noob question, I'm working in Symfony 2.8 and I want to grant all access to the role ROLE_ADMIN in access control, is there a way to do this without writing 'ROLE_ADMIN' in every rule over access_control?
What I´m trying to avoid in my security.yml, is going from this:
access_control:
- { path: ^/application, roles: ROLE_STUDENT }
- { path: ^/keyword, roles: ROLE_MENTOR }
- { path: ^/department, roles: ROLE_ADMIN }
- { path: ^/requirement, roles: ROLE_MENTOR}
To this:
access_control:
- { path: ^/application, roles: [ROLE_ADMIN, ROLE_STUDENT ]}
- { path: ^/keyword, roles: [ROLE_ADMIN, ROLE_MENTOR ]}
- { path: ^/department, roles: ROLE_ADMIN }
- { path: ^/requirement, roles: [ROLE_ADMIN, ROLE_MENTOR ]}
in a most larger file
Yes, you can add role hierarchy:
security:
role_hierarchy:
ROLE_ADMIN: [ROLE_STUDENT, ROLE_MENTOR]
That way if you have ROLE_ADMIN, you have also ROLE_STUDENT and ROLE_MENTOR.
Related
I'm trying to learn the Symfony roles and security. My current security.yml file, looks like this:
role_hierarchy:
ROLE_USER: ROLE_DO_ALMOST_NOTHING
ROLE_EDITOR: [ ROLE_USER, ROLE_ALLOWED_TO_EDIT ]
ROLE_CONTRIBUTOR: [ ROLE_EDITOR, ROLE_ALLOWED_TO_CONTRIBUTE ]
ROLE_ADMIN: [ ROLE_CONTRIBUTOR ]
ROLE_SUPER_ADMIN: [ ROLE_ADMIN, ROLE_ALLOWED_TO_DO_ANY_THING ]
access_control:
- { path: ^/admin, roles: ROLE_USER }
- { path: ^/admin/editor, roles: ROLE_ADMIN }
- { path: ^/editor, roles: ROLE_EDITOR }
- { path: ^/contributor, roles: ROLE_CONTRIBUTOR }
- { path: ^/super, roles: ROLE_SUPER_ADMIN }
And I'm using this setup for my users:
providers:
in_memory:
memory:
users:
person:
password: password!
roles: 'ROLE_USER'
admin:
password: password2
roles: 'ROLE_ADMIN'
Here is my problem. I'm been missing around with the access_control portion of security, however, the path ^/admin/editor with the roles marked as ROLE_ADMIN will allow the user person to access the route even though the person user didn't have the role of ROLE_ADMIN. I was wondering if this is because the route itself is shared by the same controller as the ^admin route? Or done someone see where I might have gone wrong with the code, since the user person can access the route that I they shouldn't.
The other routes:
- { path: ^/editor, roles: ROLE_EDITOR }
- { path: ^/contributor, roles: ROLE_CONTRIBUTOR }
- { path: ^/super, roles: ROLE_SUPER_ADMIN }
Work as expected.
The issue is you are matching /admin before you match admin/editor, and that only requires the ROLE_USER role. When you have:
- { path: ^/admin, roles: ROLE_USER }
That matches everything that starts with /admin, including admin/editor. As soon as Symfony finds the appropriate route it will not check the first of them.
So your ^/admin/editor/ check is never reached. Try this instead:
access_control:
- { path: ^/admin/editor, roles: ROLE_ADMIN }
- { path: ^/admin, roles: ROLE_USER }
- { path: ^/editor, roles: ROLE_EDITOR }
- { path: ^/contributor, roles: ROLE_CONTRIBUTOR }
- { path: ^/super, roles: ROLE_SUPER_ADMIN }
As a good rule of thumb, your most granular/specific routes should be put first. Any sub-routes should always be put ahead of the main route.
I encountered a strange issue. I have the following security.yml:
security:
encoders:
Symfony\Component\Security\Core\User\User: plaintext
role_hierarchy:
ROLE_USER:
ROLE_EDITOR: [ROLE_USER]
ROLE_ADMIN: [ROLE_USER, ROLE_EDITOR]
providers:
in_memory:
memory:
users:
admin: { password: 123456, roles: [ 'ROLE_ADMIN' ] }
editor: { password: 123456, roles: [ 'ROLE_EDITOR' ] }
firewalls:
dev:
pattern: ^/(_(profiler|wdt)|css|images|js)/
security: false
backend:
pattern: ^/backend
anonymous: ~
provider: in_memory
form_login:
login_path: backend_login
check_path: backend_login_check
access_control:
- { path: ^/, roles: IS_AUTHENTICATED_ANONYMOUSLY, host: example\.com$ }
- { path: ^/backend_login, roles: IS_AUTHENTICATED_ANONYMOUSLY }
- { path: ^/backend, roles: ROLE_ADMIN }
- { path: ^/user/fetch, roles: ROLE_USER }
- { path: ^/level, roles: ROLE_USER }
- { path: ^/gallery, roles: ROLE_USER }
I have an window development machine with XAMPP running and everything works out properly. I can log in to the backend and if I'm not logged in and try to open a backend route, I'm redirected to the login page.
This is my routing portion:
backend_login:
pattern: /backend_login
defaults: { _controller: FooBackendBundle:Security:login }
backend_login_check:
pattern: /backend/login_check
But when I'm uploading it to my integration linux server, I can open the backend without having to log in. It seems like Symfony does not care about the role the current user has.
The code and the symfony version are both the exact same (Symfony 2.3).
If I remove the anonymous: ~ part from the backend firewall, it will redirect to the login page, but also creates an inifite redirection loop.
Does anybody have an idea how to solve this?
From the Symfony documentation:
For each incoming request, Symfony checks each access_control entry to find one that matches the current request. As soon as it finds a matching access_control entry, it stops - only the first matching access_control is used to enforce access.
When you set access_control in your security config, you want to put your least-restrictive matches last. In your case you will always match on the first pattern since all routes match on ^/ and therefore do not require any authentication. Change your access_control to this:
access_control:
- { path: ^/backend_login, roles: IS_AUTHENTICATED_ANONYMOUSLY }
- { path: ^/backend, roles: ROLE_ADMIN }
- { path: ^/user/fetch, roles: ROLE_USER }
- { path: ^/level, roles: ROLE_USER }
- { path: ^/gallery, roles: ROLE_USER }
- { path: ^/, roles: IS_AUTHENTICATED_ANONYMOUSLY }
I removed the host parameter as it didn't seem relevant.
Symfony2: security.yml-access_control: how can i have two rules for one path
I would like to have two role in one path
Example: security.yml
access_control:
- { path: ^/, roles: ROLE_USER}
- { path: ^/, roles: ROLE_ADMINISTRATIVE}
I want only ROLE_USER & ROLE_ADMINISTRATIVE who can access.
Just like this path: {path: ^/path$, role: [ROLE_ADMIN,ROLE_USER]}
I'm trying to make the admin section only accessible for admin users using FOSUserBundle.
However if I go to the admin url (www.foo.local/app_dev.php/admin) without authentication, it allows me access.
In the Symfony debug toolbar it shows Logged in as anon.
I have configured the FOSUserBundle following the official documentation
Here is the security.yml config:
security:
encoders:
FOS\UserBundle\Model\UserInterface: sha512
role_hierarchy:
ROLE_ADMIN: ROLE_USER
ROLE_SUPER_ADMIN: ROLE_ADMIN
providers:
fos_userbundle:
id: fos_user.user_provider.username
firewalls:
main:
pattern: ^/
form_login:
provider: fos_userbundle
csrf_provider: form.csrf_provider
logout: true
anonymous: true
access_control:
- { path: ^/login$, role: IS_AUTHENTICATED_ANONYMOUSLY }
- { path: ^/register, role: IS_AUTHENTICATED_ANONYMOUSLY }
- { path: ^/resetting, role: IS_AUTHENTICATED_ANONYMOUSLY }
- { path: ^/admin/, role: ROLE_ADMIN }
I don't know why it doesn't ask for the ROLE_ADMIN in order to allow access to the admin section, any ideas?
I guess that's because your rule says
- { path: ^/admin/, role: ROLE_ADMIN }
which means
www.foo.local/app_dev.php/admin/one
www.foo.local/app_dev.php/admin/two
Notice the '/' after admin
where
www.foo.local/app_dev.php/admin
won't satisfy the rule because it's missing the '/' at the end
try to change the rule to be
- { path: ^/admin, role: ROLE_ADMIN }
I want that the user with the role ROLE_USER_1 or ROLE_USER_2 is getting to ^/(de|en)/secured/account/. But what I don't want that e.g. a user with ROLE_USER_2 can go to ^/(de|en)/secured/account/profile or any other action. User with the role ROLE_USER_2 can only go to ^/(de|en)/secured/account/.
What is wrong with my security.yml:
role_hierarchy:
ROLE_ADMIN: ROLE_USER
ROLE_USER_B2B: ROLE_USER_B2B_INACTIVE
access_control:
- { path: ^/(en|de)/secured/account/$, roles: [ROLE_USER_B2B_INACTIVE, ROLE_USER_B2B] }
- { path: ^/(en|de)/secured/account/*, roles: ROLE_USER_B2B }
My answer, what is working! Just had to switch the first roles! A little bit stupid. And I uncomment the role hierachy with ROLE_USER_B2B.
role_hierarchy:
ROLE_ADMIN: ROLE_USER
access_control:
- { path: ^/(en|de)/secured/b2b/account/$, roles: [ROLE_USER_B2B, ROLE_USER_B2B_INACTIVE] }
- { path: ^/(en|de)/secured/b2b/account/*, roles: ROLE_USER_B2B }