When attempting to access the Waypoints Sequence Extensions API, the credentials I use for my trial account fail to authenticate.
These same credentials work on multiple other parts of the API.
Why is this ?
Platform Extensions must be specifically whitelisted for your application credentials. These requests take a lot of processing power and because of that they can't be enabled by default as much as I know.
You have to contact us and request for WSE whitelisting.
Related
I have an web application made using servlet and I have an seperate API for the web application. I want to secure the API with OAuth so that when we use OAuth, a client certificate is sent instead of credentials to the authorization server for verification and after verification the access should be allowed to the API. Is there any ways to implement this authentication. If possible what are the steps should I do to achieve this?
Client certificate credentials can be used for confidential clients, in either the code flow or the client credentials flow. This type of solution is often used in financial grade setups, where high worth data is involved.
Access tokens issued then contain a cnf claim, so that every API call is bound to the strong credential used at the time of authentication. See the RFC8705 standard for further details.
For a worked end-to-end example that you can run locally, and which covers both the
backend and client behaviours, see this Curity code example. Not all authorization servers support these flows, so check for your provider.
We currently use WSO2 Api Manager to reach some backends.
The thing is, the consumer must :
First authenticate to the API Manager (Oauth)
Then authenticate to the Backend api (Whatever security in place, as options provided by API Manager to handle it itself is quite poor)
Make the call
I find it heavy :
Many calls just to do one real call.
Loose the "loose coupling" advantage API Managers should provide
Do you think we are doing right ? Shouldn't Api Managers deal with backend authentication ?
Thanks in advance for your help !
This depends on how you want to do this. It is not mandatory to have Oauth2 protection and backend authentication. This can be done in the following ways.
If you want only to allow backend authentication
Then you can set the Authentication type to None. Then Oauth2 won't apply. - https://wso2.com/blogs/cloud/oauth-and-authentication-type-application-vs-application-user/
You can allow Oauth2 only
If your backend is insecure and needs a way to expose, this is the best option.
If you need both authentications
There can be some cases that your backend is used by some other parties and there is no option to remove backend authentication. Also, you need the Oauth2 protection for the API and make it secure in API gateway level. Then this is the option.
Hope this is clear. WSO2 has these capabilities and you can chose any option.
I have a uwp application and an ASP Core server application. I want to perform Get and Post requests to the ASP server and I want to perform authorization on the server side.
According to the team, they don't want you to use Basic authentication nor seems there be a way to perform digest Authentication. I don't want my client app to show the user any ui: it should be able to perform a secure request by itself.
So: what is the most easy and secure protocol to use to perform api requests from UWP to an ASP Core server?
what is the most easy and secure protocol to use to perform api requests from UWP to an ASP Core server?
I'd like to say this is a open question and I will give some suggestions and hope it can help you. Basic authentication and digest authentication you mentioned are defined in rfc2617. Since you don't want to use them, besides HTTP Basic/Digest you may have other choices like OAuth, HMAC and Azure API Management.
Since you don't want the user to input username and password, to request an access token for authentication may meet your requirements. So I recommend you to use OAuth authentication which is popular. More details about OAuth2.0 please reference this. But it requires OAuth server, it may not be a easiest way.
Another way you can apply HMAC authentication to secure Web Api. HMAC authentication uses a secret key for each consumer. For more details about HMAC authentication please reference this thread. For more details about HMAC in uwp please reference MACs, hashes, and signatures.
You can also use third party tools from Azure. Azure API management can help secure and optimize your APIs. Details please reference the Publishing and securing access to REST APIs in uwp.
Reading this question, #Pinpoint's answer and the further discussion on comments, I'm well aware that natively we can't add an identity provider to our apps developed with ASP.NET 5. One possible replacement for the legacy OAuthAuthorizationServerMiddleware is then provided by the AspNet.Security.OpenIdConnect.Server as I've found in many places.
Now, there is one point that I'm still unsure about all this because I'm really not an expert in security, so my knowledge about OAuth is not very deep. My doubt is the following: is it possible to use an external identity provider when using OAuth to protect one RESTful API?
Notice that I'm not talking about adding social login to one website, I'm talking about using one external identity provider in one RESTful API.
My point is, this makes me a little confused yet, because I always thought this should be a concern of my app.
So my question here is: when using OAuth and ASP.NET 5, is it possible to use an external identity provider, other than implementing one? If it is possible, how this works in short? I mean, my app still needs to be able to manage the identities of users, in the sense that it needs to manage claims and so on.
In that case, if it is really possible, how the flow would be? The external identity provider should issue the tokens? But how my app would be able to verify those tokens and manage users identities?
EDIT: One of the reasons I feel unsure about that is that when we use the UseOAuthAuthentication extension method, we set up one callback path which is described as
The request path within the application's base path where the user-agent will be returned. The middleware will process this request when it arrives.
Now, if we are developing a site, then this really does make sense. The person goes there, click a button to login with a provider like Facebook. The user is redirected to Facebook's page and then after he logs in, he is redirected to some page of the site.
On the other hand, with a RESTful API this is meaningless. There is no notion of being redirected.
This makes it seems that the usage of external providers is only for sites and not for RESTful API's. This is the main point of my question.
My doubt is the following: is it possible to use an external identity provider when using OAuth to protect one RESTful API?
Yes, it's definitely possible. This is exactly what you do when you use Azure Active Directory to protect your API endpoints:
app.UseOAuthBearerAuthentication(options => {
options.AutomaticAuthenticate = true;
options.Authority = "https://login.windows.net/tushartest.onmicrosoft.com";
options.Audience = "https://TusharTest.onmicrosoft.com/TodoListService-ManualJwt";
});
The next legitimate question is: if you can use the tokens issued by AAD to protect your API, why couldn't you do the same thing with Facebook or Google tokens?
Unlike Facebook or Google, AAD issues completely standardized tokens named JWT tokens that the OAuth2 bearer middleware can "read" and "verify" to determine whether the token is still valid and was really issued for your API (i.e if the audience attached with the token corresponds to your API. You can control this value using the resource parameter when making your authorization request).
You can't do something similar with FB or Google tokens, since they are totally opaque. Actually, it's not really surprising since these tokens have only one objective: allowing you to query FB or Google APIs, not your own ones (these social providers don't allow to set the audience of the access token).
Since you can't read the token yourself, the only option is to ask FB or Google whether it is still valid to make sure your API doesn't accept invalid tokens. That's something you can (easily) do with Facebook as they offer a "token inspection endpoint" you can query for that: https://developers.facebook.com/docs/facebook-login/manually-build-a-login-flow (see the Inspecting access tokens chapter). This way, you can ensure the token is not expired and determine the user corresponding to the token.
Sadly, this approach has two downsides:
You have to make an extra HTTP call to the Facebook endpoint to validate the access token, which implies caching received tokens to avoid flooding Facebook with too many requests.
As the access token is not issued for your own API, you MUST absolutely ensure that the access token was issued to a client application you fully trust, or it will allow any third party developer to use his own FB/Google tokens with your API without having to request user's consent. This is - obviously - a major security concern.
You can find more information in the last part of this SO answer (it's for Katana and about Dropbox, but you should get the idea): OWIN/OAuth2 3rd party login: Authentication from Client App, Authorization from Web API
So my question here is: when using OAuth and ASP.NET 5, is it possible to use an external identity provider, other than implementing one? If it is possible, how this works in short? I mean, my app still needs to be able to manage the identities of users, in the sense that it needs to manage claims and so on.
In that case, if it is really possible, how the flow would be? The external identity provider should issue the tokens? But how my app would be able to verify those tokens and manage users identities?
To work around the limitations mentioned in the previous part, the best option is - as you've already figured out - to create your own authorization/authentication server. This way, your API doesn't (directly) accept FB or Google tokens but the tokens issued by your own server, that can possibly redirect your users to FB or Google for authentication.
This is exactly what this sample does: https://github.com/aspnet-contrib/AspNet.Security.OpenIdConnect.Server/tree/vNext/samples/Mvc
The user is invited by the client application (Mvc.Client) to authenticate with your authorization server (Mvc.Server) so he can get an access token to later query the API (also in Mvc.Server). For that, the user is redirected to your authorization server, which itself offers you to authenticate with Google or Twitter.
When this external authentication step is done, the user is redirected back to your authorization server (Mvc.Server), where he's asked to give his consent for the client app (Mvc.Client) to access his personal data.
When the consent is given, the user is redirected back to the client application with the access token you can use to query the API endpoint.
I built a wcf rest service with form authentication. All the settings are set in config file. This service needs to be consumed by android client. So can any body please tell me how to send the request with log in credential to the rest service which is implemented using forms authentication.
Note: I know by implementing custom login service method we can validate the client and pass the cookie for the wcf rest method to authenticate.
I am looking for different solution like in single request we pass the credentials it validates the user with membership and gives the response. Please let us know if u need any further information.
This is a very broad question, so it will be difficult to answer completely. For the WCF side, you can follow this: How to Consume WCF Service with Android. The idea is to return a token, or session, ID when the user successfully authenticates in the system, and each subsequent request uses this token to identify itself. That approach uses SOAP, but you can also use REST too, which REST may be easier to consume in an Android client (REST worked great for me).
See this post, Need advice on authentication for android client connecting to the WCF Rest setup, for more guidance on the setup too. When I setup my authentication mechanism, I did a lot of research online to figure out the best approach to take. A lot of people mentioned just use OAuth 2, and make sure you are using HTTPS communication. So if you can use OAuth or Facebook/Twitter/Google+ for authenticating, that would be a good approach and take a lot of the headaches away.