Why are some #media queries stacked like this? Wouldn't it be easier to just keep this kind of stuff all together?
I mean I get why you'd do it based on grouping in your css, but this seems redundant since they are literally inline of each other?
#media (max-width: 767px) {
.visible-xs-block {
display: block !important;
}
}
#media (max-width: 767px) {
.visible-xs-inline {
display: inline !important;
}
}
#media (max-width: 767px) {
.visible-xs-inline-block {
display: inline-block !important;
}
}
Related
This is with #media screen and (max-width:700px) {
https://i.gyazo.com/eab7c69146b5d47f3ce9adefae6e712d.png
When I do #media screen and (min-width:700px) { It gets screwed up. How do I change it to min-width without it messing up?
https://gyazo.com/3c27f20efe29a4cf001bf531dac59405.png
Use this code
#media only screen and (min-width: 700px) {
}
this will surly help you
You can use both min-widht and max-width and also combine them if you want.
min-width example:
#media screen and (min-width: 576px) {
body {
background-color: lightgreen;
}
}
max-width example:
#media screen and (max-width: 767.98px) {
body {
background-color: lightgreen;
}
}
min-width and max-width combination example:
#media (min-width: 576px) and (max-width: 767.98px) {
body {
background-color: lightgreen;
}
}
Note that I used 767.98px for the max-width because the next media rule would be for example #media (min-width: 768px) and (max-width: 991.98px) {}.
Read more about media rules here. You can also view how media rules are used in bootstrap here.
I'm trying to move from Bootstrap to Foundation, but I'm having an issue in trying to identify how to exactly change the breakpoint for the topbar in Foundation. I'm using a a CDN version of the minified CSS for Foundation, so I do NOT have access to the settings SASS file to modify this. Is there a quick CSS override workaround? So far my searches on here, and Google, haven't turned up a working solution.
Import another CSS file below the minified Foundation CSS that will target the topbar
<link rel="stylesheet" href="foundation-min.css">
<link rel="stylesheet" href="override.css">
So, for example, if .topbar has margin: 1px; override it on override.css by setting another margin: 2px; attribute there.
This post will help
https://stackoverflow.com/a/31511646/6294600
Have you checked this one https://zurb.com/university/lessons/change-foundation-s-default-breakpoints
EDIT: a hint here...
look for the .show-for-medium class... I hope you know what to do after that... Don't give up...
#media screen and (max-width: 39.9375em) {
.hide-for-small-only {
display: none !important; } }
#media screen and (max-width: 0em), screen and (min-width: 40em) {
.show-for-small-only {
display: none !important; } }
#media screen and (min-width: 40em) {
.hide-for-medium {
display: none !important; } }
#media screen and (max-width: 39.9375em) {
.show-for-medium {
display: none !important; } }
#media screen and (min-width: 40em) and (max-width: 63.9375em) {
.hide-for-medium-only {
display: none !important; } }
#media screen and (max-width: 39.9375em), screen and (min-width: 64em) {
.show-for-medium-only {
display: none !important; } }
#media screen and (min-width: 64em) {
.hide-for-large {
display: none !important; } }
#media screen and (max-width: 63.9375em) {
.show-for-large {
display: none !important; } }
#media screen and (min-width: 64em) and (max-width: 74.9375em) {
.hide-for-large-only {
display: none !important; } }
#media screen and (max-width: 63.9375em), screen and (min-width: 75em) {
.show-for-large-only {
display: none !important; } }
These parts can be found in
https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/foundation/6.2.3/foundation.css
Change the values, I hope this answers the question. Happy Coding...
LAST BIT OF INFO:
change the min-width size
#media screen and (min-width: 64em) {
.top-bar{
display:none;
}
}
I have the following CSS to align page content within different brower sizes. However or some reason it does not like the first #media statement, in other words changing anything in there does not do anything to the layout. I use http://quirktools.com/screenfly/ to verify the layout.
Changing the sequence of the statements will mess things up as well. I am lost
Your help is greatly appreciated
Thanks
#media (min-width: 500px) and (max-width: 820px) {
CSS HERE
}
#media (min-width: 830px) and (max-width: 1025px) {
CSS HERE
}
#media (min-width: 1026px) and (max-width: 1580px) {
CSS HERE
}
#media (min-width: 1590px) and (max-width: 2000px) {
CSS HERE
}
First you want to define a screen size for anything larger than, from there you make your media queries for the sizes in between.
Here is an example.
/* Large desktop */
#media only screen and (min-width :75.000em) {
.test {
display: none;
}
}
/* Portrait tablet to landscape and desktop */
#media only screen and (min-width :61.250em) and (max-width:74.938em) {
.test {
display: block;
color: #FF0;
}
}
/* Portrait tablet to landscape and desktop */
#media only screen and (min-width :48.000em) and (max-width:61.188em) {
.test {
display: none;
}
}
/* Landscape phone to portrait tablet */
#media only screen and (min-width :30.063em) and ( max-width :47.938em) {
.test {
display: none;
}
}
/* portrait phones and down */
#media only screen and (max-width :30.000em) {
.test {
display: block;
color: #FF0;
}
}
<meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width initial-scale=1" />
Include above code into html to run media query.
You need to set your first one to say "anything smaller than (max-width: 829px), do this"
For EG:
#media (max-width: 829px) {
.bg {background-color:blue;}
}
#media (min-width: 830px) and (max-width: 1025px) {
.bg {background-color:red;}
}
#media (min-width: 1026px) and (max-width: 1580px) {
.bg {background-color:green;}
}
#media (min-width: 1590px) and (max-width: 2000px) {
.bg {background-color:yellow;}
}
See it in effect at this Plunker - I added the bg class to the body so you can see the background change color when you change the frame width.
You can simplify your queries too by saying:
#media (max-width: 829px) {
.bg {background-color:blue;}
}
#media (min-width: 830px){
.bg {background-color:red;}
}
#media (min-width: 1026px) {
.bg {background-color:green;}
}
#media (min-width: 1590px) {
.bg {background-color:yellow;}
}
totally new to media queries and responsive design and I've fallen at the first hurdle.
I have the following:
#media only screen and (max-width: 100px) {
#wrap {
background: #F00;
}
}
#media only screen and (max-width: 500px) {
#wrap {
background: #224466;
}
}
And only the max-width: 500px works in that as I reduce the screen down it changes to the first colour, but as I reduce it further down to below 100px nothing else happens.
Where have I failed?
thanks
SOLUTION:
For anyone else with the same issue, here is the answer as provided by Sean Vieira.
The cascade still applies to active media queries so swapping them around resolves the issue) I also increased it from 100px as suggested by Roy Stanfield as the desktop browser might not go that small.
#media only screen and (max-width: 800px) {
#wrap {
background: #224466;
}
.entry-title {
font-size: 2em;
}
}
#media only screen and (max-width: 400px) {
#wrap {
background: #F00;
}
.entry-title {
font-size: 1em;
}
}
The cascade still applies to active media queries (if I understand it correctly). If you look at what you wrote without the media queries, the problem becomes more evident:
#wrap {
background: #F00;
}
#wrap {
background: #224466;
}
Switching the order should fix the problem:
#media only screen and (max-width: 500px) {
#wrap {
background: #224466;
}
}
#media only screen and (max-width: 100px) {
#wrap {
background: #F00;
}
}
If you are using a normal desktop browser you may not be able to make it smaller than 100px. Try increasing your test widths to larger sizes like 500px and 1000px.
This is because of the ordering in the media queries in CSS.
Either change the order or
Try to put !important over
Use this one http://jsfiddle.net/fidrizers/8Pmuw/
Try using min-width in one of your queries, so it becomes:
#media only screen and (max-width: 100px) {
#wrap {
background: #F00;
}
}
#media only screen and (min-width: 101px) and (max-width: 500px) {
#wrap {
background: #224466;
}
}
Of late, I've been designing sites that are more responsive and I've been using CSS media queries frequently. One pattern I noticed is that the order in which the media queries are defined actually matters. I didn't test it in every single browser, but just on Chrome. Is there an explanation for this behaviour? Sometimes it gets frustrating when your site doesn't work as it should and you are unsure if it's the query or the order in which the query is written.
Here's an example:
HTML
<body>
<div class="one"><h1>Welcome to my website</h1></div>
<div class="two">Contact us</div>
</body>
CSS:
body{
font-size:1em; /* 16px */
}
.two{margin-top:2em;}
/* Media Queries */
#media (max-width: 480px) {
.body{font-size: 0.938em;}
}
/* iphone */
#media only screen and (-webkit-min-device-pixel-ratio: 2) {
body {font-size: 0.938em;}
}
/*if greater than 1280x800*/
#media (min-width: 1200px) {
.two{margin-top:8em;}
}
/*1024x600*/
#media (max-height: 600px) {
.two{margin-top:4em;}
}
/*1920x1024*/
#media (min-height: 1020px) {
.two{margin-top:9em;}
}
/*1366x768*/
#media (min-height: 750px) and (max-height: 770px) {
.two{margin-top:7em;}
}
However, If I wrote the query for 1024x600 in the last, the browser would ignore it and apply the margin value specified in the starting of the CSS (margin-top:2em).
/* Media Queries - Re-arranged version */
#media (max-width: 480px) {
.body{font-size: 0.938em;}
}
/* iphone */
#media only screen and (-webkit-min-device-pixel-ratio: 2) {
body {font-size: 0.938em;}
}
/*if greater than 1280x800*/
#media (min-width: 1200px) {
.two{margin-top:8em;}
}
/*1920x1024*/
#media (min-height: 1020px) {
.two{margin-top:9em;}
}
/*1366x768*/
#media (min-height: 750px) and (max-height: 770px) {
.two{margin-top:7em;}
}
/*1024x600*/
#media (max-height: 600px) {
.two{margin-top:4em;}
}
If my understanding of media queries are correct, the order shouldn't matter, but it seems it does. What could be the reason?
That's by design of CSS — Cascading Style Sheet.
It means that, if you apply two rules that collide to the same elements, it will choose the last one that was declared, unless the first one has the !important marker or is more specific (e.g. html > body vs just body, the latter is less specific).
So, given this CSS
#media (max-width: 600px) {
body {
background: red;
}
}
#media (max-width: 400px) {
body {
background: blue;
}
}
if the browser window is 350 pixels wide, the background will be blue, while with this CSS
#media (max-width: 400px) {
body {
background: blue;
}
}
#media (max-width: 600px) {
body {
background: red;
}
}
and the same window width, the background will be red. Both rules are indeed matched, but the second one it's the one that is applied because is the last rule.
Finally, with
#media (max-width: 400px) {
body {
background: blue !important;
}
}
#media (max-width: 600px) {
body {
background: red;
}
}
or
#media (max-width: 400px) {
html > body {
background: blue;
}
}
#media (max-width: 600px) {
body {
background: red;
}
}
the background will be blue (with a 350 pixels wide window).
Or you could just add min-width to the bigger media query/ies and not have any issues, regardless of the order.
#media (min-width: 400.1px) and (max-width: 600px) {
body {
background: red;
}
}
#media (max-width: 400px) {
body {
background: blue;
}
}
Using this code, in any order, the background-color will always be red for resolutions with a width of 400.1px-600px, and will always be blue for resolutions with a width of 400px or less.