Coming from a SQL background, I'm wondering how does one go about doing database migration in firebase?
Assume I have the following data in firebase {dateFrom: 2015-11-11, timeFrom: 09:00} .... and now the front-end client will store and expects data in the form {dateTimeFrom: 2015-011-11T09:00:00-07:00}. How do I update firebase such that all dateFrom: xxxx and timeFrom: yyyy are removed and replaced with dateTimeFrom: xxxxyyyy? Thanks.
You have to create your own script that reads, transform and write it back. You may eider read one node at the time or read the whole DB if it is not big. You may decide to leave the logic to your client when it access to it (if it ever does)
I think you are looking for this: https://github.com/kevlened/fireway
I think is a bad idea to pollute a project with conditionals to update data on the fly.
It is a shame firestore doesn't implement a process for this as it is very common and required to keep the app and db in sync.
FWIW, since I'm using Swift and there isn't a solution like Fireway (that I know of), I've submitted a feature request to the Firebase team that they've accepted as a potential feature.
You can also submit a DB migration feature request to increase the likelihood that they create the feature.
Related
For client security and privacy reasons, we want to deploy a unique database for each client while using the same website.
I envision that during the session_start event, we would determine which database to use for them (by looking at the subdomain they come in on) and set the connection string in a session variable. Then on every page_init, we'd dynamically set any object's connection string. In code behind, we'd do the same thing with the connection string.
Is there a better approach to doing this and will setting the connection string in page_init work? Is using a session variable wise? I've tended not to ever use them except when no other solution was possible.
The problem with the model itself it is really complex and can let you with some errors specially when we are talking about changes in the database. Imagine that you need to add an extra field on the interface. if you have 100 clients this will mean updating 100 different databases. when we talk about dealing with downtime them things get even worst.
I would do with that in a light different abstract your database layer create one api that will call the database. And from the website you always call the api passing the domain that you want the data to come from.
You can ask me what advantage this will give to you. The biggest one that you will see it is when doing upgrades and maintenance. Having one api per client it is a lot better to think them having one database per client. and if you really want to have just one (I would really recommend having one per client and deploying automatically) you can have a switch on the call and base with some parameters that you pass to the api ( can be on the header like the subdomain on the header) you can chose what database to connect.
Let me give you a sample scenario and how I would suggest to approach this scenario (that is true for database or api)
I want to include a new data field. So first thing it is to add this field on the backend (api or database) deploy this new field if it is one api you can even test that calling the api and see that the new field it is now returned that is not a problem for your ui because it is just a field that it does not use. after that you change the ui to actually use this field and deploy that to production.
I am planning to create sqlite table on my android app. The data comes from the the server via webservice.
I would like to know what is the best way to do this.
Should I transfer the data from the webservice in a sqlite db file and merge it or should i get all the data as a soap request and parse it in to table or should I use rest call.
The general size of the data is 2MB with 100 columns.
Please advise the best case where I can quickly get this data, with less load on the device.
My Workflow is:
Download a set of 20000 Addresses and save them to device sqlite database. This operation is only once, when you run the app for the first time or when you want to refresh the whole app data.
Update this record when ever there is a change in the server.
Now I can get this data either in JSON, XML or as pure SqLite File from the server . I want to know what is the fastest way to store this data in to Android Database.
I tried all the above methods and I found getting the database file from server and copying that data to the database is faster than getting the data in XML or JSON and parsing it. Please advise if I am right or wrong.
If you are planning to use sync adapters then you will need to implement a content provider (or atleast a stub) and an authenticator. Here is a good example that you can follow.
Also, you have not explained more about what is the use-case of such a web-service to decide what web-service architecture to suggest. But REST is a good style to write your services and using JSON over XML is advisable due to data format efficiency (or better yet give protocol-buffer a shot)
And yes, sync adapters are better to use as they already provide a great set of features that you will want to implement otherwise when written as a background service (e.g., periodic sync, auto sync, exponential backoff etc.)
To have less load on the device you can implement a sync-adapter backed by a content provider. You serialize/deserialize data when you upload/download data from server. When you need to persist data from the server you can use the bulkInsert() method in content-provider and persist all your data in a transaction
I am new to spring framework. I would like to pull data from database and set that data in application context. When ever we change data in database according data should be refresh. Please help me out what would be the best approach.
If you want to refresh your data in application context on change in the database I have a bad news for you - that's not really possible (or easy and straightforward, at least).
Most of the common databases are passive in a sense that they won't let you to subscribe for specific events (like data update) because this will require some additional IPC between database and subscribed application and this is generally not the main purpose of database.
In any case something like this will be database-specific, so if you really want this - it is better to check api docs of your database - there is a chance that you'll find means for doing something like this there. Again, this probably won't be very flexible and robust solution.
In general case you go one of 3 routes:
Pull your data from database every time it is needed
Pull your data from database every time it is needed but add some cache
Implement application-level component that will manage data. When data is requested - it will fetch it from the database if it is missing in cache. When data is updated it will update it both in cache and database.
(1) and (2) are are pretty much your only options if your data can be updated not only from your applications. (3) is a good way if data can only be updated from within your application and if amounts of data are small enough to justify it's caching.
Hope this will help.
I'm working on the following scenario:
I have a console up that populates a SQL Server database with some data. I have one more web app that reads the same database and displays the data on a front-end. Both of the applications use Entity Framework to communicate with the database (they have the same connection string).
I wonder how can the web app be notified for any changes that have occurred to the database. Bear in mind that the two applications are not referenced, whatsoever.
Is there event provided by EF that fires when some has changes. In essence, I would like to know when a change has happened, as well as, the nature of that change
I had a similar requirement and I solved it using the EF function:
[context].Database.CompatibleWithModel(throwIfNoMetadata: true)
It will return if your model matches the underlying database structure using the metadata table.
Note that I was using a Code First approach.
The msdn definition is below:
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/system.data.entity.database.compatiblewithmodel(v=vs.103).aspx
Edit:
Just found an amazing article with a demonstration:
http://blog.oneunicorn.com/2011/04/08/code-first-what-is-that-edmmetadata-table/
This is not something that is related to EF at all. EF is just a library that makes SQL calls and maps them to objects. It has no inside knowledge of the database. As such, when data changes in one application, another application doesn't know unless they query to see if that data changes (and you're not going to be constantly running queries to know that, it's too impractical).
There are, potentially some ways to do this, such as adding triggers to the database, which then call extended stored procs to send messages to the app, but this is a lot of work to go through, and it can possibly compromise the robustness of the database.
There used to be something called Notification Services, but that was deprecated. There's now something called SqlDependency objects, which may help you in some cases.. but it all depends on what you're trying to do exactly.
In any event, it's usually easier to find a different way to do what you want. This is complex topic, and really requires a lot of sql server knowledge.
I want to update 3 meteor collections in a function but only if all three of the updates are successful. Otherwise I'd like to roll back. Is there a good pattern for doing this yet?
Thanks
meteor uses mongodb for its database backend which doesn't explicitly support transactions. But there is still a pattern you could use: http://docs.mongodb.org/manual/tutorial/perform-two-phase-commits/
Basically you just put a state value in each of your transactions and only mark them done when everything is complete