Exception fault: VerifyError: Error #1014: Class com.distriqt.extension.googleanalytics::Tracker could not be found.
The issue does NOT occur when installed to a device.
The extension has been added to the application descriptor.
I have other Distriqt extensions (notifications, dialog) already in my app which are working fine.
Setup: Mac / FDT / AIR SDK 18
We accidentally missed a few classes in default library of the first release of this ANE.
Grab the update and it should resolve this issue.
Cheers
try to copy and rename your ANE: ane-file-name.ane to ane-file-name.swc, and also add it to your project (you must have both ane and swc)
Related
I've got a Xamarin.Forms app and when I try to build the Android app I get the following compile time error:
Target _XamarinAndroidBuildAarRestore:
/packages/Xamarin.Build.Download.0.4.9/build/Xamarin.Build.Download.targets(120,4):
error MSB4064: The "VsInstallRoot" parameter is not supported by the "XamarinBuildAndroidAarRestore" task. Verify the parameter exists on the task, and it is a settable public instance property.
/packages/Xamarin.Build.Download.0.4.9/build/Xamarin.Build.Download.targets(114,3):
error MSB4063: The "XamarinBuildAndroidAarRestore" task could not be initialized with its input parameters.
The iOS app builds fine.
I'm using Visual Studio for Mac (version 7.4.1 build 48).
I was able to get this error to go away by deleting the packages, bin, and obj folders from my solution as referenced in this Xamarin Forum:
https://forums.xamarin.com/discussion/96703/the-user7zippath-parameter-is-not-supported
Is it possible to use Xamarin.Forms Android and UWP with the IoT Hub? How? I can't find a functioning example. Windows.Azure.Devices.Clint works, but only for UWP (for me at least). What to do? Is it possible to use Windows.Azure.Devices.Clint, or do I have to use Windows.Azure.Devices.Clint.PCL?
Some things from the logs (might be helpful):
Ignoring C:\Users\Korisnik.nuget\packages\system.runtime.compilerservices.unsafe\4.4.0\ref
And when trying to deploy:
03-30 10:09:33.202 D/Mono (16948): Assembly Loader probing location: 'System.Runtime.CompilerServices.Unsafe'.
03-30 10:09:33.203 F/monodroid-assembly(16948): Could not load assembly 'System.Runtime.CompilerServices.Unsafe' during startup registration.
03-30 10:09:33.203 F/monodroid-assembly(16948): This might be due to an invalid debug installation.
03-30 10:09:33.203 F/monodroid-assembly(16948): A common cause is to 'adb install' the app directly instead of doing from the IDE.
Check out the repo with the sample code: https://github.com/ChakraSpice/Xamarin-IoT-Android-Issue-Sample (use your own connection string)
I can't deploy it to the android devices.
It was a known issue but has already been fixed. Please check these issues: [1] and [2].
I install Microsoft.Azure.Devices.Client version 1.7.0 in Xamarin.Forms Android. It seems working. You can try to see if it helps.
I'm attempting to configure a spring MVC app so it builds a war file when the application is deployed. When I add the examqa:war artifact, I get the following error message (seen at the bottom of image)
Not sure where to look, didn't find any mention of this error when using google. Any ideas?
I got the same problem but solution was different. The problem was with artifact type which had to be changed from Java EE Application exploded to Web Application:Exploded/Archive
I changed artifact type from EAR to WAR (deleted the old one and created a new one). This solved the problem.
In intellij, this can be done by going to artifacts in project-structure (alt+ctrl+shift+s).
Forgot to change the artifactId and name in my pom.xml file from a previous setting.
<artifactId>examqa</artifactId>
<name>ExamQA</name>
I am porting over a Flex application from 4.1 to 4.5 and have run into some issues with the AdvancedDataGrid classes being found. The application compiles ok under 4.5.1 but at runtime I get the following error:
VerifyError: Error #1014: Class mx.controls.advancedDataGridClasses::AdvancedDataGridRendererProvider could not be found.
It appears that what was the old datavisualization.swc was divided into to libraries (advancedgrids_4.5.21328.swf and charts_4.5.21328.swf) both of which are present in my project. is there anything in the configuration that I need to update?
I am currently using Eclipse Java EE IDE for Web Developers (Helios Service Release 1)
Many thanks,
Ian
Verify error really means that there's something wrong with versions of classes you are trying to access at runtime.
First of all, you can try plaing with 'merged/rsl' settings. Second, you can double-check your includes or try to build your app outside ide, with ant task, for example.
You will have to merge your libraries into code. This might be helpful -
VerifyError: Error #1014: class could not be found
I am using a COM dll in my .Net web application. This works fine on multiple different machines.
However on one particular machine I get the following error:
Unable to cast COM object of type 'CServer.CApplicationClass' to interface type 'CServer.ICApplication'. This operation failed because the QueryInterface call on the COM component for the interface with IID '{CF0DFA28-046B-4C7D-8AA9-F4B7477D8CAE} ' failed due to the following error: Error loading type library/DLL. (Exception from HRESULT: 0x80029C4A (TYPE_E_CANTLOADLIBRARY)).
I have registerd the dll using the regsvr32 command.
I have also created a COM+ application for this dll.
Running a search through the registry
I can find the key in numerous places.
I have also tried unregistering the dll and deleting all referneces on the computer to this dll. And afterwards re-adding the dll and re-registering it.
I have written a simple windows script file which tests the dll. This works fine. However the problem exists in my .net project which is running in iis.
Can anyone help me with this?..
If you need anymore info please leave a comment. Thanks.
I had a similar problem, with the "TYPE_E_CANTLOADLIBRARY" message.
Background:
I had a project which used Interop.ReferenceA.dll. This file was created using tlbimp ReferenceA.dll /out: Interop.ReferenceA.dll.
Solution:
When I took a look at ReferenceA.dll using RegDllView I noticed that ReferenceA.dll had a subclass, which was the IID shown in the error message.
I looked around in the source code of the subclass and noticed that it had a dependency to Interop.ReferenceB.dll.
Turns out that the subclass needed Interop.ReferenceB as a type-library to work. So I ran this:
regasm /tlb:Interop.ReferenceB.tlb Interop.ReferenceB.dll (the 32-bit version of regasm was used.)
And the error went away.
Make sure your AppPool is set to x86. Also make sure your assembly is targeting only x86.
I was having a similar issue. First got Access Denied, which after some looking around was resolved, only to be faced with this error message (TYPE_E_CANTLOADLIBRARY). Mind that I'm running a COM+ Component on Windows 7.
After some fruitless attempts which involved messing with the registry, my workmate and I found a way of getting it up and running:
1) Unregister your dll (regsvr32 -u dllname)
2) make sure your references to the dll are cleared up from registry (backup first)
3) Create an empty com+ application (server app) in Component Services
4) Copy the application id to the clipboard
5) go to "c:\program files (x86)\Complus applications" and create a folder with the id on your clipboard
6) copy your dll into that folder and register it
7) Go back to your Component Services and add the component to the app you created using the dll on "c:\program files (x86)\Complus applications{*app id*}"
that did it for me. Hope it helps.
I had a similar problem where the error was triggered on my PC but not on that of other developers.
It turns out that I had been testing an automatic build process on my PC that had updated the version number of the assembly, thus registering the TLB in the registry with a version number higher than the one we were normally using.
When trying to get the interface, the server was consistently using the wrong TLB information leading to the wrong assembly. Once I deleted the higher version entry in the registry, it worked fine.
Now we just have to ensure the build process is not going to cause that issue again. :)