sample of outAct
Activity ReactionType numberActivities
activator activates 16
binding binds 83
recombinase binds 1
branching branches 3
carboxylase carboxylates 36
peptidase cleaves 425
endopeptidase cleaves 368
nuclease cleaves 53
glycosylase cleaves 24
cyclase converts 12
transhydrogenase converts 3
hist deacetylase deacetylates 8
deacetylase deacetylates 16
I want to count all the same ReactionTypes and sum up their numberActivities
reaction_types <-aggregate(numberActivities ~ ReactionType, unique(outAct), FUN=sum)
Desired output
ReactionType number
activates 16
binds 84
branches 3
carboxylates 36
cleaves 870
converts 15
deacetylates 24
Problem is, I’m getting duplicates, i.e. they are not being counted as one unique ReactionType e.g. the output contains rows such as
deacetylates 8
deacetylates 16
There are more examples like this throughout the output file.
Where am I going wrong?
Thanks in advance.
library(dplyr)
outAct %>% group_by(ReactionType) %>% summarise(number = sum(numberActivities))
Related
Aim: To retrieve last two entries of data.( I am aware of the tail function, or direct indexing)
Code:
> tdata <- read.csv("hw1_data.csv")
> temp <- tdata[(nrow(tdata)-1):nrow(tdata), ]
> temp
Ozone Solar.R Wind Temp Month Day
152 18 131 8.0 76 9 29
153 20 223 11.5 68 9 30
> temp <- tdata[nrow(tdata)-1:nrow(tdata), ]
> temp
Ozone Solar.R Wind Temp Month Day
152 18 131 8.0 76 9 29
151 14 191 14.3 75 9 28
150 NA 145 13.2 77 9 27
149 30 193 6.9 70 9 26
148 14 20 16.6 63 9 25
147 7 49 10.3 69 9 24
.
.
.
While taking a subset using the extract operator, I have used the nrows() function to retrieve the total number of rows in the data and subtracted one from it (one less than total rows) and used sequence operator(:) to sequence till nrows(data), i.e. total number of rows.
When I use parentheses, the logic works fine, but when I skip the parentheses the output is the total dataframe in a reverse order.
I can figure out that precedence rules are at play, but unable to figure out exact logic. New at R, so any formal explanation would be valuable.
As suspected correctly in the post, the observed behavior is in fact a matter of operator precedence.
A complete list of the operator syntax and precedence rules in R can be obtained by typing
help(Syntax)
in the console.
In this context, R programmers sometimes refer to a well-known and rather witty quote which encourages the use of parentheses:
library(fortunes)
fortune(138)
nrow(tdata) = 153
So the first line you run is:
temp <- tdata[(nrow(tdata)-1):nrow(tdata),]
This executes as tdata[152:153,]
Second line:
temp <- tdata[nrow(tdata)-1:nrow(tdata),]
This executes as tdata[153-1:153,]
So it returns the following:
tdata[152,]
tdata[151,]
...
tdata[0,]
i have such a difficult question (at least to me) that i spend 2 hours just writing it. Complete impossible to program it by my self. I try to be very clear and i´m sorry if i didn´t. I´m doing this in a very rustic way in excel, but i really need to program this.
i have a data.frame like this
id_pix id_lote clase f1 f2
45 4 Sg 2460 2401
46 4 Sg 2620 2422
47 4 Sg 2904 2627
48 5 M 2134 2044
49 5 M 2180 2104
50 5 M 2127 2069
83 11 S 2124 2062
84 11 S 2189 2336
85 11 S 2235 2162
86 11 S 2162 2153
87 11 S 2108 2124
with 17451 "id_pixel"(rows), 2080 "id_lote" and 9 "clase"
this is the "id_lote" count per "clase" (v1 is the id_lote count)
clase v1
1: S 1099
2: P 213
3: Sg 114
4: M 302
5: Alg 27
6: Az 77
7: Po 228
8: Cit 13
9: Ma 7
i need to split the "id_lote" randomly within the "clase". I mean i have 1099 "id_lote" for the "S" "clase" that are 9339 "id_pixel" (rows) and i want to randomly select 50 % of "id_lote" that are x "id_pixel"(rows). And do this for every "clase" considering that the size (number of "id_lote") of every "clase" are different. I also would like to be able to change the size of the selection (50 %, 30 %, etc). And i also want to keep the not selected set of "id_lote". I hope some one can help me with this!
here is the reproducible example
this is the data with 2 clase (S and Az), with 6 id_lote and 13 id_pixel
id_pix id_lote clase f1 f2
1 1 S 2909 2381
2 1 S 2515 2663
3 1 S 2628 3249
30 2 S 3021 2985
31 2 S 3020 2596
71 9 S 4725 4404
72 9 S 4759 4943
75 11 S 2728 2225
218 21 Az 4830 3007
219 21 Az 4574 2761
220 21 Az 5441 3092
1155 126 Az 7209 2449
1156 126 Az 7035 2932
and one result could be:
id_pix id_lote clase f1 f2
1 1 S 2909 2381
2 1 S 2515 2663
3 1 S 2628 3249
75 11 S 2728 2225
1155 126 Az 7209 2449
1156 126 Az 7035 2932
were 50% of id_lote were randomly selected in clase "S" (2 of 4 id_lote) but all the id_pixel in selected id_lote were keeped. The same for clase "Az", one id_lote was randomly selected (1 of 2 in this case) and all the id_pixel in selected id_lote were keeped.
what colemand77 proposed helped a lot. I think dplyr package is usefull for this but i think that if i do
df %>%
group_by(clase, id_lote) %>%
sample_frac(.3, replace = FALSE)
i get the 30 % of the data of each clase but not grouped by id_lote like i need! I mean 30 % of the rows (id_pixel) were selected instead of id_lote.
i hope this example help to understand what i want to do and make it usefull for everybody. I´m sorry if i wasn´t clear enough the first time.
Thanks a lot!
First glimpse I'd say the dplyr package is your friend here.
df %>%
group_by(clase, id_lote) %>%
sample_frac(.3, replace = FALSE)
so you first use group_by() and include the grouping levels you want to sample from, then you use sample_frac to sample the fraction of the results you want for each group.
As near as I can tell this is what you are asking for. If not, please consider re-stating your question to include either a reproducible example or clarify. Cheers.
to "keep" the not-selected members, I would add a column of unique ids, and use an anti-join anti_join()(also from the dplyr package) to find the id's that are not in common between the two data.frames (the results of the sampling and the original).
## Update ##
I'm understanding better now, I believe. Think about this as a two step process...
1) you want to select x% (50 in example) of the id_lote from each clase and return those id_lote #s (i'm assuming that a given id_lote does not exist for multiple clase?)
2) you want to see all of the id_pixels that correspond to each id_lote, all in one data.frame
I've broken this down into multiple steps for illustration, not because it is the fastest / prettiest.
raw data: (couldn't read your data into R.)
df<-data.frame(id_pix = c(1:200),
id_lote = sample(1:20,200, replace = TRUE),
clase = sample(letters[seq_along(1:10)], 200, replace = TRUE),
f1 = sample(1000:2000,200, replace = TRUE),
f2 = sample(2000:3000,200, replace = TRUE))
1) figure out which id_lote correspond to which clase - for this we use the dplyr summarise function and store it in a variable
summary<-df %>%
ungroup() %>%
group_by(clase, id_lote) %>%
summarise()
returns:
Source: local data frame [125 x 2]
Groups: clase
clase id_lote
1 a 1
2 a 2
3 a 4
4 a 5
5 a 6
6 a 7
7 a 8
8 a 9
9 a 11
10 a 12
.. ... ...
then we sample to get the 30% of the id_lote for each clase..
sampled_summary <- summary %>%
group_by(clase) %>%
sample_frac(.3,replace = FALSE)
so the result of this is a data table with two columns, (clase and id_lote) with 30% of the id_lotes shown for each clase.
2) ok so now we have the id_lotes randomly selected from each class but not the id_pix that are associated with that class. To accomplish this we do a join to get the corresponding full data set including the id_pix, etc.
result <- sampled_summary %>%
left_join(df)
The above makes a copy of the data set a bunch, so if you have a substantial data set you could just do it all at one go:
result <- df %>%
ungroup() %>%
group_by(clase, id_lote) %>%
summarise() %>%
group_by(clase) %>%
sample_frac(.5,replace = FALSE) %>%
left_join(df)
if this doesn't get you what you want, let me know and we'll take another crack at it.
I am building a streambed hydrology calculator in R using multiple tables from an Access database. I am having trouble automating and calculating the same set of indices for multiple sites. The following sample dataset describes my data structure:
> Thalweg
StationID AB0 AB1 AB2 AB3 AB4 AB5 BC1 BC2 BC3 BC4 Xdep_Vdep
1 1AAUA017.60 47 45 44 55 54 6 15 39 15 11 18.29
2 1AXKR000.77 30 27 24 19 20 18 9 12 21 13 6.46
3 2-BGU005.95 52 67 62 42 28 25 23 26 11 19 20.18
4 2-BLG011.41 66 85 77 83 63 35 10 70 95 90 67.64
5 2-CSR003.94 29 35 46 14 19 14 13 13 21 48 6.74
where each column represents certain field-measured parameters (i.e. depth of a reach section) and each row represents a different site.
I have successfully used the apply functions to simultaneously calculate simple functions on multiple rows:
> Xdepth <- apply(Thalweg[, 2:11], 1, mean) # Mean Depth
> Xdepth
1 2 3 4 5
33.1 19.3 35.5 67.4 25.2
and appending the results back to the proper station in a dataframe.
However, I am struggling when I want to calculate and save variables that are subsequently used for further calculations. I cannot seem to loop or apply the same function to multiple columns on a single row and complete the same calculations over the next row without mixing variables and data.
I want to do:
Residual_AB0 <- min(Xdep_Vdep, Thalweg$AB0)
Residual_AB1 <- min((Residual_AB0 + other_variables), Thalweg$AB1)
Residual_AB2 <- min((Residual_AB1 + other_variables), Thalweg$AB2)
Residual_AB3 <- min((Residual_AB2 + other_variables), Thalweg$AB3)
# etc.
Depth_AB0 <- (Thalweg$AB0 - Residual_AB0)
Depth_AB1 <- (Thalweg$AB1 - Residual_AB1)
Depth_AB2 <- (Thalweg$AB2 - Residual_AB2)
# etc.
I have tried and subsequently failed at for loops such as:
for (i in nrow(Thalweg)){
Residual_AB0 <- min(Xdep_Vdep, Thalweg$AB0)
Residual_AB1 <- min((Residual_AB0 + Stacks_Equation), Thalweg$AB1)
Residual_AB2 <- min((Residual_AB1 + Stacks_Equation), Thalweg$AB2)
Residual_AB3 <- min((Residual_AB2 + Stacks_Equation), Thalweg$AB3)
Residuals <- data.frame(Thalweg$StationID, Residual_AB0, Residual_AB1, Residual_AB2, Residual_AB3)
}
Is there a better way to approach looping through multiple lines of data when I need unique variables saved for each specific row that I am currently calculating? Thank you for any suggestions.
your exact problem is still a mistery to me...
but it looks like you want a double for loop
for(i in 1:nrow(thalweg)){
residual=thalweg[i,"Xdep_Vdep"]
for(j in 2:11){
residual=min(residual,thalweg[i,j])
}
}
At some point in my code, I get a list of tables that looks much like this:
[[1]]
cluster_size start end number p_value
13 2 12 13 131 4.209645e-233
12 1 12 12 100 6.166824e-185
22 11 12 22 132 6.916323e-143
23 12 12 23 133 1.176194e-139
13 1 13 13 31 3.464284e-38
13 68 13 117 34 3.275941e-37
23 78 23 117 2 4.503111e-32
....
[[2]]
cluster_size start end number p_value
13 2 12 13 131 4.209645e-233
12 1 12 12 100 6.166824e-185
22 11 12 22 132 6.916323e-143
23 12 12 23 133 1.176194e-139
13 1 13 13 31 3.464284e-38
....
While I don't show the full table here I know they are all the same size. What I want to do is make one table where I add up the p-values. Problem is that the $cluster_size, start, $end and $number columns don't necessarily correspond to the same row when I look at the table in different list elements so I can't just do a simple sum.
The brute force way to do this is to: 1) make a blank table 2) copy in the appropriate $cluster_size, $start, $end, $number columns from the first table and pull the correct p-values using a which() statement from all the tables. Is there a more clever way of doing this? Or is this pretty much it?
Edit: I was asked for a dput file of the data. It's located here:
http://alrig.com/code/
In the sample case, the order of the rows happen to match. That will not always be the case.
Seems like you can do this in two steps
Convert your list to a data.frame
Use any of the split-apply-combine approaches to summarize.
Assuming your data was named X, here's what you could do:
library(plyr)
#need to convert to data.frame since all of your list objects are of class matrix
XDF <- as.data.frame(do.call("rbind", X))
ddply(XDF, .(cluster_size, start, end, number), summarize, sump = sum(p_value))
#-----
cluster_size start end number sump
1 1 12 12 100 5.550142e-184
2 1 13 13 31 3.117856e-37
3 1 22 22 1 9.000000e+00
...
29 105 23 117 2 6.271469e-16
30 106 22 146 13 7.266746e-25
31 107 23 146 12 1.382328e-25
Lots of other aggregation techniques are covered here. I'd look at data.table package if your data is large.
The data set that I'm working with is similar to the one below (although the example is of a much smaller scale, the data I'm working with is 10's of thousands of rows) and I haven't been able to figure out how to get R to add up column data based on the group number. Essentially I want to be able to get the number of green(s), blue(s), and red(s) added up for all of group 81 and 66 separately and then be able to use that information to calculate percentages.
txt <- "Group Green Blue Red Total
81 15 10 21 46
81 10 10 10 30
81 4 8 0 12
81 42 2 2 46
66 11 9 1 21
66 5 14 5 24
66 7 5 2 14
66 1 16 3 20
66 22 4 2 28"
dat <- read.table(textConnection(txt), sep = " ", header = TRUE)
I've spent a good deal of time trying to figure out how to use some of the functions on my own hoping I would stumble across a proper way to do it, but since I'm such a new basic user I feel like I have hit a wall that I cannot progress past without help.
One way is via aggregate. Assuming your data is in an object x:
aggregate(. ~ Group, data=x, FUN=sum)
# Group Green Blue Red Total
# 1 66 46 48 13 107
# 2 81 71 30 33 134
Both of the answers above are perfect examples of how to address this type of problem. Two other options exist within reshape and plyr
library(reshape)
cast(melt(dat, "Group"), Group ~ ..., sum)
library(plyr)
ddply(dat, "Group", function(x) colSums(x[, -1]))
I would suggest that #Joshua's answer is neater, but two functions you should learn are apply and tapply. If a is your data set, then:
## apply calculates the sum of each row
> total = apply(a[,2:4], 1, sum)
## tapply calculates the sum based on each group
> tapply(total, a$Group, sum)
66 81
107 134