I've created a lookup with two columns, first one containing and integer which works just fine but the second one has a long name and this is where the problem arises. Users should horizontally scroll in order to check the entire string and even in that case, the column's width is not big enough to display the whole data.
I've found this :
Adjusting column width on form control lookup
But i don't understand exactly where and what to add.
I am not sure but maybe I have to add the fact that this lookup is used on a menu item which points to an SSRS report, in the parameters section.
Update 1:
I got it working with a lookup form called like this :
Args args;
FormRun formRun;
;
args = new Args();
args.name(formstr(LookupOMOperatingUnit));
args.caller(_control);
formRun = classfactory.formRunClass(args);
formRun.init();
_control.performFormLookup(formRun);
and in the init method of this form i added:
public void init()
{
super();
element.selectMode(OMOperatingUnit_OMOperatingUnitNumber);
}
meaning the field i really need.
I am not sure i understand the mechanism completely but it seems it knows how to return this exact field to the DialogField from where it really started.
In order to make it look like a lookup, i have kept the style of the Design as Auto but changed the WindowType to Popup, HideToolBar to Yes and Frame to Border.
Probably the best route is do a custom lookup and change the extended data type of the key field to reflect that. In this way the change is reflected in all places. See form FiscalCalendarYearLookup and EDT FiscalYearName as an example of that.
If you only need to change a single place, the easy option is to override performFormLookup on the calling form. You should also override the DisplayLength property of the extended data type of the long field.
public void performFormLookup(FormRun _form, FormStringControl _formControl)
{
FormGridControl grid = _form.control(_form.controlId('grid'));
grid.autoSizeColumns(false);
super(_form,_formControl);
}
This will not help you unless you have a form, which may not be the case in this report scenario.
Starting in AX 2009 the kernel by default auto-updates the control sizes based on actual record content. This was a cause of much frustration as the sizes was small when there was no records and these sizes were saved! Also the performance of the auto-update was initially bad in some situations. As an afterthought the grid control autoSizeColumns method was provided but it was unfortunately never exposed as a property.
you can extends the sysTableLookup class and override the buildFromGridDesign method to set the grid control width.
protected void buildFormGridDesign(FormBuildGridControl _formBuildGridControl)
{
if (gridWidth > 0)
{
_formBuildGridControl.allowEdit(true);
_formBuildGridControl.showRowLabels(false);
_formBuildGridControl.widthMode(2);
_formBuildGridControl.width(gridWidth);
}
else
{
super(_formBuildGridControl);
}
}
Related
I am new to vaadin and have a databinding problem. I have posted allready in the vaadin forum, but no answer up to now.
if you answer here, I will of course reward it anyway.
https://vaadin.com/forum/-/message_boards/view_message/1057226
thanks in advance.
greets,
Andreas
Additional information: I tried allready to iterate over the items in the container, after pressing a save button. After deleting all original elements in the model collection, and adding copies from the container, the GUI breaks. Some other GUI elements do not respond anymore.
I have personally never used ListSelect, but I found this from the API docs:
This is a simple list select without, for instance, support for new items, lazyloading, and other advanced features.
I'd recommend BeanItemContainer. You can use it like this:
// Create a list of Strings
List<String> strings = new ArrayList<String>();
strings.add("Hello");
// Create a BeanItemContainer and include strings list
final BeanItemContainer<String> container = new BeanItemContainer<String>(strings);
container.addBean("World");
// Create a ListSelect and make BeanItemContainer its data container
ListSelect select = new ListSelect("", container);
// Create a button that adds "!" to the list
Button button = new Button("Add to list", new Button.ClickListener() {
public void buttonClick(ClickEvent event) {
container.addBean("!");
}
}
// Add the components to a layout
myLayout.addComponent(button);
myLayout.addComponent(select);
The downside (or benefit, it depends :) of this is that you can't add duplicate entries to a BeanItemContainer. In the example above the exclamation mark gets only added once.
You can get a Collection of Strings by calling:
Collection<String> strings = container.getItemIds();
If you need to support duplicate entries, take a look at IndexedContainer. With IndexedContainer you can add a String property by calling myIndexedContainer.addContainerProperty("caption", String.class, ""); and give each Item a unique itemId (or let the container generate the id's automatically).
Im not sure I understand your problem but I belive that it might be that you haven't told the controller to repaint. You do this be setting the datasource like this after the save event has occured.
listSelect.setContainerDataSource(listSelect.getContainerDataSource());
I need to add an additional field to InventJournalTrans, that after posting will show up in the InventTrans table. The field is a reference column to a record in another table. What method(s) do I need to modify to make this behavior happen?
Currently, I have already added the fields to both tables and modified the Form to allow the user to enter and save the new field. I just can't seem to find the bottom of the rabbit hole on where the actual posting to InventTrans is occurring.
Ideally, it should just be a:
inventTrans.ReasonRefRecId = inventJournalTrans.ReasonRefRecId;
assignment statement before the
inventTrans.insert();
call. Anybody have a clue on where this is at?
The link above does contain the solution -- I have included the code from that page in case that page disappears or no longer becomes available. Thanks to gl00mie for answering on that site and providing this answer.
You should create a new InventMovement method like this:
public MyNewFieldType myNewField()
{
return MyNewFieldType::DefaultValue; // suppose your new field is an enum
}
Then modify \Classes\InventMovement\initInventTransFromBuffer
void initInventTransFromBuffer(InventTrans _inventTrans, InventMovement _movement_orig)
{
// ... append this line to the end of whatever else is already in this method
_inventTrans.MyNewField = this.myNewField();
}
And finally overload the new method in the InventMov_Journal class:
public MyNewFieldType myNewField()
{
return inventJournalTrans.MyNewField;
}
There are a few posts about this, but after hours of searching I still can't find what I need.
The answer in the following post almost gets me what I want:
Combobox for Foreign Key in DataGridView
Question 1:
Going off that example where a Product has many Licenses, my database mappings are all many-to-one relationships which means my License class holds a reference to the Product class. The License class does not have a property for the ProductId since that can be retrieved via the Product reference. I don't want to muck up the License class with both a reference to Product and a ProductId property just to make binding in the UI easier.
Because of this I can't set the DataPropertyName to an Id field. It needs to be the class reference name like so:
DataGridViewComboBoxColumn dataGridViewComboBoxColumn =
(DataGridViewComboBoxColumn)myDataGridView.Columns("LicenseComboBoxColumn");
dataGridViewComboBoxColumn.DataPropertyName = "License"; // not LicenseID
****Update****
I was able to get this to partially work without creating the ProductId property by specifying the Product.Id as the DataPropertyName like so:
dataGridViewComboBoxColumn.DataPropertyName = "License.Id";
However, when doing so, it broke databinding which caused me to manually get and set the cell value.
I've also seen posts about binding to the DataGridView cell, but databinding breaks when I do that and the datasource itself is never updated:
// populate the combo box with Products for each License
foreach (DataGridViewRow row in myDataGridViewProducts.Rows)
{
IProduct myProduct = row.DataBoundItem as IProduct;
DataGridViewComboBoxCell cell = (DataGridViewComboBoxCell)row.Cells("myProductCol");
cell.DataSource = getListOfILicenseObjectsFromDao(myProduct.Id);
cell.Value = myProduct.License.Id;
}
Maybe I'm doing something wrong, or maybe there's a different way. Can anyone help here?
Question 2:
How do I display a different list of Licenses for each Product?
In other words, the combobox list of Licenses will be different for each Product in the grid. I'd like to do this using databinding so I don't have to get and set the values myself.
I found the answer myself. I had this same issue a while ago and found the solution in some old code I dug up. The solution was to add a Self property to the object I wanted to databind to in the combobox (in the example above it would be the License class) and use that property as the ValueMember like so:
foreach (DataGridViewRow row in myDataGridViewProducts.Rows)
{
IProduct myProduct = row.DataBoundItem as IProduct;
DataGridViewComboBoxCell cell = (DataGridViewComboBoxCell)row.Cells("myProductCol");
cell.DataSource = getListOfILicenseObjectsFromDao(myProduct.Id);
cell.DataPropertyName = "License";
cell.DisplayMember = "Name";
cell.ValueMember = "Self"; // key to getting the databinding to work
// no need to set cell.Value anymore!
}
The License class now looks like this:
Public class License
{
public string Name
{
get; set;
}
public ILicense Self
{
get { return this; }
}
// ... more properties
}
Granted I had to "muck" up the Business classes with a property named Self, but that's much better (less confusing to the programmer) than having both a reference to License and a LicenseId property in the Product class IMO. Plus it keeps the UI code much much simpler as there's no need to manually get and set the values - just databind and done.
Is there a way to bind data to a list and/or a table using the groovy swing builder bind syntax? I could only find simple examples that bind simple properties like strings and numbers to a text field, label, or button text.
Had a look round, and the best I could see was using GlazedLists rather than standard Swing lists
http://www.jroller.com/aalmiray/entry/glazedlists_groovy_not_your_regular
There is a GlazedList plugin. And this article is very helpful. The Griffon guys swear by GlazedLists.
I just did something like this--it's really not that hard to do manually. It's still a work in progress, but if it helps anyone I can give what I have. So far it binds the data in both directions (Updating the data updates the component, editing the table updates the data and sends a notification to any propertyChangeListeners of the "Row")
I used a class to define one row of a table. You create this class to define the nature of your table. It looks something like this:
class Row
{
// allows the table to listen for changes and user code to see when the table is edited
#Bindable
// The name at the top of the column
#PropName("Col 1")
String c1
#Bindable
// In the annotation I set the default editable to "false", here I'll make c2 editable.
// This annotation can (and should) be expanded to define more column properties.
#PropName(value="Col 2", editable=true)
String c2
}
Note that once the rest of the code is packaged up in a class, this "Row" class is the ONLY thing that needs to be created to create a new table. You create instances of this class for each row, add them to the table and you are completely done--no other gui work aside from getting the table into a frame.
This class could include quite a bit more code--I intend to have it contain a thread that polls a database and updates the bound properties, then the table should pick up the changes instantly.
In order to provide custom column properties I defined an annotation that looks like this (I plan to add more):
#Retention(RetentionPolicy.RUNTIME)
#Target(ElementType.FIELD)
public #interface PropName {
String value();
boolean editable() default false
}
The rest is a class that builds the table. I keep it in a separate class so it can be reused (by instantiating it with a different "Row" class)
NOTE: I butchered this as I pasted it in so it may not run without a little work (braces probably). It used to include a frame which I removed to just include the table. You need to wrap the table returned from getTable() in a frame..
public class AutoTable<T>
{
SwingBuilder builder // This way external code can access the table
def values=[] // holds the "Row" objects
PropertyChangeListener listener={repaint()} as PropertyChangeListener
def AutoTable(Class<T> clazz)
{
builder = new SwingBuilder()
builder.build{
table(id:'table') {
tableModel(id:'tableModel') {
clazz.declaredFields.findAll{
it.declaredAnnotations*.annotationType().contains(PropName.class)}.each {
def annotation=it.declaredAnnotations.find{it.annotationType()==PropName.class
}
String n=annotation.value()
propertyColumn(header:n, propertyName:it.name, editable:annotation.editable())
}
}
tableModel.rowsModel.value=values
}
}
// Use this to get the table so it can be inserted into a container
def getTable() {
return builder.table
}
def add(T o) {
values.add(o)
o.addPropertyChangeListener(listener)
}
def remove(T o) {
o.removePropertyChangeListener(listener)
values.remove(o)
}
def repaint() {
builder.doLater{
builder.table.repaint();
}
}
}
There is probably a way to do this without the add/remove by exposing a bindable list but it seemed like more work without a lot of benifit.
At some point I'll probably put the finished class up somewhere--if you have read this far and are still interested, reply in a comment and I'll be sure to do it sooner rather than later.
I have a question regarding a data binding(of multiple properties) for custom DataGridViewColumn.
Here is a schema of what controls that I have, and I need to make it bindable with DataGridView datasource. Any ideas or a link to an article discussing the matter?
Controls
Graph Control(custom): Displayed in
the custrom DataGridView column. Has
properties like "Start Date",
"EndDate", Windows Chart control,
which is itself, bindable, etc.
Custom cell(DataGridViewCustomCell inherits
from DataGridViewCell) that holds
the Graph control and processes some
events(OnEnter event, for example,
passes the focus to the custom Graph
column for drag-n-drop type of
events, etc.)
Custom column(DataGridViewCustomColumn
inherits from DataGridViewColumn)
that defined the cell template type:
CellTemplate = new
DataGridViewCustomCell(); and also a
primary choice for data binding
Data Structure:
Main table to be displayed in other DataGridView Columns
Graph table - related to the Main table via parent-child relationship. Holds graph data
Chart table related to the graph table via parent-child relationship. Holds data for the win-form chart, which is a part of my Graph control.
So far I cannot even bind data from the Graph table to by Graph control or Graph-holding Column/Cell.
Thank you for your answer. My data sources is not a SQL data source, and as a matter of fact I was talking about datagridview for win-forms(I'm not sure that was clear).
As I did not get the reply on any of the forums I was asking the question, I figured, I would outline a solution I came up with, for those who may have a similar problem and for possible critique. :-)
(steps 1-2 are also explained in the famous MS example)
1. Create your own classes that inherit from DataGridViewColumn and DataGridViewCell, setup the column template;
2. Create your "CustomEdit" control
In the data item, whatever that is, a DataRow, or a List item, add a read-only property, that return the object itself. This property is bound to the custom column.
Custom Cell:
public partial class MyCell : DataGridViewCell
{
protected override void Paint(...)
{...} // draws control
// receives data item as a value
// in my case I have to custom-draw entire control in this fnc.
public override void InitializeEditingControl(...)
{...} // initialize control editing
// override some other properties
public override Type EditType {
get{
return typeof(MyEditControl);
}
}
public override Type ValueType{
get{
return typeof(MyItem);
}
}
}
Custom Column:
public partial class MyColumn : DataGridViewColumn
{
public MyColumn(){ ...
CellTemplate = new MyCell();
}
}
Edit Control:
public partial class MyEditControl : UserControl, IDataGridViewEditingControl
{... // implements IDataGridViewEditingControl
// value is our data item
}
Data Item, the data sources becomes List<MyItem>
public class MyItem:Object{
...
[XmlIgnore] // I need it because I do serialization
public MyItem Self {
get {
return this;
}
}
}
See my question Here
It's easy to do, you just don't use the IDE to do it, you do it all in code. It's a lot of work, but it's not that difficult if you know what your doing. I went from knowing nothing to being able to do it in less than a day so I'm sure you'll be able to do it.
Edit: you can also use a Join in the sql that populates the datagridview