I have a website which sells cloths under categories "Sarees" and "Dupattas".
I am trying to configure content grouping in Analytics, but it does not seem to be working.
e.g. I have set an extraction by page title /(.[Ss]arees)./
and some of the page which I was expcting to fall under this were:
http://dazzledori.com/Pure-Silk-Chanderi-catid-372030-page-1.html
http://dazzledori.com/Silk-Cotton-Chanderi-catid-372029-page-1.html
But when I go to my reports, I only see "not set" on the same page titles. Can somebody suggest if I am using this feature incorrectly, or there is gap in the regex? Thanks.
Edit: I just tried to convert my extraction into a rule.
So now I have created a single group called "Cloth products", and I created two rules inside it:
1) /(.[Dd]upatta)./
2) /(.[Ss]arees)./
Still not seeing any matches
Related
There is a problem, I do not know how to solve it.
The scheme is as follows.
There are categories of goods, in this form:
Category-1(term_id=1)<br>
subcategory-1(term_id=4)<br>
subcategory-2(term_id=5)<br>
subcategory-3(name Tour)(term_id=6)<br>
Category-2(term_id=2)<br>
subcategory-1(term_id=7)<br>
subcategory-2(name Tour)(term_id=8)<br>
https://docs.gravityforms.com/creating-a-feed-for-the-advanced-post-creation-add-on/
Gravity Forms will initially look for the category/tag of the same name as specified and use that. If no match is found, then a new category/tag will be created. All new categories/tags created this way will be placed at the top level of the category/tags hierarchy.
I tried everything in the Populate Anything settings, I can’t get it to correlate with the category that I need.I need this (subcategory-2(name Tour)(term_id=8)), inserts here anyway (subcategory-3(name Tour)(term_id=6))
By the way, I'll add one more thing.
https://github.com/gravitywiz/snippet-library/blob/master/gp-populate-anything/gppa-display-terms-hierarchically.php
It would seem that he chose the category that is needed, how to force the search not by name, but by term id?
I'm working with Google Analytics and i've come across a (not set) issue with Content Grouping. I changed my URL's in the month of August, and then most of the URL's went into the (not set) Content Grouping, instead of its specific group. Is there anything I can do to have the URL's put back into their correct grouping?
Also, i'm reporting out this data via Data Studio and I was wondering if there was a query/filter that I could use to have it be grouped into the correct content grouping?
The content groupings you have probably was dependent on the URL. You will need to modify your existing content groupings in GA and change the rules so that it matches the new URLs.
As for reporting in DataStudio, you can use CASE functions in a new calculated field. The cases will be the rules for your content groupings. Example:
CASE
WHEN REGEXP_MATCH(page, "(mypagepath1|mypagepath2|mypagepath3)") THEN "Group 1"
WHEN REGEXP_MATCH(page, "(mypagepath4|mypagepath5)" ) THEN "Group 2"
ELSE "No Group"
END
After that you will use the new calculated field in place of the content grouping dimension.
Welcome to StackOverflow. As #Sonali has already implied, you need to take into account the fact that GA is incapable of setting an 'if not set, use default' value on a dimension. If you can see any way of better interpreting the August data you do have, try using the GA plugin in Google Sheets: if you do that, and then use a Sheets formula to manipulate the data, you can then have GDS access the sheet.
I want to try content grouping in Google Analytics. I have entered a couple of URLs in "Group Using Rule Definition" in Google Analytics and I have saved it without any error.
But when I try it in "Behavior" flow, its giving me "(not set)". Can anyone help me out how to deal with it? Any help would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks!!
This explanation from Google covers it briefly
But the key point is
(not set) is the collection of pages that are not assigned to any group.
If you assign more content groups you should see a reduction in "(not set)" in reports.
If you are entering full URLs in the Group Using Rule Definition area, then you are creating groups of 1 page each.
A better rule is to use something like "starts with" with a partial url "/foo" to group all pages that start with "/foo", or similar logic.
Each content item is placed in the first group that it matches for. If the last group is called "Other Pages" and set to match anything, it will group all pages not collected higher on the list.
https://support.google.com/analytics/answer/2853563?hl=en
Was curious if the following was possible. We have a site, https://mysite.net
Say we want to track https://dev.mysite.net but keep it in the same view. The problem is we have around 80+ instances of different subdomains that they want tracked and the limit is 50. This works when creating different views for each, but I am trying to use filters for each subdomain and it doesn't seem to work.
So at the moment I have one view set to
https://mysite.net.
And 3 filters set to
https://site1.mysite.net
https://site2.mysite.net
https://site3.mysite.net
All are set to "include only" "traffic to the hostname" "that contain"
with the their respective URL.
Will this work does anyone know ? Or do you need different views for sure?
Thanks!
You should be able to create a custom filter type > include with the filter field hostname, and a regex of ^site[1-3]\.mysite\.net$.
Briefly: I'm making a custom view, I want a field listing the two taxonomy terms associated with an NID to output as two distinct links which return arguments for the view (term1 to view/term1, term2 to view/term2. Rather, it outputs as one aggregated link (both term1 and term2 output view/term1%0Aterm2.
Am I doing something wrong or is this not possible?
Exhaustively:
I am constructing a view of products (with the page output at http://example.com/products) in an drupal ubercart site because the built-in ubercart catalog psuedo-view isn't doing it for me. Some of these products belong to more than one taxonomy term (within the same vocabulary) - for instance, product_example1 belongs to terms blue and glowinthedark, product_example2 red and glowinthedark, product-example3 just blue.
I've created an argument which limits the view based on terms like so: products/red, products/glowinthedark etc returns this nice view I made but only with products which are associated with taxonomy terms red, glowinthedark, etc - so works as it should. Views is awesome!
Now, I want each product shown in this view to link to the generated product/[term] page(s). Outputting the field "taxonomy:all terms" as a link with replacement argument products/[tid] works for one term (product_example3's field works for its one term: /products/blue (views is awesome!) , but, AND HERE'S THE PROBLEM, it DOESN'T FOR TWO TERMS (or I assume more than two terms). This is true whether the field is output as a list or using a simple seperator. So, for product_example one, the field lists both terms blue and glowinthedark (correctly separated as list items or with the chosen "," simple separator), but both terms output the relative link products/blue%0Aglowinthedark.
Is that clear? I haven't been able to google anyone with a similar situation, strangely, although I can't imagine I'm the first to run into this. I may just give up since it's not all that important and I can think of several less-satisfactory but still doable workarounds, but I thought you all might have some insight. The only thing that gives me hope is that when the "Link this field to its term page" check box is selected, views successfully outputs two separate line items with links to the two separate terms' pages.
I'm also posting this question on Drupal.org. Thanks for your time!
Hmmm... strange. I read your question carefully. However I am getting the results that you desire!
I have a taxonomy vocabulary that is multiple select (lets call it "Sector")
I have a taxonomy vocabulary that is single select (lets call it "Location")
In my fields section, I add Taxonomy: All Terms
In the settings for Taxonomy: All Terms I select "Output this field as a link". In there, I set the "Link Path" to product/[tid]
I make sure "Link this field to its term page" is NOT checked
I use a simple comma separator
"Limit terms to a specific vocabulary" checkbox does not matter. It would depend on your business requirements.
As required by you I get products/abc, products/xyz etc. one after another on a single line. This works even if a particular node has multiple terms from the same taxonomy vocabulary. I don't get any %0A stuff.
This works out of the box for me. I tried with both views 2.11 and views 3.0-alpha3
Try upgrading to the latest version of views and see if you have better luck?