CSS variables and animation - css

I was trying to make a "multi-row" sprite CSS animation (insipred by this: http://codepen.io/simurai/pen/vmhuJ), only to find that Firefox doesn't support background-position-x or -y.
The lack of -x/-y is discussed at length here: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=550426, and a proposed solution (background-position-y doesn't work in Firefox (via CSS)?) is to use CSS variables, which were recently introduced in Firefox.
However, it doesn't look like updating CSS variables from animation #keyframes is supported?
...
background-position: var(--bgX) var(--bgY);
...
/*Here, CSS variables don't work:*/
#keyframes move-y {
from {
--bgY: 0px;
}
to {
--bgY: -670px;
}
}
Here is a JSFiddle (note: Firefox only): http://jsfiddle.net/phoj0kq5/
I added flickering borders to the animation just to make sure it's running, but the crab doesn't snap its fingers.. Am I using CSS variables wrong, or do they simply not support animation?
Edit
Updated fiddle which actually works in Chrome (still not in Firefox): http://jsfiddle.net/phoj0kq5/1/

This is not a solution, but a workaround that should help:
Since you cannot show a part of the image dynamically when cols and rows are changing one at a time, try using only one column or row of image parts.
When only one line of sub-images is used, you should be able to set the viewed part with background-position: X 0; while X is your offset per image. You will need to edit the image file you are showing to achieve this.
So change the layout of subimages in the image file form:
☺☺☺☺
☺☺☺☺
☺☺☺☺
to:
☺☺☺☺☺☺☺☺☺☺☺☺
As i said, this is not a solution to the problem itself and rather a workaround, but it should work fine on all browsers. However, Mozilla should implement the -x/-y attributes or fix the CSS-variable issue in animations. Until then, i don't see a proper solution for this.

Related

Elements using mix-blend-mode break when implementing Slick Slider

I'm building a site locally (so I can't show it here) that has elements that apply mix-blend-mode: screen; when hovered on. They're images within slides in a slideshow that I'm using Slick for. When I implement Slick to run the slides, the blend mode stops applying when hovering over the elements. From what I found last night, this is a common issue with Slick.
https://community.shopify.com/c/Technical-Q-A/Mix-blend-mode-breaks-after-scolling-Brooklyn-theme/td-p/593470
The person in the above link seems to have the same issue, but the proposed solution didn't work for me because I'm not using the slick theme, and therefore not using theme.scss.
It seems as though transform: inherit !important; might be the solution, but I'm not sure how to implement it as I don't understand how the transform is being overridden by Slick.
css 3d transforms break mix blend mode, fortunately slick still runs ok without it
but you need to add this to your CSS
.slick-slider .slick-track,
.slick-slider .slick-list {
transform: inherit !important;
}
and the no-transform rule to the js initializer
$(".slider").slick({
useTransform: false
});

Do CSS variables work differently in Microsoft Edge?

I am developing a web site and have optimized it for Firefox and Chrome. The project contains a style sheet called base.css which is included in all the pages, and which contains some global settings and definitions, including a list of variables which I use to store color values like such:
:root {
--yellow-1: #fff8e3;
--yellow-2: #ffe9a9;
}
and so on, and calling them like for example:
.a-class {
background-color: var(--yellow-2);
}
When I look at the page in Edge, all the colors are missing, and when I use the DOM explorer, it marks all uses of the variables with red underlines. Does Edge not support CSS variables in this way? What can I do to work around this?
MS Edge does support CSS variables from EdgeHTML v15:
https://blogs.windows.com/msedgedev/2017/03/24/css-custom-properties/
This is also backed up here:
https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/CSS/Using_CSS_variables#Browser_compatibility
The syntax is as follows:
Declaring a variable:
element {
--main-bg-color: brown;
}
Using the variable:
element {
background-color: var(--main-bg-color);
}
I had the same problem, but I defined variables with opacity. In Chrome it worked fine, but in edge it didn't. After I removed opacity from declarations, it worked fine in Edge as well.
I tried isolating the problem, and it seems there were no problem with this in Edge. Normal CSS works works as supposed to.
When selecting browser prefix elements like:
::-ms-track
::-ms-fill-lower
::-ms-fill-upper
::-ms-thumb
Variables does not work on theese.

SVG data-uri background repeat in IE10

I feel like I should be able to find an answer on this but, alas, I'm not having much luck. I'm trying to repeat an SVG as a background using a data-uri within CSS. It works in basically every browser except it doesn't seem to be working in IE10 (and probably other IE versions). The code is pretty simple really:
.bg-test {
background-image:url();
height: 100px;
background-repeat: x-repeat;
}
Here's an example:
http://jsfiddle.net/Aaronius/C7p83/3/
It doesn't repeat in IE. Is this just a bug? Is there a decent workaround without resorting to raster images? Thanks.

CSS - Why is my background color not showing in IE?

Here's a practice site I'm messing around with. I didn't create the theme.. but can't figure out why the background color disappears in IE 8 (the only version I have to test with)?
I used Firebug to try and pinpoint and it looks to me like it's looking at .box .cnt and the color is already set for that.
Any ideas?
http://unique-home-decor.info
The background is there, however IE8 doesn't like the class cnt height at 100%. Check out this post for more detail:
https://stackoverflow.com/a/176454/1220302
Also, take a look here for more information on the height property: http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS21/visudet.html#the-height-property
Old question but this may help someone as it solved my issue.
IE version 11 = No background colour on my heading
Chrome/Edge = Background colour on my heading
The issue was with how IE handles RGBa progressive enhancement.
My original CSS:
header {
background-color: rgba(255,255,255);/*,0.80);*/
}
I had originally decided to add opacity to the header and make it a different colour using RGBa, but later decided to remove it. I didn't consider that RGBa would cause an issue until I tested different browsers and so had LONG forgotten to change this. Changing to:
header {
background-color: rgb(255,255,255);
}
or simply:
header {
background-color: #fff;
}
Solved my problem. Solution here: https://css-tricks.com/ie-background-rgb-bug/

Background image is not displayed in Firefox

An image set as the background of a DIV is displayed in IE, but not in Firefox.
CSS example:
div.something {
background:transparent url(../images/table_column.jpg) repeat scroll 0 0;
}
(The issue is described in many places but haven't seen any conclusive explanation or fix.)
Sorry this got huge, but it covers two possibilities that consistently happen to me.
Possibility 1
You may find the path to the CSS file isn't correct. For example:
Say I have the following file structure:
public/
css/
global.css
images/
background.jpg
something/
index.html
index.html
On public/index.html the following paths will include the CSS file:
#1: <link href="./css/global.css"
#2: <link href="/css/global.css"
#3: <link href="css/global.css"
However on public/something/index.html number 1 and 3 will fail. If you are using a directory structure like this (or an MVC structure e.g.: http://localhost/controller/action/params) use the second href type.
Firebug's Net monitor tab will tell you if the CSS file can't be included.
On the subject of paths remember that images are relative to the path of the CSS file. So:
url('./images/background.jpg') /* won't work */
url('../images/background.jpg') /* works: ../ == up one level */
Hover over the url() part of the background attribute in Firebug's CSS tab to check if the file's being loaded.
Possibility 2
It could be that the div has no content and thus has a 0 height. Make sure the div has at least a line of something in (e.g.: lorem ipsum delors secorum) or:
div.something {
display: block; /* for verification */
min-height: 50px;
min-width: 50px;
}
Check Firebug's layout tab (of the HTML tab) to check the div has a height/width.
Strangely enough, after smashing my head on the keyboard for hours, I added display:table; to the DIV's style and the background image magically appeared in FF.
It looks like a background-attachment issue. It needs to be set to fixed (not scroll) to work in FF.
See: http://www.w3schools.com/cssref/tryit.asp?filename=trycss_background-position
Happend with me. The jpg does shows in IE but not in Firefox or Chrome. Here is the solution
Change the following css for the element where image is displayed. It can be span, div or any other element :
display:block
Old post but I just Had a similar problem images not showing up in Firefox turns out it was Ad-block add-on, had to change the names of my images
Try putting the image name in quotes, e.g.:
background-image: url('image.jpg');
I've had a similar issue. The reason is that firefox is sensitive for missing fields in your css. Chrome will (sometimes) auto complete missing field, thus the issue appears on your firefox browser.
You need to add a display type, because right now it is being translated to 0 height.
In my case:
.left-bg-image {
display: block; // add this line
background-image: url('../images/profile.jpeg');
background-repeat: no-repeat;
background-size: cover;
background-position: center center;
opacity: .6;
min-width: 100%;
min-height: 100vh;
}
Make sure that the image you are referring to is relative to the css file and not the html file.
try this.
background-color: transparent;
background-image: url("/path/to/image/file.jpg");
background-repeat: repeat;
background-position: top;
background-attachment: scroll;
Instead of using URLs relative to the page/stylesheet, a cross-browser solution is to give a relative URL starting with the application/domain root.
/* Relative to Stylesheet (Works in Firefox) */
background: url('../images/logo.gif');
/* Relative to Page (Works in IE, Chrome etc.) */
background: url('images/logo.gif');
/* Absolute path (Fine, unless you change domains)*/
background: url('http://www.webby.com/myproduct/images/factsheet.gif');
/* Domain Root-relative path (Works in Firefox, IE, Chrome and Opera) */
background: url('/myproduct/images/factsheet.gif');
FYI: As far as I'm concerned, there is no requirement to use quotes in CSS URLs, I've used them here 'cause it looks prettier.
I solved a similar problem by renaming the CSS class. MSIE allows CSS class IDs to begin with numbers; Firefox doesn't. I had created a class using the width of the image in pixels e.g. .1594px-01a
I actually knew it was non-standard syntax but since it was working fine in MSIE I had forgotten about it. After trying all the other stuff it finally dawned on me that it could be a simple as the naming, and as soon as I put a letter in front of the class, presto!
For me, it was a matter of the file-name being case-sensitive. I'm not sure if it was CSS or if it was my Ubuntu operating system, or if it was firefox, but the way that I finally got the background images to display was by referring to BlueGrad.jpg instead of bluegrad.jpg. The former of the two is how it was saved. I didn't think it would be case sensitive, but it was.
You could try this:
div.something {
background: transparent url(../images/table_column.jpg);
}
The other declarations are shorthand CSS properties, and I afaik they are not needed.
Do you have this online somewhere? I'd like to see if I can fiddle with it a bit. (locally)
More questions than answers I'm afraid, but they might help you get to the right answer:
Is it possible that you are collapsing the div in Firefox in some way (with some floats or similar)?
Is there any other content in the div to ensure it's large enough to display the image?
Have you installed Firebug and taken a look at the CSS definitions on the page?
Are you absolutely sure the image is a JPG file and not a PNG/Other file?
I'm wondering if IE is letting you get away with something other browsers are not.
Likewise, is the files case exactly as specified?
There's this HTML 'base' tag like in
<head>
<base href="http://example.com/some/bizarre/directory"/>
</head>
If this is present in your page, the image for the url is not relative to your current url, but to the given base url. I wouldn't know why IE displays it and Firefox doesn't, though.
The Webdeveloper Firefox extension provides the option to "Display broken images" - this may come in handy. Also, you might try "Live Http Headers" to see if/what image is requested and what the return code is.
I had a similar problem regarding the CSS background-image property in FF. It worked fine in IE but refused to work in FF ;) After reading a few posts I established that the issue was indeed that there was no content in the div except for a table (I was trying to make the background image adjust to the size of the broswer without collapsing or expanding and therefore used a much larger image in the background of the div in order to form a 'cropping' of sorts.) The solution for me it seems was to simply 'cheat' by placing an img tag that displayed a blank .png file that I then re-adjusted to the the correct height of the image with width set to 100%. This worked for my problem, and I hope it helps anyone else who is running into a similar problem. Probably not the best fix, but it's a fix ;)
The only other thing I can think of besides what has already been said is the way the picture was created. If you made/edited the image in Photoshop, make sure you save as Save For Web...
Sometimes if you use a JPG image for Photoshop without saving as a Web image, it may not appear in Firefox. I had that happen a few weeks ago where a graphic artist created a beautiful header for a mini site and it would NOT appear in FF!
Wait...
Try setting a width and height on the div to expand it. It may be a no-content issue in your div.
For those, who encounter the problem in FF, but not in Chrome:
You could mistakenly mix between different value types for the position.
For example,
background: transparent url("/my/image.png") right 60% no-repeat;
Will make this error. The fix could be:
background: transparent url("/my/image.png") 100% 60% no-repeat;
My mistake was to use '\' instead of '/'. Worked OK in IE, but not in other browsers.
I found two things that were causing this problem:
I was using a .tif file which Firefox did not seem to like - I changed to a .png file.
I added overflow:auto; to the CSS for the div - display:block; did not work for me.
It may look very weird, but this works for me >
#hwrap {
background-color: #d5b75a;
background: url("..//design/bg_header_daddy.png"), url("..//design/nasty_fabric.png");
background-position: 50% 50%, top left;
background-origin: border-box, border-box;
background-repeat: no-repeat, repeat;
}
Yes, a double dot and double slash ... ??!!?? ... I can't find anything on the internet that reports this strange behaviour.
[edit]
I've made a seperate post > https://stackoverflow.com/q/18342019/529802
(It doesn't seem like these are the exact circumstances as of the OP but the issue is somewhat related and I've found a workaround for that which I want to share)
I've had the same problem – background-image visible everywhere except in Firefox – and for me, the issue had to do with the fact that I'm working on a browser add-on.
I'm injecting a file style.css in the pageMod module with the contentStyleFile attribute. In it, there's the rule background-image: url(/img/editlist.png); where I'm referencing an image file external to the add-on. The problem here is that Firefox, unlike other browsers, misinterprets this external domain root as the add-on's internal root!
The css-file is a 1:1 port from the Chrome version of the extension/add-on, so I didn't want to mess around with it. That's why I've added an additional contentStyle rule in combination with a copy of that image in my resource folder. This rule simply overwrites the rule inside the css-file.
(In hindsight maybe even a more elegant method than before …)
Nobody mentioned background-origin so there you go :
background-image:url('dead.beef');
background-size: 100% 100%;
background-origin:border-box;
Solved the problem for me ; my background apparently was outside my div.
In my case it caused by "Strict" mode in FF Privacy & Security settings. After I have changed to "Standard" all background images had become visible.
This worked for me:
1) Click on the background image table.
2) Right click on the status bar at the bottom of the page.
3) Click Inline styles.
4) Click the Background styles tab.
5) If you see 'Transparent' in the colour title, that is the problem.
6) Click the colour box and select a colour (white is a good choice.)
7) The colour title should now read white.
8) Click OK.
9) Save the page.
10) Upload the page and overwrite the existing file.
11) Refresh the page and your background picture will display.
Note: Please ensure that you have uploaded your background picture jpeg. I forgot to upload the background jpeg once and spent ages trying to sort it before I realised my error.
Regards
Martin

Resources