I'm trying to style a typcial banner image for a site, so that for narrower viewports the vertical height is maintained and the image effectively stays the same size by going beyond the parent element horizontally. (I think this is fairly typical banner image behaviour - but feel free to correct me if I'm wrong).
(browser target is ie10 and up). The below incorrectly keeps the image ratio and at 100% width so that if fails to match the height of the parent.
The current html is just an img inside a div tag
<div class="banner">
<img class="img-fluid" src="somepic.jpg" />
</div>
Where the css classes used are:
.banner {
content: "";
position: absolute;
width: 100%;
top: 0;
left: 0;
height: 780px;
}
and img-fluid is a bootstrap(4) class with
img-fluid {
max-width: 100%;
height: auto;
}
Use a background-image instead, there are a couple interesting behaviours that can be used to achieve different results.
Here's my take:
.banner {
content: "";
position: absolute;
width: 100%;
top: 0;
left: 0;
height: 780px;
background-image:url('somepic.jpg');
background-size:cover;
}
The key here is background-size:cover;, it will make sure the image stretches to cover the full width and height while keeping its ratio. That means on very wide screens, it will be made larger, cutting some height. But on thinner resolutions you'll get the desired output.
I'm attempting to create a class for embedded youtube videos that will display them at 100% width in the div, and will adjust the height according to the video's aspect ratio.
I have found the following suggestion here:
.fluidMedia {
position: relative;
padding-bottom: 56.25%; /* proportion value to aspect ratio 16:9 (9 / 16 = 0.5625 or 56.25%) */
padding-top: 30px;
height: 0;
overflow: hidden;
}
.fluidMedia iframe {
position: absolute;
top: 0;
left: 0;
width: 100%;
height: 100%;
}
<div class="fluidMedia">
<iframe src="" frameborder="0"> </iframe>
</div>
but this relies on every video having the same aspect ratio to work. I'd prefer to write one class that just works, regardless of the video embedded into it. Can this be done without javascript?
The only CSS solution is the one you used, where you need to set the ratio in your CSS file – therefore there is no generic frontend solution without JavaScript.
You could have Drupal extract the ratio for you, of course – and write it into an inline CSS style property like
<div class="fluidMedia" style="padding-bottom: <?=$imgWidth/$imgHeight?>">
How to get the Video ratio would be a Drupal or PHP question.
For the JavaScript Solutionsee AndyM's link: http://css-tricks.com/NetMag/FluidWidthVideo/Article-FluidWidthVideo.php
I am trying to find a way to hide the black strips across the top and bottom of a vimeo video. I thought there might be a way to cover them up with CSS.
I basically wanted to achieve what this person wanted to achieve with an image in the link below except I want to do it with an embedded video whilst keeping it repsonsive.
Removing black borders 4:3 on youtube thumbnails
Many thanks.
HTML
<section class="d5-d13 c5-c13 b5-b13 a5-a13 video">
<div class='embed-container'>
<iframe src='http://player.vimeo.com/video/69252713' frameborder='0'
webkitAllowFullScreen mozallowfullscreen allowFullScreen></iframe>
</div>
</section>
CSS
.embed-container {
position: relative;
padding-bottom: 56.25%;
padding-top: 30px;
height: 0;
overflow: hidden;
max-width: 100%;
height: auto;
}
.embed-container iframe, .embed-container object, .embed-container embed {
position: absolute;
top: 0;
left: 0;
width: 100%;
height: 100%;
}
For your use case, I don't think you'll be able to use just css.
Usually we add letterboxing or pillar boxing around video iframes to keep the height and width at a certain ratio for presentation. But in that case, the black borders would just be as simple as a css background.
To keep things responsive, you would set the height to something like zero (like you have) and use the padding hack to keep the aspect ratio of the video (in this case a 16:9 video; 9/16 * 100 = 56.25%). That number would be either your padding-top or padding bottom value. Since the padding is measured with percent, this scales the padding in relation to the width keeping the correct ratio no matter what width you size the video to.
In your case, this video actually has the letterboxing in the actual video which you can see from the source of the video tag within the iframe. I'm not sure why you have the padding-top:30 but that makes the black borders even bigger. You'll need to hack your situation even more though because of the built in letterboxing. I put together a jsfiddle demo here which includes a few comments but it uses JS to achieve what you're looking for.
The concept for the code is as follows:
You want the outer container to crop off the bottom and top of the
video. Assuming you wanted the video to be responsive, and be cropped, you need to always have the actual video be larger than the outer container which masks it.
The video should be moved up in relation to how wide the video is vs the thickness of the top border
You'll want to shrink the height of the outer container a bit to compensate for the negative top margin yet still hide the bottom portion of the video
Personally I don't like doing expensive DOM operations on resize which maybe is the reason you asked for solely css but FWIW, you have the demo.
Ideally your best option would be to get the video re-recorded without the letterboxing so all you would need is the padding hack.
Cut the 1px off all edges with CSS:
.embed-container {
position: relative;
padding-bottom: 43%; /* Aspect ratio of the video */
height: 0;
overflow: hidden;
max-width: 100%;
}
.embed-container iframe,
.embed-container object,
.embed-container embed {
position: absolute;
top: -1px;
left: -1px;
width: calc(100% + 2px);
height: calc(100% + 2px);
}
HTML:
<div class="js-video [vimeo, widescreen]">
[video html goes here]
</div>
CSS:
.js-video {
height: 0;
padding-top: 25px;
padding-bottom: 67.5%;
margin-bottom: 10px;
position: relative;
overflow: hidden;
}
.js-video.widescreen {
padding-bottom: 57.25%;
}
.js-video.vimeo {
padding-top: 0;
}
.js-video embed, .js-video iframe, .js-video object, .js-video video {
top: 0;
left: 0;
width: 100%;
height: 100%;
position: absolute;
}
You will find more details here
I had this same issue and the problem was simple to solve. My videos were embedded in Wordpress pages and posts using oEmbed. Wordpress was wrapping my embedded videos in <p> tags, the <p> tags had some margin which was causing black borders on the top and bottom of my videos. I used the following bit of jQuery to remove the <p> tags from my embedded videos:
$('.embed-container iframe').unwrap();
I solved this problem by removing padding-top in .embed-container
padding-bottom: 56.25%; will set screen ratio to 16:9 and remove the black bar in top and bottom.
padding top here will add extra black bar area back.
I created a solution for this exact problem using a portion of this github post. Removing Black Bars. It doesn't change vimeo's background color but merely hides it from the viewport.
https://github.com/davatron5000/FitVids.js/issues/130
#myid {
height: 112.6%;
}
However, If you add a width using CSS "vw"(viewport width) it will size consistently on any monitor/device without showing the black background. I added a margin so that the iframe will stay centered in the div once the width is shorter.
#myvimeoiframeID {
height: 112%;
width: 80vw;
margin: 0 15% auto;
}
In my parent container that holds the video, I added:
.embed-container {
padding-bottom: 40.25%;
}
This seems to make sure the video shows in the div. When I removed this section the video disappears but you can still here it play. So there is something that is pretty awesome with the padding-bottom: 40.25%;
I changed the vimeo embedded iframe code to have a height="100%".
So you can add a height to the iframe or you can do it in css. In order to control the height by css, I kept the base height in the iframe at 100% and any adjustments to that base height is through the css.
Simply put frameborder="0" as one of your attributes.
I just solved this -
The video container was built with a video-captions-container DIV which was a black transparent bar.
I am working with images, and I ran into a problem with aspect ratios.
<img src="big_image.jpg" width="900" height="600" alt="" />
As you can see, height and width are already specified. I added a CSS rule for images:
img {
max-width: 500px;
}
But for big_image.jpg, I receive width=500 and height=600. How do I set images to be re-sized, whilst keeping their aspect ratios.
img {
display: block;
max-width:230px;
max-height:95px;
width: auto;
height: auto;
}
<p>This image is originally 400x400 pixels, but should get resized by the CSS:</p>
<img width="400" height="400" src="http://i.stack.imgur.com/aEEkn.png">
This will make image shrink if it's too big for specified area (as downside, it will not enlarge image).
Here's a solution:
object-fit: cover;
width: 100%;
height: 250px;
You can adjust the width and height to fit your needs, and the object-fit property will do the cropping for you.
More information about the possible values for the object-fit property and a compatibility table are available here: https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/CSS/object-fit
The solutions below will allow scaling up and scaling down of the image, depending on the parent box width.
All images have a parent container with a fixed width for demonstration purposes only. In production, this will be the width of the parent box.
Best Practice (2018):
This solution tells the browser to render the image with max available width and adjust the height as a percentage of that width.
.parent {
width: 100px;
}
img {
display: block;
width: 100%;
height: auto;
}
<p>This image is originally 400x400 pixels, but should get resized by the CSS:</p>
<div class="parent">
<img width="400" height="400" src="https://placehold.it/400x400">
</div>
Fancier Solution:
With the fancier solution, you'll be able to crop the image regardless of its size and add a background color to compensate for the cropping.
.parent {
width: 100px;
}
.container {
display: block;
width: 100%;
height: auto;
position: relative;
overflow: hidden;
padding: 34.37% 0 0 0; /* 34.37% = 100 / (w / h) = 100 / (640 / 220) */
}
.container img {
display: block;
max-width: 100%;
max-height: 100%;
position: absolute;
top: 0;
bottom: 0;
left: 0;
right: 0;
}
<p>This image is originally 640x220, but should get resized by the CSS:</p>
<div class="parent">
<div class="container">
<img width="640" height="220" src="https://placehold.it/640x220">
</div>
</div>
For the line specifying padding, you need to calculate the aspect ratio of the image, for example:
640px (w) = 100%
220px (h) = ?
640/220 = 2.909
100/2.909 = 34.37%
So, top padding = 34.37%.
Very similar to some answers here, but in my case I had images that sometimes were taller, sometimes larger.
This style worked like a charm to make sure that all images use all available space, keep the ratio and not cuts:
.img {
object-fit: contain;
max-width: 100%;
max-height: 100%;
width: auto;
height: auto;
}
The background-size property is ie>=9 only, but if that is fine with you, you can use a div with background-image and set background-size: contain:
div.image{
background-image: url("your/url/here");
background-size: contain;
background-repeat: no-repeat;
background-position: center;
}
Now you can just set your div size to whatever you want and not only will the image keep its aspect ratio it will also be centralized both vertically and horizontally within the div. Just don't forget to set the sizes on the css since divs don't have the width/height attribute on the tag itself.
This approach is different than setecs answer, using this the image area will be constant and defined by you (leaving empty spaces either horizontally or vertically depending on the div size and image aspect ratio), while setecs answer will get you a box that exactly the size of the scaled image (without empty spaces).
Edit:
According to the MDN background-size documentation you can simulate the background-size property in IE8 using a proprietary filter declaration:
Though Internet Explorer 8 doesn't support the background-size property, it is possible to emulate some of its functionality using the non-standard -ms-filter function:
-ms-filter: "progid:DXImageTransform.Microsoft.AlphaImageLoader(src='path_relative_to_the_HTML_file', sizingMethod='scale')";
Remove the "height" property.
<img src="big_image.jpg" width="900" alt=""/>
By specifying both you are changing the aspect ratio of the image. Just setting one will resize but preserve the aspect ratio.
Optionally, to restrict oversizings:
<img src="big_image.jpg" width="900" alt="" style="max-width:500px; height:auto; max-height:600px;"/>
Firefox 71+ (2019-12-03) and Chrome 79+ (2019-12-10) support internal mapping of the width and height HTML attributes of the IMG element to the new aspect-ratio CSS property (the property itself is not yet available for direct use).
The calculated aspect ratio is used to reserve space for the image until it is loaded, and as long as the calculated aspect ratio is equal to the actual aspect ratio of the image, page “jump” is prevented after loading the image.
For this to work, one of the two image dimensions must be overridden via CSS to the auto value:
IMG {max-width: 100%; height: auto; }
<img src="example.png" width="1280" height="720" alt="Example" />
In the example, the aspect ratio of 16:9 (1280:720) is maintained even if the image is not yet loaded and the effective image width is less than 1280 as a result of max-width: 100%.
See also the related Firefox bug 392261.
Here is a solution :
img {
width: 100%;
height: auto;
object-fit: cover;
}
This will make sure the image always covers the entire parent (scaling down and up) and keeps the same aspect ratio.
Just add this to your css, It will automaticly shrink and expand with keeping the original ratio.
img {
display: block;
max-width: 100%;
max-height: 100%;
width: auto;
height: auto;
}
This is mental. Use the scale-down property - it explains itself.
Inline styling:
<img src='/nic-cage.png' style={{ maxWidth: '50%', objectFit: 'scale-down' }} />
This will stop flex from stretching it. In this case, the image would go to 50% of the width of its parent container and the height would scale down to match.
Keep it simple.
Just replace the height attribute by the aspect-ratio attribute.
img {
max-width: 500px;
aspect-ratio: 900 / 600;
}
<img src="big_image.png" width="900"/>
The aspect-ratio attribute is not necessary, but prevent image layout shifts.
To maintain a responsive image while still enforcing the image to have a certain aspect ratio you can do the following:
HTML:
<div class="ratio2-1">
<img src="../image.png" alt="image">
</div>
And SCSS:
.ratio2-1 {
overflow: hidden;
position: relative;
&:before {
content: '';
display: block;
padding-top: 50%; // ratio 2:1
}
img {
position: absolute;
top: 0;
left: 0;
bottom: 0;
right: 0;
}
}
This can be used to enforce a certain aspect ratio, regardless of the size of the image that authors upload.
Thanks to #Kseso at http://codepen.io/Kseso/pen/bfdhg. Check this URL for more ratios and a working example.
Set the CSS class of your image container tag to image-class:
<div class="image-full"></div>
and add this you your CSS stylesheet.
.image-full {
background: url(...some image...) no-repeat;
background-size: cover;
background-position: center center;
}
I would suggest for a responsive approach the best practice would be using the Viewport units and min/max attributes as follows:
img{
display: block;
width: 12vw;
height:12vw;
max-width:100%;
min-width:100px;
min-height:100px;
object-fit:contain;
}
To force image that fit in a exact size, you don't need to write too many codes. It's so simple
img{
width: 200px;
height: auto;
object-fit: contain; /* Fit logo in the image size */
-o-object-fit: contain; /* Fit logo fro opera browser */
object-position: top; /* Set logo position */
-o-object-position: top; /* Logo position for opera browser */
}
<img src="http://cdn.sstatic.net/Sites/stackoverflow/company/img/logos/so/so-logo.png" alt="Logo">
https://jsfiddle.net/sot2qgj6/3/
Here is the answer if you want to put image with fixed percentage of width, but not fixed pixel of width.
And this will be useful when dealing with different size of screen.
The tricks are
Using padding-top to set the height from width.
Using position: absolute to put image in the padding space.
Using max-height and max-width to make sure the image will not over the parent element.
using display:block and margin: auto to center the image.
I've also comment most of the tricks inside the fiddle.
I also find some other ways to make this happen.
There will be no real image in html, so I personly perfer the top answer when I need "img" element in html.
simple css by using background
http://jsfiddle.net/4660s79h/2/
background-image with word on top
http://jsfiddle.net/4660s79h/1/
the concept to use position absolute is from here
http://www.w3schools.com/howto/howto_css_aspect_ratio.asp
You can use this:
img {
width: 500px;
height: 600px;
object-fit: contain;
position: relative;
top: 50%;
transform: translateY(-50%);
}
You can create a div like this:
<div class="image" style="background-image:url('/to/your/image')"></div>
And use this css to style it:
height: 100%;
width: 100%;
background-position: center center;
background-repeat: no-repeat;
background-size: contain; // this can also be cover
You can set the container to display: flex and align-items: center (other align-items values work too). Instead of align-items you can also set align-self on the image itself.
This will make image shrink if it's too big for specified area (as downside, it will not enlarge image).
The solution by setec is fine for "Shrink to Fit" in auto mode.
But, to optimally EXPAND to fit in 'auto' mode, you need to first put the received image into a temp id,
Check if it can be expanded in height or in width (depending upon its aspect ration v/s the aspect ratio of your display block),
$(".temp_image").attr("src","str.jpg" ).load(function() {
// callback to get actual size of received image
// define to expand image in Height
if(($(".temp_image").height() / $(".temp_image").width()) > display_aspect_ratio ) {
$(".image").css('height', max_height_of_box);
$(".image").css('width',' auto');
} else {
// define to expand image in Width
$(".image").css('width' ,max_width_of_box);
$(".image").css('height','auto');
}
//Finally put the image to Completely Fill the display area while maintaining aspect ratio.
$(".image").attr("src","str.jpg");
});
This approach is useful when received images are smaller than display box. You must save them on your server in Original Small size rather than their expanded version to fill your Bigger display Box to save on size and bandwidth.
You Can use:-
transform: scaleX(1.2);
to change the width without changing height.
And
transform: scaleY(1.2);
to change the height without changing width
You can use this on images and video tags in html and css. This does not change the aspect ration also.
you can use aspect-ratio property css
.my-image {
aspect-ratio: 1/1; // square
aspect-ratio: 16/9; // wide screen 1080p
aspect-ratio: 4/3;
aspect-ratio: 2/3;
}
img {
max-width: 80px; /* Also works with percentage value like 100% */
height: auto;
}
<p>This image is originally 400x400 pixels, but should get resized by the CSS:</p>
<img width="400" height="400" src="https://i.stack.imgur.com/aEEkn.png">
<p>Let's say the author of the HTML deliberately wants
the height to be half the value of the width,
this CSS will ignore the HTML author's wishes, which may or may not be what you want:
</p>
<img width="400" height="200" src="https://i.stack.imgur.com/aEEkn.png">
How about using a pseudo element for vertical alignment? This less code is for a carousel but i guess it works on every fixed size container. It will keep the aspect ratio and insert #gray-dark bars on top/bottom or left/write for the shortest dimension. In the meanwhile the image is centered horizontally by the text-align and vertically by the pseudo element.
> li {
float: left;
overflow: hidden;
background-color: #gray-dark;
text-align: center;
> a img,
> img {
display: inline-block;
max-height: 100%;
max-width: 100%;
width: auto;
height: auto;
margin: auto;
text-align: center;
}
// Add pseudo element for vertical alignment of inline (img)
&:before {
content: "";
height: 100%;
display: inline-block;
vertical-align: middle;
}
}
Fullscreen presentation:
img[data-attribute] {height: 100vh;}
Keep in mind that if the view-port height is greater than the image the image will naturally degrade relative to the difference.
If the application can have an image of any aspect ratio or resolution then you can manage height and width as in this link.
This uses Javascript and HTML
https://stackoverflow.com/a/65090175/13338731