I have a series of divs with z-index:20 (this is a must be for visual styling reasons), but inside one of them, I have a datepicker which stands as position:absolute floating above everything. I've assigned z-index: 1000 as a great value in order to achieve this.
I discovered the inner z-index this doesn't work because of the parent container. Is there such a hack to workaround this ?
The parent container must have such z-index in order to be above a sibling div, but the datepicker, which is inside one of the boxes, must be on top of everything, and now it is hiding under the next box.
This is the codepen with an actual example: http://codepen.io/anon/pen/jWZMPw
The problem is that .box creates a stacking context because it's a positioned element with non-auto z-index.
Don't do that. Remove
.box {
z-index: 20;
}
.banner {
padding: 10px;
background: #454545;
position: fixed;
width: 100%;
}
.box {
position: relative;
float: left;
margin-left: 20px;
min-width: 100px;
min-height: 100px;
border: 1px solid #999;
padding: 20px;
background: #45e;
}
.box:first-child {
margin-left: 0;
}
.dtpicker {
background-color: #34ed22;
padding: 20px;
min-width: 100px;
min-height: 100px;
position: absolute;
left: 50px;
z-index: 50;
}
<div class="banner">
Something behind
</div>
<div class="box" >
Box
</div>
<div class="box" >
Box
</div>
<div class="box" >
Box
<div class="dtpicker">
Dt picker
</div>
</div>
<div class="box" >
Box
</div>
I recommend reading What No One Told You About Z-Index.
Related
I'm trying to setup a frame-like area using div, so all the content and picture in the area won't display beyond the area. However, I've tried using different z-index or display but no luck.
http://jsfiddle.net/06xwge5j/
HTML
<div id="Parent">
<div id="Child">
test content
</div>
</div>
CSS:
#Parent {
width: 50px;
height: 50px;
border-width: 1px;
border-style: solid;
}
#Child {
position: relative;
top: 30px;
left: 30px;
width: 50px;
height: 50px;
background: black;
z-index: -1;
}
You need to utilize the CSS overflow property on the parent element. Add the following line to the #Parent rules:
overflow: hidden;
This will completely hide child elements that are outside the box. Most likely you want to use auto instead of hidden to show scrollbars only when the content exceeds the box. jsFiddle
Demo
#Parent {
width: 50px;
height: 50px;
border-width: 1px;
border-style: solid;
overflow: hidden;
}
#Child {
position: relative;
top: 30px;
left: 30px;
width: 50px;
height: 50px;
background: black;
}
<div id="Parent">
<div id="Child">
test content
</div>
</div>
http://jsfiddle.net/06xwge5j/1/
Take a look
overflow: hidden;
it hides all content of an element that go beyond its edges.
I have a div that is positioned absolutely in CSS. That div has overflow:auto so sometimes it shows a scrollbar if it has a lot of content. I need to completely overlay that div with another div, this one semitransparent so as to completely cover the first div.
The problem is that when a scrollbar is shown in the outer div, the overlay div does not cover it.
My HTML
<div id="outer">
<div id="content">
1<br/>2<br/>3<br/>4<br/>5<br/>
6<br/>7<br/>8<br/>9<br/>10<br/>
11<br/>12<br/>13<br/>14<br/>15<br/>
</div>
<div id="overlay">
</div>
</div>
My CSS
div#outer {
overflow: auto;
position: absolute;
top: 60px;
left: 20px;
height: 200px;
width: 200px;
border: 3px solid blue;
}
div#content {
background-color: lightgray;
}
div#overlay {
position: absolute;
top: 0px;
bottom: 0px;
left: 0px;
right: 0px;
background-color: yellow;
opacity: 0.8;
z-index: 2;
}
Run this here:
http://jsfiddle.net/pTnXF/4/
Any ideas?
Placing the #overlay inside #content and adding a "position:relative" to #content could work.
http://jsfiddle.net/pTnXF/5/
HTML changes
<div id="outer">
<div id="content">
1<br/>2<br/>3<br/>4<br/>5<br/>
6<br/>7<br/>8<br/>9<br/>10<br/>
11<br/>12<br/>13<br/>14<br/>15<br/>
<div id="overlay">
</div>
</div>
</div>
CSS changes
div#content {
background-color: lightgray;
position: relative;
}
jquery
$("#overlay").css("height",($('#outer')[0].scrollHeight));
I've stumbled upon some unexpected behaviour when testing a layout in Firefox. It seems that when a parent is set to display:table-cell and position:relative, its children do not respect the parent width when positioned absolutely and given 100% width. Instead, the child width is set to the parent's parent width. I've recreated this issue with a fiddle:
http://jsfiddle.net/D6Rch/1/
which is structured as:
<div class="table">
<div class="cell-1">
<div class="content-1">this must be positioned absolutely</div>
<div class="content-2">as these divs will be overlapping</div>
</div>
<div class="cell-2">
<div class="advert">fixed width advert</div>
</div>
</div>
.table {
width:600px;
height:400px;
border:3px solid black;
display: table;
position: relative;
table-layout: fixed;
}
.cell-1 {
width: auto;
display: table-cell;
background: yellow;
position: relative;
margin-right:10px;
}
.cell-2 {
margin-right:10px;
width: 100px;
display: table-cell;
background: pink;
position: relative;
}
.content-1 {
position: absolute;
top: 10px;
width: 100%;
background: lightgreen;
z-index: 5;
}
.content-2 {
position: absolute;
top: 50px;
width: 100%;
background: lightblue;
z-index: 5;
}
.advert {
position: relative;
border: 1px solid red;
}
It functions as expected in Chrome & Safari, but not on Firefox. Question is, why does this happen? And is there a workaround for this or should I take an altogether different approach?
Thanks in advance,
This is a known bug in Gecko. See the Gecko Notes here - https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/CSS/position
So, you'll have to wrap you content divs in another positioned div. Like so
http://jsfiddle.net/D6Rch/4/
<div class="cell-1">
<div class="wrapper">
<div class="content-1">this must be positioned absolutely</div>
<div class="content-2">as these divs will be overlapping</div>
</div>
</div>
.wrapper {
position: relative;
}
I want a few divs to be positioned in a line next to each other, but also allow them to overlap the previous div.
What I'm trying to get is a timeline with divs for events of certain length. The events can overlap each other.
My idea was to give each div the same top position, an increasing z-index and an increasing left position (according to the time of the event). Later I would pop individual divs out by mouse-over events to visualise the overlap.
What I do is to make it so each div gets placed under the next one. With fiddling of the top attribute I can get them to align horizontally, but I don't see the pattern.
<div class="day">
<div style="top: 35px; left: 200px; background-color: red; height: 50px; width:24px; z-index: 1; position: relative;"> </div>
<div style="top: 35px; left: 220px; background-color: green; height: 50px; width:24px; z-index: 2; position: relative;"> </div>
<div style="top: 35px; left: 225px; background-color: blue; height: 50px; width:48px; z-index: 3; position: relative;"> </div>
</div>
If I use absolute positions, the elements fly out of the surrounding div and are positioned absolutely at some place in the page.
It's simple. Make an inner div using absolute positioning but wrapped with a div that uses relative positioning:
<div id="container" style="position: relative;width:200px;height:100px;top:100px;background:yellow">
<div id="innerdiv1" style="z-index: 1; position:absolute; width: 100px;height:20px;background:red;">a</div>
<div id="innerdiv2" style="z-index: 2; position:absolute; width: 100px;height:20px;background:blue;left:10px;top:10px;"></div>
</div>
You can use another method like negative margin, but it's not recommended if you want to dynamically change HTML. For example, if you want to move the position of the inner div(s), just set the top/left/right/bottom CSS properties of the container or modify the properties using JavaScript (jQuery or otherwise).
It will keep your code clean and readable.
Use Negative Margins!
<div class="day">
<div style="top: 35px;left: 200px; background-color: red; height: 50px; width:24px; z-index: 1; position: relative; margin-top: -15px;"> </div>
<div style="top: 35px;left: 220px; background-color: green; height: 50px; width:24px; z-index: 2; position: relative; margin-top: -15px;"> </div>
<div style="top: 35px;left: 225px; background-color: blue; height: 50px; width:48px; z-index: 3; position: relative; margin-top: -15px;"> </div>
</div>
Fiddle: http://jsfiddle.net/vZv5k/
Another Solution:
Give the .day class a width, height, and position it relatively, keeping the inner divs absolutely positioned.
Check out the below CSS:
.day {position: relative; width: 500px; height: 500px;}
And the HTML:
<div class="day">
<div style="top: 35px;left: 200px; background-color: red; height: 50px; width:24px; z-index: 1;"> </div>
<div style="top: 35px;left: 220px; background-color: green; height: 50px; width:24px; z-index: 2;"> </div>
<div style="top: 35px;left: 225px; background-color: blue; height: 50px; width:48px; z-index: 3;"> </div>
</div>
I found the solution. It's probably blindingly obvious to anyone who knows css.
I thought I could not use absolute positioning because my elements would fly out of the surrounding div.
Turns out, I misunderstood absolute positioning. It's not the same as fixed, but to me it looked like that.
https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/CSS/position explains it well.
Absolute positioning positions absolutely to the next surrounding anchor. That defaults to the whole page, if no other anchor is defined.
To make something a anchor it needs to be position: relative;
Quick solution
add position: relative; to the day class and using absolute positioning in the inner div.
With the top attribute, you can also move relatively positioned objects. In my code sample the red box overlaps the green box due to it's z-index. If you remove the z-index, then the green box is on top.
HTML:
<div class="wrapper">
<div class="box one"></div>
<div class="box two"></div>
</div>
CSS:
.wrapper {
width: 50px;
height: 50px;
overflow: hidden;
}
.box {
width: 100%;
height: 100%;
position: relative;
}
.box.one {
background-color: red;
z-index: 2;
top: 0px;
}
.box.two {
background-color: green;
z-index: 1;
top: -50px;
}
Hello
please have a look at my jsfiddle.
The content of the inner div-element is scrollable.
Each grey symbol has a margin-left. When I scroll the content the symbols shouldn't be fixed to the background.
It should be scrollable with the position.
Have you got an idea how I achieve that effect?
Keep in mind that positioning is relative to the closest positioned parent.
When you are assigning an absolute position to the "symb" class you are positioning them relative to the document rather than their parent.
Simply adding "position: relative;" to your div.tl element will set the parent div as positioned without moving it and the "symb" elements will act the way I think you expect them to.
Your new .tl definition should be:
.tl {
width: 500x;
height: 80px;
background-color:grey;
position: relative;
}
Furthermore, I'm assuming that you have some need to position these absolutely. You could achieve similar results by simply removing the "position: absolute" portion of your .symb definition.
You are setting a margin, not a position, so you don't need to bother with positioning at all in your example case.
I am not sure what do you need. You had an error in your last "symb" - you missed 'p' in 'px'. Try this?
<div class ="outer">
<div class="inner">
<div class="tl">
<div class="box" style="width: 315px;">
<div class="symb" style="margin-left: 0px;"></div>
<div class="symb" style="margin-left: 15px;"></div>
<div class="symb" style="margin-left: 20px;"></div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
.outer {
width:50%;
}
.inner {
overflow-x:scroll;
}
.tl {
width: 500x;
height: 80px;
background-color:grey;
}
.box {
float: left;
height: 61px;
}
.box .symb {
float:left;
width: 5px;
height: 5px;
background-color: #cccccc;
z-index: 999;
margin-top: 10px;
}
Use
position: relative;
Not
position: absolute;
Just try with the following CSS:
.box .symb {
position: relative;
float: left;
position: inline-block;
width: 5px;
height: 5px;
background-color: #cccccc;
z-index: 999;
margin-top: 10px;
}