I need to fill backwards the historical prices knowing the returns (in real situation they are simulated).
So far I have this code:
library(quantmod)
getSymbols("AAPL")
df = AAPL["2014-01-01/2015-01-01", "AAPL.Close"]
df_ret = diff(log(df),1)
# imagine the half of the past prices are missing
df["2014-01-01/2014-07-01"] = NA
df_tot = cbind(df, df_ret)
fillBackwards = function(data, range_to_fill){
index_array = index(data[range_to_fill,])
data_out = data
for (i in (length(index_array)-1):1){
inx = index_array[i]
inx_0 = index_array[i+1]
data_out[inx,1] = exp(-(data_out[inx_0,2]))*(data_out[inx_0,1])
}
return (data_out)
}
df_filled = fillBackwards(df_tot,"2014-01-01/2014-07-02")
sum(AAPL["2014-01-01/2015-01-01", "AAPL.Close"] - df_filled[,1]) # zero up to computation error, i.e. identical
This works perfect, but a bit slow. Could you please suggest something using build-in rollapply()
# i want something like this
df_filled = rollapply(df_tot["2014-07-02/2014-01-01",], by=-1, function(x) {....})
You don't need rollapply, or a loop. You can use cumprod on the returns. Here's a version of fillBackwards that uses cumprod:
fillBackwards <- function(data, range_to_fill) {
data_range <- data[range_to_fill,]
returns <- rev(coredata(data_range[-1L, 2L]))
last_price <- drop(coredata(last(data_range[, 1L])))
new_prices <- rev(last_price * cumprod(exp(-returns)))
data[range_to_fill, 1L] <- c(last_price, new_prices)
return(data)
}
Related
I am using seurat to analyze some scRNAseq data, I have managed to put all the SCT integration one line codes from satijalab into a function with basically
SCT_normalization <- function (f1, f2) {
f_merge <- merge (f1, y=f2)
f.list <- SplitObject(f_merge, split.by = "stim")
f.list <- lapply(X = f.list, FUN = SCTransform)
features <- SelectIntegrationFeatures(object.list = f.list, nfeatures = 3000)
f.list <<- PrepSCTIntegration(object.list = f.list, anchor.features = features)
return (f.list)
}
so that I will have f.list in the global environment for downstream analysis and making plots. The problem I am running into is that, every time I run the function, the output would be f.list, I want it to be specific to the input value name (i.e., f1 and/or f2). Basically something that I can set so that I would know which input value was used to generate the final output. I saw something using the assign function but someone wrote a warning about "the evil and wrong..." so I am not sure as to how to approach this.
From what it sounds like you don't need to use the super assign function <<-. In my opinion, I don't think <<- should be used as it can cause unexpected changes in objects. This is what I assume the other person was saying. For example, if you have the following function:
AverageVector <- function(v) x <<- mean(v, rm.na = TRUE)
Now you're trying to find the average of a vector you have, along with more analysis
library(tidyverse)
x <- unique(iris$Species)
avg_sl <- AverageVector(iris$Sepal.Length)
Now where x used to be a character vector, it's not a numeric vector with a length of 1.
So I would remove the <<- and call your function like this
object_list_1_2 <- SCT_normalize(object1, object2)
If you wanted a slightly more programatic way you could do something like this to keep track of objects you could do something like this:
SCT_normalization <- function(f1, f2) {
f_merge <- merge (f1, y = f2)
f.list <- SplitObject(f_merge, split.by = "stim")
f.list <- lapply(X = f.list, FUN = SCTransform)
features <- SelectIntegrationFeatures(object.list = f.list, nfeatures = 3000)
f.list <- PrepSCTIntegration(object.list = f.list, anchor.features = features)
to_return <- list(inputs = list(f1, f2), normalized = f.list)
return(to_return)
}
I have a data set where I want to calculate the 6 month return of stocks with tq_get (see example below)
Dataset called top
ticker 6month
AKO.A
BIG
BGFV
Function
library(tidyverse)
library(dplyr)
library(tidyquant)
library(riingo)
calculate <- function (x) {
(tq_get(x, get = "tiingo", from = yesterday, to = yesterday)$adjusted/tq_get(x, get = "tiingo", from = before, to = before)$adjusted)-1
}
top[2] <- lapply(top[1], function(x) calculate(x))
Unfortunately for some of the tickers there is no value existing which results in error message when simply using lapply or mutate as the resulting vector is smaller (less rows) then the existing dataset. Resolving with try_catch did not worked.
I now wanted to apply a work around by checking with is_supported_ticker() provided by the package riingo if the ticker is available
calculate <- function (x) {
if (is_supported_ticker(x, type = "tiingo") == TRUE) {
(tq_get(x, get = "tiingo", from = yesterday, to = yesterday)$adjusted/tq_get(x, get = "tiingo", from = before, to = before)$adjusted)-1
}
else {
NA
}
}
top[2] <- lapply(top[1], function(x) calculate(x))
But now I receive the error message x ticker must be length 1, but is actually length 3.
I assume this is based on the fact that the whole first column of my dataset is used as input for is_supported_ticker() instead of row by row. How can I resolve this issue?
Glancing at the documentation, it looks like tq_get supports multiple symbols, only if_supported_ticker goes one at a time. So probably you should check all the tickers to see if they are supported, and then use tq_get once on all the supported ones. Something like this (untested, as I don't have any of these packages):
calculate <- function (x) {
supported = sapply(x, is_supported_ticker, type = "tiingo")
result = rep(NA, length(x))
result[supported] =
(
tq_get(x[supported], get = "tiingo", from = yesterday, to = yesterday)$adjusted /
tq_get(x[supported], get = "tiingo", from = before, to = before)$adjusted
) - 1
return(result)
}
It worries me that before and yesterday aren't function arguments - they're just assumed to be there in the global environment. I'd suggest passing them in as arguments to calculate(), like this:
calculate <- function (x, before, yesterday) {
supported = sapply(x, is_supported_ticker, type = "tiingo")
result = rep(NA, length(x))
result[supported] =
(
tq_get(x[supported], get = "tiingo", from = yesterday, to = yesterday)$adjusted /
tq_get(x[supported], get = "tiingo", from = before, to = before)$adjusted
) - 1
return(result)
}
# then calling it
calculate(top$ticker, before = <...>, yesterday = <...>)
This way you can pass values in for before and yesterday on the fly. If they are objects in your global environment, you can simply use calculate(top$ticker, before, yesterday), but it gives you freedom to vary those arguments without redefining those names in your global environment.
library(quantmod)
library(xts)
getSymbols("SY1.DE", from = "2019-4-10", to = "2019-4-19", auto.assign = TRUE)
getSymbols("PEP", from = "2019-4-9", to = "2019-4-19", auto.assign = TRUE)
calcreturn <- function(data, amount = 24) {
start <- as.numeric(data[,4][1])
end <- as.numeric(data[,4][nrow(data)])
difference <- end - start
winning <- difference * amount
return(winning)
}
allstocks <- list(SY1.DE, PEP)
amount <- list(24, 23)
lapply(allstocks, calcreturn)
Hello everbody!
This is my code to calculate my returns for my stocks. However, the amount of stocks i bought differ, so lapply does only work when the amount argument does not change. Is there a day to deal with changing arguments?
Thank you!
You can modify your lapply to run over an index pairing one by one stock with amount:
lapply(1:length(allstocks), function(x) calcreturn(allstocks[[x]], amount[[x]]))
uniq <- unique(file[,12])
pdf("SKAT.pdf")
for(i in 1:length(uniq)) {
dat <- subset(file, file[,12] == uniq[i])
names <- paste("Sample_filtered_on_", uniq[i], sep="")
qq.chisq(-2*log(as.numeric(dat[,10])), df = 2, main = names, pvals = T,
sub=subtitle)
}
dev.off()
file[,12] is an integer so I convert it to a factor when I'm trying to run it with by instead of a for loop as follows:
pdf("SKAT.pdf")
by(file, as.factor(file[,12]), function(x) { qq.chisq(-2*log(as.numeric(x[,10])), df = 2, main = paste("Sample_filtered_on_", file[1,12], sep=""), pvals = T, sub=subtitle) } )
dev.off()
It works fine to sort the data frame by this (now a factor) column. My problem is that for the plot title, I want to label it with the correct index from that column. This is easy to do in the for loop by uniq[i]. How do I do this in a by function?
Hope this makes sense.
A more vectorized (== cooler?) version would pull the common operations out of the loop and let R do the book-keeping about unique factor levels.
dat <- split(-2 * log(as.numeric(file[,10])), file[,12])
names(dat) <- paste0("IoOPanos_filtered_on_pc_", names(dat))
(paste0 is a convenience function for the common use case where normally one would use paste with the argument sep=""). The for loop is entirely appropriate when you're running it for its side effects (plotting pretty pictures) rather than trying to capture values for further computation; it's definitely un-cool to use T instead of TRUE, while seq_along(dat) means that your code won't produce unexpected results when length(dat) == 0.
pdf("SKAT.pdf")
for(i in seq_along(dat)) {
vals <- dat[[i]]
nm <- names(dat)[[i]]
qq.chisq(val, main = nm, df = 2, pvals = TRUE, sub=subtitle)
}
dev.off()
If you did want to capture values, the basic observation is that your function takes 2 arguments that vary. So by or tapply or sapply or ... are not appropriate; each of these assume that just a single argument is varying. Instead, use mapply or the comparable Map
Map(qq.chisq, dat, main=names(dat),
MoreArgs=list(df=2, pvals=TRUE, sub=subtitle))
I came across this function a while back that was created for fixing PCA values. The problem with the function was that it wasn't compatible xts time series objects.
amend <- function(result) {
result.m <- as.matrix(result)
n <- dim(result.m)[1]
delta <- apply(abs(result.m[-1,] - result.m[-n,]), 1, sum)
delta.1 <- apply(abs(result.m[-1,] + result.m[-n,]), 1, sum)
signs <- c(1, cumprod(rep(-1, n-1) ^ (delta.1 <= delta)))
zoo(result * signs)
}
Full sample can be found https://stats.stackexchange.com/questions/34396/im-getting-jumpy-loadings-in-rollapply-pca-in-r-can-i-fix-it
The problem is that applying the function on a xts object with multiple columns and rows wont solve the problem. Is there a elegant way of applying the algorithm for a matrix of xts objects?
My current solution given a single column with multiple row is to loop through row by row...which is slow and tedious. Imagine having to do it column by column also.
Thanks,
Here is some code to get one started:
rm(list=ls())
require(RCurl)
sit = getURLContent('https://github.com/systematicinvestor/SIT/raw/master/sit.gz', binary=TRUE, followlocation = TRUE, ssl.verifypeer = FALSE)
con = gzcon(rawConnection(sit, 'rb'))
source(con)
close(con)
load.packages('quantmod')
data <- new.env()
tickers<-spl("VTI,IEF,VNQ,TLT")
getSymbols(tickers, src = 'yahoo', from = '1980-01-01', env = data, auto.assign = T)
for(i in ls(data)) data[[i]] = adjustOHLC(data[[i]], use.Adjusted=T)
bt.prep(data, align='remove.na', dates='1990::2013')
prices<-data$prices[,-10] #don't include cash
retmat<-na.omit(prices/mlag(prices) - 1)
rollapply(retmat, 500, function(x) summary(princomp(x))$loadings[, 1], by.column = FALSE, align = "right") -> princomproll
require(lattice)
xyplot(amend(pruncomproll))
plotting "princomproll" will get you jumpy loadings...
It isn't very obvious how the amend function relates to the script below it (since it isn't called there), or what you are trying to achieve. There are a couple of small changes that can be made. I haven't profiled the difference, but it's a little more readable if nothing else.
You remove the first and last rows of the result twice.
rowSums might be slightly more efficient for getting the row sums than apply.
rep.int is a little bit fster than rep.
amend <- function(result) {
result <- as.matrix(result)
n <- nrow(result)
without_first_row <- result[-1,]
without_last_row <- result[-n,]
delta_minus <- rowSums(abs(without_first_row - without_last_row))
delta_plus <- rowSums(abs(without_first_row + without_last_row))
signs <- c(1, cumprod(rep.int(-1, n-1) ^ (delta_plus <= delta_minus)))
zoo(result * signs)
}