Generate Empty class - Custom Console Command Creation Symfony - symfony

In Symfony I see various commands for generating empty classes,bundles, entities etc.
I searched to generate a empty class for the creation process of custom console commands. But I couldn't.
May I know whether any commands are available in Symfony to generate empty classes for creating custom console command ?
If not, May I know whether it was restricted for any reasons ?
Note: Currently Now, I copied the codes from the symfony.com and edited accordingly.

There is no such command but you can write one by yourself if you like. I would not use it myself i think because generating an empty class is not much work to do.

Related

Get a backup of the XML for a an Azure Resource Group

I can use the powershell command: New-AzureRmResourceGroupDeployment, with a relevant template file to create an instance of all the items within the template. In fact, this is how I initially created some of the components in the current resource group I am working on. Since creating my Azure components I have tweaked things quite a lot, and I would like to create a template based on the setup in my resource group as it stands now, this would allow me to run the above command and to recreate the components if I ever need to.
Can anyone tell me if there is a way to create a template based on an existing resource group?
Looks like there are some MS docs detailing the process here:
https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/azure-resource-manager/resource-manager-export-template

Prefix/Group Symfony Console Commands of an dependency

With symfony console commands you can prefix/group each one by putting in the setName("group:command"), and this is great.
myown
myown:cool
myown:foo
myown:bar
But the problem is that some external dependencies dont use this format. Ex: Phinx Migrations.
Since I'm importing an dependency that has a console command called migrate, I dont want for it to show without prefix/group. Not just because I might have another command called migrate or just for readability. I don't event know if we have 2 with same command name which one will show (need to check).
My question is: Is there any away for me to force a group commands from an external depencency to be inside an prefix/group?
You can achieve that, I wouldn't recommend but that would be the approach:
Create a compiler Pass which removes the definitions of the Commands you don't like
Register again all those commands while setting the names you like
If you need information on compiler passes:
https://symfony.com/doc/current/components/dependency_injection/compilation.html#components-di-compiler-pass
Maybe there's an easier way which I'm not aware, but for now that's my answer to you, I can't post all the code because that would be a lot of code and if you do it maybe you can update with the solution.
Good luck

How to create multiple USE statements in sniff

I'm working on a sniff for PHP_CodeSniffer 3.x. For example, the class declaration class NoInlineFullyQualifiedClassNameUnitTestInc extends \PSR2R\Base\AbstractBase should be split into a uses and class AbstractBase. The sniff detects similar issues for method signatures.
I believe the problem is that I'm generating and inserting multiple use statements at the same line (i.e., same token), but doing so in separate fixer->beginChangeset() ... fixer->endChangeset() sequences. The fixer treats multiple sets of changes to the same token as a conflict, and things get messy (and wrong).
The GitHub issue is here: https://github.com/php-fig-rectified/psr2r-sniffer/issues/9
Has anyone figured out how to do this writing custom sniffs for the latest 3.x CodeSniffer?
You can also use SlevomatCodingStandard\Sniffs\Namespaces\ReferenceUsedNamesOnlySniff
It turns this
Into this
How to use it?
The best is to use it with EasyCodingStandard like this:
# easy-coding-standard.neon
checkers:
- SlevomatCodingStandard\Sniffs\Namespaces\ReferenceUsedNamesOnlySniff
Install it:
composer require --dev symplify\easy-coding-standard
Run it:
vendor/bin/ecs check src
Fix it:
vendor/bin/ecs check src --fix
Enjoy and let me know how it works for you.
If any troubles come up, just create an issue here. I'm happy to improve this tool as much as possible.
The problem is multiple Sniffer (fixer) changesets editing the same token. I was able to get the Sniff to work by collecting a list of USE statements and inserting them at the end of the Sniff's processing.
I identified the end of processing by searching backwards from the last token to find the first token of the list of registered tokens.
Edit: Here is the sniff: https://github.com/php-fig-rectified/psr2r-sniffer/blob/master/PSR2R/Sniffs/Namespaces/NoInlineFullyQualifiedClassNameSniff.php

Frama-C's extensible printer and projects

I am trying to make changes to the behavior of a function and print the results to a file. The ViewCfg plug-in described in the Plug-in Development Guide does something similar, but I am trying to avoid having to use Ast.get, which ViewCfg uses. I am thinking of extending Printer.extensible_printer which, according to the Frama-C API Documentation, is something I can do if I want to obtain a custom pretty-printer.
However, if I extend the pretty-printer as described in the API docs, unless I'm doing something wrong, I notice that the changes I make take place regardless of which project is set as the current project. I'm using File.create_project_from_visitor to create a new project and Project.set_current to set the new project as the current project before I use the custom pretty-printer.
Is it true that any change made by a class that extends Printer.extensible_printer applies to all projects? I happen to be using frama-c-Aluminium-20160502, which I know is not the latest version.
EDIT: Sorry, I should have made this clearer in the beginning, but I'm not actually making changes to the behavior of a function. I'm reading in the behavior of a function, then based on that, I'm trying to generate as output valid C code that's meant to be read as input by another program.
Regarding AST.get, the only reason I was avoiding it was that it sounds like it gets the entire AST, while I'm only interested in part of it, i.e. behaviors. But if I'm just making things harder for myself by avoiding it, then I'll go ahead and use it.

How to programmatically upload files to Maniphest ticket using Conduit?

i can't find the documentation anywhere for how to actually use the Conduit API. I'm able to create a task using some really weird methods, but once i create the ticket, i can't find any documentation about how to actually upload a file anywhere.
i tried looking at:
https://secure.phabricator.com/conduit/method/maniphest.createtask/
and i get so confused on how this actually works. what actually is this?
I think you need to upload the File separately through the file.upload conduit method, then use an {Fnnn} reference in the Task or Comment text to link to it. I presume when file.upload says it returns a GUID, it means a PHID, so you'll also need to use file.info to get the id to use in place of the nnn in the reference text.

Resources