I've managed to figure out that the job I sent to the AutoSys Server is failing and the Exit Code is -655. Can anyone please tell me what that means?
In our case, we got -655 when the disk space was full and it was not able to create new log files.
Recheck the Owner attribute. My experience is that the Owner is not entered correctly or it is not an authorized account for use on the Agent machine.
There can be many reasons for -655 error code but for all the main cause is that your job is not able to find some. If you are running a script check for the permissions on the script.
Related
I'm trying to open the Artifactory Users Management page, following the Admin->Security->Users tab.
Then I'm getting the following error:
Any idea of what might be causing it? Also, which log I can check this? Couldn't find anything yet.
The server error generally indicates there is problem fetching the user details from Artifactory. This can happen due to any of the following reasons:
when you have a high volume of users and the request is timing out.
There is a chance that you might have created a username with a
special character which is not allowed (using the REST method or some
other method)
There is an issue with the backend database
And the best place to troubleshoot is to first check the request log a good valid entry looks like below:
20200715164402|104|REQUEST|165.225.104.49|admin|GET|/ui/users|HTTP/1.1|200|0
Next check the artifactory.log file for java stack or check catalina.out under tomcat/logs directory.
I got an error from Sitelock dashboard. What does that mean?
put: /tmp/sitelock_find_5199431.php: Fatal error: max-retries exceededenter image description here
Jess,
This is a temporary file that our scanner adds to test connectivity to the server being scanned, as well as file permissions and write capabilities. This might mean that the FTP user connected to SMART needs to have increased permissions, but it also might just be that there was a connectivity issue with the server when SMART tried to scan.
I hope this helps!
~Cj
When I excute my code many time I get
server error 500 in the console
and no data has charged when I check the error I get cache error and then I have to refresh the page to get data. I don't know why I get this exception!!!
can someone help me and tell me how can I avoid this exception in symfony :
class: "Symfony\Component\Debug\Exception\ContextErrorException"
message: "Warning: rename(C:\wamp\www\myproject\app\cache\dev/doctrine/orm/Proxies\__CG__DefaultAppBundleEntityService.php.568513d40be3a3.02053948,C:\wamp\www\myproject\app\cache\dev/doctrine/orm/Proxies\__CG__DefaultAppBundleEntityService.php): "
Help!
unfortunatly I can't resolve this problem can someone help me please ????!!!
Sometimes all queries run without problem or errors but if I refresh the page it may that I get this error for one or more requests
Please check the user and owner of the file. assign them the same user and owner which are running php apache on your system. This worked for me.
We're having a strange issue here. Unfortunately I'm not at liberty to post the code here because it belongs to the vendor, but hopefully can provide enough info so that isn't necessary.
Much could be explained if someone here could definitively say whether or not it is possible for 'bob' to execute "some_script.sh", and have it exit out of his su'd session MID-WAY and have the remainder of the script continue as user 'pete' (who originally su'd to impersonate 'bob')
I'm fairly certain that this is not possible, but is there anyone out there that knows otherwise?
Things to keep in mind:
scriptA.sh executes multiple other processes (serially) which make changes to a database
lets assume that these are 01.sql through to 10.sql.
It does this by executing 'sqlplus' with appropriate arguments.
The 'sqlplus' binary is available to user 'bob', but NOT user 'pete'.
User pete is currently su'd into user 'bob', because pete doesn't have sqlplus on his PATH.
The output we saw in the script/database suggested that the '01.sql' was executed successfully, but not the others - they failed with a 'sqlplus command not found' error.
Cheers,
From the information you've given, "No. It is not possible."
If user 'pete' su's to 'bob', he creates a new shell as 'bob'. Any processes started from that new shell are run as 'bob'. Any script, if run as 'bob', cannot change it's user/UID to 'pete'. Any processes started as 'bob' cannot change their user/UID (absent setuid bit on the executable).
It's far more likely that part of the script is modifying the shell environment and changing its PATH or some other error within the script.
Using a script to attempt to switch UIDs is doomed to failure. A permissions system that requires shared logins is – by definition – insecure.
Use the AIX permissions system the way it was intended. If you need bob's credentials to perform a task then have a program that Sandipan can execute which will elevate to bob permissions for only that which needs bob's credentials.
This is the Principle of Least Privilege and is how to handle the job. Shared passwords are a bad hack that encourages worse hacks.
Can anyone recommend a fairly clean method for determining the process scheduler an app-engine is running on at run-time (NT or UNIX). I need to set a file path that is obviously dependent upon the server the process is being executed on. I understand the GetEnv command can be used, but I don't want to set an environment variable for this particular instance (it does not reside under the PS_FILES) path. I've searched peoplebooks for any kind of built in function or system variable, but was not successful (obviously).
Any suggestions would be appreciated.
Thanks
Okay, I may have asked this question a little too early. I apologize.
It looks like I'll just be able to query the process request table to pull back the server name:
SQLExec("SELECT SERVERNAMERUN FROM PSPRCSRQST WHERE PRCSINSTANCE = :1", &thisProcess, &server);
Evaluate &server
When.......
End-Evaluate;
Exactly :-)
There are a host of Process Request records that can give you the information you need. Glad that you found it.
John