I have an image and I need its on hover opacity to be 0.5, then It must scale up to 200% and back the opacity up to 1 when image is full scaled size.
Example
I am able to make a scaling transform and opacity on hover, but I need the opacity to be 1 after the scale when image is at 200% size.
#imagecontainer {
border: 2px solid red;
width: 251px;
height: 251px;
opacity: 1;
position: absolute;
}
#image {
width: 250px;
height: 250px;
border: 2px solid black;
position: absolute;
opacity: 1;
-webkit-transition: -webkit-transform 1s ease-in-out;
}
#image:hover {
opacity: 0.8;
-webkit-transform: scale(2, 2);
}
Since there are more than one state change (that is, opacity: 0.5 initially before the transform is completed and then opacity: 1 after the transform is completed, you cannot do it with transition alone because the transition can only change the opacity value once and retain it. You either need to use CSS3 animations or alter the styling using JS with transitionend event.
Below is a sample snippet with CSS3 animations where on hover the image gets opacity: 0.5 and this state is retained till the 99% keyframe. All this happens while the image goes from not having any transform to transform: scale(2,2). Then at the 100% frame, the transform is retained as it is but opacity is changed from 0.5 to 1.
#imagecontainer {
border: 2px solid red;
width: 251px;
height: 251px;
opacity: 1;
position: absolute;
}
#image {
width: 250px;
height: 250px;
border: 2px solid black;
position: absolute;
opacity: 1;
}
#image:hover {
opacity: 0.5;
animation: opacitynscale 1s ease-in-out forwards;
}
#keyframes opacitynscale {
99% {
transform: scale(2, 2);
opacity: 0.5;
}
100% {
transform: scale(2, 2);
opacity: 1;
}
<div id='imagecontainer'>
<img id='image' src='http://lorempixel.com/250/250/nature/1' />
</div>
The downside of using CSS animation instead of transition for this is that unlike transition, the animation wouldn't automatically produce the reverse effect on hover out (that is, it would snap back to original state and not gradually go back). Another animation must be written for the reverse effect.
If you can't use CSS3 animation for whatever reasons (including the aforementioned) then you can do it with a bit of JavaScript by using the transitionend event.
var img = document.getElementById('image'),
mousein = false;
img.addEventListener('transitionend', function() { /* this event is fired when transition is over */
if (mousein)
img.style.opacity = 1; /* changes element's opacity to 1 */
else
img.style.opacity = null; /* remove inline style on hover out, otherwise it will override others */
});
/* to determine if mouse is over image or not */
img.addEventListener('mouseover', function() {
mousein = true;
});
img.addEventListener('mouseout', function() {
mousein = false;
});
#imagecontainer {
border: 2px solid red;
width: 251px;
height: 251px;
opacity: 1;
position: absolute;
}
#image {
width: 250px;
height: 250px;
border: 2px solid black;
position: absolute;
opacity: 1;
transition: transform 1s ease-in-out;
}
#image:hover {
opacity: 0.5;
transform: scale(2, 2);
}
<div id='imagecontainer'>
<img id='image' src='http://lorempixel.com/250/250/nature/1' />
</div>
Related
I'm trying to make a div that appear and disappear on touch, like the navigation bar of android phones.
Should I use transition for this or is animation ok? In the fiddle example i use the mouse click and the setTimeout to simulate the touches and the auto disappear if you dont touch the screen for some seconds.
.custom-row{
position: fixed;
width: 100%;
height: 50px;
bottom: -100px;
left: 0px;
background-color: yellow;
opacity: 0;
}
.slidein {
animation: slidein 1s ease-in forwards;
}
.slideout {
animation: slideout 1s ease-in forwards;
}
#keyframes slidein {
0% {
}
100% {
bottom: 0px;
opacity: 1;
}
}
#keyframes slideout {
0% {
bottom: 0px;
opacity: 1;
}
100% {
bottom: -100px;
opacity: 0;
}
}
https://jsfiddle.net/1rm64q8z/1/
For this use case, transition seems to be a better solution. With animation, alerting position is a compute-intensive approach. The CSS will also be much more readable and scalable with transitions in this case.
const bar = document.getElementById("bottom-bar");
bar.addEventListener("click", (el) => {
el.target.classList.toggle("slide-out");
setTimeout(() => {
el.target.classList.toggle("slide-out");
el.target.classList.toggle("slide-in");
}, 2000)
})
body {
overflow: hidden;
}
#bottom-bar {
position: absolute;
bottom: 0px;
left: 0px;
width: 100%;
background: yellow;
padding: 16px;
text-align: center;
transform-origin: bottom;
transition: transform 0.4s ease-in-out;
}
.slide-in {
transform: translateY(0%);
}
.slide-out {
transform: translateY(100%);
}
<div id="bottom-bar">
Hello
</div>
The performance of CSS transitions and animations should be almost the same as they are both hardware accelerated so on most modern browsers the behaviour should be the same.
Animations are often used to create a more complex series of movements and they do not lift the rendering process to the GPU and resulting in being slower than transitions.
This article gives a great breakdown of when to use animations vs transitions.
I'm trying to animate a falling object, with translateX being random. Everything about the code works, apart from my variable transX.
The part of changing the value via JavaScript works perfectly fine, however the value just isn't used.
Why will it not work?
setInterval(function() {
var e = document.createElement("li");
e.style.setProperty("--transX", (Math.random() * 50 - 25).toFixed(0) + "px");
document.getElementById("list").appendChild(e);
}, 100);
li {
display: inline-block;
position: absolute;
background-color: #1eb500;
top: 50px;
left: 200px;
height: 10px;
width: 2px;
animation-name: fall;
animation-duration: 1.5s;
animation-timing-function: cubic-bezier(.66, -0.06, .77, .12);
opacity: 0%;
list-style-type: none;
transform: rotate(0deg);
--transX: 100px;
}
#keyframes fall {
0% {
opacity: 100%;
}
100% {
transform: translateY(2000px) translateX(var(--transX)) rotate(720deg);
opacity: 0%;
}
}
<ul id="list"></ul>
where are you applying the animation? Variables in CSS should be declared within a CSS selector that defines its scope. For a global scope you can use either the :root or the body selector
:root {
--transX: 100px;
}
Demo of the problem: https://jsfiddle.net/t0qsek8n/1/
<div class="test" id="test">Test text</div>
.test {
position: relative;
top: 0px;
border: 1px solid #ccc;
animation: test 5s;
transition: top 1s;
}
#keyframes test {
0% {
opacity: 0;
transition: none;
}
100% {
opacity: 1;
transition: none;
}
}
const test = document.getElementById('test');
setTimeout(() => {
test.style.top = "100px"
}, 1000);
I expect if the value of top property is changed by JS, transition transition: top 1000ms doesn't happen because of transition: none that provides #keyframes test, but actually, the transition happens.
I cannot understand why transition value from keyframes doesn't override any existing definition for transition.
let's take another example using display:
.test {
position: relative;
top: 0px;
border: 1px solid #ccc;
animation: test 5s forwards;
}
#keyframes test {
0% {
opacity: 0;
display: none;
}
100% {
opacity: 1;
display: none;
}
}
<div class="test" id="test">
Test text
</div>
We logically expect to never see the element since we set display:none and we made the animation to be forwards but display is simply ignored because it cannot be animated. Same logic with transition since it's a property that we cannot animate ref.
Basically, any property that cannot be animated will simply get ignored when used with keyframes.
Properties that aren't specified in every keyframe are interpolated if possible — properties that can't be interpolated are dropped from the animation. ref
Firefox has a nice behavior when turning off animation in a transition enabled element, it takes the element wherever it is and transition back to original form.
In Chrome it just jumps without transitioning.
Why the inconsistency? Is there any way to replicate in Chrome without using too much JS?
.wrapper {
width: 400px;
height: 200px;
}
.move {
width: 100px;
height: 100px;
position: absolute;
background-color: #f66;
transition: 1s;
cursor: pointer;
}
.move {
animation: move 2s linear infinite;
}
.wrapper:hover .move {
animation: none;
}
#keyframes move {
50% {
transform: translateX(200px);
}
}
<div class="wrapper">
<div class="move"></div>
</div>
$(".spinny").bind("webkitAnimationEnd mozAnimationEnd animationEnd", function(){
$(this).removeClass("spin")
})
$(".spinny").hover(function(){
$(this).addClass("spin");
})
div {
width: 100px;
height: 100px;
background-color: #f66;
transition: 1s;
cursor: pointer;
}
.spin {
animation: spin 1s linear 1;
}
#keyframes spin {
100% {
transform: rotate(180deg);
}
}
<script src="https://code.jquery.com/jquery-3.1.0.js"></script><div class="spinny"></div>
Taken from this answer, JS can be used to add and remove classes on hover and animation finish, respectively. jQuery is used in this example, but it is not necessary for the functionality.
EDIT: Now without jQuery, this will play the animation whenever hovered over by remembering the state and checking after the end of every animation.
hover = 0;
s = document.getElementById("spinny");
s.addEventListener("animationend", function(){
s.className = "";
if (hover)
setTimeout(function(){s.className = "spin"},0);
})
s.onmouseover = function(){
s.className = "spin";
hover = 1;
}
s.onmouseout = function(){
hover = 0;
}
div {
width: 100px;
height: 100px;
background-color: #f66;
transition: 1s;
cursor: pointer;
}
.spin {
animation: spin 1s linear 1;
}
#keyframes spin {
100% {
transform: rotate(180deg);
}
}
<div id="spinny"></div>
Add transition along side your transform
.rotate {
width: 200px;
height: 200px;
transform: rotate(0deg);
transition: 0.5s ease all;
background-color: #222;
}
.rotate:hover {
transform: rotate(20deg);
transition: 0.5s ease all;
}
This should prevent it from jumping.
I want to add 2 transition transforms
But I want to start the second transform after the end of the first transform
the element should go to a point slowly and after that it should go to another point
transform: translate(0%, 300%), translate(15%, -136%);
You cannot do this with just a single element using transition because when you put more than one translate within the transform, the transform property on the whole is transitioned and not one by one.
With pure CSS transition using an extra wrapper element:
If you add an extra wrapper element around the actual element and put one of the transforms on the wrapper element you could achieve the effect that you are looking for. It would also produce the exact reverse effect on the hover out (hover the body and hover out in the below snippet).
.wrapper {
position: relative;
height: 100px;
width: 100px;
transition: all 1s 1s;
}
.content {
position: absolute;
height: 100%;
width: 100%;
border: 1px solid;
transition: all 1s;
}
body:hover .content {
transform: translate(15%, -136%);
transition: all 1s 1s;
}
body:hover > .wrapper {
transform: translate(0%, 300%);
transition: all 1s;
}
body {
min-height: 100vh;
}
<div class='wrapper'>
<div class='content'>Some text</div>
</div>
Transition with a bit of JS/jQuery without any extra elements:
If you add an extra wrapper element around the actual element and put one of the transforms on the wrapper element you could achieve the effect that you are looking for. It would also produce the exact reverse effect on the hover out (hover the body and hover out in the below snippet).
$(document).ready(function() {
var isHover; /* variable to track state */
$('body').hover(function() {
isHover = !isHover; /* invert the state */
$('.content').css('transform', 'translate(0%, 300%)');
}, function() {
isHover = !isHover; /* invert the state */
$('.content').css('transform', 'translate(0%, 300%)');
});
$('.content').on('transitionend', function() {
if (isHover) {
$('.content').css('transform', 'translate(0%, 300%) translate(15%, -136%)');
} else {
$('.content').css('transform', 'none');
}
});
});
.content {
height: 100px;
width: 100px;
border: 1px solid;
transition: all 1s;
}
body {
min-height: 100vh;
}
<script src="https://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/2.1.1/jquery.min.js"></script>
<div class='content'>Some text</div>
With animation and no extra element:
Using animations this can be done using a single element but the reverse effect is tough to achieve. We would have to write extra code for this and even then it will be complex.
.content {
position: relative;
height: 100px;
width: 100px;
border: 1px solid;
}
body:hover > .content {
animation: move 1s forwards;
}
#keyframes move {
0% {
transform: none;
}
50% {
transform: translate(0%, 300%);
}
100% {
transform: translate(0%, 300%) translate(15%, -136%);
}
}
body {
min-height: 100vh;
}
<div class='content'>Some text</div>
Animations with reverse effect:
Below is a snippet which produces the reverse effect also using CSS animations. But as you can see it is a bit complex. We can do this using a single animation also but it would become more complex.
$(document).ready(function() {
$('body').hover(function() {
$('.content').css('transform', 'none');
$('.content').removeClass('hover-out').addClass('hover-in');
}, function() {
$('.content').css('transform', 'translate(0%, 300%) translate(15%, -136%)'); /* as soon as an animation is removed, the element would snap back to original state, to avoid that we have to add final state via inline style */
$('.content').removeClass('hover-in').addClass('hover-out');
});
});
.content {
height: 100px;
width: 100px;
border: 1px solid;
}
.hover-in {
animation: hover-in 1s forwards;
}
.hover-out {
animation: hover-out 1s forwards;
}
#keyframes hover-in {
0% {
transform: none;
}
50% {
transform: translate(0%, 300%);
}
100% {
transform: translate(0%, 300%) translate(15%, -136%);
}
}
#keyframes hover-out {
0% {
transform: translate(0%, 300%) translate(15%, -136%);
}
50% {
transform: translate(0%, 300%);
}
100% {
transform: none;
}
}
body {
min-height: 100vh;
}
<script src="https://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/2.1.1/jquery.min.js"></script>
<div class='content'>Some text</div>