Maven - SQLite - Missing database - sqlite

I'm new to maven and I'm trying to make my project work with an sqlite database.
Code works as a normal java project.
I made a Maven project with the exact same working code and added the dependacies in the pom.
pom.xml
<dependency>
<groupId>org.xerial</groupId>
<artifactId>sqlite-jdbc</artifactId>
<version>3.8.11.1</version>
</dependency>
Also, the Library.sqlite is in the root folder of the project (where it works as a normal java project)
works in java, not in maven
"jdbc:sqlite:‪Library.sqlite"
The error reads "[SQLITE_ERROR] SQL error or missing database"
Since it's the same code as the java project, I'm sure there is no syntax error, so it must be something with the location of the Library.sqlite?
How can I make this work?
SOLUTION
It seems my program created a new empty Library.sqlite in my folder and that's why it couldn't find my tables. After deleting the original and editing the new one, it works!

I tried using the same library as you and it seems to work fine for me. Take a look: https://github.com/ajorpheus/SqliteHelloWorld
Sample output after a successful build:
name = leo
id = 1
name = yui
id = 2
Process finished with exit code 0

Related

MarkLogic 9.0.5 and DHF 3.0 fail to load mlcp module on mlDeploy

I have a clean marklogic server installation together with gradle DHF(Data Hub Framework) 3.0 project.
In the build.gradle, I have a custom task that triggers an input flow and loads the files by using MLCP.
The code looks like the following.
task importEntity(type: com.marklogic.gradle.task.MlcpTask) {
classpath = configurations.mlcp
command = "IMPORT"
...
...
transform_module = "/com.marklogic.hub/mlcp-flow-transform.xqy"
transform_namespace = "http://marklogic.com/data-hub/mlcp-flow-transform"
... }
When the command is run, the execution fails due to a non-existing module (/com.marklogic.hub/mlcp-flow-transform.xqy) in MarkLogic modules database.
If I check modules database, I see that the only custom modules were uploaded but not a single dependency from MarkLogic on mlDeploy.
I am wondering, what could have gone wrong.
Thank in advance.
Best,
Igor

Can't deploy precompiled, merged webapp to Azure

I'm trying to deploy an ASP.NET web application to Azure. It's hybrid Web Forms, MVC, and WebAPI, and there are a TON of aspx/ascx files, such that they really need to be precompiled or every deploy will render the site sluggish for awhile.
I am trying to deploy via SCM integration with GitHub via kudu, with precompiled views, all merged to a single assembly.
Note that:
Deploy works fine with precompilation disabled.
Deploy works fine from Visual Studio
Build works fine if I copy the msbuild command from the Azure log, replace the relevant paths, and run it locally on my Windows 8.1 machine.
I've set up the Advanced Precompile settings as:
Don't allow precompiled site to be udpatable
Don't emit debug information
Merge all pages and control outputs to a single assembly = AppViews.dll
Here's the .deployment file for Azure
[config]
project = WebSite/WebSite.csproj
SCM_BUILD_ARGS=/p:Configuration=Release;PublishProfile=azure-prod /v:n
You notice I'm sending the verbosity /v to "normal" for extra diagnostic information.
Here is info I get toward the tail of the deployment log:
AspNetPreCompile:
D:\Windows\Microsoft.NET\Framework\v4.0.30319\aspnet_compiler.exe -v \ -p D:\home\site\repository\WebSite\obj\Release\AspnetCompileMerge\Source -c D:\home\site\repository\WebSite\obj\Release\AspnetCompileMerge\TempBuildDir
GenerateAssemblyInfoFromExistingAssembleInfo:
Creating directory "obj\Release\AssemblyInfo".
D:\Windows\Microsoft.NET\Framework\v4.0.30319\Csc.exe /out:obj\Release\AssemblyInfo\AssemblyInfo.dll /target:library Properties\AssemblyInfo.cs
AspNetMerge:
Running aspnet_merge.exe.
D:\Program Files (x86)\Microsoft SDKs\Windows\v8.0A\bin\NETFX 4.0 Tools\aspnet_merge.exe D:\home\site\repository\WebSite\obj\Release\AspnetCompileMerge\TempBuildDir -w AppViews.dll -copyattrs obj\Release\AssemblyInfo\AssemblyInfo.dll -a
aspnet_merge : error 1003: The directory 'D:\home\site\repository\WebSite\obj\Release\AspnetCompileMerge\TempBuildDir' does not exist. [D:\home\site\repository\WebSite\WebSite.csproj]
Done Building Project "D:\home\site\repository\WebSite\WebSite.csproj" (Build;pipelinePreDeployCopyAllFilesToOneFolder target(s)) -- FAILED.
Build FAILED.
It looks like aspnet_compiler.exe runs, but doesn't do what it's supposed to, which is why the TempBuildDir directory (supposed to be the output of the compiler) does not exist in time for the AspNetMerge target. Contrast that with my system, where that directory DOES in fact exist, containing the marker aspx/ascx/etc. files, static content, a PrecompiledApp.config file, and a whole mess of stuff in the bin directory.
aspnet_compiler.exe has an -errorstack flag but it's not clear to me how I could get MSBuild to add this just via the .deployment file, or even if that app is really even throwing an error.
I could just deploy via Visual Studio, but I would really like to take advantage of the SCM integration so I can just push to my prod branch and let it go. Any suggestions?
I replied on https://github.com/projectkudu/kudu/issues/1341, but copying my answer here in case someone lands here...
Way back, we had found that aspnet_compiler.exe was not working within Azure Websites due to how it dealt with the profile folder. We made a change at the time that's a bit of a hack but got us going: we turned it into a no-op, by pointing HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows NT\CurrentVersion\Image File Execution Options\aspnet_compiler.exe to our own dummy exe (D:\Program Files (x86)\aspnet_compiler\KuduAspNetCompiler.exe).
But trying it now, it appears to work correctly today, likely thanks to improvements in the Azure Websites hosting environment. So we will try getting rid of this hack and doing a full test pass to make sure it doesn't cause any major regressions. If all goes well, we can get that into production, which should enable those scenarios.
In the short term, you may be able to work around this by having your build script:
copy aspnet_compiler.exe from D:\Windows\Microsoft.NET\Framework\v4.0.30319 into your own site files, but under a different name (e.g. aspnet_compiler2.exe)
convince msbuild to use that one
Note: This GitHub issue on projectkudu will eventually make this solution obsolete, but for the meantime, that issue is filed as Backlog, and this works right now.
Thank you thank you David Ebbo. With this information, I was able to bootstrap my build to work for the short term.
First, I downloaded the aspnet_compiler.exe from the Azure instance using the Diagnostic Console available at https://{WEBSITE_NAME}.scm.azurewebsites.net/DebugConsole and added that to my own repository. This way there's no question about any difference between 32/64-bit, etc. I renamed it to azure_aspnet_compiler.exe in my repository.
Second, the AspNetCompiler task doesn't give you the option to change the tool name. It's hardcoded, but as a virtual property so it's overrideable. So I had to create my own task class, and package it in its own assembly, which I built in Release mode and also included in my repository.
public class AzureAspNetCompiler : Microsoft.Build.Tasks.AspNetCompiler
{
private string _toolName = "aspnet_compiler.exe";
protected override string ToolName
{
get { return _toolName; }
}
public string CustomToolName // Because ToolName cannot have a setter
{
get { return _toolName; }
set { _toolName = value; }
}
}
Next I needed to replace the AspNetPreCompile task in MSBuild, but I couldn't figure out how to do that directly. But that task wasn't doing anything anyway, so why not just run right after it?
I added this to the top of my Website.csproj file to import the DLL containing the AzureAspNetCompiler class. Note that the path is relative to the Website.csproj file I'm editing.
<UsingTask TaskName="AzureBuildTargets.AzureAspNetCompiler"
AssemblyFile="..\DeploymentTools\AzureBuildTargets.dll" />
Then I added this right below it, which is basically stealing the MSBuild target definition of AspNetPreCompile from C:\Program Files (x86)\MSBuild\Microsoft\VisualStudio\v11.0\Web\Transform\Microsoft.Web.Publishing.AspNetCompileMerge.targets, with some of the property setting stuff near the top of it left out (because the original task will do that for us anyway.) Just take note of the ToolPath and CustomToolName values at the bottom of the (renamed) AzureAspNetCompiler element.
<PropertyGroup>
<!--Relative to solution root apparently-->
<LocalRepoDeploymentTools>.\DeploymentTools</LocalRepoDeploymentTools>
<AzureAspnetCompilerPath>$([System.IO.Path]::GetFullPath($(LocalRepoDeploymentTools)))</AzureAspnetCompilerPath>
</PropertyGroup>
<Target Name="NoReallyAspNetPreCompile" AfterTargets="AspNetPreCompile">
<AzureAspNetCompiler
PhysicalPath="$(_PreAspnetCompileMergeSingleTargetFolderFullPath)"
TargetPath="$(_PostAspnetCompileMergeSingleTargetFolderFullPath)"
VirtualPath="$(_AspNetCompilerVirtualPath)"
Force="$(_AspNetCompilerForce)"
Debug="$(DebugSymbols)"
Updateable="$(EnableUpdateable)"
KeyFile="$(_AspNetCompileMergeKeyFile)"
KeyContainer="$(_AspNetCompileMergeKeyContainer)"
DelaySign="$(DelaySign)"
AllowPartiallyTrustedCallers="$(AllowPartiallyTrustedCallers)"
FixedNames="$(_AspNetCompilerFixedNames)"
Clean="$(Clean)"
MetabasePath="$(_AspNetCompilerMetabasePath)"
ToolPath="$(AzureAspnetCompilerPath)"
CustomToolName="azure_aspnet_compiler.exe"
/>
<!--
Removing APP_DATA is done here so that the output groups reflect the fact that App_data is
not present
-->
<RemoveDir Condition="'$(DeleteAppDataFolder)' == 'true' And Exists('$(_PostAspnetCompileMergeSingleTargetFolderFullPath)\App_Data')"
Directories="$(_PostAspnetCompileMergeSingleTargetFolderFullPath)\App_Data" />
<CollectFilesinFolder Condition="'$(UseMerge)' != 'true'"
RootPath="$(_PostAspnetCompileMergeSingleTargetFolderFullPath)" >
<Output TaskParameter="Result" ItemName="_AspnetCompileMergePrecompiledOutputNoMetadata" />
</CollectFilesinFolder>
<ItemGroup Condition="'$(UseMerge)' != 'true'">
<FileWrites Include="$(_PostAspnetCompileMergeSingleTargetFolderFullPath)\**"/>
</ItemGroup>
With this in place, everything works as I would expect it to.

Setting Jetty resourcebase to static file embedded in the same jar file

I am trying to access static resource (eg. first.html) packed inside the same .jar file (testJetty.jar), which also has a class which starts the jetty (v.8) server (MainTest.java). I am unable to set the resource base correctly.
The structure of my jar file (testJetty.jar):
testJetty.jar
first.html
MainTest.java
==
Works fine on local machine, but when I wrap it in jar file and then run it, it doesn't work, giving "404: File not found" error.
I tried to set the resourcebase with the following values, all of which failed:
a) Tried setting it to .
resource_handler.setResourceBase("."); // Results in directory containing the jar file, D:\Work\eclipseworkspace\testJettyResult
b) Tried getting it from getResource
ClassLoader loader = this.getClass().getClassLoader();
File indexLoc = new File(loader.getResource("first.html").getFile());
String htmlLoc = indexLoc.getAbsolutePath();
resource_handler.setResourceBase(htmloc); // Results in D:\Work\eclipseworkspace\testJettyResult\file:\D:\Work\eclipseworkspace\testJettyResult\testJetty1.jar!\first.html
c) Tried getting the webdir
String webDir = this.getClass().getProtectionDomain()
.getCodeSource().getLocation().toExternalForm();
resource_handler.setResourceBase(webdir); // Results in D:/Work/eclipseworkspace/testJettyResult/testJetty1.jar
None of these 3 approaches worked.
Any help or alternative would be appreciated
Thanks
abbas
The solutions provided in this thread work but I think some clarity to the solution could be useful.
If you are building a fat jar and use the ProtectionDomain way you may hit some issues because you are loading the whole jar!
class.getProtectionDomain().getCodeSource().getLocation().toExternalForm();
So the better solution is the other provided solution
contextHandler.setResourceBase(
YourClass.class
.getClassLoader()
.getResource("WEB-INF")
.toExternalForm());
The problem here is if you are building a fat jar you are not really dumping your webapp resources into WEB-INF but are probably going into the root of the jar, so a simple workaround is to create a folder XXX and use the second approach as follows:
contextHandler.setResourceBase(
YourClass.class
.getClassLoader()
.getResource("XXX")
.toExternalForm());
Or change your build tool to export the webapp files into that given directory. Maybe Maven does this on a Jar for you but gradle does not.
Not unusually, I found a solution to my problem. The 3rd approach mentioned by Stephen in Embedded Jetty : how to use a .war that is included in the .jar from which Jetty starts? worked!
So, I changed from Resource_handler to WebAppContext, where WebAppContext is pointing to the same jar (testJetty.jar) and it worked!
String webDir = MainTest.class.getProtectionDomain()
.getCodeSource().getLocation().toExternalForm(); ; // Results in D:/Work/eclipseworkspace/testJettyResult/testJetty.jar
WebAppContext webappContext = new WebAppContext(webDir, "/");
It looks like ClassLoader.getResource does not understand an empty string or . or / as an argument. In my jar file I had to move all stuf to WEB-INF(any other wrapping dir will do). So the code looks like
contextHandler.setResourceBase(EmbeddedJetty.class.getClassLoader().getResource("WEB-INF").toExternalForm());
so the context looks like this then:
ContextHandler:744 - Started o.e.j.w.WebAppContext#48b3806{/,jar:file:/Users/xxx/projects/dropbox/ui/target/ui-1.0-SNAPSHOT.jar!/WEB-INF,AVAILABLE}

Spring Boot app deployed to Glassfish is giving strange results

As mentioned here, I am having a heck of a time getting my small Spring-Boot project to deploy "correctly" to Glassfish. It runs fine using the embedded Tomcat, but once I try and move it into my organization's environment (Glassfish 3.1.2) I get some strange behavior.
Thinking it was my code, I reverted to the time-tested "Hello World"-approach and built a super-basic app following this tutorial on Spring's blog.
I did make a few very minor deviations as I went along but nothing that should have affected the app like this at all.
The only major deviation I made was that I found I could not exclude "spring-boot-starter-tomcat" from "spring-boot-starter-web" -- when I tried to that, I got 2 errors in the STS "Markers"-tab:
The project was not built since its build path is incomplete. Cannot find the class file for javax.servlet.ServletContext. Fix the build path then try building this project
The type javax.servlet.ServletContext cannot be resolved. It is indirectly referenced from required .class files Application.java
If I cleaned the STS project, then ran Maven Clean, Update, Install the Install goal gave the following error:
Failed to execute goal org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-compiler-plugin:3.1:compile (default-compile) on project test: Compilation failure [ERROR] /Users/brandon_utah/Utah Development/sts_workspaces/NidTools Rebooted/test/src/main/java/test/Application.java:[13,8] cannot access javax.servlet.ServletException [ERROR] class file for javax.servlet.ServletException not found
So what I did instead was include this dependency (which I found mentioned in several other SpringBoot resources):
<dependency>
<groupId>org.springframework.boot</groupId>
<artifactId>spring-boot-starter-tomcat</artifactId>
<scope>provided</scope>
</dependency>
In this deployed fine to the embedded Tomcat and it did deploy to my Glassfish (local install) -- but with a whole bunch (about a half-dozen) errors similar to this one:
2014-04-03T16:23:48.156-0600|SEVERE: Class [ Lorg/springframework/jdbc/datasource/embedded/EmbeddedDatabase; ] not found. Error while loading [ class org.springframework.boot.autoconfigure.jdbc.EmbeddedDataSourceConfiguration ]
Most of them are SEVERE, but I am also getting a few with a WARNING:
2014-04-04T06:57:35.921-0600|WARNING: Error in annotation processing: java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: org/springframework/batch/core/configuration/annotation/BatchConfigurer
Except that I'm not referencing any of these missing classes anywhere in my project (other than what might be referenced by Spring Boot itself).
Also, the app doesn't quite work as expected. If I hit the RestController, I do get my page rendered as I expect -- but if I put any sort of System.out or Logger.log statement in the controller's method, that line of code seemingly never gets executed; by all appearances, it just gets skipped.
To demonstrate this problem, in my sample app's RestController I created a static counter. Then in the GET-/ method I increment that counter and System.out.println it's value. I also return the value as part of the Response.
And again, from a user's perspective, it seems to be working: the screen renders "Hello World" and in parentheses it shows the counter's value. I refresh the window, the counter increments. But nothing in the STS Console. And if I navigate to the Glassfish log for the app, nothing there either. Nothing. Nada. Zip. From what I can tell, something is mysteriously eating any attempt to log anything.
To add to the mystery, if I add a System.out to the SpringBootServletInitializer#configure(), that does make it to the Console. But if I declare a constructor in my RestController and include a System.out there, that one does not make it to the Console. For good measure, I even tried including a System.err in the constructor and a Logger.getAnonymousLogger.severe in the method; neither of those result in anything.
I should note that this also deploys and runs as expected using an external Tomcat.
I would very much appreciate any input, as it's not likely that I can convince my organization to deploy this to Tomcat nor use the embedded-Tomcat approach (due to politics and an overwhelming existing Glassfish environment).
My test project on Github is here.
This has been answered here: https://stackoverflow.com/a/29438821/508247
There is a bug in Glassfish 3.1.X. You need to include metadata-complete="true" in your web.xml root element.
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<web-app version="3.1"
metadata-complete="true"
xmlns="http://xmlns.jcp.org/xml/ns/javaee"
xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
xsi:schemaLocation="http://xmlns.jcp.org/xml/ns/javaee http://xmlns.jcp.org/xml/ns/javaee/web-app_3_1.xsd">
</web-app>
I had this problem with Payara 5, I understand the problem became from Glassfish.
Versions:
Payara 5.192
Spring Boot 2.1.6
The solution worked for me:
I added this dependency in the pom.xml.
<dependency>
<groupId>org.springframework.boot</groupId>
<artifactId>spring-boot-starter-batch</artifactId>
<version>2.1.4.RELEASE</version>
</dependency>
My glassfish-web configuration:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE glassfish-web-app PUBLIC ...>
<glassfish-web-app error-url="">
<class-loader delegate="true"/>
<jsp-config>
<property name="keepgenerated" value="true">
<description>Keep a copy of the generated servlet class' java code.</description>
</property>
</jsp-config>
<!-- set a friendly context root -->
<context-root>/micuenta-api</context-root>
<!-- Change the default character encoding from ISO-8859-1 to UTF-8 -->
<parameter-encoding default-charset="UTF-8"/>
</glassfish-web-app>

Robolectric #Config path value for manifest

I am trying to run robolectric unit test but I am getting error as AndroidManifest.xml not found on path. Can anyone give me an example path of #Config manifest value. Is it relative path or absolute one?
Thanks in advance
If you are using maven to run your tests you can set as follows:
#Config(manifest = "../app/AndroidManifest.xml")
#RunWith(RobolectricTestRunner.class)
public class SomeTestCase { ... }
Please note that if you are using Android Studio/Intellij and want to run your tests within the IDE you will have to make a change in the Run configuration. In Run->Edit configuration->Defaults->JUnit->Working directory set the value $MODULE_DIR$ and Android Studio will set the relative path in all junits just like Maven.
This worked for me however if the annotation fails, you can also create a file called "org.robolectric.Config.properties" and place it on your classpath.
The file should contain something like the following:
"manifest: ./app/AndroidManifest.xml"
More information can be found here: Configuring Robolectric 2.0
A simple configuration using maven can be found here: Simple Robolectric

Resources