My dataset is a 3 dimensional array (30,15,4) representing temperature through the water column at four different depths (0.2 (layer1),0.4(layer2),0.6(layer3),0.8(layer4)). Thus, I am trying to get 3d plots with 4 layers.So far, I have used slice3Drgl function. However, I have realized that in the plots I got, the 2nd and 3rd layer look the same (T data from the 0.4 depth is plotted twice), and the fourth layer (upper layer in plot) shows T data belonging to the 0.6 depth.
This is my code:
dd<-array(d$T,dim=c(30,15,4))
x = seq(0.126,3.780, by=0.126)
y=seq(0.125,1.875,by=0.125)
z = seq(0.2,0.8,by=0.2)
grid<-mesh(x,y,z)
colvar<-with(grid,dd)
col=jet.col(100)
slice3Drgl (x, y, z, xs=NULL, ys=1,zs=c(0.2,0.4,0.6,0.8),colvar = colvar, col=col, clim = c( -1.392,0),theta = 60,smooth=TRUE,
colkey(clim = c(-1.392,0),at = do.breaks(c(-1.392,0), 2)))
This is the plot I get:
I have checked the data and its correct, no repeated T data in 2nd and 3rd layers.
In addition when defining zs as:
zs<-z[seq(1,length(z),len=4)]
The 3d plot improves a bit. I can see the correct T data on 1,2,3 layers. But 4th layer still shows T data corresponding to 0.6 depth, instead to 0.8 depth (the 4th layer).
Hope my question is more or less clear and that someone can give me some useful insight,
there is not too much information about this function in the web unfortunately.
Thanks in advance,
Best,
Amaia
This error originates with zs parameter for which package document provide no information. Here is a work around that I have used in the past:
dt<-seq(0.01,27, by=0.01)
dd<-array(dt,dim=c(30,15,5))
x = seq(0.126,3.780, by=0.126)
y=seq(0.125,1.875,by=0.125)
z = seq(0.2,1.0,by=0.2)
grid<-mesh(x,y,z)
colvar<-with(grid,dd)
col=jet2.col(100)
slice3Drgl (x, y, z, xs=NULL, ys=NULL,zs=z,zlim=c(0.2,0.8),colvar = colvar, col=col, clim = c(0,18),theta = 60,smooth=FALSE,
colkey(clim = c(0,18),at = do.breaks(c(0,18), 2)))
Basically all you need is add a dummy z layer into the data and then ignore it during the plotting by setting the zlim.
I hope this helps.
Related
I have a dataset of spatial locations data. I want to do a point pattern analysis using the spatstat package in R using this data. I want the best polygon area for the analysis instead of the rectangle area. The code I have is
original_data = read.csv("/home/hudamoh/PhD_Project_Moh_Huda/Dataset_files/my_coordinates.csv")
plot(original_data$row, original_data$col)
which results in a plot that looks like this
Setting the data for point pattern data
point_pattern_data = ppp(original_data$row, original_data$col, c(0, 77), c(0, 116))
plot(point_pattern_data)
summary(point_pattern_data)
resulting in a plot that looks like this
#The observed data has considerably wide white spaces, which I want to remove for a better analysis area. Therefore, I want to make the point pattern a polygon instead of a rectangle. The vertices for the polygon are the pairs of (x,y) below to avoid white space as much as possible.
x = c(3,1,1,0.5,0.5,1,2,2.5,5.5, 16,21,28,26,72,74,76,75,74,63,58,52,47,40)
y = c(116,106,82.5,64,40,35,25,17.5,5,5,5,10,8,116,100,50,30,24,17,10,15,15,8)
I find these vertices above manually by considering the plot below (with the grid lines)
plot(original_data$row,original_data$col)
grid(nx = 40, ny = 25,
lty = 2, # Grid line type
col = "gray", # Grid line color
lwd = 2) # Grid line width
So I want to make the point pattern polygon. The code is
my_data_poly = owin(poly = list(x = c(3,1,1,0.5,0.5,1,2,2.5,5.5, 16,21,28,26,72,74,76,75,74,63,58,52,47,40), y = c(116,106,82.5,64,40,35,25,17.5,5,5,5,10,8,116,100,50,30,24,17,10,15,15,8)))
plot(my_data_poly)
but it results in an error. The error is
I fix it by
my_data_poly = owin(poly = list(x = c(116,106,82.5,64,40,35,25,17.5,5,5,5,10,8,116,100,50,30,24,17,10,15,15,8), y = c(3,1,1,0.5,0.5,1,2,2.5,5.5, 16,21,28,26,72,74,76,75,74,63,58,52,47,40)))
plot(my_data_poly)
It results in a plot
However, this is not what I want. How to get the observed area as a polygon in point pattern data analysis?
This should be a reasonable solution to the problem.
require(sp)
poly = Polygon(
cbind(original_data$col,
original_data$row)
))
This will create a polygon from your points. You can use this document to understand the sp package better
We don’t have access to the point data you read in from file, but if you just want to fix the polygonal window that is not a problem.
You need to traverse the vertices of your polygon sequentially and anti-clockwise.
The code connects the first point you give to the next etc. Your vertices are:
library(spatstat)
x = c(3,1,1,0.5,0.5,1,2,2.5,5.5, 16,21,28,26,72,74,76,75,74,63,58,52,47,40)
y = c(116,106,82.5,64,40,35,25,17.5,5,5,5,10,8,116,100,50,30,24,17,10,15,15,8)
vert <- ppp(x, y, window = owin(c(0,80),c(0,120)))
plot.ppp(vert, main = "", show.window = FALSE, chars = NA)
text(vert)
Point number 13 is towards the bottom left and 14 in the top right, which gives the funny crossing in the polygon.
Moving the order around seems to help:
xnew <- c(x[1:11], x[13:12], x[23:14])
ynew <- c(y[1:11], y[13:12], y[23:14])
p <- owin(poly = cbind(xnew, ynew))
plot(p, main = "")
It is unclear from your provided plot of the data that you really should apply point pattern analysis.
The main assumption underlying point process modelling as implemented in spatstat
is that the locations of events (points) are random and the process that
generated the random locations is of interest.
Your points seem to be on a grid and maybe you need another tool for your analysis.
Of course spatstat has a lot of functionality for simply handling and summarising data like this so you may still find useful tools in there.
I am trying to create a 3D mesh of a specific building from points that I extracted from a lidar point cloud. I then created a matrix from the x, y and z values to feed into the as.mesh3d function from the rlg package and since its from a lidar survey, I have 27,000+ points for this one building. I run into an error when I try to create the mesh. I've copied in a sample of 20 points from the point cloud:
X <- c(1566328,1566328,1566328,1566328,1566328,1566327,1566327,1566327,
1566327,1566327,1566327,1566327,1566327,1566327,1566327,1566327,
1566326,1566326,1566326,1566326)
Y <- c(5180937,5180937,5180936,5180935,5180936,5180937,5180937,5180936,
5180936,5180935,5180935,5180935,5180936,5180936,5180937,5180938,
5180938,5180937,5180936,5180936)
Z <- c(19.92300028,19.98300046,19.93700046,19.88099962,19.93500046,19.99500046,
20.00400046,20.00600046,19.97199962,19.92499962,19.95400046,
19.99099991,20.01199991,19.97600020,19.95800008,19.93200008,
19.95300008,19.94800008,19.94300020,19.98399991)
#created a matrix
xyz <- matrix(c(X, Y, Z), byrow = TRUE, ncol = 3)
The problem arises when I try to create the mesh using as.mesh3d():
mesh <- as.mesh3d(xyz, y = NULL, Z = NULL, type = "triangle", col = "red")
This is what I get: Error in as.mesh3d.default(xyz, y = NULL, Z = NULL, type = "triangle", : Wrong number of vertices
The same error happens for the original dataset of 27000+ points despite all being of the same length.
I'm really not advanced in R and was hoping I could get some advice or solutions on how to get past this.
Thankyou
The as.mesh3d function assumes the points are already organized as triangles. Since you're giving it 20 points, that's not possible: it needs a multiple of 3 points.
There's a problem with your calculation of xyz: you say byrow = TRUE, but you're specifying values by column. Using
xyz <- cbind(X, Y, Z)
would work.
If I plot all of your points using text3d(xyz, text=1:20), it looks as though there are a lot of repeats.
There are several ways to triangulate those points, but they depend on assumptions about the surface. For example, if you know there is only one Z value for each (X, Y) pair, you could use as.mesh3d.deldir (see the help page) to triangulate. Here's the code and output for your sample:
dxyz <- deldir::deldir(X - mean(X), Y - mean(Y), z = Z)
# Warning message:
# In deldir::deldir(X - mean(X), Y - mean(Y), z = Z) :
# There were different z "weights" corresponding to
# duplicated points.
persp3d(dxyz, col = "red")
I had to subtract the means from X and Y because rounding errors caused it to look very bad without that: rgl does a lot of things in single precision, which only gives 7 or 8 decimal place accuracy.
Suppose you have two lines, L1 and L2, which for each x value (x1 and x2 for example) they have known points at L1={(x1,L1_y1), (x2,L1_y2)}, and L2={(x1,L2_y1), (x2,L2_y2)}. By joining these points they may or may not have an intersection at some x3 where x1
Now suppose you want to know the maximum at any x value (not restricted to just x1, x2 etc, but anywhere along the axis) of both of these lines. Obviously it is often trivial to calculate for just a few lines, and a few different x value, but in my case I have several tens of thousand x values and a few lines to check it against, so it can't be done manually.
In R, is there some code which will calculate the maximum at any given point x3?
An example of this can be seen here with L1={(1,1), (2,4)}, and L2={(1,4),(2,1)}, illustrated by:
Here the intersection of these lines is at (1.5, 2.5). L2 is the maximum before this, and L1 after. This maximum line is shown in red below.
As you can see, it isn't enough just to take the max at every point and join these up, and so it will need to consider the lines as some form of function, and then take the maximum of this.
Also, as mention before as there are several thousand x values it will need to generalise to larger data.
To test the code further if you wish you can randomly generate y values for some x values, and it will be clear to see from a plot if it works correctly or not.
Thanks in advance!
Defining points constituting your lines from the example
L1 <- list(x = c(1, 2), y = c(1, 4))
L2 <- list(x = c(1, 2), y = c(4, 1))
defining a function taking a pointwise maximum of two functions corresponding to the lines
myMax <- function(x)
pmax(approxfun(L1$x, L1$y)(x), approxfun(L2$x, L2$y)(x))
This gives
plot(L1$x, L1$y, type = 'l')
lines(L2$x, L2$y, col = 'red')
curve(myMax(x), from = 1, to = 2, col = 'blue', add = TRUE)
Clearly this extends to more complex L1 and L2 as approxfun is just a piecewise-linear approximation. Also, you may add L3, L4, and so on.
I have a problem I wish to solve in R with example data below. I know this must have been solved many times but I have not been able to find a solution that works for me in R.
The core of what I want to do is to find how to translate a set of 2D coordinates to best fit into an other, larger, set of 2D coordinates. Imagine for example having a Polaroid photo of a small piece of the starry sky with you out at night, and you want to hold it up in a position so they match the stars' current positions.
Here is how to generate data similar to my real problem:
# create reference points (the "starry sky")
set.seed(99)
ref_coords = data.frame(x = runif(50,0,100), y = runif(50,0,100))
# generate points take subset of coordinates to serve as points we
# are looking for ("the Polaroid")
my_coords_final = ref_coords[c(5,12,15,24,31,34,48,49),]
# add a little bit of variation as compared to reference points
# (data should very similar, but have a little bit of noise)
set.seed(100)
my_coords_final$x = my_coords_final$x+rnorm(8,0,.1)
set.seed(101)
my_coords_final$y = my_coords_final$y+rnorm(8,0,.1)
# create "start values" by, e.g., translating the points we are
# looking for to start at (0,0)
my_coords_start =apply(my_coords_final,2,function(x) x-min(x))
# Plot of example data, goal is to find the dotted vector that
# corresponds to the translation needed
plot(ref_coords, cex = 1.2) # "Starry sky"
points(my_coords_start,pch=20, col = "red") # start position of "Polaroid"
points(my_coords_final,pch=20, col = "blue") # corrected position of "Polaroid"
segments(my_coords_start[1,1],my_coords_start[1,2],
my_coords_final[1,1],my_coords_final[1,2],lty="dotted")
Plotting the data as above should yield:
The result I want is basically what the dotted line in the plot above represents, i.e. a delta in x and y that I could apply to the start coordinates to move them to their correct position in the reference grid.
Details about the real data
There should be close to no rotational or scaling difference between my points and the reference points.
My real data is around 1000 reference points and up to a few hundred points to search (could use less if more efficient)
I expect to have to search about 10 to 20 sets of reference points to find my match, as many of the reference sets will not contain my points.
Thank you for your time, I'd really appreciate any input!
EDIT: To clarify, the right plot represent the reference data. The left plot represents the points that I want to translate across the reference data in order to find a position where they best match the reference. That position, in this case, is represented by the blue dots in the previous figure.
Finally, any working strategy must not use the data in my_coords_final, but rather reproduce that set of coordinates starting from my_coords_start using ref_coords.
So, the previous approach I posted (see edit history) using optim() to minimize the sum of distances between points will only work in the limited circumstance where the point distribution used as reference data is in the middle of the point field. The solution that satisfies the question and seems to still be workable for a few thousand points, would be a brute-force delta and comparison algorithm that calculates the differences between each point in the field against a single point of the reference data and then determines how many of the rest of the reference data are within a minimum threshold (which is needed to account for the noise in the data):
## A brute-force approach where min_dist can be used to
## ameliorate some random noise:
min_dist <- 5
win_thresh <- 0
win_thresh_old <- 0
for(i in 1:nrow(ref_coords)) {
x2 <- my_coords_start[,1]
y2 <- my_coords_start[,2]
x1 <- ref_coords[,1] + (x2[1] - ref_coords[i,1])
y1 <- ref_coords[,2] + (y2[1] - ref_coords[i,2])
## Calculate all pairwise distances between reference and field data:
dists <- dist( cbind( c(x1, x2), c(y1, y2) ), "euclidean")
## Only take distances for the sampled data:
dists <- as.matrix(dists)[-1*1:length(x1),]
## Calculate the number of distances within the minimum
## distance threshold minus the diagonal portion:
win_thresh <- sum(rowSums(dists < min_dist) > 1)
## If we have more "matches" than our best then calculate a new
## dx and dy:
if (win_thresh > win_thresh_old) {
win_thresh_old <- win_thresh
dx <- (x2[1] - ref_coords[i,1])
dy <- (y2[1] - ref_coords[i,2])
}
}
## Plot estimated correction (your delta x and delta y) calculated
## from the brute force calculation of shifts:
points(
x=ref_coords[,1] + dx,
y=ref_coords[,2] + dy,
cex=1.5, col = "red"
)
I'm very interested to know if there's anyone that solves this in a more efficient manner for the number of points in the test data, possibly using a statistical or optimization algorithm.
I am trying to create a figure like the one depicted in the third column of the following image:
Link for the image in case of backup.
Basically I have x and y positions of 200 particles and I have the MSD data for these 200 positions. I'd like MSD to be the value that should determine a color map for the particles in coordinates (x,y). So MSD should be like the height, or the z position corresponding to each particle in (x,y).
I am surprised at my incompetence, because I have been trying to solve this problem for the last couple of days but none of the Google searches gave me any result. The closest thing that I have found is the concept of "self-organizing map" in Matlab and R, but I do not know how to use R and Matlab's toolbox for SOM was utterly useful for my needs.
I tried the following code in Matlab and get the attached plot as a result:
clear all; close all; clc;
x = (dlmread('xdata.dat'))'; % x is 1x200 array
y = (dlmread('ydata.dat'))'; % y is 1x200 array
msd = (dlmread('msd_field.txt'))'; % msd is 1x200 array
[X,Y] = meshgrid(x,y);
Z = meshgrid(msd);
z = [X; Y; Z];
surf(z)
But I think this plot is not useful at all. What I want is a 2D scatter plot of (x,y) depicting particle positions and on top of that color code this scatter plot with the values stored in msd like the plot I showed in the beginning. How can I create this through Matlab, or any other visualization tool? Thank you in advance.
It is not clear whay you want to have. Here a scatter plot using ggplot2.
## some reproducible data
set.seed(1)
dat <- data.frame(
x = round(runif(200,-30,30),2),
y = round(runif(200,-2,30),2),
msd = sample(c(0,2,3),200,rep=T))
## scatter plot where the size/color of points depends in msd
library(ggplot2)
ggplot(dat) +
geom_point(aes(x,y,size=msd,color=msd)) +
theme_bw()