I'm wondering if it's possible to use Intel AMT and AMD DASH plug-ins in SCCM 2012 R2 to out of band manage clients?
I've successfully implemented the Intel AMT plug-in, now I'm wondering if I can also implement the AMD DASH plug-in on the same SCCM console. Someone got experience on this matter? I'd love to hear experiences and how-to's if something needs to be done.
I'm asking this because we've got a lot of Intels, but also AMDs. And we want to be able to manage both from the same platform.
Thanks in advance,
Sander.
Related
In the ARM world vendors supply their own BSPs to initialize board peripherals. Intel boards that you buy on the market all seems to come with some version of BIOS. Does BIOS do thing that BSPs cannot do? What if some hobbyist or engineer wants to do development using Intel processors but do not want anything to do with the BIOS? Why restrict programming with a layer of firmware that programmers have no source access to?
Typically the BIOS is no layer of firmware but rather the firmware to boot the system. After booting control is provided by the OS such as Windows or Linux.
This is not really my area, but ....
The initials BSP are heavily overloaded. It appears you mean board support package and not Boot-strap-processor or one of the other computer related terms that use those initials.
It is my understanding that BSP's (board support packages) are primarily used for embedded systems and indeed, when I did a web search on 'Intel bsp', most of the hits were discussing Intel Galileo and Intel Edison boards, which are targeted toward IoT (internet of things) projects and other embedded projects. But I also found BSP's, for sale and for free, in executable and in source form, for a wide variety of Intel boards. If you are working with Linux, you might want to check out https://www.yoctoproject.org/ .
I don't know if there are any vendors packaging a BSP with an Intel board, but it is certainly possible.
The only open source boot firmware for Intel processors that I know of is coreboot. It doesn't support every board. If you are building your own board, then you could customize it to work with your design. A typical modern BIOS has lots of bloat such as ACPI and UEFI that you may or may not want.
Do Chromebooks offer adequate programming capabilities offline?
I can never guarantee my WiFi access.
I know I can access local files, and being Linux-based, what does this mean for programming offline?
Also, I am returning to obtain my MSc in IT. Would this be a good purchase for such a cause? I am focusing on web development (HTML, JavaScript, Rails).
I want to know specifically if a Chromebook (I have my eyes on the Acer C720) can get the work done. True, I'll probably rare ever be offline, but I want to know if I'll be able to both edit code, then run it to troubleshoot.
My main points: editing and running code on a Chromebook. Also, could I amend the drawback by running Windows or Linux (ie, Ubuntu, Mint)?Thanks guys for any advice.
I use an Acer C720 Chromebook (2GB RAM, 16GB SSD) as my Meteor (Javascript, HTML. CSS, MongoDB) development machine. The specs may sound poor but in reality - thanks to the fantastic Haswell chip - the laptop is great.
I have Xubuntu installed instead of ChromeOS... so maybe that is not a real answer to your question.
It's a fantastic little machine - long battery life and boots in a few seconds. I tried Bodhi Linux first but find Xubuntu better for my needs.
I expanded the storage using a keep-in tiny UltraFit 64GB USB 3.0 flash key. Amazing device.
I use an HDMI monitor when doing longer coding sessions.
Device cost me $150 on eBay and around $25 for the USB key.
I use the free http://komodoide.com/komodo-edit/ as my editor.
If you feel like taking the plunge and converting from ChromeOS to Xubuntu, these two links may help:
BIOS changes: https://blogs.fsfe.org/the_unconventional/2014/09/19/c720-coreboot/
Xubuntu distribution: https://www.distroshare.com/distros/get/14/
Good luck and enjoy!
I'm having an app that processes some DSL and draws a page. That app is qt-based. I need to work with DSL not with QT. When processing that DSL an app throws the following error
OpenGL ARB_framebuffer_object extension is not available
My laptop is rather old. I'm running Windows Vista, my gfx card is ATI Radeon HD 3200 Graphics. I tried to install ATI Radeon HD 4850 X2 Catalyst Driver 9.1 WHQL Vista and Hydravision pack for Vista and that did not help.
Can someone tell me whether I can fix the problem on my laptop and how?
The error message is pretty straightforward: your hardware just doesn't support the required extension.
And it's common knowledge software developers hate hardware problems :)
Well, I need your advice.
I'm working on a huge engineering project, everything is ready now (resources and formulas etc) and it's time to start coding. I don't have any problem with what language to code with (i know a lot).
but they're the users who are pulling me off.
I use Windows as a primary OS but there are a lot of Mac and Linux users too. And these days tablets have taken a lot of developing space ( Android and stuff).
So what option do you advice :
1)Write the program from the scratch on each OS, I mean writing the program on Windows using Visual Studio, on Mac use Xcode.
but this costs a lot ... I own Windows PC, buying Mac or Mac OS for my desktop, will ruin my budget.
2)Use cross-platform compilers ...
It is nice. but how about the commercial use? I have read that I need to buy a commercial license in order to publish my apps worldwide.
please if this is wrong tell me about it.
so really I don't know ... shall I just deploy it for Windows?
Also if you know a great option for cross-compiling would help a lot .
Your Advice Is Appreciated
Best Regards
What kind of app is it?
If it's just a number crunching app with a very simple front end then can you write a commandline version and wrap it with a web script?
If it needs very responive rich user interface and you can program in C++ then Qt is a very good solution even if you don't need cross platform.
The LGPL license is perfectly suitable for commercial apps.
I'm in the research phase of my next computer build. I have the idea in my head of running a hypervisor as the base of the system, but i would want to be able to take a shot at programming opencl with one of the OS's installed on the hypervisor...and maybe some gaming. Would i have enough access to the GPU to be able to achieve this effectively, or am i better off installing an OS that i will do development(and gaming) from and then just virtualize any systems on top of that?
what are your recommendations for a hypervisor, vmware, microsoft or other?
sidenote: Recently graduated with a BS in CS, the massive parallel processing seems like a good idea of something to learn, won't be doing any 'real'/major development work. also, i'm aware that CUDA is more mature in it's development, but i'm sticking with opencl for a few reasons, so please don't try to persuade me.
thanks for your input!
dave k.
whats your focus? Virtualisation or OpenCL?
Hak5 did a nice walkthrough of debian based virtualisation environment ProxMox, but I don't know whether it allows virtual hosts hardware access or OpenCL virtualisation.