 | 660 | 8 |
| 2006 | 2 | 24 | 2006.2.24 | 8 | 540 | 3 |
| 2006 | 2 | 24 | 2006.2.24 | 4 | 560 | 3 |
| 2006 | 1 | 22 | 2006.1.22 | 2 | 250 | 2 |
| 2006 | 3 | 22 | 2006.3.22 | 1 | 520 | 2 |
| 2006 | 2 | 24 | 2006.2.24 | 1 | 500 | 2 |
| 2006 | 2 | 22 | 2006.2.22 | NA | NA | NA |
| 2006 | 2 | 21 | 2006.2.21 | 3 | 480 | 2 |
| 2006 | 1 | 24 | 2006.1.24 | 1 | 640 | 5 |
| 2007 | 4 | 21 | 2007.4.21 | 2 | 620 | 3 |
| 2007 | 2 | 21 | 2007.2.21 | 1 | 430 | 3 |
| 2007 | 4 | 22 | 2007.4.22 | 14 | 410 | 2 |
| 2007 | 1 | 24 | 2007.1.24 | NA | NA | NA |
| 2007 | 2 | 24 | 2007.2.24 | NA | NA | NA |
| 2007 | 3 | 24 | 2007.3.22 | NA | NA | NA |
| 2007 | 4 | 24 | 2007.4.24 | NA | NA | NA |
| 2007 | 3 | 21 | 2007.3.21 | 1 | 560 | 4 |
| 2007 | 1 | 21 | 2007.1.21 | 7 | 300 | 3 |
| 2007 | 3 | 23 | 2007.3.23 | 1 | 640 | 5 |
Here year, quarter and area refers to a particular time (Year & Quarter) and area for which X no. of individuals were measured (no_individuals). For example, from the first row we get that in the first quarter of the year 2005 in area 24 I had 8 individuals belonging to a length class (lenCLs) of 380 mm and age=3. It is worth to mention that for a particular year, quarter and area combination I can have different length classes and ages (thus, multiple rows)!
So what I want to do is basically to subset the raw dataframe for a particular year, quarter and area combination, and from that combination calculate a proportion table based on the number of individuals in each length class.
So far my basic function looks as follows:
LAK <- function(df, Year="2005", Quarter="1", Area="22", alkplot=T){
require(FSA)
# subset alk by year, quarter and area
sALK <- subset(df, year==Year & quarter==Quarter & area==Area)
dfexp <- sALK[rep(seq(nrow(sALK)), sALK$no_individuals), 1:ncol(sALK)]
raw <- t(table(dfexp$lenCls, dfexp$age))
key <- round(prop.table(raw, margin=1), 3)
return(key)
if(alkplot==TRUE){
alkPlot(key,"area",xlab="Age")
}
}
From the dataset example above, one can notice that for year=2005 & quarter=3 & area=21, I do not have any measured individuals. Yet, for the same area AND year I have data for either quarter 1 or 2. The most reasonable assumption would be to take the subsetted dataframe from the closest time step (herby quarter 2 with the same area and year), and replace the NA from the columns "no_individuals", "lenCls" and "age" accordingly.
Note also that for some cases I do not have data for a particular year! In the example above, one can see this by looking into area 24 from year 2007. In this case I can not borrow the information from the nearest quarter, and would need to borrow from the previous year instead. This would mean that for year=2007 & area=24 & quarter=1 I would borrow the information from year=2006 & area=24 & quarter 1, and so on and so forth.
I have tried to include this in my function by specifying some extra rules, but due to my poor programming skills I didn't make any progress.
So, any help here will be very much appreciated.
Here my LAK function which I'm trying to update:
LAK <- function(df, Year="2005", Quarter="1", Area="22", alkplot=T){
require(FSA)
# subset alk by year, quarter and area
sALK <- subset(df, year==Year & quarter==Quarter & area==Area)
# In case of empty dataset
#if(is.data.frame(sALK) && nrow(sALK)==0){
if(sALK[rowSums(is.na(sALK)) > 0,]){
warning("Empty subset combination; data will be subsetted based on the
nearest timestep combination")
FIXME: INCLDUE IMPUTATION RULES HERE
}
dfexp <- sALK[rep(seq(nrow(sALK)), sALK$no_individuals), 1:ncol(sALK)]
raw <- t(table(dfexp$lenCls, dfexp$age))
key <- round(prop.table(raw, margin=1), 3)
return(key)
if(alkplot==TRUE){
alkPlot(key,"area",xlab="Age")
}
}
So, I finally came up with a partial solution to my problem and will include my function here in case it might be of someone's interest:
LAK <- function(df, Year="2005", Quarter="1", Area="22",alkplot=T){
require(FSA)
# subset alk by year, quarter, area and species
sALK <- subset(df, year==Year & quarter==Quarter & area==Area)
print(sALK)
if(nrow(sALK)==1){
warning("Empty subset combination; data has been subsetted to the nearest input combination")
syear <- unique(as.numeric(as.character(sALK$year)))
sarea <- unique(as.numeric(as.character(sALK$area)))
sALK2 <- subset(df, year==syear & area==sarea)
vals <- as.data.frame(table(sALK2$comb_index))
colnames(vals)[1] <- "comb_index"
idx <- which(vals$Freq>1)
quarterId <- as.numeric(as.character(vals[idx,"comb_index"]))
imput <- subset(df,year==syear & area==sarea & comb_index==quarterId)
dfexp2 <- imput[rep(seq(nrow(imput)), imput$no_at_length_age), 1:ncol(imput)]
raw2 <- t(table(dfexp2$lenCls, dfexp2$age))
key2 <- round(prop.table(raw2, margin=1), 3)
print(key2)
if(alkplot==TRUE){
alkPlot(key2,"area",xlab="Age")
}
} else {
dfexp <- sALK[rep(seq(nrow(sALK)), sALK$no_at_length_age), 1:ncol(sALK)]
raw <- t(table(dfexp$lenCls, dfexp$age))
key <- round(prop.table(raw, margin=1), 3)
print(key)
if(alkplot==TRUE){
alkPlot(key,"area",xlab="Age")
}
}
}
This solves my problem when I have data for at least one quarter of a particular Year & Area combination. Yet, I'm still struggling to figure out how to deal when I do not have data for a particular Year & Area combination. In this case I need to borrow data from the closest Year that contains data for all the quarters for the same area.
For the example exposed above, this would mean that for year=2007 & area=24 & quarter=1 I would borrow the information from year=2006 & area=24 & quarter 1, and so on and so forth.
I don't know if you have ever encountered MICE, but it is a pretty cool and comprehensive tool for variable imputation. It also allows you to see how the imputed data is distributed so that you can choose the method most suited for your problem. Check this brief explanation and the original package description
Everything is in the title, I got from a database many columns, paired two-by-two containing codes and labels for some variables, I want an easy way to create half as many factors, with, for each factor levels/codes matching to the original two variables.
Here is an exemple of original data for two factors
| customer_type | customer_type_name | customer_status | customer_status_name |
|----------------------|----------------------|----------------------|----------------------|
| 1 | A | 2 | Beta |
| 2 | B | 2 | Beta |
| 3 | C | 1 | Alpha |
| 2 | B | 3 | Gamma |
| 1 | A | 4 | Delta |
| 3 | C | 2 | Beta |
i.e. a simpler way (simpler to call in a function for lots of variables) to do from dataframe "accounts"
a<-accounts[,c("customertypecode","customertypecodename")]
a<-a[!duplicated(a),]
a<-a[order(a$customertypecode),]
accounts$customertypecode<-factor(accounts$customertypecode,labels=a$customertypecodename[!is.na(a$customertypecodename)])