I have a css transition that moves an element on hover and an animation that rotates the element on hover too. There's a delay on the animation equal to the transition duration so that after it's transitioned to it's correct position, the animation starts. And it works nice, however, when we mouse off, the animation stops but it doesn't transition back down.
Is it possible to get it to transition back after we mouse off and the animation ends?
You can see an example here: http://codepen.io/jhealey5/pen/zvXBxM
Simplified code here:
div {
width: 200px;
height: 200px;
margin: 40px auto;
background-color: #b00;
position: relative;
&:hover {
span {
transform: translateY(-60px);
animation-name: rotate;
animation-duration: 1s;
animation-delay: .5s;
animation-iteration-count: infinite;
animation-direction: alternate;
}
}
}
span {
position: absolute;
width: 20px;
height: 20px;
background-color: #fff;
bottom: 10px;
left: 0;
right: 0;
margin: auto;
transition: .5s;
}
#keyframes rotate {
from {
transform: translateY(-60px) rotate(0);
}
to {
transform: translateY(-60px) rotate(-90deg);
}
}
I have forked your project and adapted it so it works. You can find it here.
What I have changed is the following:
I give the white square a start position of top: 150px and let it, on hover of div, get a top: 0. The span gets a transition: top .5s and with that it goes to top: 0; on hover and back to top: 150px; when the mouse leaves.
I have removed the translateY(-60px); from the animation, because that would move it even more up when the animation would start.
Here's your new CSS:
div {
width: 200px;
height: 200px;
margin: 40px auto;
background-color: #b00;
position: relative;
&:hover {
span {
top: 0px;
animation: rotate 1s infinite .5s alternate;
animation-direction: alternate;
}
}
}
span {
position: absolute;
width: 20px;
height: 20px;
background-color: #fff;
bottom: 10px;
left: 0;
right: 0;
top: 150px;
margin: auto;
transition: top .5s;
}
#keyframes rotate {
from {
transform: rotate(0);
}
to {
transform: rotate(-90deg);
}
}
Edit: The problem is that an animation is time-based and not action-based, which means that as soon as you trigger an animation, a timer starts running and it will run through all the keyframes until the set time has passed. Hover-in and hover-out have no effect, except that the timer can be stopped prematurely, but the animation will not continue (or reversed, which you wanted) after that. transition is action-based, which means it gets triggered every time an action (for example :hover) is happening. On :hover, this means it takes .5s to go to top:0 and when the hover ends, it takes .5s to got to top:150px.
I hope the above addition makes sense :)
As you can see, I also cleaned up a bit in your animation-name: etc., since it can be combined into one line.
As Harry pointed out, the problem is that you are animating/transitioning the same property, in this case transform. It looks like the current versions of Chrome/FF will allow the animation to take control of the property, thereby breaking the transition. It seems like the only way to work around this is to transition/animation a different property. Since you need to continue rotating the element, you could translate/position the element by changing the bottom property instead. I know that doesn't produce the exact same results, but nonetheless, it does move the element (just not relative to the parent element).
Updated Example
div:hover span {
bottom: 80px;
}
As an alternative, you could also wrap the span element, and then translate that element instead.
In the example below, the .wrapper element is transitioned to translateY(-60px) on hover, and then the child span element is rotated and maintains the animation.
Example Here
div {
width: 200px;
height: 200px;
margin: 40px auto;
background-color: #b00;
position: relative;
}
div:hover .wrapper {
transform: translateY(-60px);
}
div:hover .wrapper span {
animation-name: rotate;
animation-duration: 1s;
animation-delay: .5s;
animation-iteration-count: infinite;
animation-direction: alternate;
}
.wrapper {
display: inline-block;
transition: .5s;
position: absolute;
bottom: 10px;
left: 0;
right: 0;
text-align: center;
}
.wrapper span {
display: inline-block;
width: 20px;
height: 20px;
background-color: #fff;
}
#keyframes rotate {
from {
transform: rotate(0);
}
to {
transform: rotate(-90deg);
}
}
<div>
<span class="wrapper">
<span></span>
</span>
</div>
Related
I'm trying to make a div that appear and disappear on touch, like the navigation bar of android phones.
Should I use transition for this or is animation ok? In the fiddle example i use the mouse click and the setTimeout to simulate the touches and the auto disappear if you dont touch the screen for some seconds.
.custom-row{
position: fixed;
width: 100%;
height: 50px;
bottom: -100px;
left: 0px;
background-color: yellow;
opacity: 0;
}
.slidein {
animation: slidein 1s ease-in forwards;
}
.slideout {
animation: slideout 1s ease-in forwards;
}
#keyframes slidein {
0% {
}
100% {
bottom: 0px;
opacity: 1;
}
}
#keyframes slideout {
0% {
bottom: 0px;
opacity: 1;
}
100% {
bottom: -100px;
opacity: 0;
}
}
https://jsfiddle.net/1rm64q8z/1/
For this use case, transition seems to be a better solution. With animation, alerting position is a compute-intensive approach. The CSS will also be much more readable and scalable with transitions in this case.
const bar = document.getElementById("bottom-bar");
bar.addEventListener("click", (el) => {
el.target.classList.toggle("slide-out");
setTimeout(() => {
el.target.classList.toggle("slide-out");
el.target.classList.toggle("slide-in");
}, 2000)
})
body {
overflow: hidden;
}
#bottom-bar {
position: absolute;
bottom: 0px;
left: 0px;
width: 100%;
background: yellow;
padding: 16px;
text-align: center;
transform-origin: bottom;
transition: transform 0.4s ease-in-out;
}
.slide-in {
transform: translateY(0%);
}
.slide-out {
transform: translateY(100%);
}
<div id="bottom-bar">
Hello
</div>
The performance of CSS transitions and animations should be almost the same as they are both hardware accelerated so on most modern browsers the behaviour should be the same.
Animations are often used to create a more complex series of movements and they do not lift the rendering process to the GPU and resulting in being slower than transitions.
This article gives a great breakdown of when to use animations vs transitions.
Please can you help troubleshoot the transition in this CSS? My browser can see the code in the inspector but no transition is taking place. I have tried operating the transition on different properties including width and position but nothing works.
#header-image {
position: absolute;
top: 30px;
right: 30px;
background: transparent;
width: 250px;
margin-left: 10px;
opacity: 1;
transition: opacity 2s linear 1s;
}
I know I'm probably being thick so apologies in advance.
In order for the transition to work.. the property value should change. only then it will trigger the transition.
i.e) lets say #header-image initially has opacity: 0; width: 50px;.
but when you hover it you want to increase the opacity and width opacity: 1; width: 250px;
so your css will look like..
#header-image {
position: absolute;
top: 30px;
left: 30px;
background: blue;
width: 100px;
height: 100px;
margin-left: 10px;
animation: fadeIn 2s linear;
}
#keyframes fadeIn {
0% {
opacity: 0;
}
100% {
opacity: 1;
}
}
<div id="header-image"></div>
Then your transition will work. So basically transition will work only when there is a change in the value. But in your case you are setting the opacity:1 initially by default.
If you want to add this effect on page load then you have to use css animation or javascript. Below I have given an example snippet on how it can be achieved using css animation.
However if you are planning to use many animations then I recommend to use some popular libraries like Animista, Animate.css, wow.js
SOLUTION:
The solution I found is using two divs on top of each other(to make the function clearer I made one of the divs red), while it has to animate two divs for the effect, it should still be cleaner and faster than using javascript:
.outerDiv {
width: 100%;
height: 50px;
position: relative;
}
.hover1 {
height: 50px;
width: 50px;
background: black;
position: relative;
top: 0px;
transition: width 1s
}
.hover2 {
height: 50px;
width: 50px;
background: red;
position: relative;
top: -50px;
transition: width 1s 1s
}
.outerDiv:hover .hover2 {
width: 100%;
transition: width 0s 0.9s;
}
.outerDiv:hover .hover1 {
width: 100%;
transition: width 1s;
}
<div class="outerDiv">
<div class="hover1"></div>
<div class="hover2"></div>
</div>
This can be achieved by specifying different transition time for the normal state and hover state.
<style>
#hoverDiv {
height: 50px;
width: 50px;
background: black;
transition: width 5s; /*Specify required time.
This affects how long it takes to transition
back to the normal state*/
}
#hoverDiv:hover {
width: 100%;
transition: width 2s; /*This affects how long it takes to transition
into the hover state*/
}
</style>
<div id="hoverDiv"></div>
Also, if you want to add a delay before width decreases back to normal, try
#hoverDiv {
height: 50px;
width: 50px;
background: black;
transition: width 5s;
transition-delay: 5s; /*Waits for 5 seconds and then decreases
back to normal size in 5 seconds*/
}
I have a parent div wrapped around a scaled child div. The child div starts off with transform:scale(0,0); & expands to transform:scale(1,1); when a button is clicked.
.content-wrapper {
display: inline-block;
background-color: #ddf;
padding: 10px;
clear: both;
}
.content {
padding: 10px;
background-color: #fff;
display: flex-block;
overflow: hidden;
transform:scale(0,0);
transform-origin:top;
transition:transform 1s ease-out;
}
.content.open {
transform:scale(1,1);
}
However the parent div content-wrapper stays at the same size of the child div content - even when the child is "closed".
The desired behaviour is when the child div is closed the parent div shrinks to only wrap around the button.
JSFiddle of Example
Is it possible to wrap the parent div around the child div when it's "closed" in this example?
This will be a little challenging because the background color is attached to the content container. I would remove the background color from the main container, then make it a separate div positioned absolute
<div class="content">
...
<div class="content-bg"> //contains your background color
then manipulate that based on your click handler.
I've updated the JSFiddle http://jsfiddle.net/ztxa5kwu/90/
CSS for the new div:
.content-bg{
position: absolute;
background-color: #ddf;
left: 0;
right: 0;
bottom: 0;
top: 0;
z-index: -1;
transition: all .5s ease;
transform-origin: bottom right;
}
Notice the transform-origin: bottom right; to scale the background towards your button. In the JSFiddle, I made the button take on a border the same color as the background, but you could easily edit the size of the new <div class="content-bg"></div> to fit around your button.
Hope that helps, and gets you in the right direction.
Try this:
.content {
background-color: #fff;
overflow: hidden;
transform:scale(0,0);
transform-origin:top;
transition:transform 1s ease-out;
display: block;
padding: 0;
height: 0; width: 0;
}
.content.open {
padding: 10px;
height: auto; width: auto;
transform: scale(1,1);
}
Edit: Play with this:
.content {
padding: 0;
background-color: #fff;
display: block;
overflow: hidden;
transform-origin:top;
transition: transform 1s ease-out, max-width 0.5s ease-out 0.4s, max-height 1s ease-out;
transform: scale(0,0); max-width: 0; max-height: 0;
}
.content.open {
padding: 10px;
transition: transform 1s ease-out, max-width 1s ease-out, max-height 8s ease-out;
transform: scale(1, 1); max-width: 1920px; max-height: 1080px;
}
I found this comment on an older question:
This method only partially achieves the desired effect but doesn't
actually remove the space. The transformed box acts like a
relatively positioned element - the space is taken up no matter how it
is scaled. Check out this jsFiddle which takes your first one and
just adds some bogus text at the bottom. Note how the text below it
doesn't move up when the box height is scaled to zero. – animuson♦ Jul
29 '13 at 20:37
So with that in mind I used the max-height/ max-width hack to get something close to what I was after: http://jsfiddle.net/BaronGrivet/ztxa5kwu/176/
.content {
padding: 10px;
background-color: #fff;
display: flex-block;
overflow: hidden;
transform:scale(0,0);
transform-origin:top;
transition:all 1s ease-out;
max-width: 0;
max-height: 0;
}
.content.open {
transform:scale(1,1);
max-width: 500px;
max-height: 500px;
}
I have a simplw div that expands and changes colors, from my understanding the backwards value for the animation-fill-mode should reset the div to the first frame of the animation after it ends, including delays, I have a delay of zero ms and instead of resetting back to the first frame, it simply disappears, why?
//css
#keyframes frames{
from{
background-color: blue;
width: 50px;
height: 50px;
}
to{
background-color: orange;
width: 200px;
height: 200px;
}
}
#d1{
width: 50px;
height: 50px;
animation: frames 1000ms ease-in-out 0ms 3 alternate backwards;
}
//html
<div id="d1"></div>
Alternate backwards doesn't exist. You should use alternate-reverse:
#d1 {
width: 50px;
height: 50px;
animation: frames 1000ms ease-in-out 0ms 3 alternate-reverse;
}