If we keep edit="false" and create="false" then we can remove the edit and create button. But is it possible to remove these buttons bases on groups?. That is for admin it should be visible and for user it shouldn't be visible.
Security in Odoo
Access Control
Managed by the ir.model.access records, defines access to a whole
model.
Each access control has a model to which it grants permissions, the
permissions it grants and optionally a group.
Access controls are additive, for a given model a user has access all
permissions granted to any of its groups: if the user belongs to one
group which allows writing and another which allows deleting, they can
both write and delete.
If no group is specified, the access control applies to all users,
otherwise it only applies to the members of the given group.
Available permissions are creation (perm_create), searching and
reading (perm_read), updating existing records (perm_write) and
deleting existing records (perm_unlink)
So you need to create a file with the model permissions (module_name/security/ir.model.access.csv) in order to get what you want.
The content of this file should be something like this:
By the way, if you want to make something only visible for the administrator then you should add this attribute to the element: groups="base.group_no_one"
Related
I have an app where I want visitors to be able to write down some text.
They are the only ones that are allowed to see their own entries.
In order to allow people to create an entry I have set the security of the content type: crud is permitted for those who have viewing rights.
In the query designer I have basically just the list of the content type. So, of course any visitor that can see the page, sees all entries.
How can I limit the results so the visitor only sees her/his own entries? If I add the ownerfilter in the query designer, the results come up empty.
So basically what you should do is give these permissions on the type:
Registered users (or those who may add) should have c permission (create). They must be logged in - so don't use "everybody" - otherwise you won't know who added it.
Owners (those who created the record) should have edit permission (I wouldn't give them delete)
In the visual query, you should then use the owner-permissions. As a host-user you can only test it, if you also made some records.
OK? otherwise just add more infos.
Or just add a field that stores the username. When you show the entries, only show the ones where the current username matches the username field :)
On our company's Phabricator site, for example, I have an Approver select (dropdown) field that is part of the form when I create a new Task. I want only a specific group of people to be able to see this Approver field when someone creates a new Task or edits the Task. Is there any way to accomplish this?
You can create forms for creating maniphest tasks and pre fill them with values. Therefore go to https://<phabricator-uri/transactions/editengine/maniphest.task/ .
You can additionally set permissions to different groups to grant access to these forms.
For more details just read: https://secure.phabricator.com/book/phabricator/article/forms/
I was wondering if there is away to control a InfoPath Form Button enable it if you are in the Security Group and disable it if you are not in the SharePoint Security Group.
Client does not want to use the list method.
Well it isn't possible. However there is a workaround I sometimes use:
You create a list and add only one item. Give unique permissions on that particular item for only the Group.
Then in InfoPath create a Data Connection on that list and check with rules if the ID is present of the data result (or check on some value if you want). If user is in the group then it will get that one record. If not the user it will result in no records.
In portal_workflow - tab Groups, one can specify the group to role mappings.
In the Sharing tab one can select roles for groups on a folder basis.
What takes precedence for a user, the mapping or the local role assigned on a folder in a given state of the workflow and a specific folder?
Are they additive?
Eventually, they are the same thing. Workflows modify (during transitions) those same settings that are manually editable using the Sharing-tab. Therefore, a transition could override the settings you had made earlier.
Let's say you'd like a certain user group to have the Editor role for all objects that are in the private state of simple_publication_workflow. You'd configure the workflow to manage that group and edit group to have the Editor role in private state, but not in other states. Now, when you click Update security settings, the group gets the defined role in all private objects controlled by that workflow. If you now make manual modification through the Sharing-tab for that particular group, your modifications will be lost after the next workflow transition or Update security settings-run.
I'm making a security permission system for a Dynamic Data site based on the article Securing Dynamic Data Preview 4 Refresh. The system contains an additional permission kind: "deny an operation for a record/field if a record is not owned by an user".
If an user can read only own objects, we need to have an always enabled filter in List and check permissions in Details. If an user can write only own objects, we need to check permissions in Edit and Delete, remove "Edit/Delete" links from some rows in List, make "User" field readonly and provide its value in Insert. I didn't think about column-level permissions of this kind yet.
So, the main problem, as I see at this moment: too many places to place the same checks (I didn't even think of malicious user crafting POST data). Also I couldn't make make a field in Insert at the same readonly and having a value which is displayed and saved to DB (I don't want to place that in the model partial classes because I think that there are already too many places that need to be edited to implement this functionality).
Is there a single place to deny a read or write operation with an object depending on the object value?
How can I provide a default value to the field, so that it will be shown on the Insert page, inserted to the DB and couldn't be changed by the user before inserting?
The following assumes you're using LINQ to SQL.
Is there a single place to deny a read
or write operation with an object
depending on the object value?
Reads
I know of no simpler way to restrict reads than to add a filter to all the relevant LinqDataSource controls. If you are able to implement your filter generally, you can write one QueryCreated handler, then add a single line registering your custom handler to all the page templates.
Writes
In the Dynamic Data metadata, add an OnValidate partial method to all the relevant tables. If the current user is not allowed to ChangeAction the given record, throw an exception. You will still have to update all the page templates to hide UI elements that the user does not have access to, but at least you can rest assured that the worst that could happen in some unexpected case is that the user sees an error page.
How can I provide a default value to
the field, so that it will be shown on
the Insert page, inserted to the DB
and couldn't be changed by the user
before inserting?
Perhaps look at some combination of adding an OnCreated and OnValidate partial methods. See also: this answer.