My objective is to repeatedly run an R script, each time with a different set of parameters.
To do so, I have been using a bash script to pass the command-line parameters to the R script by looping through an input file, in which each line contains a different combination of 7 parameters.
The input file looks like this:
10 food 0.00005 0.002 1 OBSERVED 0
10 food 0.00005 0.002 1 OBSERVED 240
10 food 0.00005 0.002 1 OBSERVED 480
10 food 0.00005 0.002 1 OBSERVED 720
10 food 0.00005 0.002 1 OBSERVED 960
10 food 0.00005 0.002 1 OBSERVED 1200
The R script to which the command-line parameters are passed, begins like this:
commandArgs(trailingOnly=FALSE)
A <- as.numeric (commandArgs()[as.numeric(length(commandArgs()) -6 )])
B <- commandArgs()[as.numeric(length(commandArgs()) -5 )]
C <- as.numeric (commandArgs()[as.numeric(length(commandArgs()) -4 )])
D <- as.numeric (commandArgs()[as.numeric(length(commandArgs()) -3 )])
E <- as.numeric (commandArgs()[as.numeric(length(commandArgs()) -2 )])
F <- commandArgs()[as.numeric(length(commandArgs()) -1 )]
G <- as.numeric (commandArgs()[as.numeric(length(commandArgs()) )])
The bash loop that reads these in and dispatches the R script, is as follows;
#!/bin/bash
N=0
cat Input.txt | while read LINE ; do
N=$((N+1))
echo "R --no-save < /home/trichard/Script.R" "$LINE" | bsub -N -q priority -R "select[model==Xeon5450]"
done
However, the problem is that there are millions of lines in Input.txt, so this approach is way too slow (it prevents other LSF users from submitting their own jobs).
So, the question is, how to do the above using an LSF array?
The main trick is to extract the nth line from the input file. Assuming you're on a Unix-like system, you can use the "sed" command to do that. Here's an example:
N=$(wc -l < input.txt)
echo 'R --no-save -f Script.R --args $(sed "${LSB_JOBINDEX}q;d" input.txt)' |
bsub -J "R_Job[1-$N]" -N -q priority -R "select[model==Xeon5450]"
Correct argument quoting is a bit tricky and very important in this example.
Note that this uses the R "--args" option to avoid warnings messages about unrecognized arguments. I'd also suggest using commandArgs(trailingOnly=TRUE) in the R script so you only see the arguments of interest.
maybe you should consider putting it all into R and use a 'foreach' loop construct with a proper parallelization framework like 'doMPI' (or pure Rmpi if your are really motivated ;-)). So the job management system on the cluster has full control and your are basically submitting one single job.
Rather a hint then a solution to your specific problem.
The answer of Steve Westson works well; thanks!
However, in the LSF system, the maximum N jobs within a single array is limited to ~1000. That means that when you have >1000 jobs, you need to submit multiple job arrays, like this:
#!/bin/bash
increment=1000
startvalue=1
stopvalue=$(wc -l < Col_Treat_BETA_MU_RAND_METHOD_part1.txt)
stopvalue=$(( ($increment*((stopvalue+999)/$increment))+$increment ))
end=$increment
for ((s=$startvalue,e=$end ; e<$stopvalue; s+=$increment,e+=$increment)); do
echo $s "-" $e
echo 'R --no-save -f script.R --args $(sed "${LSB_JOBINDEX}q;d" input.txt)' | bsub -J "R_Job[$s-$e]" -N -q normal
done
so, this successfully submits all jobs instantaneously, wihtout the original job-by-job loop that essentially blocks other users, and annoys your sysadmin. Thanks again!
I am posting this as an answer as it exceeds the max length for a comment.
Related
I want to get a count of matches with grep.
grep -c works fine with one pattern.
But when I pipe (|) a second pattern, it returns nothing.
Here is an example:
File test with contents:
A C
A A
A B
A B C
I run the command:
>grep A test
A C
A A
A B
A B C
I run the command:
>grep -c A test
4
I run the command:
>grep A test | grep B
A B
A B C
I run the command:
grep -c A test | grep B
returns nothing
How can I get a count of 2 for the second example?
thank you
grep -c A test outputs 4. The result of searching for rows that match B in a text consisting of 4 is unsurprisingly empty.
Instead, you want to count at the last step:
grep A test | grep -c B
Here, the first command filters the rows down to only those that have A, then the second command filters those rows into those that contain B, finally counting them.
The role of the pipe command is to use the result of the previous command as the input of the next command, you should use grep A test | grep -c B
I am trying to execute command similar to
plot "data.asc" every ::Q::Q+1500 using 2 with lines
But i have problem with that "Q" number. Its not a well known value but number of line with some specific string. Lets say i have line with string "SET_10:" and then i have my data to plot after this specific line. Is there some way how to identify the number of that line with specific string?
An easy way is to pass the data through GNU sed to print just the wanted lines:
plot "< sed -n <data.asc '/^SET_10:/,+1500{/^SET_10:/d;p}'" using 1:2 with lines
The -n stops any output, the a,b says between which lines to do the {...} commands, and those commands say to delete the trigger line, and p print the others.
To make sure you have a compatible GNU sed try the command on its own, for a short number of lines, eg 5:
sed -n <data.asc '/^SET_10:/,+5{/^SET_10:/d;p}'
If this does not output the first 5 lines of your data, an alternative is to use awk, as it is too difficult in sed to count lines without this GNU-specific syntax. Test the (standard POSIX, not GNU-specific) awk equivalent:
awk <data.asc 'end!=0 && NR<=end{print} /^start/{end=NR+5}'
and if that is ok, use it in gnuplot as
plot "< awk <data.asc 'end!=0 && NR<=end{print} /^start/{end=NR+1500}'" using 1:2 with lines
Here's a version entirely within gnuplot, with no external commands needed. I tested this on gnuplot 5.0 patchlevel 3 using the following bash commands to create a simple dataset of 20 lines of which only 5 lines are to be printed from the line with "start" in column 1. You don't need to do this.
for i in $(seq 1 20)
do let j=i%2
echo "$i $j"
done >data.asc
sed -i data.asc -e '5a\
start'
The actual gnuplot uses a variable endlno initially set to NaN (not-a-number) and a function f which takes 3 parameters: a boolean start saying if column 1 has the matching string, lno the current linenumber, and the current column 1 value val. If the linenumber is less-than-or-equal-to the ending line number (and therefore it is not still NaN), f returns val, else if the start condition is true the wanted ending line number is set in variable endlno and NaN is returned. If we have not yet seen the start, NaN is returned.
gnuplot -persist <<\!
endlno=NaN
f(start,lno,val) = ((lno<=endlno)?val:(start? (endlno=lno+5,NaN) : NaN))
plot "data.asc" using (f(stringcolumn(1)eq "start", $0, $1)):2 with lines
!
Since gnuplot does not plot points with NaN values, we ignore lines upto the start, and again after the wanted number of lines.
In your case you need to change 5 to 1500 and "start" to "SET_10:".
I have a large text file and I want to shuffle the file by chunks of 100 lines. So the order within each chunk of 100 lines is preserved. Is there anyway to accomplish this with only Unix command line tools?
Yes. First split the input file into 100-line chunks named "foo...". Then ask shuf to permute their names. Then cat the results together.
split -l 100 INPUTFILE foo
cat $(/bin/ls foo* | shuf)
You can test this out briefly by creating an input file of the numbers 1 to 100 like so:
seq 1 100 > inputfile.txt
and then using chunks of, say, 5 lines.
I have time-series data where I would like to find all lines matching each another but values can be different (match until the first tab)! You can see the vimdiff below where I would like to get rid of days that occur only on the other time series.
I am looking for the simplest unix tool to do this!
Timeserie here and here.
Simple example
Input
Left file Right File
------------------------ ------------------------
10-Apr-00 00:00 0 || 10-Apr-00 00:00 7
20-Apr 00 00:00 7 || 21-Apr-00 00:00 3
Output
Left file Right File
------------------------ ------------------------
10-Apr-00 00:00 0 || 10-Apr-00 00:00 7
Let's consider these sample input files:
$ cat file1
10-Apr-00 00:00 0
20-Apr-00 00:00 7
$ cat file2
10-Apr-00 00:00 7
21-Apr-00 00:00 3
To merge together those lines with the same date:
$ awk 'NR==FNR{a[$1]=$0;next;} {if ($1 in a) print a[$1]"\t||\t"$0;}' file1 file2
10-Apr-00 00:00 0 || 10-Apr-00 00:00 7
Explanation
NR==FNR{a[$1]=$0;next;}
NR is the number of lines read so far and FNR is the number of lines read so far from the current file. So, when NR==FNR, we are still reading the first file. If so, save this whole line, $0, in array a under the key of the first field, $1, which is the date. Then, skip the rest of the commands and jump to the next line.
if ($1 in a) print a[$1]"\t||\t"$0
If we get here, then we are reading the second file, file2. If the first field on this line, $1 is a date that we already saw in file1, in other words, if $1 in a, then print this line out together with the corresponding line from file1. The two lines are separated by tab-||-tab.
Alternative Output
If you just want to select lines from file2 whose dates are also in file1, then the code can be simplified:
$ awk 'NR==FNR{a[$1]++;next;} {if ($1 in a) print;}' file1 file2
10-Apr-00 00:00 7
Or, still simpler:
$ awk 'NR==FNR{a[$1]++;next;} ($1 in a)' file1 file2
10-Apr-00 00:00 7
There is the relatively unknown unix command join. It can join sorted files on a key column.
To use it in your context, we follow this strategy (left.txt and right.txt are your files):
add line numbers (to put everything in the original sequence in the last step)
nl left.txt > left_with_lns.txt
nl right.txt > right_with_lns.txt
sort both files on the date column
sort left_with_lns.txt -k 2 > sl.txt
sort right_with_lns.txt -k 2 > sr.txt
join the files using the date column (all times are 0:00) (this would merge all columns of both files with correponding key, but we provide a output template to write the columns from the first file somewhere and the columns from the second file somewhere else (but only those line with a matching key will end in the result fl.txt and fr.txt)
join -j 2 -t $'\t' -o 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 sl.txt sr.txt > fl.txt
join -j 2 -t $'\t' -o 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4 sl.txt sr.txt > fr.txt
sort boths results on the linenumber column and output the other columns
sort -n fl |cut -f 2- > left_filtered.txt
sort -n fr.txt | cut -f 2- > right_filtered.txt
Tools used: cut, join, nl, sort.
As requested by #Masi, I tried to work out a solution using sed.
My first attempt uses two passes; the first transforms file1 into a sed script that is used in the second pass to filter file2.
sed 's/\([^ \t]*\).*/\/^\1\t\/p;t/' file1 > sed1
sed -nf sed1 file2 > out2
With big input files, this is s-l-o-w; for each line from file2, sed has to process an amount of patterns that equals the number of lines in file1. I haven't done any profiling, but I wouldn't be surprised if the time complexity is quadratic.
My second attempt merges and sorts the two files, then scans through all lines in search of pairs. This runs in linear time and consequently is a lot faster. Please note that this solution will ruin the original order of the file; alphabetical sorting doesn't work too well with this date notation. Supplying files with a different date format (y-m-d) would be the easiest way to fix that.
sed 's/^[^ \t]\+//' file1 > marked1
sed 's/^[^ \t]\+//' file2 > marked2
sort marked1 marked2 > sorted
sed '$d;N;/^\([^ \t]\+\)#1.*\n\1#2/{s/\(.*\)\n\(.*\)/\2\n\1/;P};D' sorted > filtered
sed 's/^\([^ \t]\+\)#2/\1/' filtered > out2
Explanation:
In the first command, s/^[^ \t]\+// appends #1 to every date. This makes it possible to merge the files, keep equal dates together when sorting, and still be able to tell lines from different files apart.
The second command does the same for file2; obviously with its own marker #2.
The sort command merges the two files, grouping equal dates together.
The third sed command returns all lines from file2 that have a date that also occurs in file1.
The fourth sed command removes the #2 marker from the output.
The third sed command in detail:
$d suppresses inappropriate printing of the last line
N reads and appends another line of input to the line already present in the pattern space
/^\([^ \t]\+\)#1.*\n\1#2/ matches two lines originating from different files but with the same date
{ starts a command group
s/\(.*\)\n\(.*\)/\2\n\1/ swaps the two lines in the pattern space
P prints the first line in the pattern space
} ends the command group
D deletes the first line from the pattern space
The bad news is, even the second approach is slower than the awk approach made by #John1024. Sed was never designed to be a merge tool. Neither was awk, but awk has the advantage of being able to store an entire file in a dictionary, making #John1024's solution blazingly fast. The downside of a dictionary is memory consumption. On huge input files, my solution should have the advantage.
I have a test folder that contains some text:
1 Line one. $
2 Line $
3 This is a new line $
4 This is the same line$
5 $
How would I go about using a PIPED grep command to only displays lines 1, 2 and 5?
My attempt at this was grep -n '^ ' test | grep -n ' $' test
However I get lines 1, 2, 3, 5
Your second grep innvocation in the pipe reads the file test and ignores the pipe. The first grep writes to the pipe, but its output is discarded. So, your command effectively is identical to
grep -n ' $' test
Just remove the test argument from the second grep invocation.
You are probably better off removing the -n option there as well, because it will count the lines it reads from the pipe then, which is probably not what you want.